Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : LamLaj

TARGET AND MASTERY LANDS THE SCOPE OF LAND AGRICULTURAL LAND REDISTRIBUTION IN THE PROVINCE OF SOUTH KALIMANTAN Fathul Achmadi Abby; Diana Rahmawati; Yulia Qamariyanti; Syahrida
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v2i1.37

Abstract

:This type of research is juridical-empirical, character of an explanatory study, using non probality sampling technique, with sampling purposive or judgment sampling, with its own considerations for selecting members of the sample. Respondents farmers, farmer groups, informants: National Land Agency, Agency for Agricultural Extension and the National Bureau of Statistics.A redistributionsubject of Agricultural Land in South Kalimantan province, not all poor farmers and sharecroppers, but there are also traders, private employees and civil servants. Due to ignorance of the farming community will Land Redistribution program. Object of agricultural land redistribution in South Kalimantan, only on state land or land uncultivated state-controlled, whereas the maximum limit for the excess land, absentee land and abandoned land is not part of the object of reform because it could not be implemented due to the constraints of data and information not enough about it. Because the object redistribution of agricultural land that is not up to two(2) acres, has not been able to fulfill the lives of farmers, because it is too small farms and agricultural produce is not maximized.
PENERAPAN PENAHANAN (PAKSA BADAN) TERHADAP DEBITOR PAILIT MENURUT UU NO 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PKPU Diana Rahmawati
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v2i1.42

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab permasalahan mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap debitor pailit dari penerapan penahanan/paksa badan dan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan lembaga Penahanan /paksa badan terhadap debitor yang pailit menurut Undang-Undang No 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepalitan dan PKPU. Metode yang digunakan dari penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yaitu penelitian yang mengumpulkan data dengan studi keputakaan dan mengkaji Peraturan Perundang-undangan.. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa akibat hukum kepailitan debitor selain terhadap harta kekayaan debitor, debitor juga dapat dikenakan Penahanan /paksa badan. Tindakan penahanan debitor dapat diusulkan hakim pengawas,permintaan kurator,atau atas permintaan seorang kreditor atau lebih setelah mendengar hakim pengawas pengadilan dalam putusan pernyataan pailit atau setiap waktu setelah itu pengadilan dapat memerintahkan supaya debitor pailit di tahan dibawah pengawasan jaksa yang ditunjuk oleh hakim pengawas . Undang-Undang No 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU masih belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang maksimal terhadap debitor ,dalam undang-undang tersebut masih terdapat kelemahan yaitu tidak mengatur dengan tegas alasan dan jenis debitor yang dapat dilakukan penahanan, tidak adanya batas waktu perpanjangan penahanan dan upaya hukum/perlawanan yang dapat dilakukan debitor.Selain kelemahan pengaturan Penahanan atau paksa badan terhadap debitor, juga perangkat hukum dan peraturan pelaksananya belum ada dan jelas sehingga hakim cendrung tidak menerapkan ketentuan Penahanan / paksa badan terhadap debitor sehingga pasal 93 UUK belum dapat dilaksanakan secara efektif terhadap debitor yang beritikad tidak baik.
THE URGENCY OF PROTECTING CHILDREN BORN FROM WOMEN WHO HAD CEASED HER MARRIAGE DUE TO LI’AN *) Rachmadi Usman; Diana Rahmawati
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): September
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v3i2.56

Abstract

A husband is given the right to deny the child born by his wife as his child, while his wife denies the accusation. If a husband accuses his wife of adultery, but does not complete the evidence by presenting 4 witnesses and his wife refutes the accusation, then they can take the oath of li’an. The child born of the oath of li’an is a child who called as mula’nah or an adulterous child or a child born out ofmarriage. As a result of the legal li’an child, this adulterous child does not have nasab, marriage guardian, inheritance and a living with the man who caused his birth. In order for the li’an child not to be abandoned by his biological father, a biological father should be appointed to take responsibility for fulfilling the life needs of the li’an child concerned. The government has the authority to determinethe punishment of ta’zir to the adulterous man by obliging him to fulfill the life needs of theli’an child, even obliging him to give part of the assets after he dies through obligatory wasiat. This is done in order to fulfill the sense of justice and the interests of children and human rights of a child.
LEGALITY OF CONSTRUCTION WORKING CONTRACTS AS AN FORMIL AGREEMENT Diana Rahmawati; Zakiyah; Muhammad Arsyad
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v6i1.112

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the form of construction work contracts and the legal consequences of construction work contracts that are not in accordance with the provisions of statutory regulations in the field of construction services. The legal research method used is normative legal research, which is a study of the prevailing laws and regulations which are particularly related to construction service contracts. This type of research is legal obscurity. A construction work contract is a type of formal agreement in which Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Construction Services and its implementing regulations determines the procedures and conditions before the contract is made, including the form and content of the construction work contract, by determining the standard at a minimum, the contents of a construction service work contract that must be included in the construction work agreement by the parties. Since the construction work contract is a contract with mandatory conditions, the construction work contract is a formal agreement. This is if the construction work contract is made without paying attention to the provisions of laws and regulations in the field of construction services, both regarding the qualification requirements of a construction service provider, the procedure for selecting a service provider and the form and content of the construction service contract that has been determined by the law. As a juridical consequence, if the formal conditions are not fulfilled in a contract concerned, it is not legally enforceable or in other words it is a null and void contract (nietig, null and void).