Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

Constitutional Analysis of Religious Moderation Policy in Serbia: Between Legal Precepts and Social Norms Nuroniyah, Wardah; Krajišnik, Vesna; Prastiwi, Navira Shandra
Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Komparatif Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/el-aqwal.v4i1.13572

Abstract

This study examines the alignment between Serbia’s religious moderation policies and its constitutional guarantees of religious freedom, secularism, and non-discrimination. While Serbia’s 2006 Constitution enshrines these principles, the practical application of religious policies reveals discrepancies shaped by social norms and dominant religious narratives. The preferential treatment of "traditional" religious communities, especially the Serbian Orthodox Church, reflects a persistent intertwining of national identity with Orthodox Christianity. Through legal analysis and case studies, the study illustrates how cultural and institutional biases can undermine formal constitutional protections. It also explores the role of public perception, media discourse, and policy implementation in reinforcing religious hierarchies. Ultimately, the study argues that Serbia’s religious moderation remains only partially consistent with constitutional ideals, as prevailing sociocultural dynamics continue to influence both interpretation and enforcement. A more inclusive approach requires bridging legal norms with democratic values of pluralism and equal treatment for all religious communities.
Religious Moderation within Indonesian Diaspora in Australia’s Secular Society Ma'mun, Sukron; Nuroniyah, Wardah; Salim, M Arskal; Maula, Bani Sarif; Shodikin, Akhmad
AL-TAHRIR Vol 25 No 1 (2025): Islamic Studies
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/altahrir.v25i1.10176

Abstract

This study investigates the concept and practice of religious moderation within the Indonesian diaspora community in Australia, with a focus on how members navigate religious identity in a Western, secular society. Grounded in the four pillars of religious moderation established by Indonesia’s Ministry of Religious Affairs—national commitment, tolerance, anti-violence, and accommodation of local cultural values—the research employs a hybrid methodology combining online and in-person interviews, as well as direct observation, drawing on the author's field experience in Sydney. The findings highlight three core dimensions. First, the practice of religious moderation is significantly shaped by diaspora organisations such as PCI Nahdlatul Ulama Australia-New Zealand, PCI Muhammadiyah Australia, the Iqro Foundation, and the Indonesian Diaspora Network (IDN), which promote inclusive religious practices and enhance community cohesion. Second, Australian public institutions play a vital role in fostering values such as religious freedom and pluralism, providing a supportive environment for the diaspora to sustain their cultural and religious identities. Third, the Indonesian diaspora demonstrates effective acculturation by preserving religious traditions while adapting to Australia’s multicultural landscape, despite ongoing challenges related to identity negotiation in a pluralistic context. The study concludes that the Indonesian diaspora in Sydney exemplifies a resilient model of religious moderation through inclusive engagement, institutional collaboration, and cultural adaptation, offering valuable insights for broader discussions on religion, migration, and pluralism in global settings.
Assessing Indonesia and Malaysia’s Legal Responsiveness to Domestic Violence Victims within Islamic Law Framework Nuroniyah, Wardah; Al Azkiya, Mohammad Azka; Wahid, Abdul; Labib Shodiq, Fatimah Lubabiyah; Maula, Bani Syarif
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v19i2.13736

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia’s legal frameworks for protecting victims of domestic violence through the lens of Islamic legal principles. It examines both substantive and procedural dimensions in light of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which emphasize the preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘ird), and family integrity (ḥifẓ al-nasl). Indonesia’s Law No. 23 of 2004 provides broad substantive protection by recognizing various forms of violence physical, psychological, sexual, and economic and extending safeguards to domestic workers. This inclusivity aligns with the Islamic principle of ‘adl (justice) and the duty to uphold human dignity, though weak coordination and limited law enforcement training hinder procedural implementation. In contrast, Malaysia’s Domestic Violence Act 1994 demonstrates stronger procedural responsiveness, particularly in issuing protection orders and promoting inter-agency cooperation. While its narrower scope excludes domestic workers, it reflects dar’ al-mafāsid (prevention of harm) through timely intervention. Malaysia’s dual legal system also integrates Islamic values into judicial practice. The study concludes that Indonesia excels in substantive inclusivity, while Malaysia demonstrates procedural strength. A hybrid model combining Indonesia’s normative scope with Malaysia’s procedural efficiency would better fulfill the Shariah’s holistic objectives of justice and protection.
KETAHANAN KELUARGA NABI DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI PROFETIK: Analisis Struktur, Fungsi, dan Resiliensi Sosial Spiritual Siti Mukhliso; Hamdani Anwar; Wardah Nuroniyah
Al - Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol 11 No 01 (2026): Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/at.v11i01.10206

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis ketahanan keluarga nabi dalam perspektif ‎sosiologi profetik dengan fokus pada struktur, fungsi, dan resiliensi sosial-spiritual. ‎Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan tafsir tematik terhadap ‎ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an tentang keluarga Nabi Ibrahim, Yusuf, Muhammad, Nuh, dan ‎Luth. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan konsep humanisasi, liberasi, dan transendensi ‎dari Kuntowijoyo. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketahanan keluarga para nabi ‎dibangun atas ikatan iman, pembagian peran, musyawarah, dan tanggung jawab ‎moral. Fungsi keluarga meliputi pendidikan, perlindungan, dukungan emosional, ‎ekonomi, dan internalisasi nilai. Resiliensi keluarga profetik terbentuk melalui doa, ‎tawakal, dialog, pengampunan, dan dukungan sosial. Keluarga Nabi Ibrahim ‎menonjol dalam tauhid dan pengorbanan, Nabi Yusuf dalam rekonsiliasi, Nabi ‎Muhammad dalam komunikasi dan keteladanan, sedangkan Nabi Nuh dan Nabi ‎Luth menegaskan bahwa ikatan iman lebih utama daripada hubungan biologis. ‎Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa keluarga para nabi merupakan model ketahanan ‎keluarga Qur’ani yang relevan bagi keluarga Muslim kontemporer. Kebaruan ‎penelitian terletak pada penggunaan sosiologi profetik dan integrasi aspek struktur, ‎fungsi, serta resiliensi keluarga.‎
Assessing Criminal Protection of Marital Integrity in Indonesia: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Court Decisions Vivi Ariyanti; Bani Syarif Maula; Wardah Nuroniyah; Najhan Parluhutan Harahap
USRATY : Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): USRATY : Journal of Islamic Family Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/usraty.v4i1.11400

Abstract

This study aims to assess how Indonesian courts interpret and enforce criminal provisions concerning marriage-related offences and their role in protecting marital integrity and the rights of lawful spouses. Using a qualitative socio-legal approach, the study examines seven Indonesian district court decisions issued between 2021 and 2025. Data were collected through systematic document analysis and analyzed using qualitative content analysis and comparative case analysis, focusing on marital status, evidentiary basis, judicial reasoning, criminal liability, and sentencing. The results indicate that bigamy and unlawful remarriage constitute the dominant offences in the cases examined, while adultery involving married persons appears less frequently. A valid prior marriage consistently serves as the central basis for establishing criminal liability, with marriage certificates, registration records, and related administrative documents functioning as the principal evidence of marital status. Judicial reasoning demonstrates that criminal liability is shaped not only by the existence of a prior marriage but also by considerations of intent, deception, evidentiary circumstances, and the consequences of the offence for marital and family relationships. Variations in sentencing further reflect differences in the circumstances and impacts of individual cases. The study concludes that criminal law provides an important institutional mechanism for protecting marital integrity, legal certainty, and the rights of lawful spouses, but criminal sanctions alone cannot ensure comprehensive family protection. This study contributes a socio-legal perspective by demonstrating how judicial enforcement of marriage-related offences supports the legal protection of marriage and highlighting the need for an integrated framework combining criminal law, family law, marriage registration, and preventive mechanisms.
HAK AZASI MANUSIA PERSPEKTIF MAHMOUD MOHAMED TAHA wardah nuroniyah
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 13 No. 2 (2014): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v13i2.15

Abstract

Artikel ini hendak membahas gagasan dan upaya para pemikir Muslim dalam mereinterpretasi ajaran Islam dalam merespon isu-isu global seperti itu tentang HAM. Reinterpretasi itu penting guna memberikan solusi dan alternatif pemikiran dengan menawarkan berbagai model reinterpretasi terhadap syariah, sehingga syariah dapat merespon isu-isu tentang HAM. Isu Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) merupakan hasil dari kemajuan peradaban manusia kontemporer untuk hidup dan bergaul antar sesamanya dengan semangat kesetaraan serta sikap saling menghargai dan menghormati, apapun suku, bangsa, agama dan warna kulitnya. Salah satu pemikir yang dibahas adalah Mahmoud Mohamed Taha. Metode untuk memahami pemikiran Taha menggunakan pendekatan normatif dan pendekatan filosofis. Dua pendekatan tersebut dapat secara luas menelusuri doktrin dan hasil interpretasi Mahmoud terhadap ayat-ayat Al-Qur`an yang menegaskan bahwa Islam sangat menjunjung dan menghormati prinsip-prinsip HAM.