Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analisis Kritis Terhadap Matan Hadis Sebagai Upaya Memastikan Otentisitas dan Validitas Hadis Muhammad Sulaiman; Tajul Arifin; Edy Saputra
Cakrawala: Journal of Religious Studies and Global Society Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/cakrawala.v2i1.204

Abstract

This research examines the methodology of critical analysis of hadith matans as an effort to ensure the authenticity and validity of hadiths in the context of Islamic scholarship. The main focus of the research is to identify and analyze critical parameters used in assessing the validity of matan hadith, as well as their implementation in specific case studies. Through a qualitative approach with content and comparative analysis methods, this research reveals that critical analysis of hadith matan requires a comprehensive understanding of the linguistic, historical and doctrinal aspects of Islam. The research results show the importance of integrating multiple criteria in the hadith matan verification process to ensure the validity and applicability of the hadith in the contemporary context.
The Epistemology of Ecological Tafsir and the Transformation of The Interpretation of Kawniyyah Verses in Classical and Contemporary Exegesis Muhammad Faisal; Siti Nurkhafifah Marisa; Triansyah Fisa; Edy Saputra; Hanif Hanif; T Mairizal; Muhammad Nur Mirwan; Tabsyir Masykar
International Journal of Education, Language, and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): IJELaSS: International Journal of Education, Language and Social Science
Publisher : Darul Ilmi Bina Insan Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62612/ijelass.v4i1.81

Abstract

This study examines the development of Qur’anic exegesis from an ecological perspective, highlighting the epistemological shift from classical to contemporary interpretations. The primary focus of this study was the analysis of QS. al-Baqarah: 30 and QS. ar-Rum: 41 in the tafsirs of Al-Tabari, Ibn Kathir, Quraish Shihab, and Hamka. This study employed a library research method using qualitative, hermeneutical, philosophical, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that classical exegesis tends to be textual-normative, with a strong reliance on transmitted narrations (riwayat) to understand the concepts of khalifah (vicegerency) and fasad (corruption), thereby positioning nature primarily in a theological domain. In contrast, contemporary exegesis demonstrates a shift toward a contextual-ecological approach that emphasizes environmental balance and human responsibility, as in Khalifah. Quraish Shihab and Hamka, in particular, relate environmental destruction to modern ecological crises such as pollution, deforestation, and climate change. This study further demonstrates that ecological tafsir emerged from the awareness of the global environmental crisis and the need to reinterpret the Qur’an’s kauniyah verses integratively. Thus, ecological exegesis functions not only as a textual interpretation but also as a foundation for environmental ethics grounded in Qur’anic values that are relevant to the challenges of the modern era. This research is expected to strengthen the integration of Qur’anic studies and environmental issues within contemporary Islamic academic discourse, while also contributing theoretically to the development of an interpretive paradigm that is responsive to global ecological problems and the sustainability of human life in the modern age
The The Agreement of Asset Separation in the Perspective of Maqasid al-Shariah: The Problem of Asset Conflict, the Hifdz al-Mal Approach, and Its Impact on Family Stability in Islamic Law in Indonesia Edy Saputra; Mohammad Ridwan
WARAQAT : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Waraqat: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam As-Sunnah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51590/waraqat.v9i2.882

Abstract

This study analyzes marital property separation agreements through the lens of Maqasid al-Shariah, with a specific focus on the principle of Hifdz al-Mal (protection of wealth) as an essential tool for safeguarding individual financial rights within marriage and preventing asset conflicts that could threaten family stability. Employing a qualitative method with a library research approach and in-depth literature analysis, the study reveals that marital property separation agreements have a strong legal foundation in Islamic and Indonesian national law, reinforced by Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. This decision affirms the legality of marital property separation agreements under Indonesian law as an effective mechanism for ensuring fair asset management and protecting the financial rights of couples. The study recommends enhancing relevant regulations to improve legal clarity, educating the public about the benefits of these agreements, and encouraging active roles for religious scholars to support more flexible interpretations of Islamic law that address modern socio-economic needs. Future research employing quantitative methods and cross-cultural studies in dual-legal system countries such as Malaysia and Tunisia is suggested to explore public perceptions, economic impacts on women, and potential adaptations to address similar legal challenges.
Istihsān and The Dynamics of Islamic Economic Law: A Uṣūl Al-Fiqh Analysis of DSN MUI Fatwas Edy Saputra; Mohammad Ridwan; Hamdanil Hamdanil; Andri Rivai Rivai; Muflihatul Fauza
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3 No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.19

Abstract

The growing complexity of contemporary Islamic economic practices has revealed the limitations of formal qiyās as the dominant mode of legal reasoning in Islamic economic fatwas. While existing studies have discussed istihsān primarily as a pragmatic or auxiliary tool in specific financial products, its methodological role within uṣūl al-fiqh remains insufficiently theorized. This article aims to examine istihsān as a structured methodological response to the limitations of formal qiyās in contemporary Islamic economic regulation, using selected fatwas issued by the Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN–MUI) as a focused case study. Employing a qualitative normative legal research design grounded in uṣūl al-fiqh, this study analyzes DSN–MUI fatwas through systematic document analysis to identify patterns of legal reasoning and the interaction between qiyās and istihsān. The findings demonstrate that istihsān is employed both explicitly and implicitly as an internal corrective mechanism to mitigate legal rigidity, ensure socio-economic functionality, and preserve Sharia objectives. Moreover, the study shows that institutional fatwas function as instruments of legal dynamism by integrating classical jurisprudence with contemporary economic governance. This article contributes to Islamic economic law scholarship by repositioning istihsān as a central methodological framework that reshapes the epistemological orientation of uṣūl al-fiqh toward adaptive yet normatively grounded legal reasoning.