Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

The Effect of the numbered head together and pair check cooperative learning models for the understanding of grammar Rini Angreni Hasibuan; Syofyan Hadi; Rahmawati
Lughawiyyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Lughawiyyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Universitas Islam Internasional Darullughah Wadda'wah Bangil Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38073/lughawiyyat.v5i2.1400

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to determine the effect of using Numbered Head Together and Pair Check on structural understanding in eighth grade students of the Robi'ul Islam Islamic boarding school. This study used quantitative research using experimental methods. Data collection are tests and observations. Data analysis is used with normality, homogeneity and hypothesis test. The results of this study show that the understanding of structure before using Numbered Head Together and Pair Check is still low. With pre-test results in the experimental class obtained a an average score of 61.25 and in the control class an average score of 62.8. As for the use of cooperative learning Numbered Head Together and Pair Check in structure learning with a value of 3.4% very good. Then the post-test results in the experimental class got an average of 82.03 and in the control class got an average value of 73.3. and the result of hypothesis using the t-test obtained thitung = 4.047 and ttable = 2000 . If tcount > ttable or 20000> 4.046, accept Ha. The conclusion that Ha = Ha = means that there is Effect of the numbered head together and pair check cooperative learning models for the understanding of grammar VIII students at the Robi'ul Islam Islamic boarding school, Pasar Latong.
The Style of Kaminah Proverbs in The Qur'an: an Analysis of Arabic Literature Studies Aulia Fitri; Asrina; Syofyan Hadi
El-Jaudah : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): El-Jaudah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab
Publisher : Department of Arabic Education of State Collage for Islamic Studies of Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/ej.v6i1.2387

Abstract

This study aims to identify the stylistic forms or sighat amstal kaminah in the language of the Qur'an from an Arabic literary perspective. The focus of this study is on metaphors that are not explicitly mentioned in the wording that refers to the words tamstil, tasybih, or other words that have metaphorical meanings but still retain their metaphorical meanings. The research model used is qualitative, employing a descriptive approach. The research stages include data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The data collection techniques used include documentation in the form of books, Qur'anic commentaries, and journal articles. This study found that amtsal is a very distinctive literary style in conveying information and metaphors that have their own appeal and transform abstract concepts into something tangible. The results of the above study indicate that the proverb kaminah describes the expression: “The best of affairs is the middle ground” found in QS. Al-Baqarah: 68 and QS. Al-Isr?': 110, a verse similar to the expression: “News is not the same as reality witnessed firsthand” found in QS. Al-Baqarah (2): 260, a verse similar to the expression: “Whatever you borrow, you will be repaid in equal measure,” found in Surah An-Nisa (4): 123, and a verse with the expression: “A believer should not fall into the same pit twice,” found in Surah Yusuf (12:64)
Rethinking the Empty Ballot Box in Pilkada: Between Democratic Substance and Legal Formalism Sultoni Fikri; Syofyan Hadi; Baharuddin Riqiey; Rizky Bangun Wibisono
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v7n2.p409-436

Abstract

The phenomenon of single-candidate elections in regional head elections (Pilkada) poses challenges to the democratic principles of directness, generality, freedom, confidentiality, honesty, and fairness. To address such electoral impasses, the "empty ballot box" mechanism was introduced through Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/PUU-XIII/2015 and supported by General Election Commission Regulations (PKPU), offering voters an alternative. However, this mechanism raises critical legal and democratic concerns—whether it truly reflects popular sovereignty or merely serves as an administrative formality. This study examines the legal legitimacy, democratic substance, and systemic consequences of the empty ballot box in Pilkada. Using a doctrinal legal methodology with statutory and conceptual approaches, the analysis reveals that the empty box mechanism predominantly acts as an administrative safeguard rather than a vehicle of the people's will. While it ensures procedural continuity, it fails to address the deeper issues of political representation and structural deficiencies in candidate nomination. The dominance of legal positivism in regulating this mechanism neglects principles of substantive justice and meaningful participation. This study argues for a comprehensive legal reform that moves beyond formal compliance and embraces progressive legal principles. Such reform should strengthen political party accountability, support independent candidacies, and expand public participation in candidate nomination. By reframing the empty box through the lens of democratic renewal and human rights, this article contributes a novel critique of electoral design in Indonesia.
JOHN RAWLS' JUSTICE REVIEW OF THE RETIREMENT AGE LIMIT FOR INDONESIAN WORKERS Indra Pambudi Raharjo; Syofyan Hadi
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The regulation of the retirement age for workers constitutes a strategic component of labor policy and social protection systems, as it directly affects workers’ economic security, the distribution of welfare, and social justice within industrial relations. In Indonesia, retirement age regulations remain fragmented and have not yet been consolidated into a unified legal framework, potentially resulting in unequal treatment among workers and uncertainty in social protection during the transition to retirement. This study aims to examine the regulation of workers’ retirement age in Indonesia from the perspective of John Rawls’ theory of justice, while also formulating normative implications for the development of socially equitable labor policies, particularly in ensuring equal opportunity and protection for workers from the most vulnerable groups. The study employs a normative legal approach, combining conceptual analysis with a review of statutory regulations. The conceptual approach is applied to investigate Rawls’ theory of justice, particularly the principles of justice as fairness, fair equality of opportunity, and the difference principle, while the statutory analysis examines retirement age regulation within the framework of labor law and the national social security system. The findings indicate that the current regulation of workers’ retirement age in Indonesia does not fully align with Rawlsian principles of justice. Regulatory fragmentation creates disparities in opportunities and social protection among workers, which cannot be morally justified within the framework of justice as fairness. The novelty of this study lies in its normative approach, which positions retirement age regulation as an integral element of the basic structure of society, while emphasizing the urgency of reconstructing retirement age policies based on the principles of fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle, so that the distribution of benefits for the least advantaged groups of workers becomes more equitable.
Ketidakpastian Hukum Keputusan Fiktif Positif Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan Tata Usaha Negara Tan Hana Darma Mangruwa Wati; Syofyan Hadi
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17953293

Abstract

Administrative Decisions of Government, also referred to as State Administrative Decisions (Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara/KTUN), are written decisions issued by Government Bodies and/or Officials in the administration of government affairs. This definition is stipulated in Article 1 point 7 of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (UUAP). The regulation also amended the meaning of negative fictitious decisions as regulated in Article 3 of Law Number 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Courts (UUPTUN) into positive fictitious decisions as provided in Article 53 of the UUAP. A negative fictitious decision means that the silence of a government official regarding an application submitted by the public, after the lapse of the statutory time limit, is deemed as a rejection. Meanwhile, a positive fictitious decision means that the silence of a government official regarding an application submitted by the public, after the lapse of the statutory time limit, is deemed as an approval. Following the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into Law (UUCK), the regulation continues to recognize the concept of positive fictitious decisions. However, it abolishes the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) to adjudicate fictitious State Administrative Decisions, which consequently gives rise to legal certainty issues for the public, particularly since the implementing Presidential Regulation has not yet been issued.This research employs a normative legal research method with a prescriptive approach. The results are expected to provide prescriptions regarding the legal issues examined.
The Business Judgment Rule Limiting State-Owned Enterprise Directors’ Liability After the SOE Law Amendment fareh prameswari; Syofyan Hadi
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v9i1.132960

Abstract

This study examines the function of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) as a boundary of legal liability for the management organs of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia following the recent amendments to the State-Owned Enterprises Law. Using a normative juridical research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes the normative foundation of BJR within Indonesian corporate law, the implications of regulatory changes on the responsibilities of directors, commissioners, and supervisory boards, and the extent to which BJR can serve as a shield against civil and criminal liability. The findings show that BJR, grounded in fiduciary duties under the Limited Liability Company Law, provides legal protection for business decisions made in good faith, without conflicts of interest, based on adequate information, and within the scope of authority. However, the removal of the provision excluding SOE organs from the category of state officials has widened potential liability and necessitated greater professional accountability. The study further reveals differences in the application of BJR between Persero-type SOEs, which are fully governed by private corporate law, and Perum-type SOEs, which remain tied to public administrative principles, creating risks of disharmony with anti-corruption and state finance laws. The research concludes that the ideal model for implementing BJR in SOEs requires standardized risk assessment procedures, strengthened oversight documentation, and harmonization of the SOE Law, Company Law, Anti-Corruption Law, and State Finance Law to ensure a balance between managerial protection and state accountability in managing public assets.
Forming of Regional Regulations Based on Good Governance Principles: Efforts to Realize Quality Regulations Syofyan Hadi
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 22 Nomor 1 Februari 2026
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.vi.132749

Abstract

Regional regulations should be designed to promote public welfare, not merely to maintain rigid social order. They must be formulated flexibly to adapt to evolving community needs. This research examines the position of Regional Regulations within Indonesia’s legal hierarchy, analyzes the application of good governance principles in their formation, and proposes a model for their development based on these principles. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this research indicate that Regional Regulations are basically formed as delegated legislation, not as main legislation. Consequently, Regional Regulations must conform to laws issued by the Central Government. Accordingly, their formation must incorporate good governance principles. These principles at least include transparency, meaningful public participation, and accountability. The proposed model comprises five stages: needs analysis through research; participatory drafting with impact analysis; democratic discussion; effective implementation; and periodic evaluationan impact analysis, discussing the Draft Regional Regulation democratically, implementing the Regional Regulation effectively, and evaluating Regional Regulation periodically.