p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.526
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) WAJAH HUKUM Unes Law Review Journal Sampurasun : Interdisciplinary Studies for Cultural Heritage International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Journal of Social Science Jurnal Pengembangan Manajemen, Bisnis, Keuangan dan Perbankan VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan International Journal of Social Science Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Journal of Social Research East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) JISOS: Jurnal ilmu sosial Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Jurnal Pengabdian Mandiri Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) i-Latinnotary Journal: Internasional Journal of Latin Notary Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities JOEL: Journal of Educational and Language Research Journal of Social Science Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Majority Science Journal Journal of Smart Community Service Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Edukasi Sebelas April Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ipso Jure Journal of Economic Empowerment Strategy (JEES) International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Ipso Jure Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian JICL Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Best Interest of the Child of Double Burden Crime Perpetrators from the Perspective of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA) Enggenia Delin Raradela; Yusep Mulyana; Oki Earlivan Sampurno
International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/ijssh.v4i2.3025

Abstract

This study examined the application of the best interest of the child principle in cases of double burden crime sexual assault combined with murder committed by a child perpetrator against a child victim under Indonesia's Juvenile Criminal Justice System (Law No. 11 of 2012). The research employed a juridical-normative method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, with Verdict No. 50/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN.Plg as the primary object of analysis. Findings revealed that the Law established a multi-layered sentencing limitation system, including a maximum imprisonment ceiling of ten years for the most serious offenses, yet this framework was not designed to accommodate double burden scenarios. The application of the best interest principle in the examined verdict was procedurally satisfied but created a structural blind spot toward the child victim's rights, resulting in an imbalanced fulfillment of the four dimensions of punishment: retribution, general deterrence, specific deterrence, and societal protection. This study concluded that policy reforms were necessary, including reformulation of the maximum sentencing provision for double burden cases, strengthening of a double track system combining imprisonment and rehabilitation, integration of mandatory restitution, and issuance of judicial guidelines as a short-term measure to reduce sentencing disparities.
PertanPertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Dalam Kasus Keracunan Masal dalam Program Makanan Bergizi Gratis di Kabupaten Bandung Barat Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia Najhan Kemuning Harum Pratiwi; Yusep Mulyana
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.9425

Abstract

Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) yang bertujuan meningkatkan gizi siswa sekolah justru menimbulkan dampak negatif berupa kasus keracunan massal di Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum pidana terhadap pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam kasus tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif melalui studi kepustakaan yang bersumber pada data sekunder, meliputi bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Analisis dilakukan secara yuridis kualitatif untuk mengkaji ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana dapat dikenakan kepada penyedia makanan, korporasi katering, serta pejabat pemerintah daerah yang lalai dalam pengawasan. Hal ini didasarkan pada Pasal 360 KUHP tentang kelalaian yang mengakibatkan bahaya bagi orang lain serta Pasal 8 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Selain itu, penerapan teori strict liability, vicarious liability, dan teori identifikasi memperkuat dasar pertanggungjawaban terhadap pelaku langsung, pengawas, dan korporasi. Dasar hukum lainnya meliputi KUHP, UU Perlindungan Konsumen, UU Kesehatan, dan UU Pangan yang secara keseluruhan mengatur larangan peredaran pangan yang membahayakan kesehatan masyarakat. Penerapan asas legalitas, kesalahan, dan keadilan menjadi landasan penting dalam menentukan pertanggungjawaban pidana secara proporsional serta memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi korban
THE LEGAL POSITION OF A PERPETRATOR WITNESS (JUSTICE COLLABORATOR) IN THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING (TPPO) RELATED TO SEXUAL VIOLENCE UNDER THE LAW ON SEXUAL VIOLENCE CRIMES (UU TPKS) Mochamad Galih; Yusep Mulyana
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20937840

Abstract

Human Trafficking (TPPO) related to sexual violence is an extraordinary crime that is organized, has widespread impact, and causes physical suffering, psychological suffering, and economic loss for victims. In law enforcement practice, law enforcement, and uncovering human trafficking (TPPO) networks often requires the role of witnesses (justice collaborators) to uncover the involvement of the main perpetrators. Normatively, the regulation of justice collaborators in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Witness and Victim Protection and is strengthened by Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2011. However, Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence (UU TPKS) does not explicitly regulate the mechanisms, criteria, and implications of granting justice collaborator status in sexual violence cases, including those related to TPPO. This normative vacuum has the potential to lead to inconsistent decisions, legal uncertainty, and an imbalance between the interests of proof and victim protection. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and case study approach. The analysis was conducted on the regulation of justice collaborator in the Indonesian criminal law system, the position of witnesses and perpetrators in human trafficking cases based on sexual violence according to the TPKS Law, and its implications for the principles of justice and victim protection. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of justice collaborator is still general and has not been comprehensively integrated with the TPKS legal regime. As a result, the granting of this status is highly dependent on the discretion of law enforcement officials and judges. From the perspective of criminal law policy and due process of law, the granting of justice collaborator status must still guarantee the principles of proportionality, accountability, and protection of victims' rights, including the right to restitution and victim recovery. Therefore, it is necessary to harmonize regulations between the Witness and Victim Protection Law and the TPKS Law, as well as the formulation of clear technical guidelines regarding the procedures, criteria, and limitations for granting justice collaborator status in human trafficking cases based on sexual violence. This approach is important to strengthen the integrity of the criminal justice system while ensuring that victim protection and recovery remain the primary orientation in law enforcement.
Legal Transformation in the Perspective of Criminology and Victimology as a Victim Protection-Based Crime Prevention Strategy Nanindya Nataningrum; H. Yusep Mulyana
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i2.183

Abstract

The current criminal law system is still oriented towards the perpetrator, with minimal protection for victims. Ideally, the law should prioritize justice for victims through a criminological and victimological approach. Therefore, legal reform, officer training, and integrated services are needed so that crime prevention is more effective and just. This study aims to explore the transformation of criminological and victimological perspectives that can be the basis for developing a crime prevention strategy based on victim protection.method uses a descriptive qualitative approach to explore the transformation of criminology and victimology perspectives in crime prevention strategies based on victim protection. Data were collected through literature studies and analyzed thematically. The results are expected to provide conceptual and practical recommendations to strengthen the legal system and social policies that are responsive to victims.The results of this study show that the transformation of criminological and victimological perspectives reflects a shift from a perpetrator-centric legal approach to a more holistic and victim-centric one. This integration strengthens the legal system and social policies to better protect, restore and empower victims, and to develop effective crime prevention strategies. With a more humane and restorative justice approach, this transformation becomes an important foundation for reducing crime rates and forming responsive and sustainable public policies.
Penerapan Praperadilan terhadap Problematika Penetapan Tersangka yang Tidak Memenuhi Dua Alat Bukti Trisa Aprillia Hapsari; Yusep Mulyana
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1904

Abstract

This research aims to examine the application of pre-trial to the problem of determining suspects who do not meet the requirements of at least two valid evidences in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Code. This problem often occurs in criminal law practice in Indonesia, where the suspect is determined without going through valid procedures and without sufficient evidence, thus potentially violating the principles of human rights and substantive justice. This research uses normative juridical methods with legislative, conceptual, and case approaches, which focuses on the analysis of written legal norms and their application in practice through the study of laws and regulations, legal theories, and court decisions. The scope of the research includes the study of the evidence system in criminal procedure law as well as the protection of the rights of suspects, with the research object in the form of positive legal provisions, the theory of the validity of evidence, and the application of progressive law in judge's decisions. The types of legal materials used include primary legal materials (laws and decisions), secondary (legal literature and scientific journals), and tertiary (legal dictionaries and encyclopedias). Data collection is carried out through literature and documentation studies, while the analysis technique of legal materials is carried out descriptively-analytically by interpreting legal norms and examining their application systematically and critically. Research results show that pre-trial has an important function as a judicial control mechanism for investigators' actions that are beyond their authority. The Constitutional Court's decision number 21/PUU-XII/2014 has expanded the pre-trial object including the validity of determining the suspect. Through case studies such as the Pegi Setiawan case, it is proven that pre-trial is effective in ensuring the protection of individual rights and preventing abuse of authority by law enforcement officers. Therefore, the determination of suspects must be carried out carefully and based on valid legal procedures so as not to harm justice and public trust in the legal system.
Implikasi Psikologi Forensik dalam Proses Asesmen dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Narkotika Zulfikar Muhammad; Yusep Mulyana
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1967

Abstract

This study examines the application of forensic psychology in the assessment process for proving narcotic crimes in Indonesia, focusing on its contribution to justice and the accuracy of legal decisions. Forensic psychology, as a discipline integrating psychological principles into the criminal justice system, plays a crucial role in analyzing the psychological condition of perpetrators, including their motives, mental capacity, and level of narcotic dependency. This approach employs techniques such as clinical interviews, behavioral observations, and psychometric tests like MMPI and WAIS to produce reports that support courtroom evidence. The study adopts a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, referring to Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and related regulations. Findings indicate that forensic psychology enhances the objectivity of legal decisions by providing insights into psychological factors influencing perpetrators’ behavior, such as addiction or mental disorders, thus supporting restorative justice approaches. Additionally, forensic psychological assessments assist judges in distinguishing between perpetrators acting with full awareness and those influenced by external pressures, such as coercion or exploitation, commonly seen in drug courier cases.
Tantangan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Froud Perbankan dalam Industri Judi Online Adam Kemal Pasha; Yusep Mulyana
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1947

Abstract

The enforcement of law against banking fraud within the online gambling industry in Indonesia faces intricate challenges amidst rapid digital technology advancements. This study aims to analyze the forms of criminal liability for perpetrators of banking fraud involved in online gambling under Indonesia’s positive law and to identify the primary obstacles in law enforcement processes, along with investigators’ efforts to address them. Employing a normative juridical approach and literature review method, this research examines regulations such as the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 8/1981 on Criminal Procedure Code, Law No. 10/1998 on Banking, Law No. 8/2010 on Anti-Money Laundering, Law No. 1/2024 on Electronic Information and Transactions, and Law No. 1/2023 on the New Criminal Code. Findings reveal that perpetrators of banking fraud face penalties of up to 7 years under Articles 492 and 483 of the New Criminal Code for fraud and embezzlement, and up to 20 years under the Anti-Money Laundering Law for money laundering. Major challenges include difficulties in digital evidence collection due to advanced encryption, overseas servers, and low compliance in reporting suspicious transactions, as evidenced by PPATK’s 2025 report noting only 573 active reporters out of 89,000. Cases like the arrest of two online gambling bosses (OHW and H) in May 2025 exposed the massive abuse of 4,000 bank accounts, yet inter-agency coordination among the Police, OJK, Kominfo, and PPATK remains hindered by limited digital forensics and cross-jurisdictional issues. Investigators address these barriers by leveraging digital forensic technology, international cooperation through Mutual Legal Assistance, and enhanced big data-based monitoring systems. This study recommends a holistic approach integrating strengthened financial technology regulations, investigator training, and public education to prevent cybercrimes, thereby upholding the rule of law and safeguarding the national financial system.
Review of the Implementation of the Criminal Justice Process in Sexual Violence Cases: Case Studies in District Courts Yusep Mulyana; Sitti Rosmini; Andi Cakra Cindrapole; Zuraidah Zuraidah; Ridwan Fauzy Lestahulu
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55849/rjl.v2i2.840

Abstract

Background. The background research on the review of the criminal justice process in cases of sexual violence is highly relevant as these cases often cause controversy and concern in society. These cases not only damage individuals physically and psychologically, but also make people distrust the justice system. It is imperative to evaluate how the criminal justice process is carried out in dealing with sexual violence cases in the District Court, where such cases are processed. Purpose. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the criminal justice process in cases of sexual violence in the District Court. This case study also identifies key stages in handling sexual violence cases, from investigation to final decision. An additional objective of this study was to discover obstacles that may be encountered in the implementation of the criminal justice process. Method. Qualitative field research is used. Data will be collected through direct observation of the criminal justice process in sexual violence cases at the District Court, interviews with judges, prosecutors, lawyers, and other parties related to the case, and analysis of documents relating to sexual violence cases that have been processed. Results. The research shows that despite efforts to improve the criminal justice process in sexual violence cases at the District Court, there are several issues that need to be addressed. The results showed that some cases were delayed, there was a lack of support for victims, and sometimes disagreements between the law enforcement agencies involved. However, it was also found that positive progress has been made to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice process in sexual violence cases. Conclusion. This research found that, although there are obstacles and barriers in carrying out the criminal justice process in sexual violence cases in the District Court, there is still room for improvement and reform. To ensure justice for all parties involved in sexual violence cases, better collaboration between relevant institutions, better support for victims, and strengthening of legal procedures are needed.