Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.245
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Undang: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Verstek Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Zakki Adlhiyati
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Virtue of Morality: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and England Zakki Adlhiyati; Harjono Harjono
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 18, No 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v18i2.47765

Abstract

This article examines the morality of tort in Indonesian and English civil law. This is legal research by studying statutory regulations, court decisions and other related documents. A tort is an act that can harm another party. Based on the results and discussion, it is known that the concept of morality is found in the broader meaning of tort in Indonesia. Similar to Indonesia, England also aligns the concept of unlawful acts with morality. This can be seen in the neighbour principle, which then gives rise to the duty of care. Through this principle, a person must be careful, especially towards people in direct contact with us, so that our actions, whether active or passive, do not cause harm to other people. Morality, whether in Indonesia or England, is one of the keys to determining whether an action is against the law. In the Donoghue v. Stevenson case, reason is used to apply morality; conversely, in tort law in Indonesia, judges are expected to use divine values and reason in applying morality.
Ingkar Janji Menikahi sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Kajian Putusan No. 18/PDT.G/2023/PN MGG Ruth Nasya Mirachel Siregar; Zakki Adlhiyati
Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April: Aktivisme : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aktivisme.v2i2.813

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal status of marriage promises within the perspective of unlawful acts (PMH) according to the Indonesian civil law system, and to examine judicial considerations in determining legal liability and compensation in cases of marriage promise breaches in Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mgg. This study employs a normative approach with a case study method. The findings demonstrate that breaking a marriage promise can be qualified as an unlawful act if it meets the elements of Article 1365 of the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), namely the presence of an unlawful act, fault, damages, and causality. In Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mgg, the judge ruled that the breach of marriage promise resulting in material and immaterial losses can be sued as an unlawful act. The judge's considerations include analysis of evidence, causal relationships, and the impact of damages suffered by the plaintiff. This decision emphasizes the importance of legal protection for individuals harmed by marriage promise breaches.
Pemeriksaan Setempat dalam Sengketa Pembagian Harta Bersama : Studi Putusan Nomor 4757/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tgrs Jeshika Basaria Tambunan; Zakki Adlhiyati
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v3i1.2166

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of descente in disputes over the division of joint property based on a study of decision number 4757/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tgrs, as well as examining the judge's considerations in granting a lawsuit based on a study of decision number 4757/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tgrs. This research uses a normative approach with a case study method. The results of the research show that the strength of descente is independent (vrij bewijsleer), but not binding (dwingend bewijsleer). This means that the results of the descente do not absolutely determine the judge's decision, the judge's decision is still based on a free assessment of all evidence relevant to the case. The judge's considerations in this case stipulate that joint property must be divided fairly, namely that each party is entitled to half of the joint property, as regulated in Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The judge's considerations also show that the principles of justice and legal certainty are a priority, with reference to legal provisions governing the fair distribution of joint property. The decision taken accommodates the interests of both parties, and confirms that the absence of one party in the trial does not prevent decision-making based on the available evidence.
STUDI TENTANG GUGATAN INTERVENSI TUSSENKOMST PADA GUGATAN PERKARA PERDATA (Studi Putusan Nomor 548/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Sby) Zakki Adlhiyati, Melisa Citra Wardhani &
Verstek Vol 9, No 1 (2021): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.682 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i1.50012

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan proses pemeriksaan pada Gugatan intervensi, alasan Gugatan intervensi tersebut dikabulkan dan apa akibat hukumnya atas adanya intervenient bagi Penggugat dan Tergugat pada putusan nomor 548/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Sby. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan jenis dan sumber bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan data dengan cara studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa proses pemeriksaan Gugatan intervensi tidak berbeda dengan Gugatan perdata biasa, apabila Gugatan tussenkomst maka Gugatan tersebut harus ada kaitannya dengan perkara asal. Gugatan intervensi dikabulkan karena salah satu bukti yang diajukan yaitu Kitir Buku Bilyet Giro, merupakan bukti tertulis akta di bawah tangan. Bukti tersebut dapat menjadi sempurna karena diakui oleh Penggugat Intervensi sehingga bukti tersebut sah dan saling menguatkan dengan Bilyet Giro. Majelis Hakim dalam mempertimbangkan hanya berdasarkan fakta-fakta saja dan tidak menggunakan metode penemuan hukum. Akibat hukumnya dengan adanya intervenient untuk Penggugat adalah Gugatan ditolak sedangkan akibat hukum untuk Tergugat adalah eksepsi Tergugat Asal turut ditolak serta berkaitan dengan pengalihan dan balik nama objek sengketa yang meggunakan tanda tangan Penggugat Asal dan Tergugat Asal maka harus dilaksanakan oleh Penggugat Asal dan Tergugat Asal.Kata Kunci: Gugatan intervensi, Tussenkomst ABSTRACTThis study describes and examines the problems of the inspection process in the intervention lawsuit, the reason of the intervention lawsuit be granted, the legal consequences due to the intervention of the plaintiff and defendant in the decision number 548 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Sby. This study employed normative legal research by which the types and sources in this research usedprimary and secondary legal materials. The research also occupiedthe data collection techniques using literature study. The results of the study can be concluded that the process of the intervention lawsuit inspection is not different from the ordinary civil lawsuits. The claim in tussenkomstlawsuit must be related to the original case. The intervention lawsuit was granted because one of the evidences submitted, namely the cheque book, was a written evidence under the private deed. The evidence can be perfect if it is acknowledged by the plaintiff's intervention so that the evidence is valid and mutually reinforcing the cheque. The Panel of judges consider only based on facts and do not use the legal discovery method. The legal consequences due to the existence of intervenient for the original plaintiff are that the lawsuit is rejected. Furthermore, land title transfer of the disputed object using the original plaintiff's and defendant's signature must be carried out by the original plaintiff and original defendant.Keywords: Lawsuit intervention, Tussenkomst
ACESS TO JUSTICE MELALUI CLASS ACTION Zakki Adlhiyati, Rizki Cintia Devi &
Verstek Vol 9, No 2 (2021): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (255.503 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i2.51102

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah access to justice dapat ditempuh melalui class action. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif. Teknik pengumpulan yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan. Access to justice diartikan sebagai peluang bagi semua orang dalam memperoleh keadilan (justice for all). Pemerintah mengatur mengenai gugatan perwakilan kelompok atau class action yang memiliki arti prosedur pengajuan gugatan, dimana satu orang atau lebih yang mewakili kelompok mengajukan gugatan untuk dirinya sendiri dan sekaligus mewakili kelompok. Class action juga memiliki fungsi publik terhadap kebijakan yang luas dalam berbagai peraturan yang melibatkan banyak orang. Hasil penelitian menunjukan access to justice melalui class action digunakan sebagai pemenuh hak asasi manusia untuk memperoleh keadilan dengan menggunakan mekanisme sebagai perlindungan hak-hak individu untuk menegakkan keadilan bagi semua. Kata Kunci : Class action, Access To Justice, Hak Asasi Manusia ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine whether access to justice can be reached through class action. This research is normative legal method. The technical data collection in this research used a literature study. Access to justice defined as an opportunity for all people to obtain justice (justice for all). The government regulates Class action, which means procedure for lawsuit, in one or more people who represent a group submit a claim for themselves and also represent the group. Class action also has public function, on a broad policy towards various regulations involving many people. The result of this research is access to justice through class action used as a fulfillment of human rights to obtain justice by using a mechanism to protect individual rights to uphold justice­­ for all.Keywords: Class action, Access To Justice, Human Rights 
ASAS LEGITIMA PERSONA STANDI IN JUDICIO DALAM PERLAWANAN LELANG EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN PIHAK KETIGA Alyssa, Ima; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.98355

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the implementation of the principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio in opposition lawsuits against the execution of mortgage rights auction, as seen in Decision Number 4/Pdt.G/2024/PN Lmg. In this case, the opposing party acts as a third party replacing the position of the deceased debtor. Based on this, it is interesting to analyze whether the third party has legal standing as regulated under the principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio. The principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio plays a crucial role in determining the parties who have the right and capacity to file lawsuits in court, particularly in assessing the legal standing of third parties. The research method used in this study is normative or doctrinal legal research. The panel of judges assessed that the opposing party, who is the legitimate wife and legal heir of the debtor, has a legal interest in the auction object. The judges also considered the opposing party's legal relationship with the disputed object, including her involvement in the collateral agreement. In its ruling, the panel of judges stated that based on the principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio, the opposing party as a third party has legal standing because she demonstrates good faith, a legal relationship, and fulfills the formal requirements as an heir under Articles 830 and 1100 of the Civil Code, as well as Article 163 of the HIR (Herzien Inlandsch Reglement). Moreover, the analysis concluded that the opposing party has a direct legal interest, possesses legal capacity (cakap hukum), and has suffered clear and tangible losses. Therefore, the opposing party meets the criteria to be considered a party with legal standing to file an objection to the auction.
TELAAH PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM PT ANTAM DAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 158/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Sby Iskandar, Salma Amelinda; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i1.81978

Abstract

Dalam putusan perkara Tort Nomor 158/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Sby, Hakim mengabulkan gugatan Tort kepada PT Antam. Pasal ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah perbuatan PT Antam sejalan dengan unsur perbuatan melawan hukum dalam Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata dan/atau ketentuan Putusan Hoge Raad tahun 1919. Lebih lanjut, mendalami pertimbangan hukum dibalik keputusan Hakim yang mengabulkan gugatan Perbuatan Perbuatan Palsu Budi Said. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa perbuatan PT Antam memenuhi unsur perbuatan melawan hukum, kerugian, kesalahan, dan sebab akibat sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata. Putusan Hoge Raad tahun 1919 semakin mendukung perluasan makna Tort, dengan menegaskan bahwa tindakan PT Antam melanggar hak dan kewajiban hukum Budi Said sendiri. Melalui pertimbangannya, hakim menilai PT Antam telah melakukan perbuatan yang merugikan Budi Said. PT Antam terbukti melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum yang mengakibatkan kerugian baik materil maupun immateriil bagi Budi Said, yang dibuktikan dengan tidak diterimanya 1.136 kg emas dan yang terakhir ditunjukkan melalui resume kesehatan dan laporan usaha sebagai indikator kerugian sementara. kenikmatan hidup.
KEDUDUKAN BUKTI ILMIAH DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP Utomo, Prasetyo; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i1.98523

Abstract

Decision Number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh is a verdict issued by the Sukoharjo District Court, handling a civil environmental case filed by residents affected by water and air pollution caused by waste discharged by PT Rayon Utama Makmur (PT RUM). This case was examined using the class action mechanism. In this decision, there is an interesting aspect to study, namely the plaintiffs, who are the residents, and the defendant, PT RUM, both submitted scientific evidence to prove their claims and defenses. This article aims to analyze and examine the position and application of scientific evidence in environmental dispute case number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh. This article uses a normative-empirical legal research method with a case study approach using data collection techniques, namely interviews and literature studies, which are analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that in this case, the judge based the position and application of scientific evidence on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Environmental Cases, in which the position of scientific evidence is the result of research which is then supported by expert testimony in court. In case number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh, the Plaintiff submitted 14 pieces of evidence of research on testing the air and water of the Gupit River, which was reinforced by 2 expert testimonies in court. Meanwhile, the Defendant submitted 8 pieces of scientific evidence consisting of testing the quality standards of waste discharged from production activities through the results of wastewater and air testing, supported by one expert testimony in court. Although the Plaintiff submitted conclusive scientific evidence, the Panel of Judges rejected all of the Plaintiff's claims against the Defendant and stated that the act of pollution committed by the Defendant was not proven. Thus, PT RUM was declared to have not committed any unlawful act
TELAAH PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM PT ANTAM DAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 158/PDT.G/2020/PN.SBY Iskandar, Salma Amelinda; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.83396

Abstract

Terhadap putusan perkara PMH (Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum) Nomor 158/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Sby, Hakim mengabulkan gugatan PMH kepada PT Antam. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah perbuatan PT Antam telah sesuai dengan unsur-unsur PMH yang ada pada Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata dan/atau ketentuan Putusan Hoge Raad 1919. Selain itu perlu untuk diketahui bagaimana pertimbangan hukum Hakim dalam mengabulkan gugatan PMH Budi Said. Artikel ini diteliti menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif (kepustakaan). Hasil penelitian yang dihasilkan mengindikasikan bahwa perbuatan PT Antam telah memenuhi unsur perbuatan melanggar hukum, unsur kerugian, unsur kesalahan, dan unsur kausalitas yang ada pada ketentuan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata. Unsur demikian diperkuat dengan perluasan pemaknaan PMH dalam Putusan Hoge Raad 1919 bahwa perbuatan PT Antam telah bertentangan dengan Hak Budi Said sekaligus bertentangan dengan kewajiban hukumnya sendiri. Melalui pertimbangannya, Hakim menilai bahwa PT Antam telah melakukan perbuatan yang merugikan Budi Said. PT Antam terbukti melakukan PMH yang menyebabkan kerugian materiil dan immateriil bagi Budi Said. Kerugian materiil dibuktikan dengan tidak diterimanya 1.136 kg emas. Sedangkan kerugian immateriil dibuktikan melalui resume kesehatan dan laporan bisnis yang Penulis representasikan sebagai unsur hilangnya kenikmatan hidup sementara.Kata Kunci: PMH; PT Antam; Pertimbangan Hakim.
PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PEMBELI YANG BERETIKAT BAIK DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI Santoso, Marcayla Rahma; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i1.86732

Abstract

: Penelitian ini mendeskrisipkan dan mengkaji permasalahan Hakim menyatakan pembeli beretikat baik melakukan PMH (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum) dalam putusan nomor 100/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Skt karena pembelian tanah waris berasal dari perwalian tanpa penetapan Pengadilan setempat. Penelitian ini menganalisis proses penetapan perwalian terhadap jual beli tanah waris yang ahli warisnya adalah anak di bawah umur. Adapun yang menjadi rumusan masalah dalam penelitian yaitu bagaimana Penetapan Perwalian terhadap jual beli tanah dalam perkara nomor 100/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Skt? Apa yang menjadi dasar pertimbangan hakim menyatakan pembeli yang telah melaksanakan kewajibannya dengan baik dalam kasus a quo dinyatakan telah melakukan PMH?. Atas dasar hal tersebut maka penelitian ini menarik untuk dikaji. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif[1] melalui studi kasus putusan nomor 100/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Skt. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalam transaksi jual beli tanah yang dihadapan PPAT, hanya melampirkan Surat Keterangan Perwalian dari kelurahan dan diketahui oleh camat tanpa melalui penetapan perwalian dari Pengadilan Negeri praktik peralihan hak atas tanah atas nama anak maka memerlukan surat penetapan perwalian dari pengadilan negeri setempat guna izin untuk wali dalam melaksanakan perbuatan hukum atau peralihan, pemindahan atau pembebanan hak. Oleh karena itu para tergugat berdasar Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata telah melanggar hak subyektif Penggugat. Pembeli tanah yang beretikat baik mengalami kerugian akibat gugatan PMH tersebut sehingga upaya yang dapat dilakukan Pembeli untuk mendapatkan keadilan atas haknya adalah dengan melakukan gugatan PMH terhadap Penjual dan Notaris yang telah tidak melaksanakan prinsip kehati-hatian  dalam melakukan penetapan Perwalian.
Co-Authors Achmad Achmad Akbar Syafaat Faadhillah Alyssa, Ima Arsyad Aldyan Auramahsa, Aisyah Danindra Kurnia Dafa Farah Jihan Shahab H Harjono HARJONO Harjono Harjono Harjono Harjono Iskandar, Salma Amelinda Ismawati Septiningsih Ismawati septiningsih Itok Dwi Kurniawan ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Jeshika Basaria Tambunan Lia Magfiroh Maylia Wahyu Dwiputri Moch Najib Imanullah Muhamad Daffa Ramadhani Muhammad Farizka Sisma Muhammad Rafif Muhammad Rustamaji muhammad rustamaji Noer Ilmi Tari Wibowo Ricky Febriyansyah Akbar Ririh Titis Yusriyyah Ruth Nasya Mirachel Siregar Santoso, Marcayla Rahma Septiningsih, Ismawati Soehartono Soehartono Soehartono Soehartono Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti, Sri Wahyuningsih UTOMO, PRASETYO