Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Pemiskinan Koruptor Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Tambahan dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Dikaitkan dengan Rancangan Undang-Undangan Perampasan Aset Jenny Susmita Susilo; Elwi Danil; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1170

Abstract

In the latest research by Transparency International (TI) in 2022, Indonesia scores 34 out of a total of 100 and is ranked 110 out of 180 countries surveyed. This shows that responses to corrupt practices tend to be slow and even continue to get worse due to the lack of support from stakeholders. Efforts to formulate impoverishment crimes are one of the efforts in reforming criminal law in Indonesia. Impoverishment sanctions for corruptors are considered to be more effective in providing a deterrent effect than prison sentences. The formulation of the problem, namely: 1) What is the setting for impoverishment crimes against perpetrators of corruption as an alternative punishment for corruption 2) What are the obstacles faced in accepting impoverishment punishment as an additional punishment 3) How can the Asset Confiscation Bill accommodate the eradication of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia. Normative juridical research approach. The research is descriptive analysis in nature, primary and secondary data sources, namely primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, data were collected by means of library research. Data were analyzed qualitatively. The conclusion of the research results: The regulation of the crime of impoverishment against corruptors as an alternative punishment for corruption in Indonesia has not been regulated explicitly in the laws and regulations for eradicating corruption, where public prosecutors can confiscate and auction off corruptors' property originating from corruption as a substitute for losses of state money. At UNCAC 2003, confiscation of the assets of perpetrators of corruption can be carried out through criminal and civil channels. The criminal provisions contained in the Corruption Crime Eradication Law (UUPTPK) are considered unable to recover state financial losses, this is because, first, court decisions are not proportional to losses. Ideally, the calculation of state financial losses uses the concept of economic costs. The asset confiscation bill has a breakthrough needed by law enforcers to strengthen the legal system whereby asset confiscation is a crime without a court decision in criminal cases (non-conviction-based forfeiture). Through the Asset Confiscation Bill which has been initiated by the government, it is hoped that efforts to recover assets resulting from crime can be streamlined.
Peran Kejaksaan dalam Perampasan Aset dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Serta Kendala Yang Dihadapi dalam Pelaksanaannya Yohanes Yohanes; Elwi Danil; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1187

Abstract

This research is motivated by the lack of optimal eradication of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, which is indicated by data showing that the value of state financial losses in criminal acts of corruption that have been handled cannot be recovered by law enforcement. This issue is a challenge in eradicating criminal acts of corruption, not only imprisoning the perpetrators of corruption but more than that, how to confiscate the assets of the perpetrators of corruption as far as possible and return them to the state. Based on data released by ICW, the handling of criminal acts of corruption has not been followed by optimal asset recovery, including that carried out by the Prosecutor's Office. Using empirical juridical methods, this research concludes that the Prosecutor's Office has a very important role in carrying out Asset Confiscation in eradicating criminal acts of corruption, both as investigators, public prosecutors and as State Attorneys. However, this role cannot be carried out optimally by the Prosecutor's Office, especially in the regional level, in this case the High Prosecutor's Office and the District Attorney's Office, are still experiencing various obstacles. in implementation.
Perbuatan Tercela Sebagai Salah Satu Alasan Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Muhammad Irham; Nani Mulyati
SASI Vol 27, No 3 (2021): Volume 27 Nomor 3, Juli - September 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v27i3.596

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out what is meant by the President and/or Vice President committing a disgraceful act in the concept of criminal law, so that they can be impeached. By using normative legal research and approaches to legal concepts, laws and their history. The results of the research are as follows: First, all actions that are contrary to the Criminal Code are disgraceful acts for the President/Vice President; Second, the religious values, social culture of the Indonesian nation, as well as moral principles in the Criminal Code have been compiled in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, therefore any deviation from the behavior of the President/Vice President against the 1945 Constitution is a despicable act; Third, all disgraceful acts of the President/Vice President that violate criminal law offenses are subject to criminal sanctions in accordance with the Criminal Code, so that disgraceful acts that have been formally regulated in the Criminal Code are not the meaning of disgraceful acts as referred to in Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution, because the limitations of criminal acts have been determined can impeach the President/Vice President, namely: corruption, bribery, and other serious crimes; Fourth, the disgraceful act of the President/Vice President in Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution is an act of violating the 1945 Constitution as a reference to the rules of criminal law.
Pentingnya Membentuk Budaya Antikorupsi Dilihat dari Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Nani Mulyati
Nagari Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Nagari Law Review (NALREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.2.i.2.p.183-194.2019

Abstract

One of the potential actors in corruption is a corporation. An important curative effort to eradicate corruption is to ensure that all perpetrators of corruption are accountable for their actions, including corporations as legal subjects; but preventive efforts are also important. One effort to prevent the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption that can be committed by corporations is to form a law-abiding and anti-corruption corporate culture. This paper tries to analyze the role of corporate culture on corrupt behavior that exists in corporations and the legal implications in criminal cases when corporations have implemented a culture of anti-corruption. This study employs doctrinal method, by analyzing legal materials. From the research conducted, it is recommended to arrange clearer regulation pertaining justifications for corporate criminal liability, and for corporations it is recommended that they form an effective and consistent anti-corruption culture in order to ensure that corporate policy is clearly against all forms of corruption carried out by corporate organs or executives. With the implementation of an anti-corruption culture within the corporation, it is expected that every member of the corporation will be very careful in preventing corruption, which can be considered as an act that represents the corporation. If the corporation has implemented an anti-corruption corporate culture, then in theory it should be accepted as one of the reasons to alleviate criminal liability for corporations as a form of justification “afwezigheid van alle schuld” (avas).
Law Enforcement Model of Village Fund Corruption Through Adat Criminal Law Approach and Local Wisdom in West Sumatera Aria Zurnetti; Nani Mulyati
Nagari Law Review Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.116-127.2022

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia has its own characteristics. Corruption crimes committed at the village level have caused losses to state finances. Countermeasures against corruption in village funds are required to be effective and firm, in order to be able to resolve and to reduce the number of corruption in the future. This paper discusses the pattern of corruption in West Sumatra, especially in the cities of Solok and Pariaman, and discusses the prevention model used against corruption. The methodology used to answer these problems is normative juridical research. The results of the study found that the pattern of corruption tended to vary in each region, such as double budget, mark-up, unilateral withdrawal of nagari funds by nagari administrators. However, there is a pattern that is always found in every case, namely not making a deposit of tax collection results, the tax money is intentionally not deposited and used for personal interests which causes state financial losses. Furthermore, countermeasures are taken repressively using Indonesian criminal law, as well as preventively by establishing a nagari regulation that uses a customary criminal law approach. West Sumatra has its local wisdom that is still alive and well maintained, even the community respects customary criminal law more than positive law, therefore preventive efforts by using the customary criminal law approach are expected to be able to create nagari that are free from corruption. In an effort to prevent corruption of village funds and Village Fund Allocation (ADD) by village officials, the government of Nagari Situjuah Batua, Situjuah Limo Nagari District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency, West Sumatra, made legal rules based on customary law. The regulation is stated in the Situjuah Batua Nagari Regulation Number 8 of 2019 concerning Prevention of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism Based on the Salingka Nagari Customary Law
A Philosophical Analysis To Uncover The Meaning And Terminology Of Person In Indonesian Criminal Law Context Nani Mulyati; Topo Santoso; Elwi Danil
Nagari Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2017): Nagari Law Review (NALREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.1.i.1.p.56-73.2017

Abstract

The definition of person and non-person always change through legal history. Long time ago, law did not recognize the personality of slaves. Recently, it accepted non-human legal subject as legitimate person before the law. This article examines sufficient conditions for being person in the eye of law according to its particular purposes, and then, analyses the meaning of legal person in criminal law. In order to do that, scientific methodology that is adopted in this research is doctrinal legal research combined with philosophical approach. Some theories regarding person and legal person were analysed, and then the concept of person was associated with the accepted definition of legal person that is adopted in the latest Indonesian drafted criminal code. From the study that has been done, can be construed that person in criminal law concerned with norm adressat of the rule, as the author of the acts or omissions, and not merely the holder of rights. It has to be someone or something with the ability to think rationally and the ability to be responsible for the choices he/she made. Drafted penal code embraces human and corporation as its norm adressat. Corporation defined with broad meaning of collectives. Consequently, it will include not only entities with legal personality, but also associations without legal personality. Furthermore, it may also hold all kind of collective namely states, states bodies, political parties, state’s corporation, be criminally liable.
The Discretion of Internal Prosecutor Apply in Article 2 & 3 for Law Eradication of Corruption Kirana, Imme; Khairani, Khairani; Mulyati, Nani
Law Development Journal Vol 6, No 2 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.6.2.226-238

Abstract

The criminal act of corruption is the favorite as if it never gets old, precisely the term extraordinary crime corruption, in addition, the perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption are mostly legal subjects who play a role based on the authority they have. However, it is not uncommon for prosecutors to use the type of subsidiary charge in prosecuting them to determine Article 2 as the primary charge and Article 3 as a subsidiary charge, even though it is clear that the perpetrator has abused their authority and resulted in financial losses to the State. This is a concern for the author to research facultatively on charges of subsidiarity for violations of Article 2 and 3. In this research, the author uses a type of Normative Juridical research, namely legal research that is oriented to secondary data and refers to legal material sources such as Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The results of the research explained that the type of subsidiary indictment by making Article 2 the primary indictment and Article 3 the subsidiary indictment is a form of prosecutorial discretion in eradicating criminal acts of corruption effectively and efficiently so that it is unlikely that the defendant will escape criminal responsibility. Furthermore, Article 3 is the systematic lex specialist of Article 2 of the Corruption Eradication Law, because in criminal acts of corruption, the element "against the law" is the genus, while "abuse of authority" is the species.
Penerapan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Ridwan Syafaat Yori; Aria Zurnetti; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1782

Abstract

Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Selanjutnya ditulis Perja No.15 Tahun 2020) memberikan kewenangan kepada Jaksa untuk menghentikan penuntutan terhadap perkara tindak pidana berdasarkan restorative justice dengan tujuan pemulihan kembali pada keadaan semula bukan berorientasi pada pembalasan. Penerapan penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice yang dilakukan Jaksa Penuntut Umum di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan dalam perkara tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan yang diatur Pasal 363 ayat (1) ke 5 KUHP diancaman dengan pidana penjara paling lama 7 tahun tidak sesuai dengan syarat batas ancaman pidana maksimal penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf B Perja No.15 Tahun 2020 yang menyatakan bahwa ancaman penjara tidak lebih dari 5 tahun.
Kedudukan Hukum Sertipikat Hak Milik Karena Cacat Yuridis Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Hak (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batusangkar Nomor 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk) Chanda Ricci; Busyra Azheri; Mulyati, Nani
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.1938

Abstract

One of the plots of land where land registration is carried out by issuing a certificate is Certificate of Ownership Number 00164/Nagari Padang Magek. The certificate is the object of a dispute which has been decided by the Batusangkar District Court Decision Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk, which has obtained permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). Based on the Decision of the Batusangkar District Court Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk, the issuance of Certificate of Ownership Number 00164/Nagari Padang Magek, namely a Statement of Physical Control of the Field and a Certificate of Land Ownership Number 074/SK/PMT/2000, is a fake document. So the Certificate of Ownership Number 00164/Nagari Padang Magek has a legal defect. The formulation of the problem examined in this research is: 1) what is the legal position of a certificate of ownership due to juridical defects as proof of ownership of rights?; 2) what are the legal consequences of ownership of land rights following the Batusangkar District Court Decision Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk? The research method that the author uses is normative juridical, with a case approach. The type of data used is secondary data, which consists of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used is document study. The results of the author's findings are the position of Ownership Certificate Number 00164/Nagari Padang Magek, which has changed the data on the certificate above to become Ownership Certificate Number 1892/Nagari Padang Magek, Land Plot Identification Number 03.10.03.02.01654, with Measurement Letter Number: 2616/2021 dated 27 April 2021, area 940, in the names of Tisra Juwita and Hasni Wirda, still valid and valid. The next finding is that in the Batusangkar District Court Decision Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk, the basis for issuing the certificate used was a fake letter related to the ages of the parties, namely Tisra Juwita and Hasni Wirda, not a fake regarding the subject of their rights. So the plot of land registered in Certificate of Ownership Number 00164 is still legally valid in the names of Tisra Juwita and Hasni Wirda. Certificates issued based on fake documents can be canceled by submitting a written application to the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency through the Head of the Land Office where the object is located, in this case the Head of the Tanah Datar Regency Land Office.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Organ Yayasan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Yayasan Mulyati, Nani; Heriyanti, Yuli
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Upaya penegakan kemanusian dan kesejahteraan sosial diatur dalam konstitusi dan direalisasikan dengan menyediakan sarana kemanusian dan kesejahteraan sosial melalui mekanisme pendirian Kementrian Sosial dan badan hukum oleh pihak swasta. Salah satu bentuk ikut sertanya masyarakat dalam menciptakan kemanusian dan kesejahteraan sosial dengan mendirikan badan hukum yang berbentuk yayasan atau bentuk lainnya sesuai aturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Sebagai badan hukum yang menjalankan kegiatan sosial, keagamaan, dan kemanusiaan, melalui pendirian badan usaha, maka yayasan butuh subjek yang bisa dipercaya mengelola yayasan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tanggung jawab perdata organ yayasan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Yayasan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan gambaran yang jelas mengenai peran dan tanggung jawab perdata organ yayasan menurut Undang-Undang Yayasan. Penelitian ini merupakan Penelitian hukum normatif (legal research) biasanya “hanya” merupakan studi dokumen, yakni menggunakan sumber bahan hukum yang berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, keputusan/ketetapan pengadilan, kontrak/perjanjian/akad, teori hukum, dan pendapat para sarjana. Tanggung jawab yang dimaksud oleh fakta bahwa organ-organ yayasan berinteraksi satu sama lain saat melaksanakan fungsi dan tugas yang diembannya. Untuk mencegah konflik internal yang dapat merugikan kepentingan yayasan dan pihak lain, dibuat pemisahan yang jelas antara fungsi, wewenang, dan tanggung jawab masing-masing organ serta hubungan antara pihak ketiga organ yayasan. Organ yayasan bukanlah pemilik yayasan, melainkan mengelola kegiatan dan keberlangsungan yayasan untuk mencapai maksud dan tujuan yayasan.