Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

The role of perceptions of inter-group conflict on religious radicalism: Losing meaning as a mediator Ardy Hermawan; Ali Mashuri
Jurnal Psikologi Tabularasa Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023): APRIL 2023
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/jpt.v18i1.9936

Abstract

Indonesia as a country is still facing various kinds of national problems that have not been fully resolved. One of these problems is religious radicalism among some Muslims in this country. Examining the factors that trigger religious radicalism is thus an urgent and relevant scientific effort in Indonesia. To achieve this vision, this study aims to examine loss of significance as a mediator of the role of perceived intergroup conflict that pits Muslims against the West in explaining religious radicalism among some Muslims. This idea was tested using a correlational quantitative method with 201 Muslim participants. The results showed that, first, the higher the perceptions of conflict between Muslims and the West, the higher religious radicalism. Second, the perceived intergroup conflict increased loss of significance, and ultimately, loss of significance significantly explained the high levels of religious radicalism. Third, loss of significance mediated the positive relationship between perceived inter-group conflict and religious radicalism. The results of this study imply that religious radicalism is rooted in situational factors that strengthen individual motivation to support such an extreme, violent action.Indonesia sebagai sebuah negara masih menghadapi berbagai macam masalah nasional yang belum sepenuhnya tertangani. Salah satu permasalahan tersebut adalah radikalisme agama di kalangan sebagian Muslim di negeri ini. Meneliti faktor-faktor yang memantik radikalisme agama dengan demikian merupakan sebuah upaya ilmiah yang urgen dan relevan di Indonesia. Untuk mencapai visi tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan menguji kehilangan makna (loss of significance) sebagai mediator peran persepsi konflik antar kelompok dalam menjelaskan radikalisme agama di kalangan sebagian Muslim. Ide ini diuji menggunakan metode kuantitatif korelasional  dengan partisipan Muslim berjumlah 201. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, semakin tinggi persepsi konflik antara Muslim dan pihak Barat maka semakin tinggi radikalisme agama. Kedua, persepsi konflik antar kelompok tersebut meningkatkan kehilangan makna, dan kehilangan makna selanjutnya secara signifikan menjelaskan tingginya radikalisme agama. Ketiga, kehilangan makna berperan signifikan sebagai mediator hubungan positif antara persepsi konflik antar kelompok dan radikalisme agama. Hasil penelitian ini mengimplikasikan bahwa radikalisme agama bermuara pada faktor situasional yang memperkuat motivasi individu untuk mendukung tindakan ekstrim tersebut.
The Mediating Role of Micro- and Meso-Level Factors in the Relationship between University Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Problem-Solving Skills Esti Zaduqisti; Ali Mashuri
Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): PSYMPATHIC
Publisher : Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/psy.v13i1.54803

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate problem-solving skills in relation to self-regulated learning (SRL) among university students. The roles of emotional intelligence, academic self-efficacy, teacher charismatic leadership, and classmates' support were examined as mediators of SRL contribution to explaining problem-solving skills. A correlational design, including 224 respondents as participants, was adopted through an online questionnaire. This study analyzed the data using PROCESS installed in SPSS version 29. The results showed that SRL, academic self-efficacy, teacher charismatic leadership, and classmate support played a significant role in improving problem-solving skills. Furthermore, SRL significantly and positively predicted emotional intelligence, academic self-efficacy, teacher charismatic leadership, and classmate support. All variables exhibited significant mediating effects on the relationship between SRL and the enhancement of problem-solving skills, with the exception of emotional intelligence, academic self-efficacy, teacher charismatic leadership, and classmate support. This study contributed to the development of educational psychology by examining the roles of academic self-efficacy, teacher charismatic leadership, and classmate support as important mechanisms that explained how SRL positively affected problem-solving skills, while emotional intelligence did not act as a mediator.
“We Should Keep Fighting”: How Beliefs About Collective Action Success and Social Identity Process Fuel Future Activism Mashuri, Ali; Zaduqisti, Esti; Nurmala, Sukma
Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi Vol. 31 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The significance of social-psychological factors in reinforcing activism over time has been highlighted within collective action research. Against this backdrop, this research investigated the relationships among moral conviction, perceived intergroup threats, variables specified within the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA; van Zomeren et al., 2008; i.e., politicized identification, perceived injustice, collective efficacy), internal attribution of collective action success, and people’s willingness to engage in future collective action. To this end, we recruited a sample of 410 Indonesian participants through a correlational survey. Data were analyzed using a path model, and the results revealed that such an internal attribution was a positive predictor of future collective action and mediated the effects of the SIMCA variables on it. The subsequent findings revealed the roles of moral conviction and perceived intergroup threats in explaining the SIMCA variables, implying that ethical commitment and perceived threats contribute to heightened politicized identification, perceptions of injustice, and collective efficacy. These findings provide empirical support for the relevance of multi-level modes of people’s willingness to engage in future collective action, highlighting the crucial roles of the internal and external driving factors.