Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia

The Impact of Information Communication Technology Developments in The Indigenous Law Community Romana, Francisca; Saptomo, Ade; Mardina, Debi; Siska, Siska; Naning, Theresia
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i2.14622

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology (ICT) always has an impact on changes in human paradigms, both positive and negative. This change in the human paradigm will conflict or not conflict with Indigenous law which is the guideline for the Indigenous law community. The question is, to what extent are the boundaries that guide Indigenous law community that this paradigm change is or is not in conflict with Indigenous law that applies to Indigenous law community, thereby resulting in restrictions on the use of ICT by Indigenous law community? In this research, there are two case studies, namely the development of ICT, which is considered contrary to Indigenous law and the acceptance of ICT development in the Indigenous law community of Baduy Dalam, Baduy Luar, and Kasepuhan Ciptagelar Sukabumi. This research aims to examine the impact of ICT developments on the paradigm of the Indigenous law community of Baduy Dalam, Baduy Luar, and Kasepuhan Ciptagelar so that the results of this research can be used as a reference for the government to determine appropriate regulations for implementing digital transformation programs for Indigenous law community.
Minangkabau Customary Law as a Foundation and Perspective for The Formation of The National Legal System Wiwoho, Shri Hardjuno; Saptomo, Ade; Ilham, Andi Muh; Santoso, Haryo
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i2.14623

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the role of Minangkabau customary law in shaping the country's legal system and its potential contribution in creating social justice, maintaining cultural diversity, and strengthening regional autonomy. This research method used is literature analysis using relevant primary and secondary sources such as legal documents, academic works, and practical experience in the application of Minangkabau customary law. The results of this study show that Minangkabau customary law includes interrelated principles such as deliberation and consensus, gon royong (community cooperation), and restorative justice. The principles contain universal values that can be applied and integrated into the broader national legal system. In the context of building a state legal system, Minangkabau customary law is used as a source of inspiration for the development of laws that serve the interests of local communities, protect individual and collective rights, and maintain a balance between national and local interests. In addition, Minangkabau customary law has the potential to preserve cultural diversity in Indonesia. In the era of globalization that prioritizes cultural homogenization, the application of Minangkabau customary law can provide a strong foundation for the development and maintenance of cultural diversity of the community at the national level. Through an approach that respects and recognizes cultural differences, a country's legal system can be a tool for strengthening cultural identity and ensuring the sustainability of valuable cultural heritage
Kaili Tribe Criminal Dispute Resolution Process from the Perspective of Customary Law in Central Sulawesi Lubna, Lubna; Saptomo, Ade; Ibrahim, Metty Murni Wati; Situngkir, Rospita Rufina; Kristianto, Dhani
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i2.14782

Abstract

This research discusses customary law in Indonesia which is pluralistic because it reflects the diversity of tribes and ethnic groups. Customary law is still relevant and applicable in the life and culture of Indonesian society. Customary law as positive law has a special characteristic, namely that there is little written statute, despite its value applying in society. This research is descriptive in nature using normative analysis, literature studies, and field surveys. The research results show that customary law has a position that is recognized in statutory regulations, including the 1945 Constitution, the Human Rights Law, and the Draft Criminal Code. The implementation of traditional law is elucidated through the Kaili customary justice process in the Central Sulawesi region, with the stages of decision-making and the types of sanctions that can be given.
Analysis of The Role Based on The Customary Criminal Justice System of Dayak Bangkalaan in The National Criminal Justice System Pone, Darlian; Saptomo, Ade; Baharudin, Baharudin; Harahap, Aminuddin; Rustam, Rustam
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i3.14826

Abstract

This research is motivated by indigenous peoples' belief in customary rules which encourages studies on their legitimacy in the Indonesian legal system. The author collected study samples from the Bangkalan Dayak tribe in South Kalimantan Province as an example of an Indonesian customary village. This study focuses on two formulations of problems, namely the role of the customary criminal justice system in the national criminal justice system and the impact of Dayak Bangkalan customary criminal justice law enforcement when related to the national criminal justice system. This research is a sociological legal research, the legal data collection technique is carried out through literature review, including primary legal data, secondary legal data, and tertiary legal data related to this research. The result of the study is that the state recognizes the existence of customary law communities in accordance with Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Even though there is no legal framework that can regulate this at the national level, the mandate of regional legislative policy still recognizes the existence of customary courts. This is evidenced by the existence of regional regulations that recognize and protect indigenous peoples. In addition, the results of the study conveyed that the legal implications arising from customary court decisions turned out to be able to be used as legal data in national criminal courts.
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Kesehatan di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dalam Hal Malpraktik Medis Marliana, Lia; Simanjuntak, Juniaty Caroline; Hasnawan, Yudi; Ferdian, Jhohan Adhi; Saptomo, Ade
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i3.14935

Abstract

Malpraktek medis adalah suatu tindakan medis yang dilakukan oleh tenaga kesehatan yang menyebabkan kerugian, baik fisik maupun psikis, kepada pasien. Sistem hukum kesehatan di setiap negara memiliki ketentuan yang berbeda-beda dalam mengatur malpraktek medis. Hal ini disebabkan oleh berbagai faktor, seperti perbedaan budaya, nilai-nilai, dan sistem hukum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan sistem hukum kesehatan di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dalam hal malpraktek medis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian komparatif. Data penelitian dikumpulkan dari berbagai sumber, seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, buku, jurnal, dan artikel ilmiah. Data yang telah terkumpul kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sistem hukum malpraktik di Indonesia dan Amerika serikat memiliki beberapa perbedaan diantaranya dari sistem hukum Indonesia menganut civil law dan Amerika menganut common law. Sedangkan dari sisi pembuktian Indonesia melakukan pembuktiann dengan pembuktian langsung dan Amerika dengan pembuktian terbalik. Kemudian dari bentuk pertanggungjawabannya, Indonesia mengimplementasikannya dalam bentuk Litigasi dan Non litigasi dan Amerika dalam bentuk hukum perdata. Selain itu, dari pengaturan dan pengawasan indonesia berada di dalam pengawasan Kementerian Kesehatan dan Lembaga profesi seperti MDKDI dan IDI dan Amerika dalam pengawasan badan federal dan yuridiksi negara bagian.