Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Collegium Studiosum Journal

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DRIVER GRAB YANG MENGALAMI PESANAN FIKTIF PADA ERA GIG ECONOMY Ery Charmelita Raska; Wardani, Susilo
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1439

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal relationship between Grab drivers and Grab platform in the context of gig economy in Banyumas Regency, as well as legal protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders. This research uses normative juridical and empirical juridical methods. The research data includes primary data from direct interviews with several drivers in Banyumas Regency and supported by secondary and tertiary data. The data analysis method uses qualitative analysis method. The first research result shows that the relationship between the driver and the platform arises due to a partnership agreement that gives birth to balanced rights and obligations between the parties. In practice, the relationship between drivers and platforms looks like a working relationship where there are elements of orders, wages, and work as well as relationships such as superiors and subordinates that create imbalances in the existing partnership agreement. So it looks like a pseudo-partnership relationship. When viewed in Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2021 concerning Creative Economy Development, Grab drivers are included in the type of freelancers with a partnership pattern system using a profit-sharing system regulated in article 4 and article 33. However, these rules still do not provide adequate legal protection for online ojek drivers. The second research result, legal protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders is still limited. The Grab platform provides protection by providing a reimbursement mechanism, which has been stated in the partnership agreement between the driver and the Grab platform. The unclear legal relationship between Grab drivers and the platform in the Gig Economy era in Banyumas causes weak protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA MASAL PADA PEKERJA PERUSAHAAN RAMBUT Pangestu, Gema Ramadhanu Ridho Ing; Wardani, Susilo
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1698

Abstract

Mass termination of employment (PHK massal) is a critical issue in the labor sector, as it directly impacts job loss and income reduction. Purbalingga Regency, known as a hub for the wig and false eyelash industry, has significantly contributed to employment absorption and poverty reduction. However, mass terminations of employment still frequently occur, causing numerous challenges, especially for affected workers. This study aims to examine the legal resolution mechanisms of mass termination of employment in hair companies in Purbalingga Regency and to identify the challenges faced by workers affected by such terminations. The research employs both normative and empirical juridical approaches. The normative juridical approach involves a review of relevant legislation and legal doctrines, while the empirical juridical approach is conducted through interviews with relevant parties, particularly the Purbalingga Regency Department of Manpower and labor unions. The findings reveal that the Purbalingga Department of Manpower facilitates the resolution of mass terminations in hair companies by adhering to legal procedures through bipartite negotiations, mediation, and proceedings at the Industrial Relations Court in accordance with Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower. Nonetheless, several obstacles persist, including weak financial conditions of companies, workers limited understanding of legal mechanisms, and high levels of worker poverty. Therefore, collaboration among local governments, companies, and labor unions is necessary to ensure legal protection and justice for workers.
PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK PEKERJA PADA HOME INDUSTRY BULU MATA PALSU Windiarti, Lisa; Wardani, Susilo
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1703

Abstract

Entrepreneurs in the informal sector of the false eyelash home industry in Padamara Sub-District, Purbalingga Regency, have made efforts to comply with basic legal requirements through the possession of a Business Identification Number (NIB). However, several home industries in this area still lack NIBs, resulting in limited access to legal recognition and business protection. This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of workers rights in the false eyelash home industry in Padamara Sub- District, Purbalingga Regency, and to identify the factors that hinder these businesses from obtaining legal permits. The research employs both normative juridical and empirical juridical methods. Thenormative juridical approach is conducted through literature review, including books, journals, and relevant legislation. The empirical juridical method involves interviews with key informants to obtain primary research data. The findings reveal two main points: First, the fulfillment of workers normative rights does not yet align with Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. This includes issues such as the right to a fair wage, reasonable working hours, absence of clear and written employment agreements, and lack of occupational safety and health protectionslargely due to the informal status of these workers. Second, several factors hinder the fulfillment of workers rights in the false eyelash home industry in Padamara, including the lack of legal incorporation of these businesses, limited understanding among business owners regarding the importance of legal registration, perceptions that licensing processes are complex and costly, and the prevailing subcontracting and nonpermanent work system. Moreover, cooperatives, which serve as the operational platform for these businesses, also contribute to the slow progress in formalizing these enterprises.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DRIVER GRAB YANG MENGALAMI PESANAN FIKTIF PADA ERA GIG ECONOMY Ery Charmelita Raska; Wardani, Susilo
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1439

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal relationship between Grab drivers and Grab platform in the context of gig economy in Banyumas Regency, as well as legal protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders. This research uses normative juridical and empirical juridical methods. The research data includes primary data from direct interviews with several drivers in Banyumas Regency and supported by secondary and tertiary data. The data analysis method uses qualitative analysis method. The first research result shows that the relationship between the driver and the platform arises due to a partnership agreement that gives birth to balanced rights and obligations between the parties. In practice, the relationship between drivers and platforms looks like a working relationship where there are elements of orders, wages, and work as well as relationships such as superiors and subordinates that create imbalances in the existing partnership agreement. So it looks like a pseudo-partnership relationship. When viewed in Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2021 concerning Creative Economy Development, Grab drivers are included in the type of freelancers with a partnership pattern system using a profit-sharing system regulated in article 4 and article 33. However, these rules still do not provide adequate legal protection for online ojek drivers. The second research result, legal protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders is still limited. The Grab platform provides protection by providing a reimbursement mechanism, which has been stated in the partnership agreement between the driver and the Grab platform. The unclear legal relationship between Grab drivers and the platform in the Gig Economy era in Banyumas causes weak protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders.
ANALISIS PERJANJIAN PRA NIKAH YANG DILANGSUNGKAN DI DALAM PERKAWINAN MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA Choliek, Vito Qobul; Wardani, Susilo
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i2.1718

Abstract

Prenuptial agreements are still often perceived negatively by some members of the public, because they are considered contrary to the value of decency and have the potential to cause prejudice and distrust between prospective spouses. Then, there are still a number of couples who only realize the urgency of making a prenuptial agreement after the marriage is held, so they assume that making the agreement is no longer juridically possible because the marriage bond has been valid and binding according to the provisions of the legislation. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the prenuptial agreement in the invitation laws and regulations in Indonesia as well as to determine and analyze the prenuptial agreement directly in marriage after the decision of the Constitutional Court. This research uses normative juridical legal research, which is one type of legal research methodology that bases its analysis on applicable laws and regulations and is relevant to the legal issues that are the focus of the research. Indonesia has three main legal bases governing pre-nuptial agreements, namely Law No. 16/2019 on the Amendment to Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and the Civil Code (KUH Perdata) and coupled with Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. These rules have regulated in detail the substance, terms, and procedures of this agreement. After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015, the agreement can also be made after the marriage takes place, as long as it does not violate the law, religion, and decency and does not harm third parties. The emergence of the Constitutional Court's decision No. 69/PUU/XII/2015, related to the pre-marital agreement that can be made by the husband and wife after the marriage takes place. The law gives freedom to everyone to make agreements in any form and content as long as it does not conflict with the provisions of laws and regulations, decency, and public order.