Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Metacentre

Analysis the Influence of Sling Direction on Pad Eye Strength Ardianti, Andi; Hamzah; Sitepu, Ganding; Mahendra Amir, Ihza
International Journal of Metacentre Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : Naval Architecture Departement, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the stages of ship production using the grand block system is the erection process, where in this process the blocks weighing up to million Tons will be lifted. This study aims to see whether the sling angle used in the block lifting process will produce different stresses, strains, and deformations in the pad eye. Sling angle variations used in this study are 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° with a tensile load of 55 tons or 539365.75 N. This research was conducted using the finite element method and assisted by ANSYS software. Based on the results of the analysis, the maximum X-axis normal stress is 57.85 MPa which occurs at a sling angle of 45°, the maximum Y-axis normal stress is 143.32 MPa which occurs at a 90° sling angle, the maximum XY shear stress is 51.712 MPa which occurs at a sling angle of 45° and a Von-Mises stress of 151.47 MPa which occurs at a sling angle of 90°. As for the shear strain XY, the maximum strain that occurs at an angle of 45° is 6.4 x and for the maximum Von-Mises strain occurs at an angle of 90° by7.4 x . And the maximum total deformation value is obtained by7,286 x mm that occurs at a sling angle of 45°.For each variation of the sling angle used, the strength of the pad eye still meets the classification requirements because the resulting value is still below the permissible value. The difference in the results obtained after using variations in the angle of the sling shows that the difference in the direction of the pull of the sling has a different effect on the strength of the Pad eye.
Clustering of Ferry Trajectory Distance Based on Port Class and Ship Technical Specification Asri, Syamsul; Sitepu, Ganding; Idrus, Misliah; Chairunnisa, Andi Sitti; Baso, Suandar; Ardianti, Andi
International Journal of Metacentre Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Naval Architecture Departement, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A ferry route connects two ports, between a port and a terminal, and between two terminals at a certain distance. A certain distance is the distance of the ferry trajectory that allows for round-trip ferry services. Ships departing from the port of origin to the port of destination can return to the port of origin on the same day. The trajectory distance (DFT (nautical miles) was once grouped into 8 (eight) distance groups, each connected to the gross tonnage cluster of the ship, namely: the shortest (Group 1): DFT ≤ 1.0 nautical miles; and the farthest (group 8): DFT > 120 nautical miles. The Indonesian Government implemented these distance groups in the period 2003 - 2019. Ferry trajectory distance groups are needed to calculate transportation rates and place ships on a ferry route. This study is intended to evaluate and determine the distance group by the characteristics of ferry transportation services, namely shuttle services. The grouping is based on the class of ferry ports and the technical specifications of ferry ships. The results of this study indicate that one of the eight ferry trajectory distance groups implemented, group 2.4, does not match the characteristics of ferry transportation services (shuttle services). In the distance group, 40.1 ≤ FTD (nautical miles) ≤ 80.0, ferrying or frequency of ship operations is only 1 trip/day. The distance group 2.4 must be changed to 40.9 ≤ DFT (nautical miles) ≤ 70.9 to achieve a ferrying frequency of 2 trips/day. Through this study, eight groups of clustering of ferry trajectory distance are proposed to be implemented by the Indonesian Government. The shortest and longest distance groups, are the first distance group (group of 3.1): DFT (nautical miles) ≤ 2.3; and the eighth distance group (group of 1.2): 101.9 ≤ DFT (nautical miles) ≤ 165.2. Research on passenger perceptions of safety and comfort in relation to the duration of the voyage and the dimensions of the ship needs to be carried out to ensure the grouping of ferry trajectory distances orientation are towards service quality.