Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.147
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Masalah-Masalah Hukum Diponegoro Law Journal Pandecta Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Tadulako Law Review Jurisprudence Jurnal Daulat Hukum The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum Law Development Journal Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial Jurnal Jurisprudence
Eko Soponyono
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Jurisprudence

 1 
The Urgency of Judge's Legal Reasoning in Deciding on an Environmental Crime Case Based on an Ecocentric Approach (Review of Case Decision No. 640/PID.B/LH/2021/PT PBR) Jiwanti, Ainun; Soponyono, Eko
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1092

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze how the legal reasoning of the Pekanbaru High Court Judge in Decision No. 640/PID.B/LH/2021/PT PBR, and at the same time reviewing decisions at the previous level and show how important the judge's legal reasoning is based on an ecocentric approach in deciding environmental crime cases. Methods: This type of research is a normative law using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Findings: The panel of judges of the Pekanbaru High Court granted the defendant's appeal, PT. Gandaerah Hendana because Article 98 paragraph (1) of the PPLH (Environmental Protection and Management) Law that the public prosecutor indicted is a material offense that must be linked to its formal elements (Article 108 of the PPLH Law). It differs from the opinion of the Rengat District Court panel of judges, which stated that because the meaning of "action" in Article 98 paragraph (1) of the PPLH Law is so broad, the action can be in any form as long as the consequences stipulated in the formulation of the offense occurred. The action in question does not only do prohibited things but also includes not carrying out legal obligations (omission offenses). Since the burned land is the defendant's right to cultivate area, PT. Gandaerah Hendana, the process of extinguishing the fire on the land is the responsibility of the defendant, PT. Gandaerah Hendana. In this regard, the ecocentric approach in judges’ legal reasoning is urgent because, so far, the positivistic-formal and anthropocentric approaches have made judges only oriented to human interests. With an ecocentric approach, judges will pay attention to environmental sustainability when deciding the case being examined so that judges will produce outputs in the form of pro-environmentally oriented decisions. Benefits: The results of this study are expected to enrich references for academics and become input for law enforcers, especially judges, about the importance of legal reasoning based on an ecocentric approach in deciding environmental crime cases. Novelty: The discussion in this study will provide a perspective and explanation of how an ecocentric approach as the basis for legal reasoning for judges can create decisions and enforce environmental laws oriented towards the environment.
Jurisprudence for Resolving Crimes of Narcotics Abuse by Children in Indonesia Yudhoyono, Gatot Eko; Soponyono, Eko
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i1.4289

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: This study aims to analyze the application of diversion in Indonesia in the process of resolving narcotics crime cases against children. It is expected that resolution through the diversion method based on the concept of restorative justice can be regulated in more detail in Act No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics as a legal source in handling criminal cases in Indonesia. Methodology: This normative legal research employed a jurisprudential approach (legal products formed from judges' decisions) and laws to analyze problems, which were discussed using legal regulations in the form of secondary data (primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials). The analysis was carried out qualitatively, and the discussion of the problem formulation used literature studies and decision documents issued by the court. Findings: Settlement of criminal cases based on the concept of restorative justice at the level of law enforcement in the police, prosecutor's office, and courts can reduce the backlog of cases and achieve legal justice as desired by the community. The court ruling of diversion in cases Number 20/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Trg, Number 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Trg, Number 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Trg, and Number 11/ Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Trg at the Tenggarong District Court provided remedies to the parties in the cases based on Act No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Act No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Based on the findings of the judge's judgment, it was found that the aim of implementing the Juvenile Criminal Justice System is to jointly seek a fair solution by emphasizing restoration to the original condition and not retaliation. Benefits: The government needs to create a comprehensive legal basis to regulate the process of resolving cases of narcotics abuse in children based on restorative justice simultaneously and integrated in the future reform of Narcotics Law in Indonesia. Novelty: The latest legal basis for the process of resolving narcotics abuse cases based on restorative justice is linked to Act No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Act No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Based on these provisions, further discussion regarding the process of resolving criminal cases based on the concept of restorative justice by providing diversion determinations to children is discussed. Keywords: Abuse, Narcotics, Restorative Justice, and Children   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Menganalisis penerapan diversi di Indonesia dalam proses penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana narkotika terhadap anak. Penyelesaian melalui metode diversi berbasis konsep keadilan restoratif diharapkan dapat diatur secara lebih rinci di dalam Undang-Undang No.35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika sebagai sumber hukum dalam menangani perkara pidana di Indonesia. Metodologi: Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan jurisprudensi (produk hukum yang terbentuk dari  keputusan hakim) dan undang-undang untuk menganalisis permasalahan yang akan dibahas menggunakan peraturan hukum berupa data sekunder (bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier). Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif dan pembahasan atas rumusan masalah menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan dokumen penetapan yang dikeluarkan oleh pengadilan. Temuan: Penyelesaian perkara pidana berbasis konsep keadilan restoratif pada tingkat penegakan hukum di kepolisian, kejaksaan dan pengadilan dapat mengurangi penumpukan perkara dan mewujudkan keadilan hukum sebagaimana diinginkan lingkungan masyarakat. Penetapan diversi, dalam perkara Nomor 20/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Trg, Nomor 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Trg, Nomor 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Trg dan Nomor 11/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Trg di Pengadilan Negeri Tenggarong. Memberikan pemulihan kepada para pihak yang berperkara ini berdasar pada Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan Undang-Undang No.35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Berdasarkan temuan dari putusan hakim didapati bahwa tujuan diterapkannya sistem peradilan pidana anak untuk bersama-sama mencari penyelesaian yang adil dengan menekankan pemulihan pada keadaan semula dan bukan pembalasan. Kegunaan: Pemerintah perlu membuat landasan hukum yang komprehensif untuk mengatur proses penyelesaian perkara penyalahgunaan narkotika pada anak berbasis keadilan restoratif secara simultan dan terintegrasi dalam pembaharuan undang-undang narkotika di Indonesia masa mendatang. Kebaruan: Dasar hukum terbaru dalam proses penyelesaian perkara penyalahgunaan narkotika berdasar keadilan restoratif yang dikaitkan Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan Undang-Undang No.35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Berdasarkan ketentuan tersebut akan dibahas lebih lanjut terkait proses penyelesaian perkara pidana berbasis konsep keadilan restoratif dengan memberikan penetapan diversi kepada anak.  Keywords: Penyalahgunaan, Narkotika, Keadilan Restoratif dan Anak
Co-Authors Alifka, Muhammad Fauzi Nur Alifka Andriyanto Andriyanto Anis Mashdurohatun Apdiansyah, Muhammad Astuti, Laras Bambang Tri Bawono Dharmayanti, Yuliana Putri Ervanda, Vivi Amelia Ferari Wiranata, Eddy Genovés, Manuel Beltrán Herwin Sulistyowati, SH,MH Ibrahim, Mahdi Irwan Irwan Jiwanti, Ainun Kharismunandar, Jhuanda Fratama Mashdurohatun, Anies Melia Dwi Putri Heni Hidayati Munawwarah Munawwarah Nabila, Daulika Sausan Zahra Nurahman, Adiansyah Rahmi Dwi Sutanti Sirait, Trinita Yulinda Sri Endah Wahyuningsih Sularto, RB Teguh Tri Prasetya Tiyas Vika Widyastuti Umar Ma'ruf Umi Rozah Urip Giyono Yudhoyono, Gatot Eko Yudi Alvisahrin Yuristha, RM. Egidius