Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Analisis Hukum Tata Negara: Sistem Penetapan Gubernur Kepala Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dalam Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Berdasarkan Pasal 18 Ayat (4) UUD 1945 Tutik, Titik Triwulan
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 41, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Penetapan Masajabatan Jaksa Agung RI Berdasarkan Putusan MK No. 49/PUU-VIII/2010 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan RI Dalam Sistem Penetapan Jabatan Pejabat Negara Menurut UUD NRI 1945 Tutik, Titik Triwulan
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 42, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Ilmu Hukum: Hakekat Keilmuannya Ditinjau Dari Sudut Filsafat Ilmu Dan Teori Ilmu Hukum Tutik, Titik Triwulan
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 43, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Ilmu Hukum: Hakekat Keilmuannya Ditinjau Dari Sudut Filsafat Ilmu Dan Teori Ilmu Hukum Tutik, Titik Triwulan
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 44, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Tafsir Tarbawi of Restorative Justice in Qur’anic Jinayat Verses; Nahdatul Ulama Pesantren Perspective Junaedi Junaedi; Muhammad Afifudin Dimyathi; Aswadi Aswadi; Imam Syafi'i; Titik Triwulan Tutik
Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Transformative Islamic Education in Pesantren and Madrasah
Publisher : Universitas Pesantren Kh abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/nzh.v9i1.470

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of restorative justice in Qur’anic jinayat verses (QS. Al-Baqarah 178-179; Al-Maidah 45) through a tafsir tarbawi approach and the Aswaja Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) theological framework within pesantren character education. Employing a mixed-methods Design with 71 respondents 45 from the general public and 26 NU pesantren education experts this study reveals three significant findings. First, islah (reconciliation) and diyat (compensation) are reinterpreted as theological foundations of Islamic restorative justice within pesantren contexts. Second, the NU character education model, based on al-muhāfaẓah ’alā al-qadīm al-ṣāliḥ (preserving valuable traditions) and al-akhdh bi al-jadīd al-aṣlaḥ (adopting beneficial innovations), creates a natural ecosystem for restorative practices. Third, the principle of maqāṣid syarī’ah functions as a harmonizing axis between local ’urf values and global restorative justice norms. Theoretically, the study constructs a Restorative Justice Theology integrating Bayani (textual) and Burhani (rational-contextual) epistemologies characteristic of NU pesantren education. Practically, it provides an operational model for transforming qishāṣ from retribution to restoration, institutionalizing ṣulḥ (reconciliation) in conflict resolution, and aligning character education with SDGs Goal 16 on peace and justice.
HARMONISASI FUNGSI DPD DAN DPR PADA LEMBAGA PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DALAM SISTEM BIKAMERAL GUNA PELAKSANAAN CHECKS AND BALANCES Triwulan Tutik, Titik
Yustisia Vol 1, No 3: December 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10082

Abstract

AbstractThis study is a normative legal research. The study aims to examine the function of harmonization between DPD and the DPR in agency representatives in bicameral system. Approach is used in this study are the historical, the statute, the comparative, the conceptual, and the case approach. Data collection by collecting primary legal materials and secondary. Primary legal materials studied and identified with the “Irac”, while secondary legal materials are accounted for using the card system, which is based on the research subject. These materials are searched legal relationship between one and the other uses reasoning (analysis) deductive and inductive to generate propositions and concepts, either the definition, description, and classification as a result of research. Deductive analysis starts from the provisions made  UUDNRI 1945 and with the support of secondary legal materials including literature of constitutional law concerning state agency DPD. The results show that the first, DPD as state agencies in a bicameral system is formulated as a representative body of the people who are institutionally have equal footing with the DPR, even in terms of the representation of character based on regions, DPD has a broader representation of the character of the DPR because the dimensions of representativeness based to all the people who are in these areas. Second, the DPD as a representative body of the people have the duty and authority as the DPR, which has the function of the budget, legislation, and despite the limited supervision. Third, in the context of constitutional Indonesia, there is no synchronization and harmonization of the position and function of the DPD and DPR, it weakened the state DPD function as a state institution. AbstrakPenelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang mengkaji harmonisasi fungsi DPD dan DPR pada lembaga perwakilan rakyat dalam sistem bikameral. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan historis, perundang-undangan, perbandingan, konsep, dan kasus. Pengumpulan data dengan menghimpun bahan-bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Bahan hukum primer dikaji dan diidentifikasi dengan metode “IRAC”, sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder dicatat dengan menggunakan sistem kartu, yang disusun berdasarkan pokok permasalahan penelitian. Bahan-bahan hukum tersebut dicari hubungannya antar satu dan lainnya menggunakan penalaran (analisis) deduktif dan induktif untuk menghasilkan proposisi dan konsep, baik berupa definisi, deskripsi, maupun klasifikasi sebagai hasil penelitian. Analisis deduktif dilakukan bertitik tolak dari ketentuan UUD NRI 1945 dan didukung bahan hukum sekunder termasuk kepustakaan hukum tata negara yang menyangkut lembaga negara DPD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, DPD selaku lembaga negara dalam sistem bikameral diformulasikan sebagai lembaga perwakilan rakyat yang secara kelembagaan memiliki kedudukan sama dengan DPR, bahkan dari segi karakter keterwakilan berdasarkan daerah-daerah, DPD memiliki karakter keterwakilan yang lebih luas dari DPR karena dimensi keterwakilannya didasarkan kepada seluruh rakyat yang terdapat pada daerah-daerah. Kedua, DPD selaku lembaga perwakilan rakyat memiliki tugas dan wewenang sebagaimana DPR, yaitu memiliki fungsi anggaran, legislasi,  dan pengawasan meski sifatnya terbatas. Ketiga, dalam konteks ketatanegaraan Indonesia, tidak ada sinkronisasi dan harmonisasi kedudukan dan fungsi antara DPD dan DPR, keadaan ini melemahkan fungsi DPD selaku lembaga negara.