Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY LAWS FOR OFFENDERS PARTICIPATING IN NARCOTICS ABUSE Pudjawijaya, IGM Seli; Pratiwi, Siswantari; Mardani
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 3 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i3.276

Abstract

The consequences caused by narcotics abuse are very detrimental to the continuity of life of the younger generation as the majority, which ultimately impoverishes a country because it does not have a quality next generation to replace the generation that has entered retirement age. The problem is : How is the application of the law on criminal liability for perpetrators who participate in narcotics abuse (Case Study of Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Mln and Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2015/PN Mam ? How do judges consider decisions regarding perpetrators who participate? narcotics abuse (Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Mln and Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2015/PN Mam )? The research method used is normative legal research. The conclusion is that participating in Indonesian narcotics criminal law is an act that can be punished as considered by the panel of judges in decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Mln and Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2015/PN Mam and the basis for the judge's consideration is that it can be analyzed, namely considering all aspects related to the main case that occurred and then looking for statutory regulations that are relevant to the main disputed case as a legal basis. in rendering a decision.
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CRIMINAL ACTION OF COLLECTIVE PROPERTY LAND CLAIMS Malau, Boy Fernanda; Pratiwi, Siswantari; Mardani
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 3 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i3.277

Abstract

The act of illegally grabbing land is an act that can be classified as a criminal act. Land grabbing will harm other parties, so the perpetrators can be prosecuted with criminal legal instruments. Land grabbing in reality in Indonesia is something that is difficult to avoid, especially in metropolitan areas, where empty land is increasingly difficult to find but more and more immigrants are arriving to risk their fate even though they do not have a clear place to live or relatives and this is what drives this. There are many cases of grabbing of state land and land controlled by individuals or companies. The formulation of the problem is: What is the ratio decidendi made by the judge in making considerations regarding the decision in the criminal case of land grabbing as contained in Decision Number 4/Pid.C/2021/PN.Sdr and Decision Number 05/Pid.C/2016/PN.BS? and What is the effectiveness of the land grabbing crime carried out by the perpetrators in Decision Number 4/Pid.C/2021/PN.Sdr and Decision Number 05/Pid.C/2016/PN.BS?. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the research show that the Ratio Decidendi is made by the judge in making considerations regarding the decision in the case of criminal land grabbing as contained in Decision Number 4/Pid.C/2021/Pn.Sdr and Decision Number 05/Pid.C/2016/Pn.Bs In of the two decisions explained, it can be concluded that these are the main points or reasons that form the basis of the judge's ratio decidendi decision in deciding the case and the effectiveness of the crime of land grabbing carried out by the perpetrators, as explained in the Both decisions show great attention to the protection of the rights of legal land owners. In analyzing the effectiveness of criminal land grabbing, it was found that the legal system must continue to develop to overcome existing challenges and weaknesses.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF CUSTOMERS/INVESTORS FROM FRAUD CRIMES COMMITTED BY INDIVIDUALS AND NON-BANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Wicaksono, Hadi; Pratiwi, Siswantari; Saefulloh
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 3 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i3.278

Abstract

Illegal investment activities are carried out by collecting funds from the wider community by deviating or even avoiding banking regulations, which are activities that use public facilities to carry out their business activities. Thus, it is necessary to look at the authority that the Financial Services Authority has in providing protection for the public against Illegal Investment activities. The practice of moral hazard in Illegal Investment activities occurs because of the weak supervision system of financial institutions. Problem Formulation What are the factors that cause the crime of illegal investment fraud? What is the legal protection for customers of non-bank financial institutions who carry out collection activities without permission from Bank Indonesia and the OJK? The research method used is normative juridical, the results of this research are factors that cause the occurrence of criminal acts of illegal investment fraud, such as a lack of public awareness of the financial sector, especially legal investments, and the bad luck of those who seek high profits while ignoring the risks and legal protection for institutional customers. Non-Bank Finance Carrying Out Collection Activities Without Permission from Bank Indonesia and OJK Finance is a mechanism for legal protection of customers, namely by pursuing civil and general criminal charges.
THE CRIME OF TREASON COMMITTED JOINTLY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE Wijanarko, Gapung; Pratiwi, Siswantari; Sinaga, Parbuntian
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 3 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i3.279

Abstract

In general, treason is an action carried out by a person or group of citizens by questioning the legal order that applies in a country. They took this action because of dissatisfaction with the administration of government, so that citizens carried out various actions that were against the law. Or it can be said to be a discrepancy between an individual or group of people and government regulations. The problems in this journal are how to prove unlawful acts committed jointly by the perpetrators of the crime of treason (Aanslag) in crimes that threaten state security and how each perpetrator of treason is held accountable in the judge's decision in Decision Number 23/PID/2020 /PT.AMB and Decision Number 24/PID/2020/PT. AMB. The research method is carried out using the normative legal method because it describes the applicable laws and regulations and is linked to legal theories in the practice of implementation related to problems that will be researched using this method as well, it will describe/describe the facts that actually occur as reflection of the implementation of statutory regulations and legal principles linked to legal theories and implementation practices. Based on this research, it can be understood that the benchmark for determining whether an act is considered treason is an act that is indicated to endanger the head of state or head of government so that the head of state or head of government is unable to carry out his duties properly. The criminal liability of the perpetrators of the crime of treason is joint responsibility based on Article 106 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code, namely those who committed, ordered to commit, and participated in committing the criminal act.
THE URGENCY OF PUNISHMENT AGAINST CHILDREN OF NARCOTICS ABUSERS Handoko, R. Reo; Pratiwi, Siswantari; Johardi, Ali
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 3 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i3.289

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the public prosecutor's considerations in proving the elements of the article so that children are categorized as narcotics providers and the public prosecutor's considerations in proving the elements of the article regarding children as perpetrators of narcotics providers. This research is empirical research carried out at the Sidenreng Rappang District Prosecutor's Office. The data obtained is then processed and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method, namely a method where data is collected, compiled, interpreted and analyzed so as to provide complete information according to the problems faced. The results of this research are: 1) The child's public prosecutor's considerations in making a child's demand letter pay attention to the best interests and future for the child, then in its implementation it refers to juridical reasons related to applicable legal rules and non-juridical ones related to the child's personal, social, family and environment. children and the impact of children's actions on society and the state, as well as children's attitudes in undergoing the trial process; 2) There is conformity in the demands and decisions regarding the proven element, namely the element of providing, even though the element of control is not included in the judge's consideration as an element that is fulfilled in the proof of the indictment in the child's public prosecutor's claim, so even so, the public prosecutor's claim is proven in the element of providing in Article 112 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, this strengthens the position of the claim that the claim is appropriate).
PENANGGULANGAN DAN PENCEGAHAN TINDAK PIDANA PENADAHAN BARANG DARI HASIL KEJAHATAN Devi Sumardiyono; Siswantari Pratiwi; Hartanto
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i3.17899

Abstract

Pada umumnya kejahatan penadahan yang sering terjadi dewasa ini adalah kejahatan penadahan barang-barang yang didapatkan dari kejahatan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui putusan Majelis Hakim terhadap tindak pidana penadahan di Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi dan untuk mengetahui akibat hukum putusan Majelis Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap tindak pidana penadahan di Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi. Metode pendekatan yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis Normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti atau mempelajari masalah dilihat dari segi aturan hukumnya, meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Peneliti menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dalam penelitian dengan maksud untuk memberikan argumentasi hukum tentang dasar penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana penadahan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa putusan Majelis Hakim terhadap tindak pidana penadahan di Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi yaitu dalam persidangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum mengajukan fakta-fakta hukum yang berupa saksi-saksi, alat bukti, keterangan terdakwa, dan barang bukti dalam persidangan sehingga dapat diketahui antara keterangan terdakwa dan fakta-fakta tersebut saling sinkron. Oleh karena itu, Majelis Hakim memiliki keyakinan bahwa Para Terdakwa telah terbukti bersalah melakukan tindak pidana penadahan sebagaimana telah diatur dalam Pasal 480 ayat (1) KUHP. Akibat hukum dari putusan Majelis Hakim terhadap tindak pidana penadahan adalah dijatuhkannya pidana dan terdakwa telah mengakui perbuatannya serta berjanji untuk tidak mengulangi perbuatannya. Kata kunci: Tindak Pidanana, Pendahan, Barang Hasil Kejahatan.
IMPLEMENTASI PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA BERBASIS ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC CRIME INVESTIGATION) DALAM PENGUNGKAPAN KASUS YANG MELIBATKAN KELUARGA Eka Setiawati; Siswantari Pratiwi; Saefullah
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i3.17902

Abstract

Pengungkapan berbagai kasus kejahatan yang melibatkan anggota keluarga sebagai pelaku membutuhkan ketelitian dan keberanian aparat penegak hukum, terutama Polisi, dalam tahap penyelidikan maupun penyidikan. Pendekatan penyidikan tindak pidana berbasis ilmiah (scientific crime investigation/SCI) merupakan salah satu strategi yang dikembangkan oleh Polri dengan memanfaatkan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi, khususnya dalam kasus-kasus pembunuhan. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana penerapan SCI dalam kasus pembunuhan berencana yang melibatkan keluarga, dan faktor-faktor apa saja yang menghambat penggunaan pendekatan ini dalam konteks tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus, menggunakan teknik wawancara dan pengamatan dalam pengumpulan data. Polda Metro Jaya telah berhasil menerapkan pendekatan SCI dalam kasus pembunuhan berencana yang melibatkan satu keluarga, termasuk dalam kasus pembunuhan yang melibatkan Harry Aris Sandigon. Pendekatan ini melibatkan berbagai bidang seperti laboratorium forensik, identifikasi, kedokteran forensik, psikologi forensik, dan digital forensik. Beberapa aplikasi yang digunakan antara lain Analisis Forensik Digital, Analisis Forensik Darah dan DNA, serta Analisis Forensik Autopsi Jenazah. Upaya pembuktian berbasis SCI telah berhasil memenuhi target, sehingga tersangka dapat diidentifikasi, ditangkap, dan dijatuhi hukuman mati. Namun, masih terdapat beberapa faktor yang menghambat penerapan SCI dalam kasus-kasus semacam ini, antara lain analisis forensik yang memakan waktu lama, kurangnya kompetensi penyidik, besarnya anggaran yang diperlukan, minimnya sarana dan prasarana, serta belum tersedianya SOP analisis forensik yang lengkap. Kata kunci: Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Berbasis Ilmiah, Keluarga
PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA BAGI ANAK PELAKU KEKERASAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN MATINYA KORBAN Indah Moulina; Siswantari Pratiwi; Saefullah
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i3.17903

Abstract

Tindak pidana tidak hanya dilakukan oleh orang dewasa. Seorang anak juga bisa melakukan hal yang sama. Misalnya kasus pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor: 33/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.JKT.Utr yang mengakibatkan seorang anak tewas dibacok oleh pelaku anak, dan Putusan Nomor 9/PID.SUS-Anak//2020/PT DKI yang mengakibatkan seorang anak tewas di dalam kamar mandi akibat kekerasan yang dilakukan oleh temannya. Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini mengenai Bagaimana Modus dan Motif Anak Melakukan Kekerasan yang Mengakibatkan Matinya Korban pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor: 33/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.JKT.Utr dan Putusan Nomor 9/PID.SUS-Anak//2020/PT DKI? Bagaimana Implementasi Penerapan Sanksi pada Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor: 33/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.JKT.Utr dan Putusan Nomor 9/PID.SUSAnak//2020/PT DKI? Metode Penelitian yuridis normatif. Kesimpulannya Modus yang digunakan para pelaku anak melakukan kekerasan hingga menyebabkan korban meninggal adalah dengan membacok korban dengan clurit, memukul korban dengan menggunakan bambu dan memukul serta memasukan kepala korban ke dalam bak hingga meninggal. Tindakan pelaku anak tersebut merupakan criminal behavior is learned (tingkah laku kriminal dipelajari) yaitu tidak lain dikarenakan pergaulan yang buruk yang mempengaruhi pelaku untuk mempelajari tindakan kriminal. Perlindungan terhadap anak tidak hanya berlaku bagi mereka yang menjadi korban tindak pidana, oleh karenanya implementasi penerapan sanksi terhadap anak perlu dipertimbangkan dengan cermat, dan hukuman seharusnya memberikan manfaat bagi perkembangan anak. Kata kunci: Sanksi Pidana, kekerasan, anak sebagai pelaku
Perlindungan dan Pemanfaatan Cagar Budaya Berbasis Partisipasi di Kota Metro dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya Ganda Kurniawan; Abdul Latif; Siswantari Pratiwi
VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Vision and Ideas (VISA)
Publisher : IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/visa.v5i1.4715

Abstract

The protection and use of cultural heritage as part of building national character is actually not something new in Indonesia. In order to preserve cultural heritage, Law Number 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage was issued. However, a number of problems related to cultural heritage still continue to occur in various regions in Indonesia. This research is qualitative research with a normative approach. Data was obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which were then analyzed interpretively. The results of this research conclude that first, legal protection in the protection and use of cultural heritage is very important because it is the basis for regulations regarding the management of cultural heritage and related aspects. Arrangements for problems that arise and resolution of disputes related to cultural heritage are regulated in Law Number 10 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage. Preventive legal protection provides an opportunity to raise objections while repressive legal protection aims to resolve disputes and is used to resolve disputes. Second, the protection and use of cultural heritage in Metro City has been going well and is in line with the spirit of Law Number 10 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage. Aspects of public participation have appeared in the implementation and benefit-taking processes. This grows in line with the commitment and role of the government which has a direct impact on increasing awareness and participation of stakeholders in the protection and use of cultural heritage. This is demonstrated by the presence of the Cultural Heritage Expert Team, Regional Regulations and Mayor's Regulations related to Cultural Heritage, including local curriculum related to history and Cultural Heritage in the Elementary and Middle School curriculum as well as providing compensation for reduced Land and Building Tax (PBB) to cultural heritage owners.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY PERPETRATOR Bullying THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA Wijaya, Junika Nurhamidah; Johardi, Ali; Pratiwi, Siswantari
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i1.320

Abstract

The elements of the object of a criminal offense are acts carried out by distributing and/or transmitting and/or making accessible electronic information and/or electronic documents. The elements of criminal liability for perpetrators of criminal acts of cyber bullying must fulfill the elements regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law. Even though the highest criminal threat for cyber bullying is only four years in prison, the consequences of this act are very detrimental to the victim, both material and immaterial losses. The crime of cyber bullying can be seen as a result of relatively weak legal consequences or legal instruments. The problem faced is what kind of consequences are experienced by people who have become victims of cyber bullying. In Supreme Court Decision Number 120/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Lbo and Supreme Court Decision Number 95/Pid.Sus/2020/PT Gto, what is the criminal responsibility for those who carry out bullying behavior via social media? A normative legal research approach is used in this research. In conclusion, the impacts experienced by victims of cyber bullying include feeling hurt and afraid, often blaming themselves for the events they experienced, self-harm , experiencing sadness, and even thoughts and intentions to commit suicide. Criminal Responsibility of Perpetrators of Bullying Through Social Media in the Supreme Court Decision Number 120/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Lbo and Supreme Court Decision Number 95/Pid.Sus/2020/PT Gto the defendant of the crime of cyber bullying fulfills the element of responsibility as a subjective element, the defendant able to take responsibility for his actions, and the defendant does not have mental disorders or mental illness according to the Supreme Court decision.