Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.8
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Jurnal Masharif al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah JURNAL PENDIDIKAN GLASSER JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI AVICENNA Berajah Journal Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP) Jurnal Green Growth dan Manajemen Lingkungan Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi GEMBIRA (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Journal of Islamic Communication Studies
Nadia Wulandari
Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pemberitaan Kasus Keracunan Makan Bergizi Gratis dalam Perspektif Halal Food Wulandari, Nadia
Journal of Islamic Communication Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Januari
Publisher : UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jicos.2025.3.1.67-78

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how Kompas.com and Detik.com framed the news about the Free Nutritional Meal Program (MBG) poisoning case and how the two media present or ignore the halal food perspective, especially the halal principle in the news. The analysis employs Robert N. Entman’s framing model, which consists of four elements: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. In defining the problem, Kompas.com frames the incident as a manageable technical issue, whereas Detik.com portrays it as a recurring public health crisis. In diagnosing causes, Kompas.com highlights operational errors, while Detik.com emphasizes SOP negligence and weak oversight. In making moral judgments, Kompas.com tends to present the government as responsive, whereas Detik.com adopts a more critical stance through victims’ accounts and public pressure. Regarding treatment recommendations, Kompas.com underscores administrative evaluation, while Detik.com calls for legal investigation and strengthened supervision. Concerning the halal food aspect, neither media explicitly uses the term halal, yet the analysis indicates that Detik.com’s framing aligns more closely with principles of food safety and cleanliness by highlighting sanitation failures, procedural violations, and irregularities in the food supply chain. Meanwhile, Kompas.com focuses more on administrative recovery, thereby overlooking crucial food safety elements that are part of meeting halal standards.
Co-Authors Agus Ramon, Agus Ananda, Putri Badieah Assegaf Chairani, Shakila Shakila Eka Purwanda EVA OKTAVIDIATI, EVA Farah Sukmawati Wahidah Febrianti, Marlina FITRIANI LUBIS, FITRIANI Kalbuana, Nawang Mardia, Hasnatul Moch. Bahak Udin By Arifin Mukti, Wiji Aziz Hari Nasution, Adam Pirmadi, Ocei Fitri Putri, Dilla Eka Putri, Silvani Ratna Prasasti Suminar Ravenska Tiara Jessica Safitri, Kurnia Siahaan, Ganda Siregar, Sulistianty Fay Triana Wulandari, Triana Tunnisa, Kamila Vip Paramarta Wati, Nopia