Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.71
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FORUM STATISTIKA DAN KOMPUTASI Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Media Statistika Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Specta Journal of Technology Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat NUCLEUS: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Aptekmas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Community Service Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) Javanologi: International Journal of Javanese Studies Equiva Mathematics Education Journal
Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNS
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 92 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Proceedings Education and Language International Conference

 1 
THE COMPARISON OF TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION AND THINK PAIR SHARE WITH GUIDED NOTE TAKING ON RELATION AND FUNCTION VIEWED FROM ADVERSITY QUOTIENT STUDENT Rizky Anggar Kusuma Wardani; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Proceedings of Education and Language International Conference
Publisher : Proceedings Education and Language International Conference

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The research was a quasi-experimental research with a factorial design 2 x 3 aims to determine the comparison of Team Assisted Individualization – Guided Note Taking (TAI-GNT) and Think Pair Share - Guided Note Taking (TPS-GNT) viewed from Adversity Quotient for students’ mathematics achievement. The population of this research were all of Junior High School Students 8th grade in Magetan Regency schools in academic year 2016/2017 whom applied KTSP curriculum. The sampling techniques was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. The data was collected by using methods of documentation, questionnaires on students AQ, and mathematics achievement test. The analysis data technique used two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells, with significance level was 0.05. Based on the study result, it could be concluded that : (1) TAI-GNT learning model made better mathematics learning achievement than TPS-GNT learning model, (2) Climber students got better mathematics learning achievement than Camper students and Quitter students, while Camper students got better mathematics learning achievement than Quitter students, (3) for every learning model, climber student got better mathematic learning achievement than Camper students and Quitter students, while Camper student got better mathematic learning achievement than Quitter student, (4) for every categories AQ, TAI-GNT learning model made better mathematics learning achievement than TPS-GNT learning model.Keywords: Adversity Quotient (AQ), Guided Note Taking (GNT), Mathematics Learning Achievement, Relation and Function, Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Think Pair Share (TPS)
THE COMPARISON OF THINK TALK WRITE AND THINK PAIR SHARE WITH TALKING STICK VIEWED FROM STUDENTS' INDEPENDENT LEARNING EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Doni Susanto; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Proceedings of Education and Language International Conference
Publisher : Proceedings Education and Language International Conference

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research was a quasi-experimental research with 2×3 factorial design. It aimed to determine the learning model between Think Talk Write with Talking Stick (TTW-TS) and Think Pair Share with Talking Stick (TPS-TS) that gave the best achievement on mathematics subject viewed from students' independent learning. The population of this research were all of Junior High School students at the 8th grade in Ngawi Regency, East Java, Indonesia in academic year 2016/2017 which applied KTSP curriculum. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. The data were collected by using methods of documentation, students' independent learning questionnaires, and mathematics achievement test. Data analysis technique used two ways analysis of variance (ANOVA) with unequal cell. According to the research findings, it could be concluded that: (1) students' mathematics achievement which were taught by using TTW-TS is as good as students' mathematics achievement which were taught by using TPS-TS in relation and function material, (2) mathematics achievement of students with high independent learning is better than students with medium and low independent learning, and mathematics achievement of students with medium independent learning is as good as students with low independent learning in relation and function material, (3) in each learning model, mathematics achievement of students with high independent learning is better than students with medium and low independent learning, and mathematics achievement of students with medium independent learning is as good as students with low independent learning in relation and function material (4) in each category of high and medium independent learning, student’s mathematics achievement which were taught by using TTW-TS is better than student’s mathematics achievement which were taught by using TPS-TS and in low independent learning student’s mathematics achievement which were taught by using TTW-TS is as good as student’s mathematics achievement which were taught by using TPS-TS in relation and function material. Keywords: Think talk write, think pair share, talking stick, independent learning, relation and function
THE COMPARISON OF GROUP INVESTIGATION AND THINK PAIR SHARE WITH ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ SELF CONFIDENCE OF EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Ummu Salamah; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Proceedings of Education and Language International Conference
Publisher : Proceedings Education and Language International Conference

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research was a quasi-experimental research with a factorial design 2×3 aims to determine the comparison of Group Investigation (GI) with Assessment for Learning (AfL) through peer-assessment (GI-AfL-Peer) and TPS with AfL through peer-assessment (TPS-AfL-Peer) viewed from self confidence for student’s achievement in mathematics. The population of this research were all of Junior High School students 8th grade in Karanganyar Regency schools in academic year 2016/2017. Research samples obtained by stratified cluster random sampling. The data was collected by using methods of documentation, students’ self confidence questionnaires, and mathematics achievement test. Data analysis technique used two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with unequal cell. According to research result, it could be concluded that: (1) students’ mathematics achievement which applied GI-AfL-Peer better than TPS-AfL-Peer, (2) mathematics achievement of students with high self confidence better than students’ with medium and low self confidence, and mathematics achievement of students’ with medium self confidence as good as students with low self confidence, (3) in each category of self confidence, students’ mathematics achievement which applied GI-AfL-Peer better than TPS-AfL-Peer, (4) in each learning model, mathematics achievement of students with high self confidence better than students’ with medium and low self confidence, and mathematics achievement of students’ with medium self confidence as good as students with low self confidence.Keywords: AfL, GI, peer-assessment, self confidence, students’ mathematics achievement, TPS
Co-Authors Ade Susanti Adhitama, Ria Puan Adzakie, Haabi Luckmanoor Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Ahmad Faqihi, Ahmad Aji Hamim Wigena Al Barra, Andre Fajry Alfa Lutfiananda, Immas Metika Anik Djuraidah Antoni Wibowo Antoni Wibowo Ariati, Lia Arif Rahman Arrazaq, Khamid Muhammad Astutiningsih, Tiyas ‘Aini, Addin Zuhrotul Baharum, Aslina Budi Usodo Budi Usodo BUDIYONO Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyono, Heri Christy, Alexander Yonathan Dewi, Noviana Sukma Doni Susanto dwi hidayati Gustiasih, Restuning Harun Al Rasyid Heri Cahyono Ikawati, Nur Ikhsan Abdul Latif Indriati, Sela Putri Joko Domas, Joko Kananta, Ghaitsa Shafa Cinta Khairina, Fadiah Khamsatul Faizati, Khamsatul Khayati, Fitrotul Khomariah, Nurul Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati, Kiki Riska Ayu Kusuma, Nunung Fajar Kusumo, Fahri Aimar M Mardiyana, M Maharani, Swasti Marchamah Ulfa, Marchamah Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Muhamad Safa’udin, Muhamad Muslikhah, Muslikhah Musmiratul Uyun Musta'in, Ghufron Nanang Nabhar Fakhri Auliya, Nanang Nabhar Nanda Noor Fadjrin, Nanda Noor Ningrum, Hanifah Listya Ni’am, Dafi’ Ichsani Aysar Nughthoh Arfawi Kurdhi, Nughthoh Arfawi Nugroho Arif Sudibyo Nurul Khairiatin Nida Pambudi, Pangesti Arum Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Pradipta Annurwanda, Pradipta Prasetyo, Heri Pratama, Rizcka Indah Hani Prihastini Oktasari Putri Primasari, Dessy Marlinda Purnami Widyaningsih Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Putera Khano, Muhammad Nazhif Abda Putri, Diah Purwaning Putri, Matin Enggar Rahman, Arif Ramadhanti, Fajhria Budi Ririn Setyowati Riyadi Riyadi Riyansyah, Husnun Nur Ghiffari Putri Rizky Anggar Kusuma Wardani Safa’udin, Muhamad Santika, Putri Aura Sena, Arya Bima Setiyowati, Ririn Sidiq, Krisna Sujadi, Imam Sulistyaningsih Sulistyaningsih Suprapto, Suprapto Suryani, S Susanti, Ika Sutanto sutanto sutanto Sutanto Sutanto Tambunan, Nicolas Ray Amarco Tanjung, Andjani Ayu Cahaya Ummu Salamah Utami, Dwi Sari Utin Desy Susiaty Wahyu, Nugroho Lambang Wibowo, Gusti Ngurah Adhi Widiyaningsih, Purnami Winarno, Bowo YAFITA ARFINA MUTI Yekti Widyaningsih Yumaroh, Siti Roqhilu Zaidah Nurul Hasanah