Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.636
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan EduReligia : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jurnal Muhakkamah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Tadris : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Indonesian Journal of International Law Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al-Ijtima: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat At-tahsin: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan At- Ta'lim : Jurnal Pendidikan Marketica: Jurnal Ilmiah Pemasaran Proceeding of International Conference on Humanity Education and Society Al-Ijtimā: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Ahmad Rosidi, Ahmad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Use Of The Erga Omnes Principle In The Implementation Of Decisions Of The State Administrative Court (PTUN) With Permanent Legal Power Laritmas, Selfianus; Gede Yusa, I; Rosidi, Ahmad
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): February 2022
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.258

Abstract

Legal regulation The role of the State Administrative Court in the practice of settling government administration in Indonesia needs to be properly regulated, because in the implementation of the Administrative Court decisions according to Article 116 of Law no. 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 5 of 1986 is a regulation regarding forced money which is not clear and there is no final settlement of a decision that has permanent legal forcethe execution cannot be carried out properly, and the absence of an executive or foundational institution strong law causes the decision of the State Administrative Court to have no power force. Even the State Administrative Court Law does not regulate firmly and clearly regarding the issue of the coercive power of the State Administrative Court's decision, so that in the implementation The decision really depends on the good faith of the State Administration Agency or Official in obey the law. This situation is quite alarming, because the principle of justice is State Administration, to put juridical control in the government to be lost meaning in the Indonesian constitutional bureaucratic system even though the decision should bind the disputing parties and have executive power when they already have a decision that has permanent legal force, according to the legal principle Erga omnes states thatThe decision of the State Administrative Court is publicly binding, not only binding on the disputing parties. This is a consequence of the nature of the state administrative dispute which is a public legal dispute, so that the Administrative Court Decision must bind all interested parties and have the obligation to comply with every decision;This research analyzes the problem, How about The existence of the Implementation of Administrative Court Decisions in the law enforcement system? And Has the execution of the Administrative Court Decision been effective in the law enforcement system. The research methodology used in this study is normative juridical with the approach used is the Statute Approach and the Case Approach, the approach carries out an assessment of laws and regulations related to the central theme of research with the procedure for collecting legal materials. Both Primary and secondary legal materials are collected based on the topic of the problem that has been formulated based on the Legislation which is reviewed comprehensively to provide new legal ideas for legal reform.
Co-Authors Abdul Azis Abdul Basit Ain Sahara Fitri Oktafiani I Gede Yusa Iin Darmiyati Jali, Hasan Juan, Firda Jumadi, Joko Kurnia Pratiwi, Ratri Laritmas, Selfianus Laritmas, Silfianus Moh Ruslan Muhammad Havez Napisa, Ainun Ninin Ernawati Nurcahyo, Edy Nurul Anam, Nurul Pitaloka, Diva Purnomo, Ferdi Bagus Rezha, Muhammad Rofi’ah, Siti Hamidhatur Rohman, Fathor Roisyah, Hannina Sinta, Dewi Surya Saputra, Surya Wahidah, Finadatul Wijaya, Sigit Kusuma Yeni Haerani Zainal Arifin