Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.875
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-MUQARANAH-Jurnal Program Studi Perbandingan Mazhab Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Journal Equity of Law and Governance Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Jurnal Preferensi Hukum (JPH) Jurnal Sains Student Research Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Mesada: Journal of Innovative Research Ameena Journal Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Al Fuadiy: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan
Sukiati Sukiati
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Resolving Marriage Dispensation Cases for Pregnant Women Due to Adultery as Urgent Grounds: An Analysis of Practices in the Simalungun Religious Court Mulyadi Antori; Sukiati Sukiati; Imam Yazid
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 11, No 2 (2024): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v11i2.5117

Abstract

In 2023, the Simalungun Religious Court adjudicated two cases involving marriage dispensations for pregnant women: Decision Number 26/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Sim and Decision Number 62/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Sim. The outcomes of these cases highlighted a significant divergence, with one ruling in favor of the dispensation request while the other denied it. This study aims to analyze both the Islamic and formal legal perspectives regarding marriage for pregnant women, evaluate scholarly views on marriage dispensations, and conduct a comparative analysis of the judicial considerations influencing these decisions. Employing a normative legal research approach, the findings indicate three key points: First, there exists a significant difference among Islamic scholars concerning the validity of marriages involving women pregnant from adultery; while Imam al-Shafi’i and Imam Abu Hanifah accept such marriages under specific conditions, Imam Malik and Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal reject them, regardless of the identity of the husband. Second, marriage dispensations for pregnant women are compatible with Islamic law, as endorsed by several scholars. Legally, the framework for marriage dispensations is provided by the Marriage Law and Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 5 of 2019. Third, Decision Number 26/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Sim, which approved the dispensation, reinforces legal certainty, whereas Decision Number 62/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Sim, which denied it, raises potential issues regarding the predictability of legal outcomes.
Mansour Fakih's Gender Analysis of the Fulfillment of Husband And Wife's Rights and Obligations In Sirri Marriage: Case Study in Padangsidimpuan City, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia Doli Bastian Ali Saputra Nasution; Zainul Fuad; Sukiati Sukiati
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 8, No 1 (2021): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v8i1.2760

Abstract

This study analyzes the practice of sirri marriage in the City of Padangsidimpuan, Province of West Sumatra, Indonesia. The focus of this research is to see whether gender bias occurs according to gender analysis according to Mansour Fakih in fulfilling the rights and obligations of husband and wife in unregistered marriage families in Padangsidimpuan City. This type of research is field qualitative with the approach of Legal Sociology, Legal Psychology, and Anthropology. Based on research findings, unregistered marriages in the city of Padang Sidempuan do not only have an impact on wives and children, but also have an impact on husbands both in the household and in social life including 1) Marginalization, such as husbands having difficulty getting their rights from where they work and it is difficult to get social assistance from the government because they do not have a marriage certificate and family card, 2) Subordination: the impression that women are objects in marriage so that a woman can be published as a wife or kept secret, 3) Stereotypes: Women who are married in unregistered ways are considered mistresses , having an affair, or living at home without being married, 4) Violence: unregistered marriages are prone to domestic violence because there is no evidence that shows the existence of marital ties, and 5) double burden that must be borne by the wife, namely having to earn a living that should be borne by the husband, as well as take care and care for their children
MODELS OF POLYGAMY REGULATION AROUND THE WORLD: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS Agus Salim; Sukiati Sukiati; Iwan Iwan
Al-Muqaranah : Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab Vol 4, No 1 (2026): Al-Muqaranah Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab
Publisher : Al-Muqaranah : Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Polygamy is one of the most controversial issues in Islamic family law, continuously debated from both normative and comparative perspectives. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of polygamy from a comparative law perspective, covering both Muslim-majority countries and those that have undergone significant family law reform. The method employed is normative legal research using a comparative approach and a conceptual approach. Data sources consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed through qualitative-descriptive analysis. The findings indicate three models of polygamy regulation in the Muslim world: first, countries that absolutely prohibit polygamy (such as Tunisia and Turkey); second, countries that permit polygamy under strict conditions through judicial oversight (such as Indonesia and Morocco); and third, countries that permit polygamy with minimal conditions based on classical fiqh (such as Saudi Arabia and Malaysia). These regulatory differences are influenced by historical, political, socio-cultural factors, and local scholarly ijtihad. In conclusion, comparative law demonstrates that there is no single universal model for regulating polygamy in Islam, and each country retains its own authority to interpret and implement Islamic law in accordance with its local context.Keyword: Polygamy; Comparative Law; Islamic Family Law; Law Reform; Marriage.
Hak Ekonomi Perempuan Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Islam: Analisis Gender atas Mahar dan Harta Bersama di Indonesia, Turki, dan Arab Saudi Siti Khodijah MY; Sukiati; Iwan Nasution
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6457

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas hak ekonomi perempuan dalam hukum perkawinan Islam melalui kajian komparatif terhadap tiga negara: Indonesia, Turkey, dan Saudi Arabia. Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya kesenjangan antara fungsi ideal instrumen ekonomi perkawinan khususnya mahar dan harta bersama dengan realitas perlindungan yang diterima perempuan di masing-masing negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem yang paling efektif melindungi hak ekonomi perempuan bukanlah yang paling formal dalam penerapan syari'ah, melainkan yang paling konsisten dalam mewujudkan keadilan substantif. Indonesia berada di posisi tengah dengan kerangka normatif yang kuat namun implementasi belum optimal; Turkey memberikan perlindungan tertinggi melalui rezim harta bersama yang bersifat otomatis; sedangkan Saudi Arabia justru paradoksikal memiliki kewajiban mahar tertinggi namun perlindungan ekonomi perempuan paling lemah. Perbedaan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa hak ekonomi perempuan dalam perkawinan sangat dipengaruhi oleh pilihan sistem hukum negara dan orientasi keadilan gender yang dianutnya.
Rekayasa Hukum (Fraus Legis) Dalam Perkawinan Beda Agama: Studi Komparatif Pengakuan Hukum Antara Singapura Dan Indonesia Pasca Sema No 2 Tahun 2023 Wike Sundari; Sukiati; Iwan
Ameena Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Ameena Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Madinah Al-Aziziyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63732/aij.v4i2.258

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of interfaith marriages involving Indonesian citizens (WNI) conducted in Singapore as a response to national legal restrictions following the enactment of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023. The central issue lies in the conflict between the principle of lex loci celebrationis, which recognizes the formal validity of marriages performed in Singapore, and lex patriae, which requires compliance with material conditions—specifically religious uniformity for Indonesian citizens. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this research aims to analyze the differing roles of religious and civil law in both countries and their legal implications.The findings reveal a fundamental divergence: Indonesia adopts a religious-formalistic system, where religious law constitutes an essential requirement for marital validity, whereas Singapore applies a secular-pragmatic system under the Women’s Charter, separating civil authority from religious doctrine. Marriages conducted by Indonesian citizens in Singapore are considered a form of legal evasion (fraus legis), as they involve an intention to circumvent national law (animus evadendi). SEMA No. 2 of 2023 reinforces the refusal to register such marriages on the grounds of public policy derived from Pancasila values. Consequently, this gives rise to limping marriages, in which couples lack full legal recognition in Indonesia, particularly regarding marital property and inheritance rights. The most significant impact affects children born from such unions, who are legally classified as children born out of wedlock, with limited civil rights and more complex administrative procedures. This study concludes that Indonesia’s current legal policy prioritizes theological legal certainty over the protection of citizens’ civil rights within a global context.
PERAN NEGARA DALAM KODIFIKASI HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA Isman Nuddin Ritonga; Sukiati Sukiati; Iwan Iwan
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Agustus: Jurnal Sains Student Research
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v4i4.10980

Abstract

. Kodifikasi hukum keluarga Islam merupakan bagian penting dari upaya negara dalam mengatur kehidupan masyarakat Muslim secara sistematis melalui perangkat hukum positif. Indonesia dan Malaysia sebagai negara dengan mayoritas penduduk Muslim memiliki pendekatan yang berbeda dalam mengkodifikasi hukum keluarga Islam. Indonesia menggunakan pendekatan nasional melalui Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI), sedangkan Malaysia menerapkan sistem legislatif berbasis negara bagian melalui Islamic Family Law Enactment. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran negara dalam proses kodifikasi hukum keluarga Islam di kedua negara, menelaah substansi regulasi yang berlaku, serta membandingkan kelebihan dan kekurangannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan studi kasus terhadap putusan pengadilan mengenai dispensasi kawin dan poligami. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia memiliki sistem yang lebih terintegrasi secara nasional namun menghadapi tantangan implementasi, sedangkan Malaysia memiliki mekanisme pengawasan yang lebih ketat terhadap praktik keluarga seperti poligami, tetapi regulasinya tidak sepenuhnya seragam antar negara bagian. Secara umum, kedua sistem memiliki kelebihan dan kekurangan masing-masing dalam upaya melindungi hak keluarga Muslim dan menjaga ketertiban hukum
HUKUM PERKAWINAN DI TIMUR TENGAH Rasyid Siddiq; Sukiati; Iwan
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Agustus
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v3i4.11301

Abstract

This study examines marriage law in Middle Eastern countries, focusing on the legal basis, regulations, and dynamics of family law reform in several key countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Tunisia. This study uses normative legal methods with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches to examine how Islamic law is implemented in each country's national legal system. The results show that although Middle Eastern countries share the same normative sources, namely the Qur'an, Hadith, and Islamic jurisprudence, in practice there are significant differences in the form of codification, implementation, and level of marriage law reform. Egypt and Jordan tend to develop moderate family law systems with a codification approach and selection of school opinions (takhayyur), while Saudi Arabia still displays a conservative character based on the Hanbali school of law despite starting to implement legal reforms. On the other hand, Tunisia is the most progressive country, having implemented major reforms in family law, including restrictions on polygamy and strengthening women's rights in divorce. These differences indicate a broad legal spectrum in the marriage legal system in the Middle East, ranging from conservative to progressive. This study concludes that marriage law in the Middle East is dynamic and adaptive to social change, without relinquishing the legitimacy of Islamic law as the primary source of law. Therefore, marriage law in this region reflects the interaction between classical Islamic jurisprudence traditions, state policies, and the demands of modernity in shaping family law.
MARRIAGE LAW IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND SAUDI ARABIA Azhar Nur Mawaddah Gulo; Sukiati Sukiati; Iwan Iwan
Al-Muqaranah : Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab Vol 4, No 2 (2026): Al-Muqaranah Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab
Publisher : Al-Muqaranah : Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Marriage in Islam is an act of worship aimed at building a harmonious family based on the theological values of sakinah (love), mawaddah (love), and rahmah (mercy). However, the implementation of marriage law in various Muslim countries has a diverse knowledge base or epistemology. This study aims to examine in depth the differences in the epistemology of marriage law between Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, and their impact on the protection of domestic rights. Using a qualitative approach in normative-theoretical library research, this study dissects secondary data in the form of regulations in Indonesia and legal practices in Saudi Arabia. The research shows that Indonesia implements a positive codified legal system through Law No. 1 of 1974, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Law No. 16 of 2019, which provides legal certainty through strengthening administration such as marriage registration and tightening requirements for polygamy. In contrast, Saudi Arabia implements an unwritten legal system (uncodified law) rooted in the methodology of the Hambali School, where legal practice relies heavily on the ijtihad of judges and fatwas of religious authorities. This difference has implications for legal protection policies, such as the strict minimum age limit for marriage in Indonesia (19 years), in contrast to Saudi Arabia, which does not set a rigid legal age limit and still recognizes men's unilateral rights in divorce.
Sistem Hukum Perceraian di Indonesia, Maroko dan Tunisia Muhammad Ichwan Zulfadly; Sukiati Sukiati; Iwan Nasution
Mesada: Journal of Innovative Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Yayasan Zia Salsabila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61253/pg68ky63

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan sistem hukum perceraian di Indonesia, Maroko, dan Tunisia dalam perspektif hukum keluarga Islam kontemporer. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum, serta didukung oleh pendekatan historis dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiga negara memiliki kesamaan dalam menjadikan pengadilan sebagai otoritas utama dalam proses perceraian, namun berbeda dalam tingkat intervensi negara dan reinterpretasi terhadap konsep talak. Indonesia menerapkan model integratif yang menggabungkan hukum Islam dengan hukum nasional melalui Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Maroko mengadopsi model reformis melalui Mudawwanah dengan pendekatan yang lebih progresif dalam perlindungan perempuan dan kesetaraan gender. Sementara itu, Tunisia menerapkan model sekular-progresif melalui Code of Personal Status dengan menghapus talak sepihak dan menempatkan perceraian sepenuhnya dalam kewenangan negara. Secara komparatif, perbedaan ini dipengaruhi oleh faktor sosial, politik, dan ideologis masing-masing negara. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa hukum keluarga Islam bersifat dinamis dan adaptif, serta reformasi hukum perceraian di ketiga negara bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keadilan, kemaslahatan, dan perlindungan terhadap perempuan dan anak.
Co-Authors Achmad Yazid Sinulingga Agus Salim Azhar Nur Mawaddah Gulo Denni Herdiansyah Doli Bastian Ali Saputra Nasution Fatimah Gema Rahmadani Harry Permana Hotma Ringan Limbong Imam Yazid Isman Nuddin Ritonga Iwan Iwan Iwan Iwan Nasution Milhan Milhan Muhammad Ichwan Zulfadly Mulyadi Antori Nurasiah Nurasiah Putri Rahma Rasyid Siddiq Septi Angraini Harahap Siti Khodijah MY Sri Fadliati Syafruddin Syam Ulfa Safira Soliha Wike Sundari Zainul Fuad