This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Dinamika Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM DE JURE JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Pagaruyuang Law Journal Journal of Law Science Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Cepalo SIGn Jurnal Hukum Mulawarman Law Review AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP) Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL) LEGAL BRIEF Journal of Judicial Review Hukum Responsif : Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Hukum Malahayati Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Trunojoyo Law Review Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Jurnal Sosial dan Sains Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) SmartComp Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Law & Pass : International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Integralistik Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Trunojoyo Law Review

Reconstructing Environmental Criminal Law in Indonesia Through a Comparative Zemiological Legal Study Fernando, Zico Junius; Sueni, Annisa Sabilla; Arifin, Firdaus; Ramadhani, Susi; Zulaika, Almira Novia
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.31912

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia are increasingly recognized not only as violations of legal norms but also as social and ecological harms affecting communities and ecosystems. However, the existing framework of environmental criminal law remains largely formalistic, emphasizing administrative violations and statutory illegality while insufficiently addressing the broader dimension of socio-ecological harm. This research examines how a zemiological perspective can contribute to the reconstruction of environmental criminal law in Indonesia through a comparative legal study. Using a normative juridical method with statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes Indonesian environmental criminal law alongside developments in Belgium, the European Union, Argentina, Scotland, and the Philippines. The findings demonstrate that Indonesian law continues to rely on formal legality and weak corporate accountability, whereas comparative jurisdictions increasingly recognize severe environmental harm, ecocide, and collective victimization as bases for criminal responsibility. The contribution of this research lies in three main aspects. First, it develops a zemiological framework as a new theoretical basis for evaluating environmental criminal law beyond formal statutory violations, emphasizing social and ecological harm as the central criterion for criminalization. Second, it provides a systematic comparative legal analysis that identifies normative gaps between Indonesian law and emerging global models of harm-based environmental criminal law. Third, it proposes a conceptual model for reconstructing environmental criminal law in Indonesia by integrating the principles of social harm, the recognition of ecocide, and strengthened corporate liability.
Legality and Effectiveness of the DPR’s Aspiration Network System under Administrative Law Maarif, Ihsanul; Arifin, Firdaus; Al Dhaheri, Luma Ali Faraj; Nggilu, Novendri M.; Al Arif, M. Yasin
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.33486

Abstract

The public aspiration management system within Indonesia’s House of Representatives (DPR) operates without a clear framework rooted in administrative law, resulting in procedural ambiguity, weak institutional accountability, and limited meaningful public participation. The aim of this study is to analyze the normative and institutional shortcomings of the House of Representatives’ consultation system; consequently, it seeks to contribute by proposing a conceptual framework grounded in administrative law. Employing normative legal research with a conceptual and statutory approach, this study also draws on a qualitative analysis of institutional documents and academic literature. The findings revealed the absence of standardized regulations governing aspiration procedures, which rendered the system discretionary and resistant to objective evaluation. Aspirations are treated as political functions rather than administrative obligations, undermining the legitimacy of legislative representation. The study recommends institutional and regulatory reforms, including the development of standard operating procedures, a digital aspiration tracking system, and the integration of accountability principles into legislative ethical codes. These findings not only expose institutional deficiencies but also reconceptualize the DPR’s aspiration system within the framework of administrative law. A key theoretical contribution lies in extending the scope of administrative law beyond the executive branch to legislative institutions, particularly in the governance of public participation. Public aspirations are reframed as administrative rights and forms of public service rather than merely political functions. The introduction of a “limited administrative embedding” model provides a structured approach to integrating administrative principles into legislative functions without diminishing their political character.