Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
6.032
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Language and Literature International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL) JURNAL SMART EDUCAFL : E-Journal of Education of English as a Foreign Language Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching) Channing: Journal of English Language Education and Literature Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal Edu-Ling: Journal of English Education and Linguistics ELT-Lectura JURNAL CEMERLANG: Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang JURNAL PERSPEKTIF PENDIDIKAN Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies UTAMAX : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal EDULIA: English Education, Linguistic and Art Journal Linguisic, Literature, and English Education Bakti Nusa Linggau Jurnal Arjuna : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Matematika Sintaksis: Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris Dharma Acariya Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan ELite Journal: International Journal of Education, Language and Literature Masyarakat Mandiri: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pembangunan Lokal
Maria Ramasari
PGRI Silampari University
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 55 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal

 1 
Students Pronounciation Error Made in Speaking for General Communication Maria Ramasari
Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2017): Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (718.791 KB) | DOI: 10.31539/leea.v1i1.32

Abstract

This qualitative research described students pronunciation error mostly appeared in speaking for general communication class. The participants were the first semester students. This research was descriptive method. It involved describing, analyzing, and interpreting of condition that existed. In collecting the data, the researcher used documentation. Based on the result of data analysis, it could be concluded that students made of three types of pronunciation error. The pronunciation errors were pre systematic error, systematic error, and post systematic error. Furthermore, the students dominant error made was pre systematic error. The errors of students made were caused by three sources of students competence error in learning English as Foreign Language. They were interference error, intra lingual error, and developmental error. Key words: pronunciation, error, speaking for general communication.
Students Ability in Producing the Sentences of Simple Present Tense at STMIK Musi Rawas Herlina Herlina; Maria Ramasari
Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2018): Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (637.059 KB) | DOI: 10.31539/leea.v1i2.181

Abstract

This research aimed to find out the students ability in producing the sentences of simple present tense at STMIK Musi Rawas. The research was a qualitative study. As stated in findings, it interpreted that there were 34 students (62.91 percent) in the low category. Thus, there were 15 students (27.50 percent) in the good category. Finally, there were 5 students (9.59 percent) in the excellent category. Hence, it can be concluded that students ability in producing the sentences of simple present tense was still low. It showed that many students still got difficulties in producing the sentences of simple present tense especially for verb in third person singular as the subject pronoun. Keywords: students ability, simple present tense, sentences
Co-Authors Agus Triyogo Aminah Khoiriyah Anggitaria Siahaan Ardayati Ardayati Ardayati Ardayati Ardayati Ardayati Ardayati Ardayati, Ardayati Ayu Ayu Oktaviani Checilia Fristiviona Cintia Novtarina Dafa Alya Nabilla Dendi Saputra Dewi Syafitri Enggie Kharmelita Febria Kumalasari Hamdan Hamdan Hamdan Hamdan Hamdan Herlina Herlina Kartika, Ayumi Ningsih, Ratih Purwasi, Lucy Asri Roselia Putri Lestari Sarkowi Sarkowi Sastika Seli Suwarno, Widiya Juliyanti Syafitri, Dewi Syaprizal, Syaprizal Triananda, Rialisa Ummi Azzara Zuztra Wahyu, Annisa Wicaksono Febriantoro Windi Tri Apriyani Windi Virgia Yadri Irwansyah Yulfi Yulfi Yulfi, Yulfi