Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

The Implementation of the Whistleblowing System in Supporting Good Corporate Governance at PT Angkasa Pura Indonesia Muhammad Faisal Ramadhan; Asmarani Ramli
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.63210

Abstract

The Whistleblowing System (WBS) is one of the instruments that supports the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). This research endeavors to examine the implementation of WBS in reinforcing GCG at the PT Angkasa Pura Indonesia Branch Office of Jenderal Ahmad Yani Airport Semarang, alongside the determinants influencing its efficacy. Utilizing an empirical juridical methodology (socio-legal research) within a qualitative framework, data acquisition was conducted through interviews with three employees, complemented by a comprehensive document analysis of pertinent statutory laws and regulations, internal company regulations, the Annual Report 2025, and relevant scientific literature. The results show that the implementation of WBS has been supported by internal regulations, clear division of authority, and reporting mechanisms that support GCG principles. However, its implementation still needs strengthening, especially in the socialization and understanding of employees about WBS and strengthening the reporting culture (speak-up culture). Based on Soerjono Soekanto's theory of legal effectiveness, the effectiveness of WBS is influenced by legal factors, law enforcement, facilities or facilities, society, and culture.
Between Justice and Development: How the Indonesian Courts Are Handling Land Disputes in the Face of Industrial Expansion Asmarani Ramli; Aprila Niravita; Suhadi Suhadi
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): August, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/56wg3592

Abstract

Land disputes in Indonesia have intensified with rapid industrial expansion, infrastructure development, and agribusiness growth, often pitting local communities against state-backed corporate interests. This study analyzes how Indonesian courts adjudicate land conflicts, particularly those involving indigenous communities, smallholders, and rural populations affected by development projects. Employing case analysis, field observation, and interviews with litigants, judges, and legal aid providers, the research assesses the judiciary’s capacity to uphold land rights and environmental justice amid developmental pressures. Findings reveal a systemic bias favoring formal land title holders—typically corporations or state entities—over customary or informal land claims. Procedural barriers, lack of legal recognition for indigenous tenure, and limited judicial expertise on land law further disadvantage vulnerable claimants. While some progressive rulings exist, their impact remains limited due to weak enforcement and institutional fragmentation. This study’s novelty lies in its intersectional analysis of land, law, and development, offering a critical lens on how legal institutions mediate conflicts in resource governance. It argues that unless the judiciary is empowered and reoriented toward distributive justice, courts risk becoming instruments of dispossession rather than protectors of rights. The study contributes to wider debates on sustainable development, legal pluralism, and judicial independence in resource-rich developing countries.
Strengthening Legal Rights in Disadvantaged Communities: Addressing Housing Injustice and Homelessness Aprila Niravita; Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikri; Rayi Kharism Rajib; Asmarani Ramli; Andika Prawira Buana
Lentera Masyarakat Hukum Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): October, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/rpbbtp73

Abstract

Introduction: Housing injustice and homelessness are significant issues in Indonesia, especially for low-income, marginalized, and urban migrant populations. The lack of affordable housing, coupled with land disputes, eviction threats, and inadequate legal protections, exacerbates social inequalities and economic hardships.Purpose: This paper examines legal interventions designed to address housing injustice and homelessness, focusing on community-based approaches to strengthening legal rights in disadvantaged communities.Method: The research combines case studies of successful legal interventions in housing disputes with interviews from community leaders, legal professionals, and homeless individuals in urban areas.Findings and Results: The study finds that legal services are crucial in helping low-income communities secure affordable housing, challenge evictions, and protect their property rights. However, the lack of affordable housing policies and limited legal aid accessibility remain significant barriers.Urgency: The increasing number of homeless people and housing disputes in urban areas highlights the urgent need for stronger legal protections and policy reforms to address this crisis.Contribution: This paper contributes to the conversation on affordable housing and legal rights by demonstrating how community-driven legal initiatives can help mitigate the effects of housing injustice.Recommendation: The study recommends reforming housing policies, increasing the availability of legal aid services for marginalized communities, and prioritizing affordable housing development.