Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.283
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Tapis : Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam Al-Iqtishad : Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah (Journal of Islamic Economics) AKSES: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Tasfiyah Supremasi Hukum Public Policy : Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik dan Bisnis Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum AKM: Aksi Kepada Masyarakat Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak Khaira Ummah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law Asian Journal of Law and Humanity Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Pratama, Agung Barok
UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Inclusive Development and the Islamic Economic Paradigm: Unveiling Structural and Epistemic Injustices in Indonesia Inayati, Anindya Aryu; Pratama, Agung Barok; Faristiana, Andhita Risko; Mulyawisdawati, Richa Angkita
Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 17 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v17i2.46359

Abstract

Inclusive economic development is a constitutional mandate aimed at achieving economic democracy, social justice, and public welfare. However, these goals are often hindered by structural barriers and dominant perspectives that marginalize vulnerable groups. This article analyzes how structural and epistemic injustices shape inclusive development in Indonesia through the lens of the Islamic economic paradigm. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach grounded in policy documents, legal texts, and critical literature, this study employs thematic analysis. The findings show that development policies tend to prioritize elite capital accumulation and large-scale projects, while neglecting the voices and local knowledge of marginalized communities. By integrating the ethical values of ‘adl, maṣlaḥah, and ta‘āwun, with epistemological critique, this article argues that genuine inclusivity requires not only institutional reform or Islamic philanthropy, but also participatory governance and the rethinking of dominant perspectives. Keywords: inclusive development; epistemic injustice; islamic economic paradigm; structural injustice   Abstrak Pembangunan ekonomi inklusif merupakan amanat konstitusi untuk mewujudkan demokrasi ekonomi, keadilan sosial, dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Namun, praktik pembangunan kerap dibatasi oleh struktur dan cara pandang dominan yang meminggirkan kelompok rentan. Artikel ini menganalisis ketidakadilan struktural dan epistemik dalam pembangunan inklusif di Indonesia melalui paradigma ekonomi Islam. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif dan analisis tematik terhadap dokumen kebijakan, teks hukum, dan literatur kritis, penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan pembangunan masih berorientasi pada kepentingan elite dan proyek berskala besar, serta mengabaikan suara kelompok rentan. Dengan mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai adl, maṣlaḥah, dan ta‘āwun, artikel ini menegaskan bahwa inklusivitas sejati menuntut reformasi kelembagaan, tata kelola partisipatif, serta peninjauan ulang cara berpikir dominan. Kata kunci: pembangunan inklusif; ketidakadilan epistemik; paradigma ekonomi islam; ketidakadilan struktural
Partial Egalitarianism And Marital Instability: The Role Of Ambivalent Gender Ideology In Driving Latent Conflict Among Javanese Couples, Indonesia Fuad, Iwan Zaenul; Fateh, Mohammad; Inayati, Anindya Aryu; Pratama, Agung Barok; Imana, Anis Ni'am
Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak (PSGA) IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/yinyang.v21i1.15349

Abstract

The gender roles played by husbands and wives have considerable impacts on the stability of marriage. However, marital instability can lead to divorce. Egalitarian (nontraditional) gender roles cause negative effects on marital stability. This research tried to reveal the perception of married couples in Java about their gender roles, whether egalitarian or traditional. This study found the fact that in general, husband and wife who become respondents tend to choose egalitarian (non-traditional) gender roles, even though in three aspects they still adhere to the patriarchal (traditional) gender role, most of them reject the concept of: (a) household leadership based on agreement (not on sex); (b) the possibility of providing cost of living from wife to husband; and (c) household expenses are shared responsibility. Moreover, the egalitarian gender perception of the respondents has negative impact on marital stability. Fortunately the impact is not significant.
Co-Authors Akhmad Jalaludin, Akhmad Aldila Leo Saputra Alfianalia, Alfianalia Aminah . Andhita Risko Faristiana Anindya Aryu Inayati Arum, Dewi Sekar Asyria Yamin, Tsinta Aufi Imaduddin Barok Pratama, Agung Fadzlina, Nurul Auliya Hilmi Yusron Rofi'I IMANA, ANIS NI'AM Isthifailla, Isthifailla Iwan Zaenul Fuad Khasanah, Rohmatun Leo Saputra, Aldila Manasikana, Arina Mohammad Fateh Mohammad Jamin Muhammad Yusron Noorma Fitriana M. Zain, Noorma Fitriana Putri, Sofi Ekiana Richa Angkita Mulyawisdawati, Richa Angkita Risqiani, Rifatul Saputri, Tiara Ika Umam, Muhammad Rizal Yusron Rofi'i, Hilmi