Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.893
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Geografi : Media Informasi Pengembangan dan Profesi Kegeografian Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori dan Praktik) Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Abdimas PHB : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Progresif Humanis Brainstorming J-PIPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial) Geodika: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pendidikan Geografi GEOGRAPHY : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Jurnal Abdidas International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL) Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia GEOGRAPHIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Geografi El-Jughrafiyah : Jurnal Geografi dan Terapannya Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review (IJRER) JP (Jurnal Pendidikan) : Teori dan Praktik Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia International Journal of Educational Research Proceeding of The International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Innovation
Pradika Adi Wijayanto
Pendidikan Geografi Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang
Religion Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Geografi : Media Informasi Pengembangan dan Profesi Kegeografian

 1 
EVALUASI KUALITAS INSTRUMEN TES DALAM PEMBELAJARAN GEOGRAFI DI MAN 2 KOTA BATU Wijayanto, Pradika Adi; Allifah, Aimmaul; Amirrudin, Ach
Jurnal Geografi Vol 13, No 2 (2016): July 2016
Publisher : Jurnal Geografi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of the test instrument. The instrument could be qualified and worthyif meets certain requirements include good quality language, validity, reliability, level of difficulty, anddistinguish. Data used in the form of daily test questions code A and B geography class X IPS MAN 2 KotaBatu. This is evaluative research. Based on the survey results revealed (1) the test instrument in accordancewith the basic competencies and learning indicators; (2) the language quality which used in daily geographytest still less valid; (3) the validity of the test questions was not good yet; (4) The coefficient reliabilitybetween code A and B questions are medium; (5) code A questions dominated by easy level of difficulty whilecode B questions dominated by medium level of difficulty; (6) distinguish power of the questions showed thatboth code A and B were bad.
EVALUASI KUALITAS INSTRUMEN TES DALAM PEMBELAJARAN GEOGRAFI DI MAN 2 KOTA BATU Wijayanto, Pradika Adi; Allifah, Aimmaul; Amirrudin, Ach
Jurnal Geografi : Media Informasi Pengembangan dan Profesi Kegeografian Vol 13, No 2 (2016): July 2016
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jg.v13i2.7969

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of the test instrument. The instrument could be qualified and worthyif meets certain requirements include good quality language, validity, reliability, level of difficulty, anddistinguish. Data used in the form of daily test questions code A and B geography class X IPS MAN 2 KotaBatu. This is evaluative research. Based on the survey results revealed (1) the test instrument in accordancewith the basic competencies and learning indicators; (2) the language quality which used in daily geographytest still less valid; (3) the validity of the test questions was not good yet; (4) The coefficient reliabilitybetween code A and B questions are medium; (5) code A questions dominated by easy level of difficulty whilecode B questions dominated by medium level of difficulty; (6) distinguish power of the questions showed thatboth code A and B were bad.
Co-Authors Ach Amirrudin, Ach Ach. Amirudin Aimmaul Allifah, Aimmaul Amirudin, Ach. Andhika Rizqy Heristama Apik Budi Santoso Arifien, Moch Arinata, Firdian Setiya Aulia, Diska Berliana, Alfina Putri Bintang Wicaksana, Muhammad Guruh Dewi Liesnoor Setyowati Dwi Intan Rahmawati Elok Ayu Khumaerok Ertika Subekti Erni Kurniawati Ferani Mulianingsih Ferani Mulianingsih Fina, Ika Nura Fithri, Aulia Syafira Fithri, Aulia Syafira Fithri Syafira Fitri, Aulia Syafira Fitriana, Dwi Afni Heri Irawan Heri Tjahjono Heristama, Andhika Rizqy Heristama, Andika Rizqy Hilmy M. A. F, Jihan Ihza Ikhsan, M Nur Jamhur, Jamhur Juhadi Juhadi M. Rifky Abu Zamroh Maulana, Muhammad Afwan Moch. Arifien Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mubarak, Muh Azhar Muhammad Fatkhur Rizal Muhammad, Qais Ray Munawaroh, Eem Mutiara R, Zalza Bela Nabila, Erva Destianti Nafi’ah, Khoirima Nafi’ah, Khoirima Ni'maturrodhiyah, Ni'maturrodhiyah Ni’maturrodhiyah Ni’maturrodhiyah Novianti, Tiara Annisa Novianti, Tiara Annisa Nurul Laeli P, Galih Mahardika Christian Prasetyo, Selamet Dwi Pratomo, Vitho Puspitasari, Jerry Raihan, Rafi Naufal Thariq Rizal, Muhammad Fatkhur Rizal, Muhammad Fatkhur Rizki Astuti, Maidika Rossi Galih Kesuma, Rossi Galih Saadah, Nuris Salisa, Dziya Nikmatul Sari, Alifa Ambar Satya Budi Nugraha Shintya Novita Rahmawati, Shintya Novita Siti Ekowati Rusdini, Siti Ekowati Subekti, Elok Ayu Khumaerok Ertika Subekti, Elok Ayu Khumaerok Ertika Sugeng Utaya Suyahmo Suyahmo Tiara Annisa Novianti Tiesya Valvina Pramaysela Tjaturahono Budi Sanjoto Utaya, Sugeng Vina Nurul Husna Wahid Akhsin Budi Nur Sidiq, Wahid Akhsin Budi Nur Wicaksana, Muhammad Guruh Bintang Winarni, Erin Dian