Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.454
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Elemen Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) Jurnal ABDINUS : Jurnal Pengabdian Nusantara Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M) MATHEdunesa JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JOMP) Mathematics Education Journal Journal on Mathematics Education
Yurizka Melia Sari
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education

 1 
An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding Sari, Yurizka Melia; Valentino, Erik
(JRAMathEdu) Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education Vol. 1, No. 2, July 2016
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i2.3380

Abstract

Based on PISA survey in 2012, Indonesia was only placed on 64 out of 65 participating countries. The survey suggest that the students’ ability of reasoning, spatial orientation, and problem solving are lower compare with other participants countries, especially in Shouth East Asia. Nevertheless, the result of PISA does not elicit clearly on the students’ inability in solving PISA problem such as the location and the types of student’s errors. Therefore, analyzing students’ error in solving PISA problem would be essential countermeasure to help the students in solving mathematics problems and to develop scaffolding. Based on the data analysis, it is found that there are 5 types of error which is made by the subject. They consist of reading error, comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error. The most common mistake that subject do is encoding error with a percentage of 26%. While reading is the fewest errors made by the subjects that is only 12%. The types of given scaffolding was explaining the problem carefully and making a summary of new words and find the meaning of them, restructuring problem-solving strategies and reviewing the results of the completion of the problem.
An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding Yurizka Melia Sari; Erik Valentino
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Vol. 1, No. 2, July 2016
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i2.3380

Abstract

Based on PISA survey in 2012, Indonesia was only placed on 64 out of 65 participating countries. The survey suggest that the students’ ability of reasoning, spatial orientation, and problem solving are lower compare with other participants countries, especially in Shouth East Asia. Nevertheless, the result of PISA does not elicit clearly on the students’ inability in solving PISA problem such as the location and the types of student’s errors. Therefore, analyzing students’ error in solving PISA problem would be essential countermeasure to help the students in solving mathematics problems and to develop scaffolding. Based on the data analysis, it is found that there are 5 types of error which is made by the subject. They consist of reading error, comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error. The most common mistake that subject do is encoding error with a percentage of 26%. While reading is the fewest errors made by the subjects that is only 12%. The types of given scaffolding was explaining the problem carefully and making a summary of new words and find the meaning of them, restructuring problem-solving strategies and reviewing the results of the completion of the problem.
Co-Authors Abdul Haris Rosyidi Afsari, Fadilla Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Alfianita, Nova Febrian Ali Shodikin Aliya, Afifa Alvenna Nursyafira Anjani, Karlina Anjasari, Tika Arfiansyah, Noval Ilham Arlinwibowo, Janu Asteria, Prima Vidya Auni, Anggita Dewi, Alvi Setya Kurnia Dini Kinati Fardah Dwi Purwoko El Milla, Yulia Izza ENDANG SUSANTINI Erik Valentino Fatima, Gupita Nadindra Feriyanto Feriyanto Fiangga, Shofan Fikky Dian Roqobih Haq, Muhammad Dani Izzul Jamil, Siti Nur Amalina Kurniasari, Santi Lestari, Widy Martin, Azzahra Cahyaning Marzuqi, Muhammad Ilyas Masitah Shahrill, Masitah MASRIYAH Masriyah Masriyah Minarsih, Ni Made Marlin Nafis, Tazkiyatun Nurul Fadilah, Nurul Prayogo, Mochammad Reval Ardhi Yudi Puspaningtyas, Nicky Dwi Putra, Riza Dhifa Alzabarjud Putri, Taszkia Aulia Putriani, Desi Rahayu, Dwi Shinta Rahmawati, Nabila Neva Rini Setianingsih Rooselyna Ekawati Sholihah, Umi Mar’atus Shubhiy, Annisa Nadiya Fauziyah Siti Farida Suprapto Suprapto Valentino, Erik