Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.745
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-ATHFAAL : JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN ANAK USIA DINI Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Husada: Health Sciences Journal Jurnal Ners Jurnal Aisyah : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan TA'DIB Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika International Journal Corner of Educational Research (IJCER) JISIP UNJA (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik Universitas Jambi) Journal of Community Service for Health JARSI
Heni Anggraini, Heni
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Students’ Word-Problem Errors Identified Through Newman’s Procedure in a Problem-Based Learning Classroom Anggraini, Heni; Surya, Ed
Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): October - December 2025
Publisher : Education and Talent Development Center Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51574/kognitif.v5i4.2638

Abstract

Low mathematics achievement, particularly in solving word problems, remains a persistent challenge for students. This study aims to analyze (1) whether students’ errors in solving word problems through the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model are lower than those in conventional learning, (2) whether students’ mastery learning in the PBL model is higher than that in conventional learning, and (3) how well students are able to solve mathematical word problems based on Newman’s procedure when taught using the PBL model. A mixed methods approach was employed, combining a quasi-experimental design with a qualitative descriptive method. Data were collected through written tests for the quantitative component and in-depth interviews for the qualitative component. The quantitative data were analyzed using an Independent Sample t-test. The findings indicate that students taught with the PBL model experienced a notable reduction in errors across all stages of Newman’s procedure. These results demonstrate that the PBL model effectively minimizes student errors, increases mastery learning, and strengthens students’ ability to solve mathematical word problems. Overall, the study recommends the use of the PBL model in mathematics classrooms to foster deeper understanding and enhance the relevance of learning to students’ everyday experiences.
Co-Authors Achmad Asrori Anggraini, Silvia Ani Kristianingsih Anum, Adelina Dani Amran Hakim Kanada Komariyah Lala Maharani, Dwi Mustafa Kamal Nasution, Mustafa Kamal Nasor, Nasor Ningsih, Tri Riwayati Rahimah, Rahimah Ridho Fitri, Febri Rosmawati, Dwi Rumadani Sagala Safhira Maharani, Tria Sari, Nina Ayu Puspita Siti Maesaroh Surya, Ed Windari, Fitri Wulan Dhari, Putri