p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.598
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Cakrawala Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi) Jurnal Psikologi Integratif Tumbuh Kembang Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi Journal of Disability Studies Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Inquiry: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan PEDAGOGIA AL-ATHFAL : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ANAK Journal of Psychological Science and Profession Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan VISI : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Non Formal Cakrawala Dini : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia PSYCHE 165 Journal Psikogenesis Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Mind Set Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Psychosophia: Journal of Psychology, religion, and humanity Jurnal Paedagogy Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Psikoborneo : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi) Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan MANASA, Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Psyche 165 Journal Psycho Idea Psychological Research on Urban Society Buletin Psikologi International Journal of Science Education and Cultural Studies Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Eruditio : Indonesia Journal of Food and Drug Safety JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi) SOSIO KONSEPSIA: JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN KESEJAHTERAAN SOSIAL KONSELOR Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : KONSELOR

Agentic Engagement in Education: A Systematic Review of its Characteristics, Factors, and Impacts (2011–2024) Utami, Rany Aprilia; Kurniawati, Farida
KONSELOR Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02024134104-0-86

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the concept of agentic engagement, a form of proactive student involvement in learning defined by self-directed behaviours such as expressing preferences, seeking clarifications, and actively shaping the instructional environment. Previous research on engagement has predominantly focused on behavioural, emotional, and cognitive dimensions, making agentic engagement—which was introduced in 2011—a novel branch in the study of student engagement. Consequently, this review analyses studies published between 2011 and 2024, sourced from five major databases: Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, and Taylor & Francis. We identified and thoroughly reviewed a total of 15 eligible articles across three key dimensions: (1) characteristics of students exhibiting agentic engagement, (2) factors contributing to the development of agentic engagement, and (3) the impacts of agentic engagement on students' learning. Additionally, an in-depth analysis addresses ways to enhance agentic engagement through an intervention called the Autonomy-Supportive Intervention Program (ASIP). This analysis suggests that agentic engagement is a vital educational aspect, benefiting students by fostering academic resilience, self-efficacy, motivation, and school adjustment, while also reducing test anxiety. Teachers can cultivate supportive learning environments that foster student agentic engagement with the help of ASIP. The implications of agentic engagement extend beyond traditional classroom settings, providing valuable insights into student-centred practices that encourage self-determination and active participation. Furthermore, understanding agentic engagement can guide teachers in gaining deeper insights into their students and help them identify those who require greater encouragement or motivation. Additionally, counsellors can design targeted interventions to enhance agentic engagement in learning. This literature review highlights the transformative potential of agentic engagement in education, especially in school settings, and suggests promising avenues for future research. 
Academic Flow: A Systematic Review of the Influencing Factors and Their Impacts on Students Jayati, Eva Agustina; Kurniawati, Farida
KONSELOR Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02025141107-0-86

Abstract

Flow is a source of mental energy because it focuses on attention and motivates the individual to perform an action. The concept of flow was developed by a psychologist named Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Csikszentmihalyi studied the flow phenomenon in the 1970s and found that individuals who experience flow will feel total involvement in an activity, which then leads them into an optimal experience. On the other hand, students need academic flow to successfully complete lectures, study, and work assignments. This study aims to determine and to explore factors and impacts of flow for university students. This study used a systematic literature review method based on the PRISMA flow diagram. This study used data from 13 eligible and credible articles. The results demonstrated that students can strive to achieve flow by understanding related factors and impacts. In addition, the abilities are required for educators to foster academic flow. Therefore, although flow is a condition related to students‘ internal conditions, this study shows that flow can also be influenced by external factors.
A Systematic Literature Review on Technostress in Post-COVID-19 Education: Psychological Stressor, Antecedents, Mitigation Strategies, and the Role of Counseling Vermila, Ayu; Kurniawati, Farida
KONSELOR Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02025141111-0-86

Abstract

This systematic literature review (SLR) explores technostress among educators in post-COVID-19 education. While technostress—stress caused by technology use—has been extensively studied in non-educational settings, its impact on educators remains underexamined, particularly as the pandemic accelerated digital adoption in teaching. This review addresses this gap by analysing the key stressors associated with technology, their underlying causes, their effects on educators, and potential mitigation strategies, including the role of counselling.  We used the PRISMA guidelines to search six academic databases (Emerald Insight, ProQuest, Taylor & Francis, SAGE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 that look specifically at tech-related stress among teachers. The search initially yielded 1,142 articles, with 23 meeting the inclusion criteria for in-depth analysis. The findings reveal that excessive digital workloads, the complexity of new technological tools, work-life imbalance, and inadequate institutional support are primary contributors to technostress. These challenges are further exacerbated by limited training and resources. Additionally, individual factors such as digital competence, self-efficacy, and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) play a significant role in determining educators’ ability to cope with technology-related stressors. This review provides valuable insights into the challenges of technostress and outlines strategies for intervention. The findings offer practical recommendations for educational institutions, policymakers, and counsellors to create more sustainable and supportive digital learning environments.
Agentic Engagement in Education: A Systematic Review of its Characteristics, Factors, and Impacts (2011–2024) Utami, Rany Aprilia; Kurniawati, Farida
KONSELOR Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02024134104-0-86

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the concept of agentic engagement, a form of proactive student involvement in learning defined by self-directed behaviours such as expressing preferences, seeking clarifications, and actively shaping the instructional environment. Previous research on engagement has predominantly focused on behavioural, emotional, and cognitive dimensions, making agentic engagement—which was introduced in 2011—a novel branch in the study of student engagement. Consequently, this review analyses studies published between 2011 and 2024, sourced from five major databases: Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, and Taylor & Francis. We identified and thoroughly reviewed a total of 15 eligible articles across three key dimensions: (1) characteristics of students exhibiting agentic engagement, (2) factors contributing to the development of agentic engagement, and (3) the impacts of agentic engagement on students' learning. Additionally, an in-depth analysis addresses ways to enhance agentic engagement through an intervention called the Autonomy-Supportive Intervention Program (ASIP). This analysis suggests that agentic engagement is a vital educational aspect, benefiting students by fostering academic resilience, self-efficacy, motivation, and school adjustment, while also reducing test anxiety. Teachers can cultivate supportive learning environments that foster student agentic engagement with the help of ASIP. The implications of agentic engagement extend beyond traditional classroom settings, providing valuable insights into student-centred practices that encourage self-determination and active participation. Furthermore, understanding agentic engagement can guide teachers in gaining deeper insights into their students and help them identify those who require greater encouragement or motivation. Additionally, counsellors can design targeted interventions to enhance agentic engagement in learning. This literature review highlights the transformative potential of agentic engagement in education, especially in school settings, and suggests promising avenues for future research. 
Academic Flow: A Systematic Review of the Influencing Factors and Their Impacts on Students Jayati, Eva Agustina; Kurniawati, Farida
KONSELOR Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02025141107-0-86

Abstract

Flow is a source of mental energy because it focuses on attention and motivates the individual to perform an action. The concept of flow was developed by a psychologist named Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Csikszentmihalyi studied the flow phenomenon in the 1970s and found that individuals who experience flow will feel total involvement in an activity, which then leads them into an optimal experience. On the other hand, students need academic flow to successfully complete lectures, study, and work assignments. This study aims to determine and to explore factors and impacts of flow for university students. This study used a systematic literature review method based on the PRISMA flow diagram. This study used data from 13 eligible and credible articles. The results demonstrated that students can strive to achieve flow by understanding related factors and impacts. In addition, the abilities are required for educators to foster academic flow. Therefore, although flow is a condition related to students‘ internal conditions, this study shows that flow can also be influenced by external factors.
A Systematic Literature Review on Technostress in Post-COVID-19 Education: Psychological Stressor, Antecedents, Mitigation Strategies, and the Role of Counseling Vermila, Ayu; Kurniawati, Farida
KONSELOR Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02025141111-0-86

Abstract

This systematic literature review (SLR) explores technostress among educators in post-COVID-19 education. While technostress—stress caused by technology use—has been extensively studied in non-educational settings, its impact on educators remains underexamined, particularly as the pandemic accelerated digital adoption in teaching. This review addresses this gap by analysing the key stressors associated with technology, their underlying causes, their effects on educators, and potential mitigation strategies, including the role of counselling.  We used the PRISMA guidelines to search six academic databases (Emerald Insight, ProQuest, Taylor & Francis, SAGE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 that look specifically at tech-related stress among teachers. The search initially yielded 1,142 articles, with 23 meeting the inclusion criteria for in-depth analysis. The findings reveal that excessive digital workloads, the complexity of new technological tools, work-life imbalance, and inadequate institutional support are primary contributors to technostress. These challenges are further exacerbated by limited training and resources. Additionally, individual factors such as digital competence, self-efficacy, and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) play a significant role in determining educators’ ability to cope with technology-related stressors. This review provides valuable insights into the challenges of technostress and outlines strategies for intervention. The findings offer practical recommendations for educational institutions, policymakers, and counsellors to create more sustainable and supportive digital learning environments.
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Airin Yustikarini Saleh Aldri Frinaldi Alza, Nadatuljannah Ambar M.R.S Amidha, Siti Anisa Anita Cristy Anjani, Siti Dwita Arina Isyalhana Arman, Andi Nur Zamzam Atikah, Denisa Nurul Ayuningtyas, Aradewi Laksmi Bijak Aditia Hutomo Bodrorini, Nany Brigitta Dyah Utami Immanuella Citraningrum, Dian Asri Cut Mellyza Rizka Damas, Risa Ramadhany Dea Karlina Denisa Nurul Atikah Dewi Kumalasari Dewi, Marvella Cynthia Dias Amartiwi Putri Gavinta Dina Permata Sari Dominika Arthalia Ayunda Putri Dwintasari, Yulinda Elizabeth Kristi Poerwandari, Elizabeth Kristi Eunike Karina Nadine Matitaputty Faradilla, Ayuzha Tidar Fatin Rohmah Wahidah Firosyana Rizki Amalia Handayani, Eko Handayani, Eko Handayani, Izmi Hanifah Sabila Hasna Hafizhah Salma Hesti Purnamasari Hutomo, Bijak Aditia Intan, Reno Irene Cathrin Shalomnita Hale Isyalhana, Arina Izmi Handayani Jarar, Syeda Parsa Jaswandi, Lathiffida Noor Jayati, Eva Agustina Jesslin, Jesslin Jimny Hilda Fauzia Josiana Levyadi Karima, Raisa Karimah, Afifah Nurul Karina Adistiana Kharisma Hakiki Kusumasari Kartika Hima Darmayanti Lusianti, Erita Maridha Normawati Matitaputty, Eunike Karina Nadine Maulidina, Nila Alya Mujiati, Sri Nina Oktarina Nisa, Aulia Zahratun Nissa Amalia Novianti, Amalia Noviyanti, Evi Nurani Fitriyah Nurfitriyanie Nurfitriyanie Pinta Palupi Primasari Rafika Tasya Nesia Rahmania El Barusi, Atika Reno Intan Reno Intan Risa Ramadhany Damas Risma Uli, Aan Rose Mini Agoes Salim Sabila, Hanifah Safitri, Fathia Afrazayne Safitri, Shahnaz Santi Maria Permatasari Septiana Arini Situmorang, Dominikus David Biondi Sulistami Prihandini Tjut Rifameutia Tjut Rifameutia Tjut Rifameutia Utami, Nadia Rahma Utami, Rany Aprilia Vermila, Ayu Wahyuni Christyani Martono Zahara Zahara