Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

SOSIALISASI JARINGAN GAS PERKOTAAN BAGI MASYARAKAT Ristawati, Arinda; Prima, Andry; Yulia, Prayang Sunny; Kurniawati, Riskaviana; Puspitosari, Meldinar Riska; Fattahanisa, Aqlyna; Wijayanti, Puri; Aryanto, Reza
Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia (JAMIN) Vol 5 No 1 (2023): JURNAL ABDI MASYARAKAT INDONESIA (JAMIN)
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/jamin.v5i1.15730

Abstract

Socialization of the utilizations and advantages of city gas is a community service that aims to make people understand the growth of the urban gas distribution sector in Indonesia and provide information to the public about LPG substitute economic energy sources. Gas network for households means distributing gas through pipes to households. The limited availability of household gas in DKI Jakarta made this socialization theme raised. The location chosen is the Tanjung Gedong area, Tomang-sub distrct, Grogol Petamburan district, West Jakarta, which in this case, the area is a densely populated area, especially family settlements. The participants who took part in this community service were housewives.  The method used is to provide socialization about the urban gas network developed by the government for household gas purposes, the socialization is carried out online with the zoom facility and some others offline in the community while still using the existing health protocol. The result of this community service activity is that the public is able to recognize and understand the existence of a gas network whose infrastructure development is being developed by the government through PT PGN Tbk. This community service makes the community clearly aware of the flow in the “jargas” development program.
ANALISIS PEMANFAATAN SURFAKTAN MINYAK JELANTAH KONSENTRASI RENDAH UNTUK PROSES PENINGKATAN PEROLEHAN MIGAS Ibnu, Muhammad; Lestari Said; Puri Wijayanti; Pauhesti Rusdi; Samsol; Yulia, Prayang Sunny
Jurnal Eksakta Kebumian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL EKSAKTA KEBUMIAN (JEK)
Publisher : Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/jek.v3i2.10078

Abstract

Abstrak Pada tahap pengembangan untuk meningkatkan perolehan minyak bumi terdiri dari 3 tahapan yaitu:primary recovery, secondary recovery, dan tertiary recovery (Enhanced Oil Recovery). Penelitian menggunakan metode Enhanced Oil Recovery di laboratorium Enhanced Oil Recovery Universitas Trisakti. EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery). terdiri dari injeksi kimia,injeksi uap panas, injeksi gas, dan injeksi microbial. Metode EOR yang dilakukan pada penelitian adalah injeksi surfaktan. Konsentrasi surfaktan yang digunakan 0,3%, 0,4%, dan 0,75% dengan variasi temperatur 30o C dan 70o C. Prosedur penelitian diawali dengan pembuatan brine dan pembuatan surfaktan. Kemudian perhitungan sifat fisik larutan dan perhitungan sifat fisik batuan sampel. Pada Surfaktan konsentrasi 0,2%, 0,3%, 0,4%, 0,5%, dan 0,75% dilakukan uji IFT (Interfacial Tension) untuk mendapatkan nilai CMC (Critical Micelle Concentration). Nilai CMC berada di 0,4% pada temperatur 30o C dan 70o C. Kemudian dilakukan saturasi minyak, dilanjutkan dengan injeksi brine dan injeksi surfaktan didapat recovery faktor. Dari penelitian, didapat hasil Recovery faktor yang dilakukan pengujian di konsentrasi 0,3%, 0,4%, dan 0,75% di temperatur 30o C didapat RF sebesar 33%, 45,8%, dan 42,2%. Recovery factor pada konsentrasi 0,3%, 0,4%, dan 0,75% di temperatur 70o C sebesar 37,2%, 55%, dan 46,7%. Dihasilkan recovery faktor yang paling bagus di konsentrasi 0,4% di temperatur 30o C dan 70o C   Kata kunci: Enhanced Oil Recovery,injeksi kimia,injeksi surfaktan, minyak jelantah.   Abstract At the development stage to increase oil recovery, it consists of 3 stages, namely: primary recovery, secondary recovery, and tertiary recovery (Enhanced Oil Recovery). The study used the Enhanced Oil Recovery method in the Enhanced Oil Recovery laboratory at Trisakti University. EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery). consists of chemical injection, hot steam injection, gas injection, and microbial injection. The EOR method used in this study is surfactant injection. The surfactant concentrations used were 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.75% with variations in temperature of 30o C and 70o C. The research procedure began with making brine and making surfactants. Then the calculation of the physical properties of the solution and the calculation of the physical properties of the rock samples. At 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.75% surfactants, the IFT (Interfacial Tension) test was performed to obtain the CMC (Critical Micelle Concentration) value. The CMC values were at 0.4% at 30oC and 70oC. Then oil saturation was performed, followed by brine injection and surfactant injection to obtain recovery factor. From the research, it was found that the recovery factor was tested at concentrations of 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.75% at a temperature of 30o C. The RF was 33%, 45.8%, and 42.2%. Recovery factors at concentrations of 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.75% at a temperature of 70o C were 37.2%, 55%, and 46.7%. The best recovery factor was obtained at a concentration of 0.4% at temperatures of 30o C and 70o C.   Keywords: Enhanced Oil Recovery, chemical injection, surfactant injection, waste cooking oil
ANALYSIS OF GEOTHERMAL WELL PRODUCTION CAPABILITY BASED ON OUTPUT CURVE AND WELLBORE SIMULATION IN AAP FIELD Putri, Alayda Aisyah; Malinda, Marmora Titi; Yulia, Prayang Sunny; Pramadika, Havidh
Petro : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/petro.v14i3.23215

Abstract

The assessment of geothermal well production capability plays a crucial role in optimizing geothermal energy generation systems. This study focuses on evaluating the performance of two geothermal wells, ZM-42 and ZM-31, located in the AAP Field, by developing output curves through wellbore simulation techniques. The analysis utilizes field production test results, well casing configuration data, and PTS (Pressure, Temperature, and Spinner) survey data to generate key parameters such as wellhead pressure, fluid flow rate, fluid temperature, enthalpy, and vapor fraction (dryness). These parameters are essential for understanding the thermal and flow characteristics of each well. Wellbore simulations were conducted using specialized software to replicate the flow behaviour of geothermal fluids within the well system. The output curves produced provide a graphical representation of the relationship between wellhead pressure and mass flow rate under various operating conditions. Validation of the simulation was done by comparing the generated curves with actual field measurements. The results show that well ZM-31 demonstrates a higher production capability compared to ZM-42. ZM-31 recorded a flow rate of 96.61 kg/s and an enthalpy of 1134.5 kJ/kg, with a vapor fraction of 0.14. In contrast, ZM-42 exhibited a lower flow rate of 85.60 kg/s, enthalpy of 1027.7 kJ/kg, and a vapor fraction of 0.11. These differences indicate superior separation efficiency and thermal performance in ZM-31. Furthermore, ZM-31’s production is dominated by a single feed zone, while ZM-42 relies on multiple contributing zones. In conclusion, based on output curve analysis and well simulation results, ZM-31 is recommended as the primary production well for further optimization in the AAP geothermal field, contributing to more efficient and reliable energy output.