Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Peter's Motive for Quoting Proverbs 11:31 as an Encouragement to Be Righteous Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano; Kiamani, Andris; Sualang, Farel Yosua
Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat Vol 9 No 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Simpson Ungaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46445/ejti.v9i1.860

Proverbs 11:31 is an Old Testament passage of wisdom quoted by Peter in 1 Peter 4:18. Based on the literature search, there are two interpretations related to this intertextual use of Scripture, namely talking about retribution or divine justice and moral responsibility. But it was found that previous studies did not mention anything about Peter's motive in quoting this wisdom literature narrative. Therefore, this study aims to specifically examine Peter's motives in quoting this Old Testament passage. There are strong implications of the Wisdom literature exhortations quoted by Peter as an encouragement to the early church to choose to live as righteous people. Therefore, this research used qualitative methods with a sub-interpretive design, specifically wisdom literature hermeneutics and literature study. This article finds that Peter's motivation for encouraging the believers was that they should never envy the oppressors and persecutors because those who reject the gospel will suffer more than anything Christians have to face in this life. God is just, and His judgment will apply to everyone, including the wicked. Peter's motive for quoting the Old Testament also serves as a theological and practical guide for believers, enabling them to live in a way that reflects their faith and trust in God's final judgment and deliverance.

Inklusio dan Paralelisme dalam Relasi Ciptaan dan Pencipta Berdasarkan Mazmur 150:1-6 Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano; Kiamani, Andris
KHAMISYIM: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani Vol 2, No 2 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Alkitab Batu, Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71415/jkmy.v2i2.35

Two poetic literary forms stand out in Psalm 150:1-6: the thirteen times the phrase "praise the Lord" is part of parallelism (synonymy, synthesis, and climax) and the word "hallelujah" as an inclusio at the beginning and end of the text. Many researchers often overlook the richness of meaning and the extraordinary literary features of the poem in this section, because they focus only on examining the context of the structures that correlate and imply praise. This study aims to explore the rich meanings of parallelism and inclusio, which have profound implications for the relationship between creation and creator. Based on the qualitative hermeneutic method of poetic literature, this study found the main reasons for creation to praise its creator, namely: First, recognition of God's sovereignty; Second, gratitude for God's grace and salvation; Third, response to God's faithfulness. This research is an important reference to open insights for every believer to realize that the main task as a creation is to praise and glorify the Creator.AbstrakDalam Mazmur 150:1-6 terdapat dua bentuk sastra puisi yang sangat menonjol yakni, ada tiga belas kali frase “pujilah Tuhan” yang merupakan bagian dari paralelisme (sinonim, sintesis dan klimaks) dan kata “Haleluya” sebagai inklusio di awal dan akhir teks. Penelitian sebelumya sering mengabaikan kekayaan makna dan ciri khas sastra puisi yang luar biasa dalam bagian ini, karena terfokus hanya meneliti konteks struktur yang berkorelasi dan berimplikasi dengan pujian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali kekayaan makna paralelisme dan inklusio yang sangat berdampak bagi relasi ciptaan dan pencipta. Berdasarkan metode kualitatif hermeneutik sastra puisi, maka penelitian ini menemukan alasan utama ciptaan memuji PencipataNya, yakni: Pertama, pengakuan kedaulatan Allah; Kedua, syukur atas kasih karunia dan keselamatan dari Allah; Ketiga, respons terhadap kesetiaan Allah. Penelitian ini sebagai rujukan penting dalam membuka wawasan bagi setiap orang percaya untuk menyadari tugas utama sebagai ciptaan yakni memuji dan meninggikan Sang Pencipta. Kata kunci: Mazmur, Ciptaan, Pencipta, Haleluya, Pujilah Tuhan

Analisis Makna Frase “Lembu Jantan Kedua”: Studi Eksegese Hakim-Hakim 6:25-26 Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano; Kiamani, Andris
Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Berita Hidup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38189/jtbh.v7i2.634

The book of Judges 6 is a book that tells the life of the Israelites during the time of the Judges, and one of the most famous stories is about the life of Gideon, an outstanding judge. In verses 25-26 there is an unusual line of narration, which readers will find odd, concerning the "second bull." Any reader would ask, why the second bull? Why not the first bull? Where is the first bull? Dominic Rudman has specifically researched this part of the text, but has not formulated a definitive answer and no other studies have specifically analyzed this phrase. Many interpretations of this phrase, too, are often based on thematic and historical interpretations of Gideon's narrative, without regard to the context of the verse. Since there are very few studies oriented towards this phrase and in order to find its exact meaning, this article analyzes the phrase "second bull" using a qualitative method based on hermeneutic exegesis. This article finds three important meanings of the phrase "the second bull": firstly, it refers to the oxen as per the meaning of the text; secondly, it refers to the oxen set aside for the Lord; and thirdly, it refers to Gideon's obedient response to the Lord. The results of this study have added exegetical and theological insight and value to support a better understanding of this phrase in the book of Judges. Kitab Hakim-hakim 6 merupakan kitab yang menceritakan kehidupan bangsa Israel pada masa Hakim-hakim, dan salah satu kisah yang terkenal adalah mengenai kehidupan Gideon, seorang hakim yang luar biasa. Pada ayat 25-26 terdapat alur narasi yang tidak biasa, karena dinilai janggal oleh para pembaca, mengenai “lembu jantan kedua.” Setiap pembaca akan bertanya, mengapa harus lembu jantan kedua? Mengapa bukan lembu jantan yang pertama? Di mana lembu jantan yang pertama? Dominic Rudman telah secara khusus meneliti bagian teks ini, tetapi tidak merumuskan jawaban yang dapat dijadikan acuan secara pasti serta belum adanya penelitian lain yang secara spesifik, yang menganalisis frase ini. Banyak interpretasi terhadap frase ini juga, sering didasarkan pada tafsiran tematis dan historis dari narasi Gideon, tanpa memperhatikan konteks ayat tersebut. Dikarenakan sangat sedikit penelitian yang berorientasi dalam pembahasan frase ini dan untuk menemukan makna yang pasti, maka artikel ini menganalisis frase “lembu jantan kedua” dengan metode kualitatif berdasarkan study hermeneutik eksegesis. Artikel ini menemukan ada tiga makna penting dari frase “lembu jantan kedua” yakni: pertama, frase ini merujuk kepada lembu tambun sesuai makna teks; kedua, frase ini merujuk kepada lembu yang dikhususkan bagi Tuhan; dan ketiga, frase ini merujuk kepada respons ketaatan Gideon terhadap Tuhan. Hasil penelitian ini, telah menambah wawasan dan nilai eksegetis dan teologis untuk mendukung pemahaman yang lebih baik terhadap frase ini dalam kitab Hakim-hakim.

DARI “EPISTATA” KEPADA “KURIOS”: STUDI NARATIF TEOLOGIS PENGAKUAN PETRUS BERDASARKAN LUKAS 5:1-11 Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano
Jurnal Amanat Agung Vol 19 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Amanat Agung Vo. 19 No. 2 Desember 2023
Publisher : STT Amanat Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47754/jaa.v19i2.653

Dalam narasi Lukas 5:1-11, terdapat sebuah perubahan sapaan dan pengakuan yang dilakukan oleh Petrus kepada Yesus. Perubahan ini, muncul dari panggilan “epistata” yang artinya guru kepada “Kurios” yang artinya Tuan yang juga merujuk kepada Tuhan. Perubahan panggilan ini sangat menarik, sehingga harus diteliti secara spesifik. Dalam penelusuran literatur, fenomena ini, kadang terabaikan karena pembahasan lebih difokuskan kepada konteks keseluruhan narasi. Berdasarkan metode kualitatif, studi naratif teologis, maka penelitian ini menemukan tiga nilai penting dari perubahan panggilan Petrus ini, yakni : pertama, pengenalan akan keilahian Yesus; kedua, kesadaran akan dosa dan ketidaklayakan diri; dan ketiga panggilan untuk menjadi murid yang mengikuti Tuhan. Hasil penilitian ini memberikan pengetahuan dan informasi kepada orang percaya, dan memperkaya eksplorasi biblika.

PERSPEKTIF STANDAR KECANTIKAN TERHADAP EMOSI WANITA BERDASARKAN KIDUNG AGUNG 1:5-6 Loiksoklay, Pulela Dewi; Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano; Siahaya, Nally Beatrikh Kartini
Jurnal Teologi RAI Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Teologi RAI - Edisi April
Publisher : STT-RAI Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63276/jurnalrai.v1i1.17

The unwritten standard of beauty for women is white and clean. As a result, women face more emotional distress to achieve ideal beauty, but this standard of beauty is challenged in Song of Songs 1:5-6, which calls black and beautiful. This study is motivated by the gap in researchers who provide an understanding of the opposition to emotional distress from the standard of beauty from the perspective of women who say I am black but beautiful. The method used in writing this journal is qualitative with a literal study approach. In this writing, the author attempts to see and provide an understanding of the existence of self-acceptance beyond beauty standards based on Song of Songs 1:5. Thus, this research found that a false perspective of beauty can affect women's emotional disorders if it is not accompanied by self-acceptance and self-love.

PERSPEKTIF QŌHELET MENCAPAI “FINISHING WELL” DALAM STRUKTURPERALELISME KOMPARATIF BERDASARKAN PENGKHOTBAH 7:8 7:8 Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano
Jurnal Teologi RAI Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Teologi RAI - Edisi Desember
Publisher : STT-RAI Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63276/jurnalrai.v1i3.68

This study examines the concept of "finishing well," which appears in the structure of comparative parallelism, as an emphasized Qōhelet perspective. This verse temporarily contrasts the beginning and the end, indicating that the end is better when done with patience and wisdom. In the literature search, it was found that the study of this text is rarely done, as it is often included in the discussion of the advice of wisdom in this passage. Based on the method of hermeneutic study of the sub-genre of wisdom literature, this study found that there are three perspectives of Qōhelet that encourage one to achieve "finishing well," namely: first, patience as the main factor; second, focusing on the goal; third, avoiding pride. These are the main factors that should be applied to achieve a glorious ending. Every child of God should make these factors the basis of character building in order to persevere to the end.

Analisis Makna Frase “Lembu Jantan Kedua”: Studi Eksegese Hakim-Hakim 6:25-26 Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano; Kiamani, Andris
Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Berita Hidup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38189/jtbh.v7i2.634

The book of Judges 6 is a book that tells the life of the Israelites during the time of the Judges, and one of the most famous stories is about the life of Gideon, an outstanding judge. In verses 25-26 there is an unusual line of narration, which readers will find odd, concerning the "second bull." Any reader would ask, why the second bull? Why not the first bull? Where is the first bull? Dominic Rudman has specifically researched this part of the text, but has not formulated a definitive answer and no other studies have specifically analyzed this phrase. Many interpretations of this phrase, too, are often based on thematic and historical interpretations of Gideon's narrative, without regard to the context of the verse. Since there are very few studies oriented towards this phrase and in order to find its exact meaning, this article analyzes the phrase "second bull" using a qualitative method based on hermeneutic exegesis. This article finds three important meanings of the phrase "the second bull": firstly, it refers to the oxen as per the meaning of the text; secondly, it refers to the oxen set aside for the Lord; and thirdly, it refers to Gideon's obedient response to the Lord. The results of this study have added exegetical and theological insight and value to support a better understanding of this phrase in the book of Judges. Kitab Hakim-hakim 6 merupakan kitab yang menceritakan kehidupan bangsa Israel pada masa Hakim-hakim, dan salah satu kisah yang terkenal adalah mengenai kehidupan Gideon, seorang hakim yang luar biasa. Pada ayat 25-26 terdapat alur narasi yang tidak biasa, karena dinilai janggal oleh para pembaca, mengenai “lembu jantan kedua.” Setiap pembaca akan bertanya, mengapa harus lembu jantan kedua? Mengapa bukan lembu jantan yang pertama? Di mana lembu jantan yang pertama? Dominic Rudman telah secara khusus meneliti bagian teks ini, tetapi tidak merumuskan jawaban yang dapat dijadikan acuan secara pasti serta belum adanya penelitian lain yang secara spesifik, yang menganalisis frase ini. Banyak interpretasi terhadap frase ini juga, sering didasarkan pada tafsiran tematis dan historis dari narasi Gideon, tanpa memperhatikan konteks ayat tersebut. Dikarenakan sangat sedikit penelitian yang berorientasi dalam pembahasan frase ini dan untuk menemukan makna yang pasti, maka artikel ini menganalisis frase “lembu jantan kedua” dengan metode kualitatif berdasarkan study hermeneutik eksegesis. Artikel ini menemukan ada tiga makna penting dari frase “lembu jantan kedua” yakni: pertama, frase ini merujuk kepada lembu tambun sesuai makna teks; kedua, frase ini merujuk kepada lembu yang dikhususkan bagi Tuhan; dan ketiga, frase ini merujuk kepada respons ketaatan Gideon terhadap Tuhan. Hasil penelitian ini, telah menambah wawasan dan nilai eksegetis dan teologis untuk mendukung pemahaman yang lebih baik terhadap frase ini dalam kitab Hakim-hakim.

Paralelisme Dan Metafora Dalam Amsal 4:18-19: Analisis Jalan Orang Benar Dan Orang Fasik Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano
Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan Kerusso Vol 10 No 1: Jurnal Teologi & Pelayanan Kerusso - Maret 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Injili Indonesia Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33856/kerusso.v10i1.445

In The parallelism and metaphors found in the structure of Proverbs 4:18-19 highlight the difference between the choice to be righteous or wicked. Parallelism ensures that the wisdom conveyed can be easily remembered and applied, while metaphor enriches the moral message in a way that stirs emotions and imagination. This parallel structure strengthens the narrative about the choice of life paths, accompanied by the implementation of each individual's decision. Meanwhile, the metaphor depicts the final outcome of each choice. This research aims to serve as a life contemplation for everyone to choose the path of righteousness. Based on a hermeneutic study of the wisdom literature subgenre, this method includes structural analysis of parallelism and poetic devices such as metaphors, as well as exploring its theological meaning within social and cultural contexts, along with its implementation in the ethical and moral lives of individuals. The research identifies three life contemplations: first, the path of the righteous is always illuminated by blessings and promotion; second, the path of the wicked is always in darkness and leads to punishment; and third, the path of the wicked is always a stumbling block. The results of this study affirm that the wisdom in Proverbs remains relevant to modern life. By understanding and applying its principles, one can build a life that is wiser, more moral, and oriented toward God's will, both in personal, spiritual, and social contexts.

Dosa “Iri Hati” dalam Kumpulan Amsal 3:31; 14:30; 23:17 serta Implikasinya terhadap Pergaulan Gen-Z Manurung, Irenza Artanauli; Hukum, Clarita; Kapang, Fredy; Pattinaja, Aska Aprilano
Jurnal Teologi Pambelum Vol 4 No 2 (2025): JTP Februari 2025
Publisher : Unit Penerbitan Informasi dan Teknologi Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Gereja Kalimantan Evangelis (STT GKE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59002/jtp.v4i2.110

The sin phrase "envy" appears only three times in the entire book of Proverbs, namely Proverbs 3:31; 14:30; 23:17, and this sin has a very negative impact on Gen-Z because it can trigger behavior without ethics and morals. In the literature search, there is a research gap in discussing this sin specifically and comprehensively because the discussion is often combined in wisdom advice and book structure. The purpose of this study is to specifically and comprehensively analyze this sin and its negative impact on the spiritual development of Gen-Z. Based on the hermeneutic method of the subgenre of wisdom literature, this study found that there are four negative effects, namely: first, destructive comparisons; second, emotional health problems; third, spiritual deterioration; and fourth, damaged relationships. This research is a contribution for counselors and educators to better understand and reach out to Gen-Zs who are bound by the sin of envy.

Sebuah Kontemplasi Mengandalkan Tuhan Di Era Disrupsi: Studi Analisis Paralelisme Antitesis Berdasarkan Mazmur 20:8-9 Aska Aprilano Pattinaja; Jacob Latumahina
Jurnal Ilmiah Tafsir Alkitab Vol. 1 No. 2: JUITA (Jurnal Ilmiah Tafsir Alkitab) 2024
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Injili Indonesia Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69668/juita.v1i2.16

Era disrupsi adalah suatu kondisi di mana nilai-nilai kebenaran mulai tergeser dan hilang dari akar dalam kehidupan manusia. Salah satu hal yang memprihatinkan adalah keputusan manusia, termasuk orang percaya, untuk lebih mengandalkan kekuatan diri sendiri dan faktor lain, seperti uang, kekayaan, status, jabatan dan kekuasaan. Berdasarkan paparan di atas, maka penelitian ini dilakukan sebagai bentuk kontemplasi dan peringatan bagi orang percaya agar sadar dan kembali mengandalkan Tuhan. Melalui studi hermeneutik sub genre sastra penafsiran puisi, maka penelitian ini menemukan beberapa hal penting: Pertama, memilih mengandalkan Tuhan atau tidak adalah pilihan kehendak bebas setiap manusia; Kedua, menaruh harapan dan kepercayaan sepenuhnya kepada Tuhan adalah pilihan yang sangat tepat; Ketiga, hasil akhir dari mereka yang mengandalkan Tuhan adalah keberhasilan dan kesuksesan. Penelitian ini berfungsi sebagai peringatan bagi orang percaya untuk berhati-hati dalam memilih, agar tidak mengabaikan kebergantungan kepada Tuhan.

Title

Found 58 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 58 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 58 Documents
Search