Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.762
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin JGuruku: Jurnal Penelitian Guru LamLaj Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Rasji
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Awang Long Law Review

 1 
OMNIBUS LAW COPYRIGHT WORK REVIEWED FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW Sofian; Rasji
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (307.153 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v4i1.244

Abstract

This research aims for omnibus law copyright work reviewed from the philosophy of law. The research method used is normative legal research. Research is descriptively analytical. Data collection techniques are carried out by way of literature studies. The results of the study showed the Omnibus Law Copyright Work Reviewed From the Philosophy of Law, it is seen that the Law to be created through the establishment of omnibus copyright law only pursues legal certainty in the field of the investment itself and forgets the principle of justice. Where the government's current goal continues to encourage the entry of foreign investors into the country, this can be seen from the onslaught of government actions, including omnibus law regulations and policies. Omnibus Law is known in Indonesia after the President of Indonesia delivered it in a state of the nation address at his inauguration as President before the MPR session on October 20, 2019. Omnibus law is the focus of the president to solve the problem of overlapping regulations and bureaucracy. The hope is that the omnibus law can provide good service for the community and attract foreign investors to invest in Indonesia.
THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN SUPREME COURT DECISION NO. 675 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2025 FOR WORKERS Imanuela, Pricillia; Rasji
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1898

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Judicial Review as a substantive corrective legal remedy against Supreme Court cassation decisions that fail to grant the full scope of workers’ normative entitlements in cases of unilateral termination of employment, as well as to identify the critical barriers that limit workers’ access to such remedies. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and case-study approach, focusing on a critical analysis of Supreme Court Decision No. 675 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2025. The findings conclude that Judicial Review holds significant potential as a safeguard for justice in correcting discrepancies in cassation decisions that grant only a minimal portion of workers’ rights. However, this potential is hindered by two layers of constraints: regulatory uncertainty due to the absence of specific provisions on Judicial Review within the Law on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, and practical obstacles arising from the Supreme Court’s restrictive judicial posture combined with the high financial and temporal burdens imposed on workers. It is recommended that the Supreme Court issue a Supreme Court Regulation easing the requirements for Judicial Review for workers based on the favor laboris principle, in order to realise substantive justice that is prompt, simple, and cost-efficient.
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPOSITION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON PERPETRATORS OF HOMICIDE OFFENSES WITH PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA Banjarnahor, Shalom Inka Nauli; Rasji
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1932

Abstract

A person suffering from a mental disorder cannot be held criminally responsible, as stipulated in Article 44 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. However, some judges still impose criminal sentences on defendants with mental disorders. One example is Supreme Court Decision Number 1675K/Pid/2024, which concerns a murder case committed by an individual diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia. This study aims to examine the legal basis and juridical considerations used by judges in rendering their verdicts, as well as to analyze how Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code is applied to perpetrators of murder who suffer from Paranoid Schizophrenia. The author adopts a qualitative normative legal research method, focusing on legal norms contained in legislation, court decisions, and prevailing societal norms. Based on the findings, in Supreme Court Decision Number 1675K/Pid/2024, the panel of judges applied a strict interpretation of Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Although the defendant was proven to suffer from Paranoid Schizophrenia, the judges concluded that the disorder did non entirely eliminate the defendant’s awareness or ability to be held responsible for his actions. Furthermore, the application of Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code to individuals with mental disorders requires careful evaluation of their mental condition based on expert psychiatric assessments. However, in judicial practice, disparities in interpretation and application of this article still occur.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE ANNULMENT OF LAND GRANTS DEEDS AND THE LIABILITY OF THE LAND DEED OFFICIAL IN DEED EXECUTION Kartika, Yenni; Rasji
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1957

Abstract

The Deed of the Land Deed Official plays an essential role in guaranteeing legal certainty over the transfer of land rights. However, in practice, violations of formal requirements often occur, such as the failure to read the deed before the parties. This study aims to analyze the validity of a deed of grant that was not read in the presence of the parties, as well as the legal liability of the Land Deed Official for executing a deed that does not comply with the prescribed procedures. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a case study analysis of Decision Number 298/Pdt.G/2021/PN Kpg. The results of the study indicate that a Land Deed Official’s deed that is not read before the parties constitutes a deed with a formal defect, causing it to lose its status as an authentic deed and, consequently, depriving it of full legal evidentiary strength. In addition, a Land Deed Official who neglects the obligation to read the deed may be held legally liable administratively, civilly, as well as ethically under professional conduct standards. In conclusion, the reading of the deed before the parties is not merely a procedural formality, but rather constitutes a form of legal protection and a moral responsibility of the Land Deed Official to ensure validity and fairness in every legal act concerning land affairs.
Co-Authors Abdullah Zimah, Amelia Adre Wiradi, Dio Alexander Nainggolan, Matthew Apriza, Nathania Arya Salwa Aurel Aprilia Annisya Trisetya Aurelius Steven Beale Ayi Meidyna Sany Banjarnahor, Shalom Inka Nauli Bayu Prasetyo, Bayu Bravo, Antonio Christian Samuel Lodoe Haga Delicia, Nadya Frisca Desy Agatha Sari Eka Aprilia Ellen Juwita, Dhiny Farell David Trawocoadji Farhan Muhammad Ramadhan Febriany Fernandha, Rizqy Dini Giovanni Cornelia Goldwen, Filshella Graciella Azzura Putri Ananda Harry Harmono Ida Kurnia Imanuela, Pricillia Inas Tsabitah, Talitha Jedyzha Azzariel Priliska Jusuf Habibie Hasta, Baharuddin Kartika, Yenni Louissa Nobel Tan Matheus, Juan Melia Metanoya, Finsri Michele Fedryca Michelle Audrey Serena Neshya Rusli, Vennia Noble Effendi, Kevin Octavia, Christine R. Rahaditya R.M. Gatot P Soemartono Rafliyansyah Rheina Aini Safa’at Sandra Dewi Putri Pahlawan Sebastian Matondang, Matthew Mikha Shalom Inka Nauli Banjarnahor Siregar, Yovanka Angela Sofian Syahril, Shintamy Nesyicha Syamsiar, Syamsiar Tabitha Roulina Anastasya Vera Tua Tobing Whisnu Aji P. S Yohanes Yuniati Zayyan Syafiqah Aggistri