Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

JANJI (JABAR HIJI ANTI KORUPSI) SEBAGAI INOVASI INDEKS PERSEPSI KORUPSI KABUPATEN/ KOTA DI JAWA BARAT Jaelani, Elan; Mindar R, Encep; Novia, N Santi; Zulvia, Ransya Ayu
Lex Jurnalica Vol 21, No 1 (2024): LEX JURNALICA
Publisher : Lex Jurnalica

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/lj.v21i1.7483

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tingginya angka korupsi di Jawa Barat. Berdasarkan data statistik KPK, terdapat lebih dari 100 kasus penindakan tindak pidana korupsi di Jawa Barat dalam satu dekade terakhir. Fokus permasalahan yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini adalah korupsi yang terjadi pada pemerintahan Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Barat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menurunkan angka korupsi di Jawa Barat sebagai upaya mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan yang bersih dan berkualitas dengan cara meningkatkan angka Indeks Persepsi Korupsi di lingkungan pemerintahan Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Barat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dapat diketahui bahwa: 1) Pemerintahan Kabupaten/Kota memberikan kontribusi terbesar terhadap akumulasi angka korupsi di Jawa Barat; 2) Bidang pelayanan perizinan menjadi ruang lingkup utama terjadinya korupsi di Pemerintahan Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Barat; 3) Melakukan pengukuran secara berkala sebagai bentuk mitigasi sekaligus parameter untuk mengukur Indeks Persepsi Korupsi di Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Barat. Solusi yang ditawarkan pada penelitian ini adalah sebuah model survei yang berfungsi sebagai instrumen untuk mengukur Indeks Persepsi Korupsi di Jawa Barat di bidang pelayanan perizinan. Model survei tersebut bernama “JANJI” yang merupakan singkatan dari kalimat “Jabar Hiji Anti Korupsi”. 
Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi in the Formation and Development of Islamic Law Anwar, Saiful; Malik, Deden Abdul; Zulvia, Ransya Ayu; Fauziansah, Silvanus; Fitrianto, Bambang; Anwar, Syahrul
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 3 No 2 (2024): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v3i2.88

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role and contribution of Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi in forming and developing Islamic law. These two groups of thought emerged in the 2nd century Hijriah with different approaches to interpreting the sources of Islamic law. This study uses a qualitative research type with a descriptive-analytical approach. The primary data in this study are classical and modern literature relevant to the thoughts of Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi. Data sources include classical Islamic law books, books, and scientific articles that discuss the methodology of these two groups. Data collection techniques are carried out through library research by analyzing primary and secondary texts. The collected data are analyzed using content analysis techniques, which aim to explore the methodological patterns of the two groups in interpreting Islamic law. The study results show that despite having different methodological approaches, both seek to uphold Islamic law by maqashid al-sharia. Ahl Al-Hadith contributed to the birth of the Maliki and Hanbali schools, emphasizing the text's authority. At the same time, Ahl Ar-Ra’yi played a role in introducing the flexible ijtihad method popularized by Abu Hanifah. This approach was later balanced by Imam Syafi'i, who integrated text and reason into his ushul fiqh. This study concludes that the differences in methodology between Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi not only enrich the treasury of Islamic law but also provide a mechanism for adapting Islamic law to changing times while maintaining the basic principles of sharia.
ANALISIS METODE PENEMUAN HUKUM ISLAM DALAM KONTEKS DINAMIKA SOSIAL MODERN Zulvia, Ransya Ayu; Prasetia, Riky; Jihad, Fitri; Syahidin, Rosyad; Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v10i3.9786

Abstract

This study analyzes the methods of Islamic legal reasoning in addressing modern social dynamics, focusing specifically on the application of qiyas, istihsan, maslahah mursalah, and al-urf. The research aims to identify and evaluate the relevance and effectiveness of these methods in providing solutions to contemporary issues. Employing a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis, the study examines various literature and primary sources related to Islamic legal methodology and its application in modern contexts. The findings reveal that these four methods remain highly relevant and can be harmoniously integrated to address modern challenges. Qiyas serves as the primary method closely aligned with the texts, istihsan provides flexibility in specific circumstances, maslahah mursalah considers the common good, and al-urf acknowledges the socio-cultural context of society. The study concludes that the successful implementation of these Islamic legal methods depends on balancing the steadfast principles of sharia with the flexibility needed to navigate social changes. Penelitian ini menganalisis metode penemuan hukum Islam dalam menghadapi dinamika sosial modern, dengan fokus khusus pada penerapan metode qiyas, istihsan, maslahah mursalah, dan al-urf. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis relevansi serta efektivitas metode-metode tersebut dalam memberikan solusi terhadap problematika kontemporer. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis deskriptif, mengkaji berbagai literatur dan sumber primer terkait metodologi hukum Islam serta aplikasinya dalam konteks modern. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keempat metode tersebut masih sangat relevan dan dapat diintegrasikan secara harmonis dalam merespons tantangan modernitas. Qiyas berperan sebagai metode prioritas yang lebih dekat dengan nash, istihsan memberikan fleksibilitas dalam kondisi khusus, maslahah mursalah mempertimbangkan kemaslahatan umum, serta al-urf memperhatikan konteks sosial budaya masyarakat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan implementasi metode-metode penemuan hukum Islam bergantung pada kemampuan untuk menyeimbangkan antara keteguhan prinsip syariah dengan fleksibilitas yang dibutuhkan dalam menghadapi perubahan sosial.
PERLINDUNGAN HAK PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI HUKUM Malik, Deden Abdul; Ningrum, Novita Ardiyanti; Zulvia, Ransya Ayu; Alfani, Feralda Septya; Aisah, Putri Maharani Rahma; Saebani, Beni Ahmad
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 3a (2024): September-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i3a.10718

Abstract

Protection of the rights of persons with disabilities in Indonesia is generally regulated through various statutory regulations, one of which is Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities. However, various challenges arise due to stigma, discrimination and a lack of public understanding of the rights of people with disabilities.. The aim of this research is to determine the factors that cause social stigma towards people with disabilities, to determine efforts to overcome social stigma towards people with disabilities and legal protection. The methodology used in this research is juridical-empirical law with a qualitative paradigm with a legal sociology approach. Factors that cause social stigma towards people with disabilities are not receiving support from their families, a lack of self-will to develop, as well as negative stigma from society. Efforts to overcome social stigma towards people with disabilities include that the families of people with disabilities must provide support, people with disabilities must have the self-confidence to develop, and the community is given education through outreach regarding the prohibition of discrimination against people with disabilities.
PEMAJAKAN EKONOMI DIGITAL DI INDONESIA: TANTANGAN KONSEPTUAL DAN YURIDIS DALAM PENERAPAN SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC PRESENCE Hidayat, Agi Attaubah; Anwari, Amalia Nur; Sugiarti, Lilis Diah; Zulvia, Ransya Ayu; Najmudin, Nandang
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i3.3619

Abstract

The digital economy transformation challenges the relevance of the Permanent Establishment principle in Indonesia’s tax system. As a response, the Significant Economic Presence (SEP) concept was introduced to tax foreign digital entities without physical presence. This study aims to examine the conceptual and legal challenges in implementing SEP in Indonesia. The method used is normative-juridical with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that SEP implementation faces legal uncertainty, conflicts between domestic and international norms, and lacks clear technical parameters. While SEP holds potential for promoting fiscal justice, its ambiguous legal basis risks creating discrimination unless supported by regulatory reform and international cooperation. This study highlights the urgency of harmonizing tax laws and strengthening institutional capacity to meet global digital taxation challenges.