Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Pdeode dengan Bantuan Kit untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Ipas Di Kelas V Sd Negeri 9 Lawa Basmala, Mohamad; Sisi, La; Parisu, Chairan Zibar L.
Arus Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 5 No 3: Desember (2025)
Publisher : Arden Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57250/ajup.v5i3.2076

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan strategi pembelajaran PDEODE (Predict, Discuss, Explain, Observe, Discuss, Explain) dengan bantuan KIT IPAS terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi cahaya di kelas V SD Negeri 9 Lawa. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain Nonequivalent Control Group Design yang melibatkan dua kelas, yaitu kelas eksperimen yang menggunakan strategi PDEODE dengan bantuan KIT dan kelas kontrol yang menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes awal (pretest), tes akhir (posttest), observasi, serta dokumentasi, dan dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferensial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan signifikan pada nilai tes awal antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Namun, terdapat perbedaan signifikan pada nilai tes akhir, di mana kelas eksperimen memperoleh rata-rata 79,9, lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelas kontrol yang memperoleh rata-rata 74,3. Nilai N-Gain kelas eksperimen juga lebih tinggi dan signifikan dibandingkan kelas kontrol (0,7 kategori sedang-tinggi). Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa strategi pembelajaran PDEODE dengan bantuan KIT efektif dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi cahaya. Dengan demikian, strategi PDEODE direkomendasikan sebagai alternatif pembelajaran aktif yang mampu meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan keterlibatan peserta didik dalam pembelajaran IPAS.
Augmented reality-based stem learning to enhance elementary school students' higher-order thinking skills Parisu, Chairan Zibar L.; Aspin, Aspin; Suleman, Asharif
Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan Vol. 13 No. 4 (2025): JKP
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/1184100

Abstract

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of AR-assisted science learning with a STEM approach in improving students' HOTS compared to conventional learning. The method used was a quasi-experimental design with a Pretest–Posttest Control Group involving two classes: an experimental class (AR-STEM) and a control class (conventional). The instruments consisted of a HOTS test (domains C4–C6), an engagement observation sheet, and a student response questionnaire. The results showed an average HOTS posttest score of 82.23 for the experimental class compared to 67.09 for the control class; The average N-Gain value in the experimental class was 0.64 (medium-high category according to learning criteria), while the control class was 0.36 (medium-low category). The independent samples t-test showed a significant difference in the posttest score and N-Gain (p < 0.001). This quantitative finding is supported by very positive student responses (average > 3.50) in the aspects of media attractiveness, ease of use, learning engagement, and perception of HOTS improvement. Interpretation of the results: the increase in N-Gain from 0.36 to 0.64 in the experimental group indicates a meaningful learning change, namely an increase in higher-order thinking skills in a range of effects that are practically substantial, not just statistically significant. The highly significant difference (p < 0.001) strengthens the finding that the integration of AR with the STEM approach not only increases engagement, but also encourages the development of students' analytical, evaluation, and creative skills more effectively than conventional methods. These findings are consistent with the idea that AR provides visual representations and real interactions for exploring scientific phenomena, while the STEM approach structures activities that require critical thinking and integrated problem-solving—a complementary combination to build HOTS. In conclusion, AR-STEM learning is an effective and contextual strategic alternative to increase HOTS, engagement, and learning motivation in science learning, and is relevant to the demands of the Independent Curriculum.