Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.879
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REVIEW Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Sriwijaya Law Review Pleno Jure Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Jurnal Akta Yudisia SIGn Jurnal Hukum Unnes Law Journal Jurnal Darma Agung Journal of Judicial Review Dikmas: Jurnal Pendidikan Masyarakat dan Pengabdian Yuridika Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Moonti, Roy Marthen
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gorontalo
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : University Of Bengkulu Law Journal

 1 
KEWENANGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA TERHADAP PUTUSAN PEMBERHENTIAN TIDAK DENGAN HORMAT Muten Nuna; Roy Marthen Moonti; Arifin Tumuhulawa; Dince Aisa Kodai
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.106-118

Abstract

Nowadays, Indonesia as a developing country has been developed in various sectors. Globalization is a process of organizational change from the function of capitalism which is marked by the emergence of the integration of markets and transnational companies and the lagging of supranational institutions. With this, it is possible for it to affect the work patterns of Indonesian society. For this reason, a further legal remedy will be needed if the party that feels disadvantage is not satisfied with the outcome of the dispute resolution that arises due to the development of globalization. The intended legal remedies are administrative efforts as referred to in Article 48 of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 9 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court (PTUN). The aim of this article is to find out the authority for dispute resolution of State Administrative Court (PTUN) toward dismissal with no reverence verdict and dispute resolution efforts for State Administrative Court (PTUN) toward dismissal with no reverence verdict. Juridical normative is applied as research method. This research concludes that dispute resolution on personnel is done through the State Administrative Court except it is caused by violations of the disciplinary rules of the State Civil Apparatus which will be resolved through administrative appeals to the Court of Civil Service.
Co-Authors Abdullah, Julie Agustina Bilondatu Arifin Tumuhulawa Dikson junus Dince Aisa Kodai Dince Aisa Kodai ernikawati ernikawati Harun, Nur Istiyan Ibrahim Ahmad Ismail, Nurwita Lamuda, Ilyas Marten Bunga Marthen Bunga Muhammad Fachri Arsjad Muslim A Kasim Nirmala Sahi Nuna, Muten Oyald Puhi Oyaldi Puhi Paramata, Yeni Polidu, Irwan Ramdhan Kasim Rasid, Ayub Usman Rustam Hs Akili Rustam Hs. Akili Saiful R. Pakaya Salahudin Pakaya Wahyudin Hasan Yayan Hanapi Yohan Mahmud Yusrianto Kadir Yusrianto Kadir