cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal
Published by Universitas Medan Area
ISSN : 2088527X     EISSN : 25487787     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Journal of Public Administration (Public Administration Journal) is a journal which contains about article result of research and thinking result of Public Administration which keep growing. This development of course provides wider opportunities for teachers or researchers to continue to explore the development of public administration that is expected to be useful for the community.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 566 Documents
 53   54   55   56   57 
Revitalising Development Administration for Environmental Disaster Risk Reduction in Gorontalo Djafar, Franky
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v15i2.14329

Abstract

This study examines the factors influencing the effectiveness of disaster mitigation policies in Gorontalo and explores how revitalizing development administration can enhance these efforts. The research is grounded in the context of weak inter-agency coordination and limited community participation, which pose significant challenges to policy implementation. Data were collected through literature review, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGD), and document analysis. The findings reveal that effective inter-agency coordination, human resource capacity, and community engagement are critical to successful disaster risk mitigation. Furthermore, integrating sustainable development principles and empowering local communities are essential to strengthening resilience. The study concludes that improving governance structures, fostering institutional synergy, and promoting active community involvement are necessary steps to enhance the effectiveness of disaster mitigation policies in Gorontalo and other disaster-prone regions.
Scenario Thinking-Based Strategy in Preventing Sexual Violence in Higher Education: Strategic Learning from Universitas Brawijaya Said, Moh; Cahyasari, Erlita; Pratama, Bayu Indra; Hidayat, Cikal Azahra Putri; Kubebity, Latisha Nazahira
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v15i2.14377

Abstract

Sexual violence has been a public concern, and cases of sexual violence in Indonesia have been increasing in recent years. The cases also occur in higher education, which should be a strong fortress against moral damage. The phenomenon of sexual violence is something that is both visible and invisible and difficult to control. A competent strategy is required for higher education to prevent sexual violence. This study aims to describe the preventive strategies adopted by Universitas Brawijaya to address sexual violence on campus through a scenario thinking approach. A qualitative method was employed, comprising five phases: orientation, monitoring, action, synthesis, and exploration. The findings reveal that the university's strategy focuses on identifying potential risks, conducting risk analysis, simulations, and implementing multi-stakeholder-based interventions. Key components include the development of institutional policies, the establishment of dedicated units such as the Integrated Unit for Sexual Violence and Bullying and the Ethics Commission, and the active involvement of student organizations and academic communities. The study concludes that a comprehensive, adaptive, and collaborative approach is essential for universities to effectively prevent and manage sexual violence in a dynamic and uncertain environment.
Hybrid and Collaborative Governance Model for Village Development in Indonesia Alkadafi, Muammar; Susanti, Susanti; Wasistiono, Sadu; Broto, Mani Festati
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v15i2.14443

Abstract

Village development in Indonesia continues to face tensions between formal decentralization mandates and persistently centralized governance practices. Although Law Number 6 of 2014 on Villages was intended to strengthen village autonomy, its implementation is often constrained by rigid central regulatory frameworks and standardized fiscal controls, limiting local participation and contextual responsiveness. This study offers a conceptual and empirical contribution by developing and examining an integrated hybrid and collaborative governance model for village development. Employing a qualitative research design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis conducted in six villages in Kampar Regency, Riau Province. The findings indicate that hybrid governance, which combines top-down regulatory mechanisms with bottom-up community participation, enhances policy flexibility, responsiveness, and contextual alignment at the village level. Furthermore, the incorporation of collaborative governance strengthens cross-sectoral coordination among central and local governments, village institutions, private actors, and civil society organizations, thereby reducing fragmentation in policy implementation. Theoretically, this study operationalizes hybrid and collaborative governance within the context of village development policy. Practically, it provides policy-relevant insights for strengthening the legitimacy, responsiveness, and sustainability of decentralized governance in Indonesia.
Implementing OKR in Indonesian Public Bureaucracy: A Case Study of the Ministry of State Secretariat Wulansari, Nita; Prasojo, Eko
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v15i2.14735

Abstract

This study aims to examine the compatibility of Objective and Key Results (OKR) as a performance management framework in the context of public bureaucracy, with a case study at the Ministry of State Secretariat. Using a qualitative approach, this study analyzes the application of the basic principles of OKR, the advantages and disadvantages that arise, and the implementation challenges faced. The results of the study indicate that the success of OKR adoption is highly dependent on the organization's contextual awareness, namely the ability to adapt the design and implementation of OKR to the existing structure, work culture, and regulatory system. OKR provides a number of advantages such as increased performance tracking, employee performance diversification, collective alignment and accountability, flexibility, and frequency of performance monitoring and evaluation, thereby increasing the perception of fairness among employees. However, there are also weaknesses such as the tendency for OKR to become a to-do list, incompatibility with certain types of work, and insynchrony with the performance compensation system. Other challenges include HR capacity, work culture transformation, performance-based reward systems, consistency in the review and monitoring process, and coordination between agencies, and the need for a sustainable digital support system. Despite the growing popularity of OKR in private sector organizations, empirical studies examining the adaptation and effectiveness of OKR in public sector bureaucracies, particularly in developing country contexts, are still very limited. Therefore, this study contributes to the public administration literature by providing contextual empirical findings on how OKR interacts with bureaucratic characteristics, regulatory frameworks, and government organizational culture in Indonesia. These findings emphasize that OKR cannot be adopted uniformly in the public sector, but needs to be implemented gradually and adaptively.
Public Transport Arrangement: A Study of Policy Implementation in Bandung City Harahap, Agus Supriadi
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v15i2.15087

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Public Transportation Regulations in Bandung City, Indonesia. The issues focused on are the policy content and the context of its implementation. This study applies Grindle's policy implementation framework to critically examine policy implementation, exploring how political interests, administrative capacity, and institutional dynamics shape policy outcomes, dimensions often overlooked in transport policy research. This study fills a gap in urban transportation research that largely focuses on technical and infrastructure solutions. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach using in-depth interviews, direct observation, and document analysis involving government officials, transportation operators, drivers, and users in Bandung City. The results indicate that policy implementation has not been successful for several reasons: the policy content does not accommodate the interests of the community and operators; the community is not interested in the long-term benefits of using public transportation; the anticipated changes in the policy are too broad; coordination problems between implementing agencies; and insufficient resource allocation. Policy implementation is also hampered by various contexts, namely: the existence of strong patron-client relationships between actors in channeling their economic interests; mechanisms for community engagement that have not been institutionalized; and low bureaucratic responsiveness.
Making Collaboration Work: A Systematic Multidimensional Review of Collaborative Governance Setiono, Dede Puji; Kustulasari, Agustina
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v15i2.15371

Abstract

Collaborative governance (CG) has become a crucial approach for addressing complex public issues that single actors cannot solve. Despite its growing relevance, the understanding of CG remains fragmented. This study aims to synthesize the existing CG literature to provide a more cohesive understanding and identify a future research agenda. Using a systematic, multidimensional literature review, 53 academic documents were qualitatively analyzed. The findings reveal key antecedent conditions for successful collaboration, including a sense of community, a favorable historical context, and a level playing field. Furthermore, the study identifies eleven critical factors that contribute to effective collaborative networks. The synthesis highlights the strengths of CG literature in institutional and multilevel analysis but also points to significant gaps in integrative dimensions and developmental dynamics. This study contributes a systematic, multidimensional framework that advances collaborative governance theory by integrating institutional, processual, and contextual dimensions and addressing the research gap in comprehensive CG synthesis. The findings reveal that future research must address these gaps to advance both theoretical knowledge and practical application, particularly in diverse contexts like public administration in Indonesia.
Silo Mentality in Stunting Reduction Programs in Southeast Sulawesi Abidin, Zainul; Asmiddin, Asmiddin; Parasit, La
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v15i2.15714

Abstract

This article aims to analyze how silo mentality affects the effectiveness of stunting reduction program implementation in three regencys in Southeast Sulawesi: Buton, Central Buton, and South Buton. The problem is centered around silo mentality and it’s affects. To adress this issue theoretical references are employed. Data is collected through in-depth interviews and analysis of local policy documents. The study concludes that that silo mentality is manifested in the form of non-integrated planning, weak collaborative commitment between OPDs, fragmentation of information systems, and passive leadership towards cross sector work. Despite the existence of convergence planning documents, implementation in the field is still procedural and administrative, without substantive coordination. This finding reinforces public organization theory which states that institutional reform and organizational culture change are key prerequisites for cross sector policy success.
Evaluating Public Service Satisfaction Provincial Government of Banten Using IKM Tjahyo Rawinarno
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v16i1.15299

Abstract

Research on public service quality based on the Public Satisfaction Index at the local government level still shows limitations in comparative analysis between service units, resulting in performance measurements not fully reflecting variations in service delivery effectiveness. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the performance of four regional government agencies providing direct services in Banten Province. Using quantitative methods through univariate analysis of the IKM scores per question and the cumulative index, as well as bivariate analysis to identify performance differences, the study found that the Investment and Licensing Office recorded the highest score (3.44; 86.00) with a quality category of B. Meanwhile, Banten Regional General Hospital (3.054; 75.36), Samsat (3.045; 76.13), and Malingping Hospital (3.003; 73.08) were in the quality category of C. These findings confirm theoretical arguments regarding the importance of procedural simplification, speed of service, and cost transparency as determinants of public satisfaction. Conceptually, this study strengthens the validity of the IKM as a cross-unit evaluative instrument in public service governance. Policy-wise, local governments need to accelerate procedural reforms to sustainably improve service quality.
Community-Based Conflict Resolution in Iron Sand Mining at Pasar Seluma Village Henny Aprianty; Heru Purnawan; Hariangga Hariangga; Deni Triyanto; Kismartini Kismartini
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v16i1.15639

Abstract

This study examines community-based conflict resolution in iron sand mining management in Pasar Seluma Village, Indonesia. It addresses persistent conflicts involving local communities, mining companies, and government authorities by identifying their root causes and proposing a policy-oriented resolution model. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis. The analysis integrates Ralf Dahrendorf’s social conflict theory and Johan Galtung’s peaceful conflict resolution framework, with data credibility ensured through source triangulation. The findings reveal that conflicts stem from prolonged community resistance since 2010, inadequate corporate communication, incomplete licensing procedures, environmental degradation concerns, and unresolved social grievances. These conditions generate both manifest and latent conflicts that undermine governance legitimacy. The study’s novelty lies in formulating a Grassroots Conflict Resolution Model, which reframes community participation not merely as consultation but as a core governance mechanism in resource management. Unlike top-down regulatory approaches, this model emphasizes early-stage engagement, local power redistribution, and justice-oriented mediation. From a policy perspective, the study provides actionable insights for local governments to design inclusive, participatory, and conflict-sensitive mining governance frameworks. The model contributes both theoretically and practically to public policy discourse on managing natural resource conflicts in marginalized and resource-rich regions.
Good Governance Practices in BPS Partner Selection in Banggai Regency Ade Putra Ode Amane; Sahraen Sibay; Fadli Sandewa; Haminun Dg. Matorang; Erwin Nursin; Nuraina Pilon
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v16i1.16209

Abstract

This study examines transparency and accountability in the selection process of Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) partners in Banggai Regency. The specific research gap addressed in this study is the limited attention given to public recruitment governance in BPS partner selection, particularly regarding information accessibility, grievance mechanisms, external oversight, participant feedback, and public justification of recruitment decisions. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through interviews, observation, and document analysis involving six informants. The findings show that BPS has implemented digital recruitment systems and structured selection procedures; however, transparency remains partial due to unequal access to digital information and limited procedural communication. Accountability also remains procedural-administrative because evaluation mechanisms are internally oriented, external oversight is weak, participant feedback is inconsistent, and decision justification is limited. The novelty of this study lies in distinguishing procedural transparency and accountability from substantive governance practices in decentralized public recruitment. This study contributes to governance and public recruitment studies by showing that digital systems and formal procedures do not automatically ensure inclusiveness, answerability, and public trust. The findings imply the need for inclusive information dissemination, transparent grievance systems, standardized feedback, auditable evaluation, and stronger independent oversight in public recruitment governance.

Page 56 of 57 | Total Record : 566

 53   54   55   56   57 

Filter by Year

2011 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 10, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 10, No 1 (2020): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK (PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION JOURNAL) JUNI Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 9, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK (PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION JOURNAL) DESEMBER Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 9, No 1 (2019): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK (PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION JOURNAL) JUNI Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Desember Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Juni Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 7, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Desember Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 7, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), December Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Juni Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June Vol 6, No 2 (2016): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK DESEMBER Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol. 6 No. 1 (2016): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol 6, No 1 (2016): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK JUNI Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 5, No 2 (2015): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK DESEMBER Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol 5, No 1 (2015): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK JUNI Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 4, No 2 (2014): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK DESEMBER Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol 4, No 1 (2014): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK JUNI Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 3, No 2 (2013): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK DESEMBER Vol 3, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol. 3 No. 1 (2013): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol 3, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Juni Vol 3, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol. 2 No. 2 (2012): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 2, No 2 (2012): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK DESEMBER Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Juni Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal December Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Desember Vol. 1 No. 1 (2011): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Juni Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Administrasi Publik Juni Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal June More Issue