cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Novianita Rulandari
Contact Email
novianitarulandari@gmail.com
Phone
+6281289935858
Journal Mail Official
novianitarulandari@gmail.com
Editorial Address
l. Cikini Raya No.9, RT.16/RW.1, Cikini Kec. Menteng, Kota Jakarta Pusat Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10330
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Ilomata International Journal of Management
Published by Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda
ISSN : 27148971     EISSN : 27148963     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
The analysis of this study aims to determine whether recruitment positive and significant effect on the performance of employees in the Manufacturing Company. To know able to moderate recruitment monitoring the performance of employees in the Manufacturing Company. Data analysis technique used is quantitative method with SPSS version 16.0. This study uses regression analysis moderating. The population in this study were all employees Manufacturing Company, and a sample of 44 respondents
Arjuna Subject : Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (semua kategori) - Perilaku Organisasi dan Menejemen Sumber Daya Manusia
Articles 452 Documents
 42   43   44   45   46 
Testing the Mediating Role of Work Engagement between Work Environment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior among Generation Z Employees Indri Guslina; Mohammad Fayruz; Adrian Adha; Giharjo Giharjo
Ilomata International Journal of Management Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijjm.v7i3.2460

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between work environment, work engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) among Generation Z employees in Bekasi, Indonesia. Previous studies generally report that work engagement mediates the relationship between supportive workplace conditions and positive organizational behavior. However, limited evidence explains whether this mechanism operates similarly among Generation Z employees in urban workplaces characterized by digital communication, workplace flexibility, and rapidly changing work expectations. This context provides a meaningful boundary condition for Social Exchange Theory (SET) and Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) Theory into positive workplace behavior. Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey, data were collected from 202 Generation Z employees working in various organizations in Bekasi, Indonesia. The proposed relationships were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings show that a supportive work environment positively and significantly influences both work engagement and OCB. However, work engagement does not significantly affect OCB and fails to mediate the relationship between work environment and OCB (β = −0.017, p > 0.05). These findings suggest that supportive workplace conditions directly encourage discretionary organizational behavior without requiring strong psychological attachment to work. Practically, organizations should prioritize supportive work environments, effective communication, teamwork, and collaborative organizational climates to strengthen OCB among Generation Z employees. Because this study focuses on Generation Z employees in Bekasi, the findings should be interpreted within this context. The study contributes to SET and JD-R Theory by demonstrating that work engagement may not always function as a mediating mechanism in explaining OCB among younger digital-oriented employees.
Multiple Routes to Manufacturing SME Performance in DKI Jakarta: An fsQCA Study of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Normative Pressure, and Dynamic Capabilities Darwin Raja Unggul Saragih; Wahyuningsih Santosa; Bahtiar Usman; Andri Dayarana K. Silalahi
Ilomata International Journal of Management Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijjm.v7i3.2608

Abstract

This study explains why manufacturing SMEs in DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, achieve different performance outcomes under similar external conditions. Drawing on dynamic capability theory, it examines entrepreneurial orientation, normative pressure, and dynamic capabilities as interdependent configurations rather than isolated linear predictors. Using 314 calibrated SME responses, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis evaluates five conditions: innovativeness, proactiveness, normative pressure, sensing capability, and reconfiguration capability. The results identify two robust pathways to positive performance, with overall solution coverage of 0.870 and consistency of 0.961, and two exploratory pathways to negative performance, with coverage of 0.835 and consistency of 0.767. Strong performance arises through a normatively supported proactive-sensing pathway and an entrepreneurial-capability pathway combining innovativeness, proactiveness, sensing, and reconfiguration. Weak performance occurs when firms sense external expectations but lack innovativeness and reconfiguration capability, or when all five conditions are absent. These negative configurations require caution because their consistency and PRI support are weaker. The findings show that sensing capability alone does not ensure superior performance; its contribution depends on alignment with entrepreneurial and reconfiguration capacities. The study advances SME performance research by demonstrating that configurational interdependencies explain outcomes more effectively than separate antecedents. It also reveals causal asymmetry between pathways producing strong and weak performance.

Page 46 of 46 | Total Record : 452

 42   43   44   45   46 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July 2026 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): January 2026 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October 2025 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July 2025 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): April 2025 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January 2025 Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): October 2024 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): July 2024 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): April 2024 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): January 2024 Vol 4 No 4 (2023): October 2023 Vol 4 No 3 (2023): July 2023 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): July 2023 Vol 4 No 2 (2023): April 2023 Vol 4 No 1 (2023): January 2023 Vol 3 No 4 (2022): October 2022 Vol 3 No 3 (2022): July 2022 Vol 3 No 2 (2022): April 2022 Vol 3 No 1 (2022): January 2022 Vol 2 No 4 (2021): October 2021 Vol 2 No 3 (2021): July 2021 Vol 2 No 2 (2021): April 2021 Vol 2 No 1 (2021): January 2021 Vol 1 No 4 (2020): October 2020 Vol 1 No 3 (2020): July 2020 Vol 1 No 2 (2020): April 2020 Vol 1 No 1 (2019): October 2019 More Issue