Collegium Studiosum Journal
Collegium Studiosum Journal adalah Jurnal Ilmiah yang diterbitkan secara berkala oleh LPPM STIH AWANG LONG. Collegium Studiosum Journal memilik e-ISSN 2797-3751 dan p-ISSN 2797-4332. Pemilihan dan penggunaan kata Collegium Studiosum Journal dimaksudkan untuk menunjukkan pemetaan lingkup ide dan gagasan dari para praktisi, akademisi, dan ilmuan hukum yang difokuskan pada berbagai isu strategis mengenai penelitian di tingkat nasional maupun international. Collegium Studiosum Journal terbit dalam setahun sekali yaitu pada bulan Juni. Pengiriman artikel dapat dilakukan melalui daring dengan melakukan registrasi terlebih dahulu pada website ini. Collegium Studiosum Journal menerima artikel pada bidang kajian hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum tata negara, hukum administrasi negara, hukum international, hukum masyarakat pembangunan, hukum islam, hukum bisnis, hukum acara dan hak asasi manusia.
Articles
326 Documents
<![CDATA[KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DENGAN JAMINAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Rosdiana Dewi, Elvira]]>;
<![CDATA[Amalia, Lia]]>;
<![CDATA[Abas, Muhamad]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1297
<![CDATA[A practice that is widespread in banking, credit collateral is material in the form of land. In credit agreement practice, defaults often occur, therefore collateral is needed, so that credit agreements gain trust and have high economic value. In this writing, the author aims to find out the legal certainty of creditors regarding collateral in the form of property rights certificates in credit agreements and to find out what the judge's decision was in decision number 8/Pdt.G.S/2021/PN.Kwg. This research uses a normative juridical approach. This research concludes that in credit agreements with collateral, legal protection for creditors is very necessary. Therefore, material collateral is needed to minimize the risk of default by the debtor. Article 6 of the Mortgage Rights Law states that if there is a breach of contract in a credit agreement, the first mortgage holder has the right to sell the collateral that is the object of the mortgage through a public auction.]]>
<![CDATA[KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI PASCA DEVELOPER DIPAILITKAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Fahmi, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Janisriwati, Sylvia]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1306
<![CDATA[The aim of this research is to provide an understanding regarding strong and weak binding Sale and Purchase Agreement deed in terms of buying and selling houses or land carried out by the community as buyers and developers as sellers. Especially when in his journey the developer is in trouble until it occurs that the developers are declared bankrupt and and all his wealth at that time and during the process of pailit will go into the bankrupt boedel. This type of research is normative law using legislative approaches. File on research is secondary data supported by primary and secondary legal materials and obtained from library studies, which are then analyzed by qualitative methods. As for the results of this study, Firstly, the sale and purchase binding agreement is an agreement between the developer and any person to carry out the sale and purchase of a house which can be carried out by the developer before the construction of the house which is made before a notary. Second, there are two deeds of Sale and Purchase Banding Agreement, namely a deed of sale and purchase agreement which has been paid off and Whika has not yet been paid off. If the status of the sale and purchase agreement has been paid in full and was made by a notary before the developer went bankrupt, then the status of the sale and purchase agreement is very strong. On the other hand, if the developer goes bankrupt with the buyer's status still in the installment phase, does not control the object and the sale and purchase agreement was not made by a notary, then the status is weak.]]>
<![CDATA[KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH ATAS PEMBAYARAN HARGA TANAH YANG BELUM DILUNASI PEMBELI ]]>
<![CDATA[Saputro, Agus Purwo]]>;
<![CDATA[Huda, Miftakhul]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1310
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum dalam akta jual beli PPAT (Pengadilan Tata Tanah) terkait pembayaran harga tanah yang belum dilunasi pembeli. Fokus penelitian ini adalah pada kesesuaian pelaksanaan jual beli dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 888/K/Pdt/2017 dengan prinsip tunai, terang, dan riil. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan normatif preskriptif dengan analisis kualitatif dari sumber bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepastian hukum pelaksanaan jual beli telah terpenuhi karena telah dilaksanakannya penyerahan hak atas tanah secara hukum (juridische levering). Kesepakatan harga jual beli sebesar Rp.1.000.000.000, meskipun hanya perjanjian lisan, tetap sah dan mengikat secara hukum jika tidak bertentangan dengan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. Namun, jika ada bukti tertulis berupa akta otentik, harga tanah yang dituangkan dalam akta jual beli menjadi penentu harga yang sempurna sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1870 KUHPerdata. Dalam hukum adat, terdapat tiga prinsip jual beli tanah: tunai, terang, dan riil. Jika penjual telah menyerahkan hak atas tanah dan pembeli telah membayar harga meskipun baru sebagian, maka transaksi dianggap lunas. Sisa harga yang belum dibayar akan menjadi hutang piutang antara penjual dan pembeli. Penjual dapat mengajukan gugatan perdata atas dasar wanprestasi terhadap sisa pembayaran yang belum dilunasi. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah bahwa akta jual beli PPAT atas pembayaran harga tanah yang belum dilunasi pembeli sudah memenuhi kepastian hukum karena telah dilaksanakannya juridische levering. Kesesuaian antara pelaksanaan jual beli dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 888/K/Pdt/2017 dengan prinsip terang, tunai, dan riil telah sesuai]]>
<![CDATA[EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA OLEH KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Faisal, Fedhli]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1329
<![CDATA[This study examines the legal implications of the execution of fiduciary guarantees in bankruptcy, focusing on the rights of secured creditors and the role of the curator. According to Article 59(1) of the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Law, secured creditors holding fiduciary guarantees are required to exercise their execution rights within no later than two months from the commencement of the state of insolvency. If not exercised, these execution rights are transferred to the curator. This research adopts a statutory approach and a case approach, analysing the bankruptcy case Number 269 K/Pdt-Sus-Pailit/2024. In this case, the secured creditor executed the fiduciary object beyond the prescribed time limit, prompting the curator to file a lawsuit against the action as an unlawful act in the Semarang Commercial Court. The court ruled that the creditor's actions were unlawful and ordered the creditor to return the disputed objects, including the vehicle registration certificate (BPKB) and a four-wheeled vehicle. This decision was upheld by the Supreme Court, which referred to Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU/XVII/2019. The study highlights the importance of creditors' compliance with execution rules and the role of the judiciary in safeguarding the interests of parties involved in bankruptcy.]]>
<![CDATA[GRASI DALAM KASUS NARKOTIKA DI ANTARA KEBIJAKAN KEADILAN DAN UPAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Puluhulawa, Irlan]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i1.1331
<![CDATA[This research examines the process of giving mercy to drug prisoners and if it supports criminal law's drug crime prevention goals. Drug offences in Indonesia are regarded extreme crimes that destroy social order and affect the younger generation, hence they are generally sentenced to death or life in prison. The President's power under Article 14 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 22 of 2002 respecting Clemency allows offenders to request clemency. Granted pardon to drug offenders creates a conflict between severe law enforcement to prevent and rehabilitation and social reintegration. This research employs normative, statutory, and juridical-analytical methods. The 1945 Constitution, Law No. 22 of 2002 on Clemency, and Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, as well as court rulings on drug clemency, are examined in this paper. To understand how mercy is applied to drug offences, retributive, utilitarian, and rehabilitative philosophies of punishment were examined. This research found that although clemency may help rehabilitate offenders, it might also impair drug crime deterrence. To prevent reoffending, drug clemency must be backed by a thorough rehabilitation program and based on tougher and more open standards. Thus, clemency policy change is required to reconcile justice, prevention, and rehabilitation in Indonesian criminal law.]]>
<![CDATA[POLITIK HUKUM PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR MENGGUNAKAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE YANG DI LAKUKAN OLEH HAKIM SEBAGAI PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN TUJUAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasaki, Nero Mika]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudjiarto, Tatok]]>;
<![CDATA[Pandiangan, Hendri Jayadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i1.1333
<![CDATA[Criminal Law Policy can also be called a Criminal Law policy or can also be called Penal Policy or Criminal Law reform. In implementing a Criminal Law Policy, it means an effort to realize criminal legislation that is in accordance with the circumstances and situations at a certain time and for the future. One of the implementations of a legal policy, especially what the author wants to discuss, namely Criminal Law Policy in the implementation of laws and regulations, is in the context of Restorative Justice arrangements, which is a settlement of cases or Criminal Law problems outside the Criminal Justice System. Settlement of Criminal cases outside the court using modern dispute resolution or problem resolution methods greatly changes criminal law reform, but a settlement of cases or Criminal Law problems involving Legal Subjects in the form of victims, perpetrators, families of victims and perpetrators, as well as the community and parties interested in a Criminal act or problem that occurs to reach an agreement and settlement between each party who has a problem or case. With the settlement of criminal cases using out-of-court dispute resolution using Restorative Justice, it is a new model of dispute resolution that has an impact on criminal law renewal and realizes the objectives of the law itself. The research method used by the author in writing this thesis is the normative legal research method, namely legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data only. This research is also called library material research. The concept of Restorative Justice has been applied in Decision No. 27 / Pid.Sus / 2022 / PN. Jkt.Pst,. and has fulfilled the sense of justice for the Defendant and for the victim, because the Defendant is ready to marry witness Thalia Bunga Chalista when he finishes college and until now between the Defendant and witness Thalia Bunga Chalista in this case have not been harmed even until now the Defendant and Witness Thalia Bunga Chalista still have good communication.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBERIAN SANKSI TERHADAP ANGGOTA KEPOLISIAN INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Rony Makasuci]]>;
<![CDATA[Ardiansah]]>;
<![CDATA[Yelia Nathassa Winstar]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i1.1337
<![CDATA[Indonesia telah mengembangkan dan memperbarui berbagai regulasi untuk menjaga integritas dan etika dalam kepolisian. Dua regulasi penting dalam konteks ini adalah Peraturan Kapolri (PERKAP) No. 14 Tahun 2011 tentang Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dan Peraturan Kepolisian (Perpol) No. 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Kode Etik Profesi dan Komisi Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Kedua regulasi ini memiliki tujuan yang sama yaitu untuk mengatur dan menegakkan kode etik dalam tubuh Kepolisian Republik Indonesia (Polri), namun terdapat beberapa perbedaan signifikan dalam isi dan implementasinya. Adapun tujuan yang hendak dicapai dalam penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut :Untuk Menganalisis inkonsistensi pemberian sanksi terhadap anggota Kepolisian berdampak bagi seluruh anggota Kepolisian Indonesia, Untuk Menganalisis idealnya pemberian sanksi terhadap anggota Kepolisian dalam perspektif kepastian hukum. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Inkonsistensi Pemberian Sanksi Terhadap Anggota Kepolisian Berdampak Bagi Seluruh Anggota Kepolisian Indonesia dapat membawa dampak yang luas dan negatif bagi institusi kepolisian Indonesia. Untuk menjaga kepercayaan publik, moral anggota, dan integritas institusi, diperlukan upaya yang serius untuk memastikan bahwa setiap pelanggaran ditangani dengan adil dan konsisten. Dengan demikian, kepolisian dapat menjalankan tugasnya dengan lebih efektif dan mendapatkan dukungan penuh dari masyarakat. Idealnya Pemberian Sanksi Terhadap Anggota Kepolisian Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum bahwa Idealnya, harus mencakup prinsip-prinsip kepastian hukum, prosedur yang jelas dan transparan, proporsionalitas sanksi, kesetaraan di hadapan hukum, dan akuntabilitas. Dengan menerapkan prinsip-prinsip ini, institusi kepolisian dapat meningkatkan disiplin internal, menjaga kepercayaan publik, dan memastikan bahwa hak-hak semua pihak dihormati. Penerapan sanksi yang adil dan konsisten tidak hanya memperkuat integritas institusi kepolisian tetapi juga mendukung upaya penegakan hukum yang lebih efektif di masyarakat.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBERIAN GANTI KERUGIAN ATAS PEMBEBASAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Annisa Berliani]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudi Fahmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ardiansah]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i1.1338
<![CDATA[Pemberian ganti kerugian atas pembebasan tanah untuk kepentingan umum di Indonesia merupakan topik yang kompleks dan melibatkan berbagai aspek hukum. Pembebasan tanah untuk kepentingan umum diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum dan peraturan turunannya. UU ini menetapkan prosedur, mekanisme, dan ketentuan terkait kompensasi yang adil bagi pemilik tanah. Sering terjadi perbedaan antara penilaian pemerintah dan ekspektasi masyarakat. Ini bisa menimbulkan ketidakpuasan dan sengketa hukum. Proses administrasi yang panjang dan birokrasi yang rumit sering mengakibatkan keterlambatan dalam pembayaran kompensasi. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis Pemberian Ganti Kerugian Atas Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Indonesia, untuk menganalisis Pemberian Ganti Kerugian Atas Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Indonesia Dinilai Layak Dalam Perspektif Keadilan. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum sosiologis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Pemberian Ganti Kerugian Yang Layak Atas Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Dalam Perspektif Keadilan bahwa dalam Pemberian ganti kerugian yang layak atas pembebasan tanah untuk kepentingan umum merupakan aspek penting dalam mewujudkan keadilan bagi pemilik tanah yang terkena dampak. Dari perspektif keadilan, proses ini harus memenuhi prinsip-prinsip keadilan distributif, komutatif, prosedural, dan substantif. Ganti kerugian yang layak tidak hanya memastikan bahwa pemilik tanah menerima kompensasi yang sesuai dengan nilai ekonomis dan emosional dari tanah, tetapi juga melindungi hak milik individu dan mengurangi potensi sengketa. Dampak hukum dari pemberian ganti kerugian yang layak mencakup kepastian hukum, perlindungan hak milik, minimasi sengketa, dukungan terhadap pembangunan berkelanjutan, dan peningkatan legitimasi pemerintah. Dengan demikian, implementasi yang adil dan transparan dalam pemberian ganti kerugian mendukung terciptanya pembangunan yang inklusif, adil, dan berkelanjutan.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PANITIA PENYELENGGARA KONSER MUSIK TERHADAP PENONTON YANG MEMBELI TIKET SECARA ONLINE ]]>
<![CDATA[Saputra, Hendrik Aldi]]>;
<![CDATA[Pasaribu, Benhard Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1342
<![CDATA[A music concerts are business prospects int the filed of entertainment, which can be held in various places because of promising business oportinity in there. A music concert Music concerts require careful planning, good organization, and implementation in accordance with the schedule that has been determined, therefore the organizers are obliged to fulfill their rights and obligations to consumers or in this case music concert goers. In this study the authors will raise two problems, namely how the legal protection of consumers who buy tickets online, and how the problem resolution efforts by the organizing committee of the music concert to the audience who buy tickets online. This study using normative legal research, of whom the data used in this study are library material, namely material that contains new or cutting-edge scientific knowledge, or a new understanding of facts that are known or about Ideas (Ideas), in this case covering books, journals, dissertations or theses and other legal materials. This study of normative legal materials fully uses premier legal materials and secondary legal materials. This study concludes that online concert ticket buyers have the right to get goods and/or services, specifically the ability to access the musical venue in accordance with the claimed exchange value, conditions, and guarantees. The concert organizer's failure to allow online ticket buyers into the musical venue constitutes a breach of contract for which restitution can be sought through either litigation or non-litigation procedures.]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELESAIAN HUKUM KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Nofarizal, Dedi]]>;
<![CDATA[Yusuf, Yusuf]]>;
<![CDATA[Pardede, Rudi]]>
<![CDATA[ Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM STIH Awang Long ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1350
<![CDATA[The issues above are rooted in the focus on a criminal act and the justice achieved through resolving a criminal case. The perspective on the meaning of a crime and punishment adopted in the current traditional criminal justice system is that “a crime is a violation of the state, defined by lawbreaking and guilt,” which is rigid and does not allow freedom for victims and perpetrators to resolve their cases. Based on research findings, it is known that the implementation of restorative justice for perpetrators of assault in the jurisdiction of Dumai Police, based on the Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice, has not been running effectively. Many cases between victims and perpetrators have not reached an agreement, making the process only viable if both parties, the victim and the perpetrator, agree to resolve the issue through restorative justice. The obstacles include the influence of third parties from the victim's family on the victim, the involvement of interested parties in the matter, the lack of understanding of restorative justice among the community, and communication barriers between the perpetrator and the victim. Efforts to overcome these obstacles involve providing input to victims and perpetrators regarding the issue, preventing interference from uninterested parties, increasing public understanding of restorative justice, and improving communication between the perpetrator and the victim.]]>
