cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)" : 8 Documents clear
Anomali Masa Jabatan Presiden Terhubung Dengan Bentuk Negara Republik: Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Presiden dalam Perspektif Konstitusi : Menghindari Otoritarianisme di Era Demokrasi Mujahidah, Mujahidah; Tibaka, Leli
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2147

Abstract

The proposal to extend the presidential term has emerged as a significant issue within Indonesia’s constitutional discourse. This study aims to examine the concept of a “presidential term anomaly” in relation to the republican form of government, employing a normative juridical approach. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s constitution implements a closed-norm framework, explicitly limiting the presidential term to two periods. Any effort to prolong this term is deemed unconstitutional unless the pertinent constitutional provisions are formally amended. More fundamentally, the limitation of the presidential term is closely tied to the republican model, wherein sovereignty resides with the people and executive power is held by a president. In a republic, governance is conducted by and for the people’s interest, necessitating that the exercise of power always aligns with the will and welfare of the broader community.
Reforming of Marriage Law Through Constitutional Court Decision in Indonesia: Reformasi Undang-Undang Perkawinan Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia Rosa, Melia; Huda, Yasrul; Danil, Muhammad; Maulidah, Chabibatul; Arlis, Arlis
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2148

Abstract

The authority of the Constitutional Court to conduct judicial review against the 1945 Constitution often generates both support and criticism, particularly among those who feel disadvantaged by the existence of Law No. 1 of 1974. This study employs a qualitative research method with a normative juridical approach. The findings indicate that the Constitutional Court frequently engages in ijtihad (independent reasoning) when adjudicating cases. Additional considerations underlying these decisions include developments in science, technology, reform, and the renewal of Islamic thought, all of which influence the dynamic application of Islamic law in Indonesia. The implication of this study is that the Constitutional Court not only serves as an institution that tests statutory laws against the 1945 Constitution, but also plays an active role in legal interpretation (ijtihad), particularly concerning religious and matrimonial law. Consequently, the Court takes on a more prominent role in directing the development of Indonesian law in line with contemporary changes. Following the Court’s decisions, stricter oversight is necessary to ensure that legal amendments are effectively implemented in practice, so that the benefits of these reforms are truly felt by the public.
Non-Procedural Replacement of Constitutional Court Justices: A Threat to Democracy and Judicial Independence: Penggantian Non-Prosedural Hakim Konstitusi: Ancaman terhadap Demokrasi dan Independensi Peradilan Sumodiningrat, Aprilian; Nabila Aulia Rahma
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2144

Abstract

The dismissal of Constitutional Court Justice Aswanto and the appointment of Guntur Hamzah as his replacement by the DPR, ratified by the President, have sparked public outcry over alleged violations of the Constitutional Court’s (MK) independence. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of democratic regression and the erosion of MK’s independence resulting from the replacement of Constitutional Court Justices in violation of the Constitutional Court Law. The study addresses two main research questions: First, how does the non-procedural replacement of Constitutional Court Justices contribute to democratic regression? Second, what are the implications of such non-procedural actions by the DPR on the independence of the Constitutional Court? This research employs a doctrinal legal method, analyzing relevant regulations and literature. The findings reveal that, first, the non-procedural replacement of Constitutional Court Justices constitutes a symptom of constitutional backsliding that poses significant risks to democratic governance. Second, the independence of the MK’s judicial authority has been increasingly marginalized due to the non-procedural dismissal and appointment of Constitutional Court Justices, ultimately distorting the principle of checks and balances.
Menggagas Paradigma Quo Vadis Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Putusan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat : Pengaturan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat pada Kewenangan Pengujian Formil Undang–Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Yarni, Meri; Amanda, Khofifah Rizki
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2146

Abstract

Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dinilai bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 dan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat secara bersyarat, namun masih berlaku selama dua tahun tanpa perbaikan. Penelitian ini menganalisis kekuatan hukum putusan inkonstitusional bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam kasus Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 dan Ius Constituendum untuk pengujian Undang-Undang. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif digunakan dengan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa kekuatan hukum putusan inkonstitusional bersyarat adalah mengikat dan wajib dilaksanakan. Ius Constituendum dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi menekankan perbaikan Undang-Undang terkait dan kolaborasi lembaga negara. Rekomendasi penulis termasuk pembentukan dasar hukum melalui revisi undang-undang Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk menambahkan jenis putusan bersyarat sebagai landasan pelaksanaan kewenangan lembaga peradilan konstitusi.
The Idea of Presidential Term Limit as an Implicit Unamendable Provision: Gagasan Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Presiden sebagai Implicit Unamendable Provision Hatim, Ahmad; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; Giri Ahmad Taufik
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2142

Abstract

The discourse on amending Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution to extend the presidential term has surfaced on multiple occasions. The author’s hypothesis asserts that such an amendment is not only challenging but fundamentally unfeasible, as it constitutes an implicit unamendable provision. This article examines this hypothesis using a normative juridical method, which involves analyzing legal norms, principles, and doctrines through a positive legal approach. The study concludes that Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution represents an implicit unamendable provision, as evidenced by its historical context, its interrelation with other constitutional provisions, relevant court decisions, and the procedural framework of the constitutional amendment process.
Inconsistency of the Constitutional Court Regarding the Minimum Age Requirement for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates: Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Syarat Minimal Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Situmeang, Selvi Christina; Ardilafiza, Ardilafiza; Dinata, Ari Wirya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2145

Abstract

This paper discusses several Constitutional Court decisions concerning the minimum age requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates that were issued on the same day. In Constitutional Court Decisions Number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, Number 51/PUU-XXI/2023, and Number 55/PUUXXI/ 2023, the Court consistently rejected all petitions. However, later in the afternoon, through Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, the Court changed its stance and partially granted the request. This paper aims to analyze the differences among these decisions and the Constitutional Court’s inconsistency when addressing decisions that substantially challenge the same article. This research employs a normative legal approach using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings of this study indicate discrepancies between the decisions, procedural irregularities, and drastic shifts in the judges’ perspectives. These factors have resulted in the Constitutional Court’s inconsistency in ruling on the issue of the minimum age requirements for the President and Vice President.
Integrating Electronic Participation in the Legislative Process to Optimize the Fulfillment of Meaningful Participation: Integrasi Electronic Participation dalam Proses Legislasi sebagai Optimalisasi Pemenuhan Meaningful Participation Wafi, Mochamad Adli; Izzi, Muhammad Machshush Bill
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2141

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 mengamanatkan penerapan meaningful participation dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang. Sejalan dengan revisi UU P3, partisipasi publik secara daring atau e-participation mulai diakomodasi bersamaan dengan substansi meaningful participation. Artikel ini mengkaji penerapan e-participation dalam proses legislasi di Indonesia untuk mengoptimalkan partisipasi publik melalui pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. Tiga rumusan permasalahan yang dibahas dalam artikel ini adalah: (1) bagaimana evaluasi pengaturan dan pelaksanaan e-participation dalam proses legislasi saat ini? (2) bagaimana perbandingan e-participation dalam pembentukan undang-undang di berbagai negara? (3) bagaimana reformulasi e-participation guna mengoptimalkan pemenuhan partisipasi bermakna? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dan menemukan empat isu krusial dalam reformulasi e-participation di Indonesia, yaitu: (1) penguatan infrastruktur Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik; (2) unifikasi pengaturan lembaga pembentuk undang-undang yang menyelenggarakan e-participation; (3) akomodasi model citizen initiative dan crowdsourcing; serta (4) pengaturan waktu pelaksanaan e-participation.
Dynastic Politics in Regional Elections: Challenges to Democracy and the Need for Legal Reform in Indonesia: Politik Dinasti dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah: Tantangan terhadap Demokrasi dan Urgensi Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia Mutawalli Mukhlis, Muhammad; Ilmar, Aminuddin; Maskun, Maskun; Aswanto, Aswanto; Tajuddin, Muhammad Saleh
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2143

Abstract

Dynastic politics, practiced by certain groups of individuals with kinship ties or close relationships, dominate political positions in regional head elections and local government administration processes. This phenomenon persists due to the lack of concrete regulations, thereby normalizing it as a political practice in Indonesia. This study aims to elaborate on the facts surrounding dynastic political practices, examine how such practices undermine the democratic ideals envisioned by the people, and propose prospective regulatory frameworks to address this issue. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, historical, and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that dynastic political practices harm the democratic system and tend to be more formalistic rather than providing a genuine opportunity for the people to elect leaders aligned with their will. To prevent such practices in the future, the government, the legislature, and election organizers must collaborate to formulate concrete regulatory norms in the Regional Head Election Law.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue