cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hindarto
Contact Email
jurnal@umsida.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnal@umsida.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Mojopahit No. 666B, Sidoarjo, Jawa Timur
Location
Kab. sidoarjo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25989936     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v17i
Core Subject : Science, Education, Social, Engineering,
Computer Science & IT Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies (IJINS) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo four times a year. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.This journal aims is to provide a place for academics and practitioners to publish original research and review articles. The articles basically contains any topics concerning new innovation on all aspects. IJINS is available in online version. Language used in this journal is Indonesia or English.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 1,072 Documents
 104   105   106   107   108 
Administrative Law Innovation in Preventing Land Mafia Practices: Strengthening Public Governance in Indonesia: Inovasi Hukum Administrasi dalam Mencegah Praktik Mafia Tanah: Memperkuat Tata Kelola Publik di Indonesia Etis Cahyaning Putri; Rudi Mulyanto
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Vol. 27 No. 4 (2026): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2219

Abstract

General Background: Systemic land-related crime in Indonesia undermines legal certainty, public trust, and the state’s constitutional responsibility to protect property rights through accountable agrarian administration. Specific Background: Organized networks exploit paper-based records, fragmented historical data, document falsification, bureaucratic collusion, overlapping certificates, and weaknesses within Indonesia’s negative publication system with positive tendencies. Knowledge Gap: Technological modernization alone does not explain how doctrinal reform, administrative safeguards, professional responsibility, and coordinated enforcement can collectively prevent state capture in agrarian governance. Aims: This study analyzes administrative law innovation for preventing organized property appropriation through digital transformation, registration doctrine reform, good governance principles, institutional restructuring, and interagency enforcement. Results: Using normative legal research enriched by socio-legal review, statutory, conceptual, comparative, and analytical case-study approaches, the study identifies cryptographically protected Electronic Land Certificates and Electronic Land Books as essential mechanisms for reducing physical document manipulation and preserving auditable ownership records. Their legal value, however, requires transition toward an absolute positive publication system based on indefeasible title, accompanied by a state indemnity fund for maladministration victims. Prevention also requires strict adherence to the General Principles of Good Governance, heightened due diligence by Land Deed Officials, proactive administrative revocation through contrarius actus, internal bureaucratic cleansing, and coordinated repressive enforcement. Novelty: The study integrates cryptographic administration, doctrinal reconstruction, professional gatekeeping, corrective discretion, and zero-tolerance institutional reform within a unified public governance framework. Implications: Sustainable prevention requires secure digital infrastructure, inclusive access, independent forensic audits, uncompromising bureaucratic integrity, and continuous cross-ministerial coordination. Highlights: Cryptographic certificates reduce document forgery and preserve traceable ownership records. AUPB compliance, heightened PPAT diligence, and contrarius actus enable rapid administrative correction. Zero-tolerance internal cleansing and cross-ministerial enforcement address state capture in agrarian governance. Keywords: Land Mafia, Administrative Law, Electronic Land Titles, Public Governance, Legal Certainty
Multifactorial Ergonomic Assessment Identifies Posture as the Dominant MSD Determinant: Penilaian Ergonomi Multifaktorial Mengidentifikasi Postur Tubuh sebagai Faktor Penentu Utama Gangguan Muskuloskeletal (MSD) Raditya Ayuningtyas; Zufra Inayah
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Vol. 27 No. 4 (2026): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2229

Abstract

General Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are among the most prevalent work-related health problems affecting workers in the informal sector worldwide. Specific Background: Tailors are particularly vulnerable to MSDs because prolonged static postures, repetitive movements, and extended working hours substantially increase musculoskeletal strain. Research Gap: However, evidence identifying the dominant determinants of MSDs complaints among informal-sector tailors, particularly in developing-country settings, remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to identify the dominant factors associated with MSDs complaints among informal-sector tailors in Gresik Regency, Indonesia. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectionall study was conducted involving 78 tailors using a total sampling approach. MSDs complaints were assessed using the Nordic Body Map (NBM), working posture was evaluated using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), while temperature and lighting conditions were measured using a thermometer and a lux meter. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests followed by multiple logistic regression. Results: Sex (p = 0.022), working duration (p = 0.001), and working posture (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with MSDs complaints. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that prolonged working duration (OR = 6.491; 95% CI: 1.658–25.410) and poor working posture (OR = 16.941; 95% CI: 4.476–64.123) were significant predictors, with working posture emerging as the strongest determinant of MSDs complaints. Novelty: This study provides evidence on the relative contribution of individual, occupational, and environmental factors in explaining MSDs complaints, highlighting working posture as the primary determinant among informal-sector tailors. Implications: These findings support the implementation of ergonomic interventions and working-hour management strategies to reduce the risk of MSDs among informal-sector tailors.  Highlight: Working posture identified as the dominant MSD risk factor. Working more than 8 hours increased MSD complaints. Ergonomic improvements are recommended for informal-sector tailors.  Keywords: Musculoskeletal Disorders, Tailor, Informal Workers, Working Posture, Ergonomics

Page 108 of 108 | Total Record : 1072

 104   105   106   107   108 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 27 No. 4 (2026): October Vol. 27 No. 3 (2026): July Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): April Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): January Vol. 26 No. 4 (2025): October Vol. 26 No. 3 (2025): July Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025): April Vol. 26 No. 1 (2025): January Vol. 25 No. 4 (2024): October Vol. 25 No. 3 (2024): July Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024): April Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024): January Vol. 24 (2023): October Vol. 23 (2023): July Vol. 22 (2023): April Vol. 21 (2023): January Vol. 20 (2022): October Vol. 19 (2022): July Vol. 18 (2022): April Vol. 17 (2022): January Vol. 16 (2021): October Vol. 15 (2021): July Vol. 14 (2021): April Vol. 13 (2021): January Vol. 12 (2020): October Vol. 11 (2020): July Vol. 10 (2020): April Vol. 9 (2020): January Vol. 8 (2019): October Vol. 7 (2019): July Vol. 6 (2019): April Vol. 5 (2019): January More Issue