cover
Contact Name
Moh Masduki
Contact Email
almikraj@insuriponorogo.ac.id
Phone
+6282389445858
Journal Mail Official
almikraj@insuriponorogo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Batoro Katong No. 32 PONOROGO
Location
Kab. ponorogo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27454584     DOI : -
Al-Mikraj: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Humaniora Indonesia. Jurnal ini membahas tentang Studi Islam dan Humaniora. Kajian Islam memiliki ruang lingkup kajian yang cukup luas secara sistematis dan terintegrasi untuk mengetahui, memahami dan menganalisis secara mendalam hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan Islam, baik yang menyangkut sumber-sumber ajaran Islam, pokok-pokok ajaran Islam, sejarah Islam, dan realitas Islam. implementasinya dalam kehidupan. Kajian humaniora menjelaskan ilmu alam yaitu ilmu sosial dan humaniora. Ilmu alam meliputi matematika, fisika, kimia, ilmu bumi, dan astronomi. Ilmu sosial tersebut adalah sosiologi, antropologi, psikologi, pendidikan, ekonomi, dan politik. Sedangkan ilmu humaniora meliputi bahasa, linguistik, sastra, pendidikan, sejarah, hukum, filsafat, arkeologi, seni, dan ilmu sosial yang memiliki muatan humanistik.
Articles 1,485 Documents
Integrasi Hukum Agraria dan Tata Ruang dalam Pengendalian Alih Fungsi Lahan: Analisis Yuridis atas Disharmoni Regulasi di Indonesia Naylin Putri Harsa; Raisa Qolbina Ibrizzahra; Nazjwa fatharani; Agil Sabani; Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikri
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10037

Abstract

This study examines the legal integration between agrarian law and spatial planning law in controlling land-use conversion in Indonesia, focusing on the regulatory disharmony between Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles and Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning. The research aims to identify the forms of normative disharmony, analyze their implications for land-use control, and formulate an integrative legal harmonization model. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through the analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and judicial decisions. The findings reveal that regulatory disharmony originates from fragmented legal norms, sectoral institutional arrangements, and the absence of an integrated normative framework linking land administration with spatial planning, resulting in horizontal and vertical conflicts of norms that undermine legal certainty in controlling land-use conversion. The study further finds that systematic and teleological legal interpretation provides the basis for reconstructing legal integration through a Model of Integrative Harmonization of Agrarian and Spatial Planning Law, which connects the social function of land, spatial conformity, and institutional coordination within a unified legal framework. This model constitutes the principal novelty of the research by offering a normative framework for strengthening legal integration and promoting sustainable land governance in Indonesia
The Implementation of Qawāʿid Fiqhiyyah in Islamic Securities Crowdfunding Alfan Jawahir Muhammad; Zainal Arif; fina Nurafni
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10289

Abstract

Islamic Securities Crowdfunding (ISC) is an innovation in Islamic finance that offers an alternative funding mechanism in accordance with Sharia principles. As financial technology continues to develop, ISC enables the public to participate in investment activities in a more inclusive and transparent manner. However, its implementation must consistently adhere to the principles of qawāʿid fiqhiyyah (Islamic legal maxims) to avoid elements of riba (usury), gharar (uncertainty), and maysir (gambling). This study examines the application of qawāʿid fiqhiyyah in Islamic Securities Crowdfunding by referring to DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 140/DSN-MUI/VIII/2021. It analyzes several Islamic legal maxims, including the permissibility of commercial transactions unless explicitly prohibited, the principle of preventing harm, and the relationship between legal rulings and their effective causes (ʿillah). Using a literature review method and a descriptive-analytical approach, this research explores how ISC can be implemented in accordance with Indonesia's Islamic financial regulations. The findings indicate that ISC has significant potential to enhance Islamic financial inclusion while upholding the principles of transparency, justice, and public welfare (maṣlaḥah). The application of qawāʿid fiqhiyyah in ISC ensures that every transaction complies with Islamic law, making it a sustainable investment solution that aligns with the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah).
Kedudukan Living Law dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dianto; Aida Dwi Putri
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10294

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code marks a significant shift in Indonesia's criminal law reform by recognizing living law as a basis for criminal liability. This recognition reflects an effort to develop a national criminal law rooted in the social, cultural, and customary values that exist within society. However, the implementation of living law, particularly through Regional Regulations, raises concerns regarding the principle of legality, legal certainty, the distribution of authority between central and regional governments, and the protection of human rights. This study aims to examine the legal position of living law in Indonesia's criminal law reform, identify challenges in its implementation through Regional Regulations, and formulate a balanced legal framework for its future application. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with legal materials analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and argumentation. The findings reveal that living law strengthens legal pluralism and national legal identity but requires clear legal parameters to prevent arbitrary criminalization and discriminatory regional policies. The study proposes a harmonization model integrating living law, legality, constitutional principles, legal certainty, and human rights protection as its primary scientific contribution.
Efektivitas Gamifikasi Berbasis Quizizz Terhadap Minat Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif pada Pembelajaran Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam M. Dahlan R; Keisya Fajrina
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10312

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low interest in learning and the low cognitive learning outcomes of students in the subject of Islamic Cultural History (SKI) due to the use of still-conventional learning media. One innovation that can be applied is Quizizz-based gamification, which integrates game elements into the learning process to increase student engagement. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Quizizz-based gamification in increasing students' learning interest and cognitive learning outcomes in SKI learning. The research uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experiment method through a Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The research sample comprised 90 students in class VII at MTs Al-Islamiyah Ciledug, consisting of 45 students in the experimental class and 45 in the control class. Data were collected using a Likert-scale learning-interest questionnaire and cognitive learning outcome tests, administered as pre-tests and post-tests. They were then analyzed using N-Gain and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). The results showed that Quizizz-based gamification was effective in increasing learning interest, with an average N-Gain of 0.7403 (high category), and cognitive learning outcomes, with an average N-Gain of 0.5724 (medium category). The MANOVA results also showed a significant simultaneous influence on both variables (Wilks' Lambda, Sig. = 0.000 < 0.05). Thus, Quizizz-based gamification is recommended as an innovative learning medium that can create SKI learning that is more interactive, interesting, and effective in improving learning quality.
Konstruksi Delik dalam Tradisi Ngomo dan Merari' Tau Samawa sebagai Perbuatan yang Tidak Dipandang sebagai Tindak Pidana dalam Sistem Hukum Adat Jasardi Gunawan; Dianto
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10334

Abstract

The recognition of living law under Article 2 of Indonesian Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code marks a paradigm shift from formal legality toward acknowledging laws that exist within society. However, previous studies have primarily emphasized legal pluralism, customary law recognition, and the legality principle, while limited attention has been given to how indigenous communities construct criminality. This study analyzes the delict construction underlying the Ngomo and Merari' Tau Samawa traditions, which may formally satisfy the elements of theft and kidnapping under positive criminal law but are not regarded as criminal acts within customary legal systems. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this research synthesizes evidence through qualitative content analysis and conceptual comparison. The findings identify five key parameters shaping customary delict construction: social legitimacy, mutual consent, social purpose, customary control mechanisms, and restorative orientation. The study proposes the Living Law Delict Construction Framework (LLDCF), offering a conceptual model that bridges formal legality and social legality in developing a more pluralistic and culturally responsive Indonesian criminal law.
Epistemologi Tafsir bi al-ma’tsur dalam Kitab Al-Durr al-Manṡūr: Kritik atas Otoritas Riwayat dan Relevansinya dalam Studi Tafsir Kontemporer Muhammad Baharuddin; Andi Abdul Hamzah; Abdul Rahman Sakka
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10337

Abstract

Tafsīr bi al-Ma’ṡūr has traditionally been regarded as the most authoritative approach to Qur'anic exegesis because it relies on transmitted reports (naql) from the Qur'an, the Prophet, the Companions, and the Successors. This study examines the epistemological foundation of tafsīr bi al-Ma’ṡūr in Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī’s Al-Durr al-Manṡūr, evaluates the authority of its transmitted reports, and explores its relevance to contemporary Qur'anic studies. Using a qualitative library research approach with descriptive-analytical and critical methods, the study analyzes Al-Durr al-Manṡūr alongside classical and recent literature (2020–2026). Data were analyzed through the Miles and Huberman interactive model, supported by riwāyah and dirāyah criticism. The findings indicate that although Al-Durr al-Manṡūr prioritizes transmitted knowledge as the foundation of Qur'anic interpretation, its omission of complete isnād, lack of authenticity classification, and inclusion of Isrā’īliyyāt narratives weaken its epistemological authority if accepted uncritically. The study concludes that the work should be treated as a valuable repository of exegetical traditions requiring rigorous verification through ḥadīth and tafsīr criticism to maintain its relevance and methodological credibility in contemporary Qur'anic scholarship.
Pendekatan Makna Dalam Tafsir Mafātīḥ Al-Ghayb: Kajian Terhadap Rasionalitas Penafsiran Al-Rāzī Sulfadli; Andi Abdul Hamzah; Abdul Rahman Sakka
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10338

Abstract

This article examines the rationality of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī's exegesis in Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb as a model of meaning-making that integrates revelatory authority with burhānī reasoning. The central problem addressed is how al-Rāzī constructed an exegetical method saturated with kalam argumentation, Aristotelian logic, and natural knowledge without detaching from the textual and transmitted tradition. Employing a qualitative library-based method with a historical-hermeneutical approach, this study examines the primary text of Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb alongside more than thirty recent secondary sources to map this pattern of rationality. The findings indicate that al-Rāzī's rationality is moderately Ash'arite, positioning reason as an instrument for defending and elucidating revelation rather than as an independent authority as held by the Mu'tazilites. This pattern appears in his use of imaginary dialogue, the mas'alah-bahth classification, ta'wīl of ambiguous verses, and the integration of munāsabah, philosophy, and natural science into exegesis. The article argues that al-Rāzī's rationality offers a paradigm relevant to contemporary discourse on the relationship between reason and revelation, while serving as a critical reference for developing an integrative epistemology of tafsir amid the challenges of modern scientific secularization.
Metode dan Corak Tafsir al-Manār Karya Muhammad Abduh dan Muhammad Rasyid Ridha dalam Pembaruan Tafsir Modern Muh Haslam Hafid; Andi Abdul Hamzah; Abdul Rahman Sakka
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10340

Abstract

Tafsir al-Manār is widely recognized as one of the most influential works of modern Qur’anic exegesis, reflecting the reformist ideas of Muhammad Abduh and his disciple, Muhammad Rashid Rida. This study aims to analyze the interpretive method, characteristics, and intellectual contributions of Tafsir al-Manār to the development of modern Qur’anic interpretation. Employing a qualitative approach through library research, this study relies on Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Ḥakīm al-Masyhūr bi Tafsīr al-Manār as the primary source, complemented by relevant books and scholarly publications. The findings indicate that Tafsir al-Manār adopts the taḥlīlī (analytical) method by interpreting Qur’anic verses sequentially while emphasizing their practical guidance for contemporary Muslim society. The commentary integrates tafsīr bi al-ma’thūr and tafsīr bi al-ra’y, accompanied by a critical evaluation of Isrā’īliyyāt narratives. Its dominant interpretive orientation is adabī ijtimā’ī, which seeks to relate the Qur’anic message to social reform, education, morality, and the intellectual revival of the Muslim community. The analysis of the interpretations of Q.S. al-Baqarah [2]: 62 and Q.S. Āli ‘Imrān [3]: 104 demonstrates that Abduh and Rashid Rida emphasize faith, righteous deeds, and social responsibility as the essential foundations for individual and societal progress. This study concludes that Tafsir al-Manār represents not only a Qur’anic commentary but also a significant reformist project that bridges the normative teachings of the Qur’an with the socio-intellectual challenges of the modern era.
Integrasi Tafsir Teologi dan Tafsir Sufistik dalam Menjawab Problem Keagamaan Kontemporer: Analisis Karakteristik, Metodologi, dan Relevansinya Muhammad Baharuddin; Halimah Basri; Muhammad Irham
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10345

Abstract

This paper examines theological interpretation (tafsir theologis) and Sufi interpretation (tafsir sufistik) as two approaches to Qur'anic exegesis that possess distinct characteristics, methodologies, and orientations while complementing one another in understanding the messages of the Qur'an. Theological interpretation primarily aims to strengthen Islamic creed (aqidah) through rational and textual approaches in explaining concepts of divine attributes, prophethood, predestination, and other theological issues. In contrast, Sufi interpretation focuses on uncovering the inner (esoteric) meanings of the Qur'an through spiritual contemplation and self-purification without neglecting the outward (exoteric) meanings of the verses. This study aims to explain the concepts and characteristics of these two exegetical approaches, examine their respective methodologies, and analyze their relevance in addressing contemporary religious issues. The research employs a qualitative approach using library research as its primary method. Data were collected from classical and contemporary literature on theological and Sufi Qur'anic exegesis and analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method by examining, comparing, and interpreting the views of Muslim scholars and contemporary academics. The findings indicate that theological interpretation provides a systematic foundation for Islamic doctrine, whereas Sufi interpretation enriches the spiritual and ethical dimensions of religious life. The integration of these two approaches offers a comprehensive, moderate, and contextual understanding of the Qur'an that remains relevant to the challenges of contemporary society.
Analisis Corak Tafsir Adabi Ijtima'i Dalam Tafsir Al-Manar: Studi Atas Pemikiran Muhammad Abduh Dan Rasyid Ridha Sulfadli; Halimah Basri; Muhammad Irham
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10357

Abstract

This article examines the adabi ijtima'i (literary-social) style of exegesis as manifested in Tafsir al-Manar, a work born from the intellectual collaboration of Muhammad Abduh and his student, Muhammad Rasyid Ridha, as a response to the decline of the Muslim community in the face of modernity and Western colonialism. The problem addressed is how the adabi style, which emphasizes the linguistic beauty and moral message of the Qur'an, is combined with the ijtima'i style oriented toward solving the social problems of the ummah, and how both figures positioned reason and ijtihad as instruments of exegetical reform. Employing a qualitative library-based method with a historical-analytical approach, this study examines Tafsir al-Manar as a primary source alongside more than thirty recent secondary sources to map the character, strengths, and limitations of this style. The findings show that Tafsir al-Manar presents a tahlili-method tafsir bi al-ra'y that rejects blind imitation, promotes rational ijtihad, and consistently links verse meanings to actual issues such as superstition, oppression, polygamy, and education. This article argues that the adabi ijtima'i style of Abduh and Ridha laid an important foundation for contemporary contextual-thematic exegesis, while leaving a number of methodological critiques that warrant proportional scrutiny.