cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Nur Putri Hidayah
Contact Email
ilrej@umm.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
ilrej@umm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ)
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
ISSN : 27769259     EISSN : 27769674     DOI : 10.22219
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Scope of scientific articles published in this journal deals with various topics in the multidisciplinary field of study of Law from around the world, in particular issues related to: 1. Jurisprudence 2. Legal theory 3. Laws in modern countries 4. Comparative law 5. Constitutional law 6. Law and environment 7. Customary law 8. International law 9. Legal institutions 10. Islamic law 11. other legal topics
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 107 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
Protecting the Land Tenure Rights of Papuan Indigenous Peoples After New Autonomy Region Wicaksana Prakasa, Satria Unggul; R.S. Rakia, A. Sakti; Wook, Izawati
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.31352

Abstract

The issues with indigenous peoples are very frequent, the impact of development, investment, and deforestation is accompanied by land conversion activities for oil palm plantations and mining, making the rights of indigenous peoples marginalized. In this context, this study seeks to investigate: (1). What problems are experienced by the Papuan Indigenous Peoples and what protection should be accepted by legal and human rights approaches? (2) What are the challenges of Special Autonomy in Papua following the stipulation of the latest Special Autonomy Law, especially in Southwest Papua, and what kind of projections and challenges are needed to protect the Papuan people at large? This research uses socio-legal methods to identify legal procedures related to socio-cultural and political-economic aspects of the Papuan community. The result of this study shows that several points are specified to protect Indigenous Peoples rights in Papua, especially after Special Autonomy, namely the importance of protecting the human rights of Indigenous Peoples related to the right to self-determination, recognition of adat rights, and basic rights that should have affirmative policies carried out by the state to ensure that Indigenous Peoples can play a major role in protecting the environment and contributing to climate change prevention. Investment or state authority must be limited to protect, promote, and respect Indigenous Peoples in Papua and also Southwest Papuans. Then, with regard to the DOB in Papua, of course, it must be returned to its noble goal of protecting the rights of the Papuan people in realizing welfare and independence. Abuse of various forms of authority, including special autonomy funds in Papua must be condemned and strictly processed. Abstrak Problematika terhadap masyarakat adat sangat sering terjadi, dampak pembangunan, investasi, deforestasi disertai dengan aktivitas alih-fungsi lahan untuk perkebunan kelapa sawit dan pertambangan, menjadikan hak-hak masyarakat hukum adat menjadi tersingkirkan. Pada konteks ini kita perlu mengidentifikasi lebih dalam: (1). Bagaimana  problematika yang dialami MHA Papua dan perlindungan yang harusnya diterima pendekatan hukum dan HAM; (2). Bagaimana tantangan Otsus Papua pasca UU Otsus terbaru, khususnya di Papua Barat Daya, proyeksi dan tantangan seperti apa yang dibutuhkan untuk melindungi masyarakat Papua secara luas. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode sosio-legal untuk mengidentifikasi prosedur hukum serta lebih dari itu berkaitan dengan aspek sosio-kultur, dan  politik-ekonomi masyarakat Papua. Hasil penelitian ini adalahsetidaknya ada beberapa point untuk melindungi hak MHA di Papua khususnya pasca Otsus, yaitu pentingnya melidungi hak asasi dari MHA, berkaitan dengan hak menentukan nasibnya sendiri, pengakuan terhadap hak ulayat, serta hak-hak dasar yang harusnya ada kebijakan afirmatif yang dilakukan oleh negara untuk meastikan bahwa MHA dapat menjalankan peran besarnya dalam melindungi lingkungan hidup serta berkontribusi terhadap pencegahan perubahan iklim. Atas nama investasi atau otoritas negara yang berlebih, harus dibatasi dalam rangka perlindungan, pemajuan, dan penghormatan terhadap MHA, khususnya MHA di Papua. Kemudian, berkaitan dengan DOB di Papua termasuk di Papua Barat Daya, tentu harus dikembalikan kepada tujuan mulianya untuk melindungi hak masyarakat Papua dalam mewujudkan kesejahteraan dan kemandirian.
Capturing Law Reform in The Digital Age: Indonesian and Estonian Perspectives Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Sinha, Sara
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.31970

Abstract

This article examines how law reform in the digital age happens in Indonesia and Estonia. Indonesia and Estonia are located in different cultures and also areas. While law reform in the digital age happens, the two countries above will also demonstrate differences. This article uses normative legal studies to capture which legal instrument is better in both countries. This article found that Estonia is leading in providing legal instruments to face the digital age, while Indonesia needs to catch up. Some legal instruments in Indonesia such as AI law, Digital ID law, and e-government law should be drafted and implemented. Abstrak Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana reformasi hukum di era digital terjadi di Indonesia dan Estonia. Indonesia dan Estonia terletak dalam budaya dan wilayah yang berbeda. Meskipun reformasi hukum di era digital terjadi, kedua negara di atas pasti akan menunjukkan perbedaan dalam menghadapinya. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif untuk menemukan instrumen hukum mana yang lebih baik di kedua negara. Hasilnya, artikel ini menemukan bahwa Estonia lebih unggul dalam menyediakan instrumen hukum untuk menghadapi era digital, sementara Indonesia tertinggal dalam hal tersebut. Beberapa instrumen hukum di Indonesia harus dirancang dan diterapkan, seperti Rancangan Undang-Undang AI, Rancangan Undang-Undang Identitas Kependudukan Digital, dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Digital.
The Incorporation of Customary Water Rules under the Ethiopian Formal Water Governance System: Clash of Values between Commodification and Preservation Degu, Temesgen
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.31995

Abstract

Customary water rules need to be adequately incorporated into the Ethiopian formal water governance system despite their significance for ensuring sustainable and equitable utilization of scarce water resources. This research, using the textual analysis method and employing the theory of institutional incongruence, seeks to explore the extent of recognition of customary water rules under the formal water governance system of Ethiopia. The article argues that there needs to be more recognition of customary water rules under the Ethiopian formal water governance system, which has led to conflicts, inefficiencies, and unsustainable use of water resources. This is due to the value clash between the formal water rules built on the notion of water as a resource for commodification and customary water rules that see water as a sacred and communal part of communities' sociocultural and ecological being. As a result of this value clash, customary water rules, however important sustainability tenets they might lend, are only easily amenable to the formal water governance framework in the first place, questioning its basic foundations. Strategies such as incorporating ecosystems-based approaches, recognizing and integrating traditional knowledge, and promoting participatory decision-making processes can assist in bridging the gaps between commodification and preservation values. This, in turn, requires and largely depends on finding the right balance between economic development and environmental sustainability. This entails a fundamental reconsideration of the very goals of the Ethiopian water resources management policy, proclamation and regulation. 
Impacts of Justice Collaborator Revocation from Prisoner Remissions for Extraordinary Crimes in Class 1 Correctional Facilities in Tangerang Amiludin, Amiludin; Dias Saputra, Muhamad; Bukhari Razif, Imran; Nurfauziah Ahmad, Dwi
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.32022

Abstract

The elimination of Justice Collaborator as a requirement for an Extraordinary Crime convict to obtain sentence reduction or remission, in accordance with the provisions stated in the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 7 of 2022, which amends the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 3 of 2018 regarding the requirements and procedures for granting sentence reduction, has changed the mechanism for granting remission to prisoners at Class 1 Tangerang Correctional Institution, both in terms of administrative and subjective requirements. This change has both positive and negative impacts on the existing regulations. The research methodology employed is empirical legal research, as it relates to the effectiveness of the law. The recommendations obtained are related to communication, education, and transparency regarding the implementation of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 7 of 2022 at Class 1 Tangerang Correctional Institution, in order to be accepted and understood by the inmates, their families, and relevant stakeholders
Legal Liability for Celebrities Promoting Goods Through The Instagram Platform Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari; Devlita Almi Az Zahra; Herwastoeti
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.32107

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the Legal Position of celebrities in promoting goods through the Instagram platform and the form of legal liability by celebrities for endorsements or advertised products. With a normative Legal method supported by statutory and conceptual approaches in the context of problem-solving, and Library Research, this research reveals that the legal position of celebrities holds no legal basis which specifically regulates the legal position of celebrities and no rules used and applied, resulting in a vacuum in norms. When a problem regarding endorsement with indications of products not in accordance with what is advertised emerges, this issue involves Liability based on fault. In such a case, the relevant form of liability where the celebgram is responsible for losses caused by mistakes contravening Article 4 letter h of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection asserting that consumers are entitled to compensation, compensation and/or replacement if the goods and/or services received are not by the agreement or not as they should be. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui tentang Kedudukan Hukum selebgram dalam mempromosikan barang melalui platform Instagram serta untuk dapat mengetahui tentang bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum oleh selebgram atas endorsement atau produk yang diklankan. Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah jenis Penelitian Hukum Normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (the statute approach), penelitian ini juga menggunakan pendekatan konseptual (the conceptual approach) yang digunakan dalam rangka pemecahan masalah, serta penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (Library Research). Hasil penelitian yang didapat adalah Kedudukan hukum selebgram secara khusus ditegaskan bahwasanya tidak ada dasar hukum yang mengatur secara khusus mengenai kedudukan hukum selebgram dan belum memiliki aturan yang dipakai dan diterapkan akibatnya terjadi kekosongan norma. Ketika terjadi permasalahan mengenai endorsement dengan indikasi produk yang tidak sesuai dengan yang diklankan maka bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang dilakukan adalah Liability base on fault. Dimana dalam hal ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa Bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang relevan adalah dimana selebgram bertanggungjawab atas kerugian yang disebabkan oleh kesalahan yang dilakukannya terdapat dalam Pasal 4 huruf h UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen yang berbunyi konsumen berhak untuk mendapatkan kompensasi, ganti rugi dan/atau penggantian, apabila barang dan/atau jasa yang diterima tidak sesuai dengan perjanjian atau tidak sebagaimana mestinya.
The Indonesian Legal Framework to Mitigate Marine Plastic Debris Chomariyah, Chomariyah; Rafiqi, Ilham Dwi
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): March, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i1.32110

Abstract

This study aims to analyse and identify the problem of plastic marine debris in Indonesia and in the ASEAN Frame. This research employed a normative approach involving the implementation of the ASEAN Framework, Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and management, based on the principle of sustainability. The government and the local Government's duties are to ensure that marine debris will be implemented in a good manner and based on environmentally sound management, as in line with Presidential Regulation No. 83 Year 2018 on Marine Debris Management.  This study also uses qualitative methods to explain and analyze the phenomena and social dynamics of marine plastic debris. The ASEAN framework involves the encouragement of the preparation of regional action plans to combat marine plastic debris. This is important, considering that the four ASEAN countries (Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines) are the largest producers of marine plastic debris in the world, while Indonesia is involved in every stage of environmental diplomacy in ASEAN.  The research results show that the measures taken by ASEAN range from the initiation stage to the implementation of the ASEAN Regional Action Plan to Combat Marine Debris in ASEAN Member States 2021 – 2025 including in Indonesia. Every state performs its own marine debris management, depending on the Area, population, mastery of technology and state budget. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengidentifikasi permasalahan sampah plastik di laut di Indonesia dan dalam kerangka ASEAN. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan normatif, peraturan perundang-undangan dengan mengimplementasikan Kerangka ASEAN, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, berdasarkan prinsip keberlanjutan. Tugas Pemerintah dan Pemerintah Daerah adalah menjamin pengelolaan sampah laut dilaksanakan dengan baik dan berdasarkan pengelolaan yang berwawasan lingkungan, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 83 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Laut. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan metode kualitatif untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis fenomena, dinamika sosial sampah plastik di laut. Kerangka kerja ASEAN adalah dengan mendorong penyusunan rencana aksi regional untuk memerangi sampah plastik di laut. Hal ini penting karena keempat negara ASEAN (Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Filipina) merupakan penghasil sampah plastik laut terbesar di dunia. Indonesia terlibat dalam setiap tahapan diplomasi lingkungan hidup di ASEAN. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Di ASEAN mulai dari tahap inisiasi hingga implementasi Rencana Aksi Regional ASEAN untuk Memerangi Sampah Laut di Negara Anggota ASEAN 2021 – 2025 termasuk di Indonesia. Dalam melaksanakan pengelolaan sampah laut tidak selalu sama di setiap Negara, terdapat empat unsur yang membedakannya tergantung pada Luas Wilayah, jumlah penduduk, penguasaan teknologi dan anggaran pendapatan Negara.
Implementation of Indirect Evidence on Tender Conspiracy in The Construction Services: How to Prove it? Yusro, Mochammad Abizar; Hakimah , Arista Salsabila; Edeline, Aurora
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): March, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i1.32741

Abstract

In the current government era, the focus on infrastructure development is carried out to increase competitiveness on a national and international scale. Tthe realisation of the infrastructure budget in 2021 reached IDR 402.8 trillion, growing 31.1% compared to 2020. However, it is not uncommon for irregularities to occur in preparing and implementing infrastructure development, one of which is a tender conspiracy in the construction services sector. Difficult proof becomes an obstacle in law enforcement regarding business competition. Therefore, this research focuses on implementing indirect evidence in the construction services sector to sanction violations of business competition aspects in Indonesia. This research is descriptive and uses normative juridical research. The statutory approach (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach) are used, supported by the secondary data divided into primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The secondary data was obtained through library research collection techniques and then analysed qualitatively. The results of this study prove that indirect evidence can be used to confirm that the respondent was found guilty of tender conspiracy, indicating the practice of unfair business competition. The respondent is subject to administrative sanctions to provide a deterrent effect so as not to repeat the violation. Abstrak Pada era pemerintahan saat ini berfokus pada pembangunan infrastruktur dilakukan untuk meningkatkan daya saing di skala nasional maupun internasional. Realisasi anggaran infrastruktur tahun 2021 mencapai Rp 402,8 triliun, tumbuh 31,1% dibandingkan tahun 2020. Akan tetapi, tidak jarang penyimpangan dalam proses persiapan dan pelaksanaan pembangunan infrastruktur, salah satunya adalah terjadi persekongkolan tender di sektor jasa konstruksi. Pembuktian yang sulit menjadi hambatan dalam penegakan hukum dalam aspek persaingan usaha. Oleh karena itu, tujuan penelitian ini berfokus pada implementasi pembuktian tidak langsung (indirect evidence) di sektor jasa konstruksi, guna memberikan sanksi pada pelanggaran aspek persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif. Jenis pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach). Data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang terbagi atas bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Data sekunder tersebut diperoleh melalui teknik pengumpulan studi kepustakaan (library research), yang kemudian data dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa indirect evidence dapat digunakan untuk membuktikan termohon dinyatakan bersalah atas pelanggaran persekongkolangan tender, dalam praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Adapun termohon dikenakan sanksi administratif untuk memberikan efek jera agar tidak melakukan pelanggaran tersebut kembali.
Implementation of Public Service Supervision Function in Government Agencies by the Ombudsman of The Republic of Indonesia Mamluatus Sa'adah; Catur Wido Haruni; Esfandiari, Fitria
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): July, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i2.32819

Abstract

Public service is an important part of government administration that directly impacts people's lives. The quality and effectiveness of public services are the most important factors influencing public satisfaction and faith in government. The Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, an autonomous agency governed by Law Number 37 of 2008, regulates the delivery of public services in Indonesia. As a result, the purpose of this study is to discover and investigate the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia's execution of the public service supervisory function in government agencies, as well as the challenges encountered and the efforts taken to overcome them. This study used the sociological juridical research approach. This study used primary data, specifically data obtained directly by researchers through in-depth interviews with the chairman and staff of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as secondary data, which included laws, documents related to public service supervision, and Ombudsman reports, to gain a better understanding of the supervisory function's implementation, which was then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The study's findings shed light on the Ombudsman's implementation of the public service oversight function, including the challenges it faced and the measures made to overcome them. This study also makes recommendations for improving the efficacy of public service monitoring in government entities. This research is expected to help Indonesia create public service oversight rules and practices, allowing government agencies to improve public services to better fulfill the requirements of the population. Abstrak Pelayanan publik merupakan bagian penting dari administrasi pemerintahan yang berdampak langsung pada kehidupan masyarakat. Kualitas dan efektivitas pelayanan publik adalah faktor terpenting yang mempengaruhi kepuasan dan kepercayaan publik terhadap pemerintah. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia, sebuah lembaga otonom yang diatur oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008, mengatur penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan dan menyelidiki pelaksanaan fungsi pengawasan pelayanan publik oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia di instansi pemerintah, serta tantangan yang dihadapi dan upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengatasinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian yuridis sosiologis. Penelitian ini menggunakan data primer, khususnya data yang diperoleh langsung oleh peneliti melalui wawancara mendalam dengan ketua dan staf Ombudsman Republik Indonesia, serta data sekunder, yang meliputi undang-undang, dokumen terkait pengawasan pelayanan publik, dan laporan Ombudsman, untuk mendapatkan pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang pelaksanaan fungsi pengawasan, yang kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif secara kualitatif. Temuan studi ini menjelaskan implementasi fungsi pengawasan layanan publik oleh Ombudsman, termasuk tantangan yang dihadapinya dan langkah-langkah yang dilakukan untuk mengatasinya. Studi ini juga memberikan rekomendasi untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pemantauan pelayanan publik di entitas pemerintah. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat membantu Indonesia menciptakan aturan dan praktik pengawasan pelayanan publik, memungkinkan lembaga pemerintah untuk meningkatkan pelayanan publik untuk memenuhi kebutuhan penduduk dengan lebih baik.
Justice for Indigenous People: Management Right Term to Third Parties Maulana, Iqbal; Fadli, Moh; Herlinda, Herlinda; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): March, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i1.33058

Abstract

Management rights are control rights from the state, part of which is given to the right holder. Management rights on customary land can contribute to the state and customary law communities by paying attention to the customary rights of customary law communities recognised by the constitution. This research explores the legal basis for the recognition of customary rights, the concept of management rights over customary rights, and how the time limit for management rights cooperated with third parties can provide justice to Indigenous peoples. The method employed is the normative legal method, utilising both statutory and conceptual approaches. The research results highlight a legal vacuum regarding the time limit of management rights when engaging with third parties, where legal protection to the parties cannot be provided due to a legal vacuum. This gap in legal protection necessitates prompt regulation to set time limits that are equitable for Indigenous communities to ensure certainty, justice and legal protection for all parties involved. Abstrak Hak pengelolaan merupakan hak menguasai dari negara yang sebagian pelaksanaannya diberikan kepada pemegang haknya. Hak pengelolaan di atas tanah ulayat dapat memberikan konstribusi bagi negara dan masyarakat hukum adat dengan memerhatikan Hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat yang di akui oleh konstitusi. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk menganalisis  pengakuan hak ulayat, kedua konsep hak pengelolaan diatas hak ulayat, ketiga dan batasan waktu hak pengelolaan yang dikerjasamakan kepada pihak ketiga dapat memberikan keadilan kepada masyarakat hukum adat. Metode yang digunakan adalah  metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kekosongan hukum mengenai batasan waktu hak pengelolaan yang akan dikerjasamakan kepada pihak lain/ketiga, yang dimana perlindungan hukum kepada para pihak tidak dapat diberikan karena adanya kekosongan hukum, sehingga demi menjamin kepastian, keadilan dan perlindungan hukum bagi pihak ketiga, terkhusus masyarakat hukum adat, maka perlunya segera diatur batasan waktu yang berkeadilan bagi masyarakat hukum adat.
Diversion Taken for the Case of Violence Committed by Children Haris, Haris; Santi, Nyadina Eka
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): March, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i1.33062

Abstract

This research seeks to investigate, study, and analyse the diversion taken in the case of violence committed by children in the Sub-Regional Police Department in Malang City. This is socio-empirical research entailing direct observation in the Sub-Regional Police Department in Malang City, aiming to delve into the problems discussed. The research materials consist of primary and secondary data obtained directly and indirectly. The analysis results reveal that the process of diversion in the case of violence committed by children should take into account deliberation involving both victims and perpetrators along with their parents/guardians, social welfare personnel, and the members of the public. Some measures of diversion work as expected when redress could be obtained, while others fail when family members of the victims insist on bringing the case to court. The diversion process should also take into account mentorship for the victims and their rights, where direct protection is provided. A legal advisor or a psychologist can facilitate this mentorship. Diversion is intended to teach children to be responsible for what they have committed to ensure that the objectives of diversion enshrined in the Law concerning the Judicial System of Juvenile Crime are attained. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, mengkaji, dan menganalisis diversi yang dilakukan dalam kasus kekerasan yang dilakukan oleh anak di wilayah hukum Polres Kota Malang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian sosio-empiris dengan melakukan observasi langsung di Kepolisian Sektor Kota Malang, yang bertujuan untuk mendalami permasalahan yang dibahas. Bahan penelitian terdiri dari data primer dan sekunder yang diperoleh secara langsung dan tidak langsung. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa proses diversi dalam kasus kekerasan yang dilakukan oleh anak harus memperhatikan musyawarah yang melibatkan korban dan pelaku beserta orang tua/wali, tenaga kesejahteraan sosial, dan masyarakat. Beberapa langkah diversi berhasil seperti yang diharapkan ketika ganti rugi dapat diperoleh, sementara yang lain gagal ketika anggota keluarga korban bersikeras untuk membawa kasus tersebut ke pengadilan. Proses diversi juga harus mempertimbangkan pendampingan bagi para korban dan hak-hak mereka, di mana perlindungan langsung diberikan. Seorang penasihat hukum atau psikolog dapat memfasilitasi pendampingan ini. Diversi dimaksudkan untuk mengajarkan anak untuk bertanggung jawab atas apa yang telah mereka lakukan untuk memastikan bahwa tujuan diversi yang tercantum dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak tercapai.

Page 9 of 11 | Total Record : 107

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2021 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): November, 2024 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): July, 2024 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): March, 2024 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): July 2023 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): March, 2023 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): November, 2022 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Maret, 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2: July, 2022 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Maret 2021 More Issue