cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Buletin Peternakan
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 01264400     EISSN : 2407876X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak
Core Subject : Health, Education,
Veterinary Other
Bulletin of Animal Science is published every four months. The Annual subscription rate is Rp. 150.000,-/year. Bulletin receives original papers in animal science and technology which are not published at any other journals.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 1,046 Documents
 31   32   33   34   35 
Lactation Characteristic of Etawah Crossed Breed Goats Under Intensive Management Yuni Suranindyah; Budi Prasetyo Widyobroto; Sulvia Dwi Astuti; Tridjoko Wisnu Murti; Adiarto Adiarto
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i1.44176

Abstract

The study aimed to describe lactation characteristic of Etawah Crossed Breed goats raised under intensive management. The study located in BBPTU HPT Baturraden, Purwokerto, used 27 female pregnant goats, at 24 to 27 months old. The goats were managed followed standard operating procedure of the research institute. The data consisted of body size and body weight, colostrum and milk yield, lactation period and reproductive performance. The results showed the average of daily milk yield, lactation period, total milk and colostrum production in first lactation were 960±340 mL/day, 157±41 days, 114,720±68,900 mL and 415±240 mL/day. The proportion of monthly milk production from initial lactation to dry off were 21.27, 22.17, 20.18, 17.29, 12.52, 9.13, and 5.65% of total lactation yield, respectively. Peak production ranged from first to second months of lactation, the highest was in the week 4th, averaged of 1080 mL/day. Production persistency was 66.39%. The rate of increase toward peak was 5.60%/week and rate of decline from peak was -3.92% of milk yield in the previous week. Trend equation of lactation curve was Y = 8412.7 –233.65 x. Means period of postpartum mating, service per conception and body condition score were 88.7±39.2 days, 1.2 and 3.45, respectively. There was no correlation between postpartum mating, body condition score and milk production. The study concluded that Etawah Crossed Breed goat under intensive management had short lactation period, early peak production, low persistency. The dry period was estimated 3 months and pregnancy occurred after peak production. 
Diet with Concentrate Containing Durio zibethinus Murr Seed Meal: Nutrient Contents, Fatty Acid Profiles, In Vitro Characteristics, and Nutrient Digestibility in Dairy Cows Endang Sulistyowati; Irma Badarina; Sigit Mujiharjo; Tamrin Simbolon; Idop Rohani Purba
Buletin Peternakan Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i4.44606

Abstract

This research was to evaluate concentrate diet containing Durio zibethinus seed meal (DSM) on nutrient contents, fatty acid profiles, in vitro characteristics, and nutrients digestibility in dairy cows. The experiment was arranged in Latin Square 4 x 4 design with 4 lactating dairy cows in 4 periods in 2 weeks for each period. The treatments were diets with concentrate containing ratios of rice bran and DSM,  DC 35/12.5 (35% of Rice bran+ 12.5% of DSM), DC 27.5/20 (27.5% of Rice bran+ 20% of DSM), DC 20/27.5 (20% of Rice bran+ 27.5% of DSM) and DC 12.5/35 (12.5% of Rice bran+ 35% of DSM). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (Anova), if any significant difference among treatment means were found, will be further analyzed using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Results showed that 20% of  DSM supplemented in concentrate improved nutrient contents of crude protein, ether extract, medium chain fatty acid (MCFA), long chain fatty acid (LCFA), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), unsaturated fatty acid (UFA), and n6/n3. In vitro dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, N-NH3, and total VFA were high in concentrate containing 35% DSM. However, in vivo digestibility evaluation showed nutrient intakes were no differences among treatments. Nutrient digestibility were found higher in diet with concentrate containing 27.5% of DSM. There were three different optimal levels could be suggested, 20% of DSM (for nutrient and fatty acid content), 27.5% of DSM (for nutrient digestibility), and 35% of DSM (for in vitro characteristics).  Supported by previous milk production, it was concluded that the 27.5% of DSM was suggested to be applied in concentrate for dairy cows.
Influence of Hemicell® Addition on Diets Containing Different Levels of Crude Fiber on Performance of Laying Hens Muhammad Ridla; Annisa Imran; Anuraga Jayanegara; Widya Hermana; Allaily Tarman
Buletin Peternakan Vol 43, No 3 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (3) AUGUST 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i3.44618

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of Hemicell® addition on diets containing different levels of crude fiber on performance and egg quality of laying hens. A total of 72 laying hens aged 21 weeks were randomly divided into 18 experimental units. A completely randomized design with factorial design 2×3 and 3 replications was employed in this study. Factor A was crude fiber level (5% and 8%) and factor B was the level of Hemicell®(0, 100x103 and 200x103 IU/kg ration).  Results showed that crude fiber significantly (P<0.01) increased feed consumption and decreased the performance of laying hens. The addition of Hemicell®in diets significantly (P<0.01) decreased feed consumption and increased the performance of laying hens. Hemicell®addition (100 IU) to a diet containing 8% crude fiber significantly (P<0.05) affected egg mass, feed conversion ratio, egg yolk score and egg weight. It can be concluded that diet with 8% crude fiber added with Hemicell® (100 IU) could increase egg mass, feed conversion ratio, egg weight and yolk color score.
Farmers’ Satisfaction of the Service Quality of Broiler Contract Farming Model in Banyumas Regency Mochamad Sugiarto; Yusmi Nur Wakhidati; Hudri Aunurrohman
Buletin Peternakan Vol 43, No 3 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (3) AUGUST 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i3.44853

Abstract

This study aims at identifying nucleus companies’ service quality, broiler farmers’ satisfaction and the relationship between contract farming services quality and broiler farmers’ satisfaction in Banyumas Regency. The study takes survey method to broiler farmers participating in contract farming programs from five nucleus companies in Banyumas Regency as its population. 50 broiler farmers are selected using the proportional random sampling method based on Slovin formula as respondents. The data obtained are analyzed by employing descriptive statistics and Correlation Rank Spearman Analysis. The results show that the farmers are averagely 44 years old with mostly junior high education, and 76% of the respondents have broiler farming as their main livelihood. The farmers have quite a long time of experience (8.92 years) in raising broiler farming. Their satisfaction of the contract farming model’s service is of medium category (score 84.02) and their perception of the nucleus companies’ service quality is of medium category (score 86.34). The Spearman Rank Correlation analysis shows that the nucleus companies’ service quality is significantly related to the broiler farmers’ satisfaction (P<0.01) with a strong correlation coefficient of 0.761. The nucleus companies’ services in broiler contract farming model must be continuously improved to increase broiler farmers’ satisfaction.
The Effect of Nano-Encapsulation Phaleria macrocarpa Fruits Extract in Drinking Water on the Digestive Tract and Carcass Characteristic of Broiler Chickens Zuprizal Zuprizal; Niati Ningsih; Taufik Ahmad Zulfian
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i1.44958

Abstract

The present study was to evaluate the effects of nano-encapsulated Phaleria macrocarpa fruit extract (NEPM) in drinking water on the digestive organs and carcass characteristic of broiler chickens. A total number of two hundred male broiler chicks were randomly divided into five treatments with four replicates, each replicate contained ten chickens. Broiler chickens have received a basal diet supplemented with or without experimental treatments. Five experimental treatments were: control diet (T0; negative control), diet with tetracycline (T1; positive control), diet with 2.5% of Phaleria macrocarpa fruits extract (T2),  diet with 2.5% NEPM (T3), and diet with 5.0% NEPM (T4). The diets were based on yellow corn and soybean meal and contained 20.44% crude protein, 2,917.47 kcal/kg metabolizable energy, 0.84% Calcium, and 0.51% available Phosphorus. On the 35th day, one bird from each replicate pen was slaughtered. Carcass characteristics and weights of digestive organs were measured. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA in a completely randomized design. The orthogonal contrast test was used to separate the mean when the P-value was less than 5%. Results showed that the use of nano-encapsulated Phaleria macrocarpa fruits extracts up to 5.0% in the diet did not give any significant effect on the carcass, digestive organs, heart and liver weights of broiler chickens. It can be concluded that the supplementation of Phaleria macrocarpa fruits extracts whether nano-encapsulated or not, did not affect carcass weight, weights of digestive organs and weights of the heart and liver of broiler chickens.
Household Behavior and Response to the Participative Institutional Model for the Program of Handling Drainage of Productive Cows Ardi Novra; Bagus Pramusintho
Buletin Peternakan Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i4.44968

Abstract

The research survey aimed to observe the households behavior and response to the participatory institution model of the preventing of the productive cows exploitation. The sample technique to select of the domestic cattle farmer (DCF) as the unit of analysis using the multiple stages cluster sampling and then sample allocation was equal for three districts. Structural equation model consisted of 5 behavior equations drawn up from the 5 endogenous and 13 exogenous variables. The research results showed that the rate of release of productive cows about 19.23 percent. The institutional model to handling of the drain at least productive cows have four major components, were members (DCFs), the management, micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and buffer-stock. The household motivation to develop the business scale and maintain the productive heifer shaped by land ownership and livestock scale expected factors. Then both types of motivation were not significantly associated with DCF's motivation to engage in institutional, as the more dominant individual as shaped by the farmer age. The other hand, the confidence level of participatory institutional effectiveness significantly shaped by the perception of institutional and potential release of productive heifer compared the potential release of motivation factors and correlated positively with the economic conditions.
Refeeding Postmolting Method to Improve Weekly Production Performance of Rejected Laying Hens with Low Mortality Claude Mona Airin; Amelia Hana; Pudji Astuti; Sarmin Sarmin; Trini Susmiati; Okti Herawati
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 2 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (2) MAY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i2.45508

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the influence of gradually feeding rejected laying hens after molting on the performance of production. This research used 6,000 rejected laying hens of 80 weeks old in Subur Farm. Molting method was a modification method by reducing the feed gradually. At the beginning of this research, the feed was given 120 g/laying hens/day and it would be reduced by 10 g/laying hens/day until it reach 50 g/laying hens/day. In the next phase, all chickens fasted for seven days then the chicken was given 10 g/laying hens on the first day. The feed was increased 10 g/laying hens every two days up to 120 g/laying hens/day. Data Collection of Feed conversion ratio (FCR), mortality rate, amount of feed, and egg production were taken at the start of re-feeding. The results showed that during the period of molting until refeeding, mortality was 3.6%, an increase in egg production was seen since week 1, peak of production was 78% at week 9 with FCR 2.3.  The results of statistical analysis showed significant differences (P<0.05) on the percentage of egg production between time periods after the treatment of feed reduction. As the conclusion, molting followed by refeeding in rejected laying hen influences weekly production performance by extending peak production period, optimal FCR and daily egg production.
Physicochemical Characteristics and Microbiological Quality of the Topside and Longissimus Dorsi of Indonesian Local Buffalo Meat Noraimah Binti Sulaiman; Cece Sumantri; Irma Isnafia Arief; Cahyo Budiman
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 2 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (2) MAY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i2.45544

Abstract

The physicochemical characteristics and microbiological quality of buffalo meat are influenced by differences in muscle type. This study aimed to evaluate the physiochemical characteristic and microbiological quality of the topside (active muscle) and longissimus dorsi (passive muscle) of Indonesian local buffalo meat. Samples used in this study were buffalo meat from local swamp buffalo, aged more than four years old on the topside and longissimus dorsi. This study used a completely randomized design, with three repetitions in each treatment. All data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The result of the study on the topside and longissimus dorsi area showed a significant difference in the pH and cholesterol levels of the buffalo meat. The longissimus dorsi area had a lower level of pH and cholesterol compared to the topside area. Furthermore, this longissimus dorsi meat has a higher color, protein, ash, fat, essential amino acid, and lactic acid bacterial (BAL) content than the topside meat. However, the topside meat had higher carbohydrate, essential fatty acid, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) content compared to the longissimus dorsi meat. Longissimus dorsi meat had better physicochemical characteristics and microbiological quality than the topside meat
Morphometry of Male Reproductive Organ and Sperm Evaluation of Belgian Blue Crossbreed Cattle as a Candidate of Superior Bull Riyan Nugroho Aji; Panjono Panjono; Ali Agus; Budi Prasetyo Widyobroto; Tety Hartatik; I Gede Suparta Budisatria; Ismaya Ismaya; Akhmad Fathoni; Dwi Astuti; Sigit Bintara
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 4 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (4) NOVEMBER 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i4.45944

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to observe the size of reproductive organ and to evaluate the sperm quality of Belgian Blue (BB) crossbreed cattle. This cattle are the crossbreeding result between a female Brahman Cross (BX) cattle inseminated with frozen semen from pure male BB cattle, by Artificial Insemination (IB) method, as a candidate of superior bull. The samples of this study were 2.5 years old (BB1), (BB2), and (BB3) crossbreed cattle. Its process involved general physical examination, genital organ inspection, sperm production, and quality assessment. The data obtained were analyzed through descriptive analysis. The results of this study were the three BB crossbred cattle showed the good appearance of normal reproductive organs with scrotum circumferences of each bull were 40.2 cm, 38.6 cm, and 39.8 cm respectively, and sperm quality of the good and the normal motility values of each bull were 82%, 81% and 80%, viability 84%, 83%, and 86%, and the sperm concentrations of each bull were 2.218 million/ml, 1.986 million/ml and 2.120 million/ml respectively. As a result, it could be concluded that those three BB crossbreed cattle are suitable for being used as a superior bull.
Reproductive Performance of Beef Cattle Raised Under SPR Program in Tegal Regency Aji Gunawan; Akhmad Sodiq; Krismiwati Muatip; Novie Andri Setianto
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i1.46127

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to assess the reproductive performance of beef cattle based on different production systems. Survey research was carried out in Margasari Subdistrict, Tegal Regency, Central Java Province, in 13 farmer groups (a total of 188 breeders and 557 beef cattle) who took shelter in the SPR Program The qualitative and quantitative design framework is used to obtain comprehensive data. The questionnaire was used to get data and respondents determined by census method. SPSS software is used to analyze data. The results showed that 38.46% of farmer groups implemented a crop-livestock-system (CLS), 30.77% of farmer groups implemented a livestock-forestry system (LFS), and 30.77% of farmer groups implemented a crop-livestock-forestry-system (CLFS) in producing beef cattle. The results of the present study were significantly (P<0.05) there were differences in each reproductive performance parameter (BCS, S / C, CR, CI, and CC), which was observed in each beef production system (CLFS, CLS, and LFS). The results of this study also provide an overview of the simultaneous effects on the application of the production system to the reproductive performance of beef cattle. Although there has been certain variation between the production systems, the reproductive performance of the observed beef cattle has not been satisfactory. Improving nutrition management in cattle is needed to realize successful reproductive performance.

Page 33 of 105 | Total Record : 1046

 31   32   33   34   35 

Filter by Year

1987 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 49, No 4 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (4) November 2025 Vol 49, No 3 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (3) August 2025 Vol 49, No 2 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (2) MAY 2025 Vol 49, No 1 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (1) FEBRUARY 2025 Vol 48, No 4 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (4) NOVEMBER 2024 Vol 48, No 3 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (3) AUGUST 2024 Vol 48, No 2 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (2) MAY 2024 Vol 48, No 1 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (1) FEBRUARY 2024 Vol 47, No 4 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (4) NOVEMBER 2023 Vol 47, No 3 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (3) AUGUST 2023 Vol 47, No 2 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (2) MAY 2023 Vol 47, No 1 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (1) FEBRUARY 2023 Vol 46, No 4 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (4) NOVEMBER 2022 Vol 46, No 3 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (3) AUGUST 2022 Vol 46, No 2 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (2) MAY 2022 Vol 46, No 1 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (1) FEBRUARY 2022 Vol 45, No 4 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (4) NOVEMBER 2021 Vol 45, No 3 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (3) AUGUST 2021 Vol 45, No 2 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (2) MAY 2021 Vol 45, No 1 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (1) FEBRUARY 2021 Vol 44, No 4 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (4) NOVEMBER 2020 Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020 Vol 44, No 2 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (2) MAY 2020 Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020 Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019 Vol 43, No 3 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (3) AUGUST 2019 Vol 43, No 2 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (2) MAY 2019 Vol 43, No 1 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (1) FEBRUARY 2019 Vol 42, No 4 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (4) NOVEMBER 2018 Vol 42, No 3 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (3) AUGUST 2018 Vol 42, No 2 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (2) MAY 2018 Vol 42, No 1 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (1) FEBRUARY 2018 Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017 Vol 41, No 3 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (3) AGUSTUS 2017 Vol 41, No 2 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (2) MEI 2017 Vol 41, No 1 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (1) FEBRUARI 2017 Vol 40, No 3 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (3) OKTOBER 2016 Vol 40, No 2 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (2) JUNI 2016 Vol 40, No 1 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (1) FEBRUARI 2016 Vol 39, No 3 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (3) OKTOBER 2015 Vol 39, No 2 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (2) JUNI 2015 Vol 39, No 1 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (1) FEBRUARI 2015 Vol 38, No 3 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (3) OKTOBER 2014 Vol 38, No 2 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (2) JUNI 2014 Vol 38, No 1 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (1) FEBRUARI 2014 Vol 37, No 3 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (3) OKTOBER 2013 Vol 37, No 2 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (2) JUNI 2013 Vol 37, No 1 (2013): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 37 (1) Februari 2013 Vol 36, No 3 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (3) Oktober 2012 Vol 36, No 2 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (2) Juni 2012 Vol 36, No 1 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (1) Februari 2012 Vol 35, No 3 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (3) Oktober 2011 Vol 35, No 2 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (2) Juni 2011 Vol 35, No 1 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (1) Februari 2011 Vol 34, No 3 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (3) Oktober 2010 Vol 34, No 2 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (2) Juni 2010 Vol 34, No 1 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (1) Februari 2010 Vol 33, No 3 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (3) Oktober 2009 Vol 33, No 2 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (2) Juni 2009 Vol 33, No 1 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (1) Februari 2009 Vol 32, No 3 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (3) Oktober 2008 Vol 32, No 2 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (2) Juni 2008 Vol 32, No 1 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (1) Februari 2008 Vol 31, No 4 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (4) November 2007 Vol 31, No 3 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (3) Agustus 2007 Vol 31, No 2 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (2) Mei 2007 Vol 31, No 1 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (1) Februari 2007 Vol 30, No 4 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (4) November 2006 Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (3) Agustus 2006 Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (2) Mei 2006 Vol 30, No 1 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (1) Februari 2006 Vol 29, No 4 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (4) November 2005 Vol 29, No 3 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (3) Agustus 2005 Vol 29, No 2 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (2) Mei 2005 Vol 29, No 1 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (1) Februari 2005 Vol 28, No 4 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (4) November 2004 Vol 28, No 3 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (3) Agustus 2004 Vol 28, No 2 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (2) Mei 2004 Vol 28, No 1 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (1) Februari 2004 Vol 27, No 4 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (4) November 2003 Vol 27, No 3 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (3) Agustus 2003 Vol 27, No 2 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (2) Mei 2003 Vol 27, No 1 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (1) Februari 2003 Vol 26, No 4 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (4) November 2002 Vol 26, No 1 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (1) Februari 2002 Vol 25, No 4 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (4) November 2001 Vol 25, No 3 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (3) Agustus 2001 Vol 25, No 2 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (2) Mei 2001 Vol 25, No 1 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (1) Februari 2001 Vol 24, No 4 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (4) November 2000 Vol 24, No 3 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (3) Agustus 2000 Vol 24, No 2 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (2) Mei 2000 Vol 24, No 1 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (1) Februari 2000 Vol 23, No 4 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (4) November 1999 Vol 23, No 3 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (3) Agustus 1999 Vol 23, No 2 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (2) Mei 1999 Vol 23, No 1 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (1) Februari 1999 Vol 22, No 4 (1998): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 22 (4) November 1998 Vol 21, No 3 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (3) November 1997 Vol 21, No 1 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (1) April 1997 Vol 20, No 2 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (2) Desember 1996 Vol 20, No 1 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (1) Juni 1996 Vol 19, No 2 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (2) Desember 1995 Vol 19, No 1 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (1) Juni 1995 1995: BULETIN PETERNAKAN SPECIAL EDITION 1995 Vol 18, No 4 (1994): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 18 (4) Desember 1994 Vol 17, No 1 (1993): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 17 (1) Juni 1993 Vol 16, No 1 (1992): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 16 (1) Desember 1992 Vol 15, No 2 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (2) Desember 1991 Vol 15, No 1 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (1) Juni 1991 Vol 14, No 2 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (2) Desember 1990 Vol 14, No 1 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (1) Juni 1990 Vol 13, No 1 (1989): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 13 (1) September 1989 Vol 11, No 2 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (2) September 1987 Vol 11, No 1 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (1) Maret 1987 More Issue