cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Buletin Peternakan
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 01264400     EISSN : 2407876X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak
Core Subject : Health, Education,
Veterinary Other
Bulletin of Animal Science is published every four months. The Annual subscription rate is Rp. 150.000,-/year. Bulletin receives original papers in animal science and technology which are not published at any other journals.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 1,046 Documents
 32   33   34   35   36 
The Contribution of Labors to the Income of Pig Farming Business in the Tropical Coastal Papua Barat Jhonly Woran; Mulyadi Mulyadi; Lusia Keworip; Stepanus Pakage; Desni Saragih; Meky Sagrim; Lily Orisu; Deny Anjelus Iyai
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i1.46460

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the type of work and division of labor in the household-scale pig farm business and how much income was earned and generated by each male, adult female and child labor as a case study in the Manokwari coastal agroecological area Papua Barat. The method used is descriptive research method with survey techniques through interviews and field observations. The sample of farmers chosen purposively was 35 households out of 50 pig breeder. Farmers selected as samples are those who have been running pigs for more than 1 year. The parameters measured are labor involvement and contribution of economic beneficiaries. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, namely analysis of variance with further testing Scheffe using SPSS v.16.0. The results showed that the types of work carried out by domestic workers included processing and providing [A4] food, medicine and sanitation, selling live cattle on the market and selling carcasses. Female breeders have almost the same level of participation as men. In terms of working hours, women give higher time (521 hours/month) in 6 pig raising activities. Female workers contribute higher incomes than male workers.
Multivariate Analysis of Thermal Adaptive Profile of Three Genetic Groups of Duck Abel Oguntunji; Opeyemi Adetola Oladejo; Mathew Oluseyi Ayoola; Lopemi Opeoluwa Oriye; Opeyemi Olufemi Ogundijo; Abiola Olufunke Ilufoye
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i1.46595

Abstract

Inherent thermal adaptation in livestock is an important economic trait that cannot be overlooked, most especially in animals reared in sub-optimal thermally stressful environments. The present study explored the possibility of using multifactorial discriminant analysis (DA) to separate two duck genera {Muscovy and Common (Mallard) ducks) and their hybrid (Mule ducks) to distinct genetic groups using physiological, haematological and biochemical parameters. Data were collected after exposure of ducks to solar radiation for 90 minutes (12.00 – 13.30 hours). The result of analysis of variance indicated that genotype significantly (P<0.05) affected heamoglobin (Hb), basophil (Bas), total protein (TP), albumin (Alb), globulin (Glb), skin temperature (SKT), respiratory rate (RRT), panting rate (PTR) and rectal temperature (RTC). Stepwise DA revealed that PTR, RRT, Bas and TP in descending order were the most important parameters discriminating the three duck genotypes. The result of cross validation showed that 71.00%, 97.30% and 50.00% of Muscovy, Common and Mule ducks were correctly classified in their expected genetic group respectively. The Euclidean distance between the duck genotypes indicated that longest distance (86.507) was between Muscovy and Common (Mallard) ducks while shortest distance (12.415) was between Muscovy and Mule ducks. The results are applicable in breed adaptation studies, management, conservation and improvement programmes.
The Influence of Socio Economics Characteristics and Meat Self-Sufficiency Policy on Beef Cattle Farmer’s Income in Indonesia Wisnu Bawono; Sudi Nurtini; Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.47786

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the influence of the implementation of the meat self-sufficiency policy on the cattle farmers’ income in Indonesia. This study used secondary data of Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) that were collected in 2014. The IFLS are household data taken by survey at national level. This study used IFLS 5 data. The observed variables in this study included characteristics of farmer's household such as age, area of land cultivated, number of family members, education level, patterns integration of livestock farming and government assistance. Household income is derived from reduced revenue from agricultural sector and it cost as the dependent variable. The results of the study showed that mixed farming or livestock farming integration influenced farmer household income significantly (P<0.01). The cultivated land size affected the household income of farmers (P<0.01). The level of education, number of family members, type of assistance and age did not affect the income of household farmers. The Respondents were divided in two group, group that were exposed and those that were not to the meat self-sufficiency program. The results of study showed that government policy in meat self-sufficiency did not have a significant impact on the household income of farmers. The development of livestock in order to achieve self-sufficiency in meat needs to be
Effect of Different Beehives Size and Daily Activity of Stingless Bee Tetragonula Laeviceps on Bee-Pollen Production Ali Agus; Agussalim Agussalim; Nafiatul Umami; I Gede Suparta Budisatria
Buletin Peternakan Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i4.47865

Abstract

Bee activities and colony may affect the production of bee products. Bee-pollen is one of the important products of honeybees, besides of honey. Tetragonula laeviceps is a group member of stingless bees found in tropical region. In Indonesia, Tetragonula laeviceps mostly create a nest in bamboos that make unfortunately difficult for harvesting of its products. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different beehives size and the daily activity (morning vs. afternoon) of stingless bee Tetragonula laeviceps on bee-pollen production. This study was conducted in Ngrandu, Katongan Village, Sub-district of Nglipar, Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. Forty colonies of Tetragonula laeviceps were obtained from bamboos (similar in diameter and length) were transferred into four different group of beehives size (BS) made from dried wood, respectively: 35x17.5x13.5 (BS1); 35x20x17.5 (BS2); 37.5x20x20 (BS3) and 40x20x20 cm (BS4). Each group of beehives size had ten colonies/beehives as replicates. The colonies consisted of a queen bee, eggs, worker bees, and drones were transferred into wood beehives, and they were kept for two months for the study. The bee-pollen was harvested from beehives, separated from the propolis then weighed. The production of bee-pollen in the four different beehives size (BS1: 2.34±2.48 g/colony; BS2: 4.56±3.94 g/colony; BS3: 1.30±1.22 g/colony, BS4: 1.02±0.63 g/colony) was not different (ns) among the groups. The daily activity of bee bring the pollen to the nest in the morning (07.00 to 11.00) was significantly different (P<0.05) among the groups, but not significant (ns) different in the afternoon (14.00 to 17.00). The frequency of bringing in pollen into the hives at the morning is higher than at the afternoon (21.75 vs. 12.43 times/5 minutes). It could be concluded that the colony in beehive size of BS2 (35x20x17.5 cm) has higher daily activities and thus higher bee-pollen production, compared to the other beehives groups.
The Effect of Nutmeg Leaves Tannin (Myristica fragrans Houtt) as Protein Protecting Agents on In Vitro Nutrient Digestibility Monica Canadianti; Lies Mira Yusiati; Chusnul Hanim; Budi Prasetyo Widyobroto; Andriyani Astuti
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i1.47976

Abstract

This experiment was aimed to study the effect of nutmeg leaf tannin addition on in vitro nutrient digestibility. Treatments in this experiment consisted of: P0 (control without tannin), P1 (feed + 2% tannin) and P2 (feed + 4% tannin). Feed for fermentation substrate consisted of Pennisetum purpureum and soybean meal with ratio 60:40. Fermentation was carried out using Tilley and Terry two stages in vitro technique for 48 hours. Variables measured were the digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein in the rumen as well as the total digestive tract digestibility based on in vitro technique. The data obtained were analyzed by One Way ANOVA, and followed by the Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The results showed that rumen dry matter digestibility was lower (P<0.05) in P1 and P2 (59.03±3.24 and 57.19±1.32) compared to P0 (70.77±1.05), but did not show a significant difference (P>0.05) in the total dry matter digestibility of P0, P1, and P2 (74.88±5.28, 67.70±3.21, and 64.83±4.96). Organic matter digestibility in the rumen was also lower (P<0.05) in P1 and P2 (55.55±6.29 and 55.76±6.88) compared to P0 (75.39±0.91), but did not show significant difference (P>0.05) in total organic matter digestibility from P0, P1, and P2 (64.69±6.44, 64.33±6.34, and 61.20±5.11). The digestibility of crude protein in the rumen at P1 and P2 (45.48±5.12 and 38.47±3.44) was also significantly lower (P<0.05) compared to P0 (60.93±9.72), whereas total digestibility did not show any significant difference (P>0.05). Addition of tannin leaf nutmeg 2% optimally reduced rumen dry matter and crude protein digestibility without causing excessive negative impact on results of in vitro digestibility, so it can be used as a protective agent protein feed.
Application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Probiotic for Producing Low Cholesterol and Antibiotic-Free Broiler Meat Suci Wulandari; Theo Mahiseta Syahniar; Dadik Pantaya
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 2 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (2) MAY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i2.48544

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of S. cerevisiae as a probiotic for producing low cholesterol and antibiotic-free broiler meat. This study used 250 broilers (14 days old) which were divided into 5 treatment groups, those were T0 (rations without S. cerevisiae addition), T1, T2 and T3 (rations added with 0.5, 1, and 1.5 g/kg DM of S. cerevisiae respectively), and K group (commercial feed). Broilers were reared until 36 days old prior to slaughter. The carcass quality, abdominal fat, internal organs, cholesterol content of breast meat, the number of LAB and E. coli of intestinal tract were observed. The addition of S. cerevisiae tended to increase the number of LAB in intestinal tract, whereas the number of E. coli significantly decreased. The highest slaughter weight was found in group fed with commercial feed. There were no significant effects of S. cerevisiae addition on carcass, abdominal fat and weight of internal and immunity organs. The lowest cholesterol content was showed on broiler fed with rations added with 1 g/kg DM S. cerevisiae. Therefore it could be concluded that the addition of S. cerevisiae up to 1 g/kg DM rations showed health improvement and able to produce low cholesterol broiler meat.
Phylogenetic Study of Madura Cattle Based on Mitochondrial Cyt b and D-loop Sequences Nirmala Fitria Firdhausi; Achmad Farajallah; Dyah Perwitasari
Buletin Peternakan Vol 45, No 1 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (1) FEBRUARY 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v45i1.48557

Abstract

Madura Cattle is one breed of local cattle from Indonesia. Madura cattle are estimated to originate from a crossbreeding between Bos indicus and Bos javanicus. Another presumption is that Madura cattle are the result of a crossbreeding between B. indicus males and mixed B. javanicus or Bos taurus. Tracing the history of Madura cross and another cattle phylogenetic based on maternal lineage can be done by analyzing the variation of the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA). The purpose of this study was to determine the clarity of the origin of Madura cattle based on maternal lineage using mtDNA markers Cyt b and D-loop. This research is expected to provide genetic information and the origin of Madura cattle, so that it can be used to help improve the breeding and conservation program for Madura cattle. The results of the phylogeny tree reconstruction, using the Cyt b and D-loop genes showed that Madura cattle originated from Sampang region (Polagan, Golbung, and Komis) were grouped into two types of maternal origin. Madura cattle clade I are grouped with B. indicus and B. taurus, while Madura cattle clade II are grouped with B. javanicus. A crossbreeding between B. javanicus and B. indicus is estimated to have been carried out since the entry of Hindu culture brought by the India peoples to Indonesia around 1800 years ago. The crossing between B. javanicus and B. indicus was then more intensively carried out at the time of the government's promoting the development of Ongol cattles (B. indicus) in the days of the Dutch East Indies. The length segment of Cyt b that can be amplified is 230 bp and the D-loop segment of varying length, 577 bp for the Madura 41 and 29 samples, and 624 bp for sample 32.  
Physical and Microstructural Characteristics of Kefir Made of Milk and Colostrum Triana Setyawardani; Juni Sumarmono; Kusuma Widayaka
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i1.49130

Abstract

This research set out to compare the physical and microstructural characteristics of kefir made of milk, colostrum, and milk-colostrum mixes at various proportions. Kefir was made by adding kefir grains to 100% milk (P0), 80% milk + 20% colostrum (P1), 60% milk + 40% colostrum (P3), 40% milk + 60% colostrum (P4), 80% milk + 20% colostrum (P5), and 100% colostrum (P6). Fermentation was allowed under room temperature for 24 hours. The characteristics observed were color values, viscosity, pH, water holding capacity (WHC), syneresis, and microstructure. The result showed that the color of kefir (L* value, lightness); (b* value, yellow-blue), (a*, red-green), and whiteness index (WI) was significantly affected by raw materials. The viscosity of kefir was also affected by the raw materials (p<0.05), in which the kefir made from a mix of 80% milk and 20% colostrum showed the highest viscosity (1524.20 m.Pa.S). However, other characteristics such as pH, WHC, and syneresis were not significantly affected by raw materials. The microstructure of kefir made from 20 to 40% colostrum showed a string and compact protein tissues, while that made from 80 to 100% colostrum showed a clumping gel and concentration dominated by protein and fat tissues.  This study demonstrated that milk kefir produced from milk-colostrum mixes posses a yellowish color (b*), low whitenes index, negative a* value, low lightness, whereas kefir made from 100% colostrum showed slightly greenish with low lightness level. Kefir with highest viscosity was produced from combined 80% milk and 20% colostrum. The microstructure of kefir produced from mixes with 40% and 60% colostrum showed a strong, tight, and compact microstructure of protein tissues.
Profile of Farmers Based Feed Management and Animal Health of Bali Cattle in Agroecosystem Variation at Timor Island Jefirstson Richset Riwukore; Asnath Maria Fuah; Luki Abdullah; Rudy Priyanto; Ahmad Yani; Bagus Priyo Purwanto; Fellyanus Habaora
Buletin Peternakan Vol 45, No 2 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (2) MAY 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v45i2.49417

Abstract

The research objective was to determine the profile of smallholder farms based on the aspects of feed management and animal health in different agro-ecosystems on Timor Island. The research was carried out for 6 months, from June to December 2018. The research location was determined by purposive sampling, namely (1) pasture agroecosystem in District of Belu, Malaka, and Timor Tengah Utara, (2) agricultural agroecosystem in Kupang Regency and Kupang City, (3) plantation agroecosystems in Kupang Regency, and (4) forest agroecosystems in District of Timor Tengah Selatan. The purposive stratified proportional sampling method was used to determine the number of samples according to the Slovin formula at an error probability of 0.05 (5%) so that the sampling of respondents was 436 people. Types of data used are primary and secondary data with data methods by observation, interviews (questionnaires), and documentation. Descriptive quantitative data analysis described in a narrative manner. The results showed that for the aspect of feed management, feed preservation was only done by some farmers, with the highest to lowest percentage of actors being plantation agroecosystems (12.8%), agriculture, (5.9%), pasture (1.6%) and forest (0%). Whereas in the aspect of livestock health, the highest to lowest vaccination implementers were carried out in agricultural agroecosystems (98.0%) followed by plantations (92.2%), pasture (66.9%) and forests (44.8%).
Economic and Technical Analysis of Utilization Pistia Stratiotes as Magelang Duck Alternative Feed: An Agribusiness Paradigm Agus Setiadi; Siswanto Imam Santoso; Edjeng Suprijatna; Teysar Adi Sarjana; Suryani Nurfadillah
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.51049

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the economic analysis, performance analysis and chemical quality of the meat of the utilization of pistia stratiotes (PS) in Magelang duck feed. Most duck feed is still very dependent on imports from other countries so there is a need to find alternative feedstuff that are not competing with humans. The experimental research was conducted at the Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Agriculture Undip using 4 treatments, namely T0 duck feed without the addition of PS in feed, T1 added 6% PS in feed, T2 added 12% PS in feed and T3 added 18% PS in duck feed. Parameters observed were final body weight, feed consumption, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), mortality, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, antioxidants, feed costs, income over feed costs, return on investment (ROI) and RC ratio. Feed consumption on T3 was the highest. Final body weight on T3 was not significantly different (P> 0.05) compared to T1 and T2 but higher than T0 (P<0.05). The FCR between T3, T2 and T1 was not significantly different (P>0.05), but was lower than T0, duck mortality in this study 0. Blood chemistry analysis (cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL) showed that T2 and T3 were significantly better than T0 and T1. The results of the economic analysis showed that ducks given PS at T2 and T3 had significant lower feed costs compared to T0 and T1, while ROI from T1, T2 and T3 were significantly higher than T0. The highest IOFC was achieved when duck were fed (T2), while the lowest IOFC was at T0. R/C ratio of T1, T2 and T3 was not significantly different, but higher when compared to T0. Based on the results of technical and economic analysis, the use of PS in 12% duck feed gave the best result of technical and economic performance

Page 34 of 105 | Total Record : 1046

 32   33   34   35   36 

Filter by Year

1987 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 49, No 4 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (4) November 2025 Vol 49, No 3 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (3) August 2025 Vol 49, No 2 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (2) MAY 2025 Vol 49, No 1 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (1) FEBRUARY 2025 Vol 48, No 4 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (4) NOVEMBER 2024 Vol 48, No 3 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (3) AUGUST 2024 Vol 48, No 2 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (2) MAY 2024 Vol 48, No 1 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (1) FEBRUARY 2024 Vol 47, No 4 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (4) NOVEMBER 2023 Vol 47, No 3 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (3) AUGUST 2023 Vol 47, No 2 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (2) MAY 2023 Vol 47, No 1 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (1) FEBRUARY 2023 Vol 46, No 4 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (4) NOVEMBER 2022 Vol 46, No 3 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (3) AUGUST 2022 Vol 46, No 2 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (2) MAY 2022 Vol 46, No 1 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (1) FEBRUARY 2022 Vol 45, No 4 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (4) NOVEMBER 2021 Vol 45, No 3 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (3) AUGUST 2021 Vol 45, No 2 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (2) MAY 2021 Vol 45, No 1 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (1) FEBRUARY 2021 Vol 44, No 4 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (4) NOVEMBER 2020 Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020 Vol 44, No 2 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (2) MAY 2020 Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020 Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019 Vol 43, No 3 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (3) AUGUST 2019 Vol 43, No 2 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (2) MAY 2019 Vol 43, No 1 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (1) FEBRUARY 2019 Vol 42, No 4 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (4) NOVEMBER 2018 Vol 42, No 3 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (3) AUGUST 2018 Vol 42, No 2 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (2) MAY 2018 Vol 42, No 1 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (1) FEBRUARY 2018 Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017 Vol 41, No 3 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (3) AGUSTUS 2017 Vol 41, No 2 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (2) MEI 2017 Vol 41, No 1 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (1) FEBRUARI 2017 Vol 40, No 3 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (3) OKTOBER 2016 Vol 40, No 2 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (2) JUNI 2016 Vol 40, No 1 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (1) FEBRUARI 2016 Vol 39, No 3 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (3) OKTOBER 2015 Vol 39, No 2 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (2) JUNI 2015 Vol 39, No 1 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (1) FEBRUARI 2015 Vol 38, No 3 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (3) OKTOBER 2014 Vol 38, No 2 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (2) JUNI 2014 Vol 38, No 1 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (1) FEBRUARI 2014 Vol 37, No 3 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (3) OKTOBER 2013 Vol 37, No 2 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (2) JUNI 2013 Vol 37, No 1 (2013): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 37 (1) Februari 2013 Vol 36, No 3 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (3) Oktober 2012 Vol 36, No 2 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (2) Juni 2012 Vol 36, No 1 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (1) Februari 2012 Vol 35, No 3 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (3) Oktober 2011 Vol 35, No 2 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (2) Juni 2011 Vol 35, No 1 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (1) Februari 2011 Vol 34, No 3 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (3) Oktober 2010 Vol 34, No 2 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (2) Juni 2010 Vol 34, No 1 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (1) Februari 2010 Vol 33, No 3 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (3) Oktober 2009 Vol 33, No 2 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (2) Juni 2009 Vol 33, No 1 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (1) Februari 2009 Vol 32, No 3 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (3) Oktober 2008 Vol 32, No 2 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (2) Juni 2008 Vol 32, No 1 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (1) Februari 2008 Vol 31, No 4 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (4) November 2007 Vol 31, No 3 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (3) Agustus 2007 Vol 31, No 2 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (2) Mei 2007 Vol 31, No 1 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (1) Februari 2007 Vol 30, No 4 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (4) November 2006 Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (3) Agustus 2006 Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (2) Mei 2006 Vol 30, No 1 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (1) Februari 2006 Vol 29, No 4 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (4) November 2005 Vol 29, No 3 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (3) Agustus 2005 Vol 29, No 2 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (2) Mei 2005 Vol 29, No 1 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (1) Februari 2005 Vol 28, No 4 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (4) November 2004 Vol 28, No 3 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (3) Agustus 2004 Vol 28, No 2 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (2) Mei 2004 Vol 28, No 1 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (1) Februari 2004 Vol 27, No 4 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (4) November 2003 Vol 27, No 3 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (3) Agustus 2003 Vol 27, No 2 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (2) Mei 2003 Vol 27, No 1 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (1) Februari 2003 Vol 26, No 4 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (4) November 2002 Vol 26, No 1 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (1) Februari 2002 Vol 25, No 4 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (4) November 2001 Vol 25, No 3 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (3) Agustus 2001 Vol 25, No 2 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (2) Mei 2001 Vol 25, No 1 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (1) Februari 2001 Vol 24, No 4 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (4) November 2000 Vol 24, No 3 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (3) Agustus 2000 Vol 24, No 2 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (2) Mei 2000 Vol 24, No 1 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (1) Februari 2000 Vol 23, No 4 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (4) November 1999 Vol 23, No 3 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (3) Agustus 1999 Vol 23, No 2 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (2) Mei 1999 Vol 23, No 1 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (1) Februari 1999 Vol 22, No 4 (1998): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 22 (4) November 1998 Vol 21, No 3 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (3) November 1997 Vol 21, No 1 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (1) April 1997 Vol 20, No 2 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (2) Desember 1996 Vol 20, No 1 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (1) Juni 1996 Vol 19, No 2 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (2) Desember 1995 Vol 19, No 1 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (1) Juni 1995 1995: BULETIN PETERNAKAN SPECIAL EDITION 1995 Vol 18, No 4 (1994): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 18 (4) Desember 1994 Vol 17, No 1 (1993): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 17 (1) Juni 1993 Vol 16, No 1 (1992): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 16 (1) Desember 1992 Vol 15, No 2 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (2) Desember 1991 Vol 15, No 1 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (1) Juni 1991 Vol 14, No 2 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (2) Desember 1990 Vol 14, No 1 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (1) Juni 1990 Vol 13, No 1 (1989): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 13 (1) September 1989 Vol 11, No 2 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (2) September 1987 Vol 11, No 1 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (1) Maret 1987 More Issue