cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Jamal
Contact Email
omjamal738@gmail.com
Phone
+6282228532417
Journal Mail Official
omjamal738@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. KH. Abdul Karim no 84, Kediri
Location
Kab. kediri,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
SYARIAH
Published by Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo
ISSN : 30253373     EISSN : 30250161     DOI : 10.61570
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
Syariah Jurnal Kajian Fiqh is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal that presents high-quality, theoretically insightful articles in various fields related to fiqh research. Syariah Jurnal Kajian Fiqh is published by the Research and Scientific Writing Division, Mahad Aly Lirboyo, Kediri, Indonesia. Articles in this journal are published every six months two editions per year in June and December. This journal emphasizes aspects related to fiqh, including Fiqh Legal Products, Fiqhiyyah Fatwa Analysis, and Fiqh Contextualization. Internet users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full text of the articles, or use them for other lawful purposes without first requesting permission from the publisher or author. .
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 32 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
Iḥyā’ al-Mawāt in the Shāfi‘ī School as a Legal Basis for Indigenous Community Ownership of Their Communal Land (Tanah Ulayat) bin Jamaludin, Uzair; Ubaidillah, Deden; Amin, Fuad
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Syariah : Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61570/syariah.v3i1.127

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal relevance of iḥyā' al-mawāt from the perspective of the Syafii Mazhab and contextualizes it against customary land, considering that both have similar characteristics in terms of the land tenure process. This research is essential to establish the legal force of customary land through the iḥyā' al-mawāt approach from an Islamic law perspective. To achieve this goal, the research method used is content analysis, which is classified as a qualitative method whose analysis is descriptive. Iḥyā al-mawāt is the management of land that is not owned and not utilized by anyone. Through the process of iḥyā' al-mawāt, a person is entitled to land ownership after conducting real management. Customary land is related to the territory that is communally managed by indigenous peoples. The results of the research on iḥyā' al-mawāt in the Shafii Mazhab found some differences with Customary Land in terms of land ownership and territory. Iḥyā' al-mawāt applies to free or formerly managed land that has been abandoned, while communal land relates to customary territories that are communally managed by indigenous peoples. Although there are differences in the aspects of ownership and management, both iḥyā' al-mawāt and customary land have the main similarity of land utilization, as well as land management of both implicating proof of ownership that is legal in state law and Sharia. This research provides theoretical benefits in the form of insight, information, and knowledge about the concept of iḥyā' al-mawāt in the Shafi'i Mazhab as a legal basis for indigenous peoples' ownership of their customary land.
Analisis Fatwa Dr. Syauqi Ibrahim ‘Allam Tentang Eksploitasi Ilegal Tanah Negara Al Wafa, Mohammad Hassan; Hakim, Nur
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Syariah : Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61570/syariah.v3i1.129

Abstract

The dense population and growing economic needs are leading humanity toward a new way of life. One of the fundamental needs of every person is the need for a place to live and reside. The exploitation of state-owned land, whether in cities or the wilderness, has become inevitable. State land, which should be managed by the government and used for the welfare of society, is often seized and used for personal interests. Dr. Syauqi Ibrahim Allam, a grand mufti at the Egyptian fatwa institution, stated in his book Fiqh al-Wathan wa al-Muwathonah that using state land without permission is forbidden (haram) and is considered gasab (unlawful usurpation). He also urged those involved in such acts to vacate and return the land to its rightful authority. How did he determine the legal basis for his fatwa? What are the implications for Indonesia? This article reviews Dr. Syauqi Ibrahim Allam's perspective on the illegal use of state land, a practice now common in Indonesia, as a moral and ethical compass. To analyze this, the author employs descriptive analysis within the framework of qualitative research methodology.The findings indicate that Dr. Syauqi Ibrahim Allam's fatwa is well-grounded in religious texts and is also supported by the views of Ahlus Sunnah scholars from the four major schools (madhabs), with a particular alignment to the Hanafi school, which strictly requires permission from the leader (imam) for the use of state land. He equates the illegal use of state land to the gasab of private properties. This fatwa is crucial for public understanding, given the numerous issues arising from land disputes with the government.    
A Jurisprudential Review of the Application of Monetary Punishment for the Circulation of Illegal Cigarettes Rispandi, Ade Endang; Arif Rahman Hakim Syadzali
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Syariah : Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61570/syariah.v3i1.134

Abstract

Indonesia plays a significant role in minimizing the negative impact of large-scale illegal tobacco production. Legislation imposing fines is expected to serve as a solution to address concerns regarding its effects on public health and the economy. However, the imposition of fines is claimed to violate maqāṣid asy-syarī‘ah and even the consensus (ijmā‘) of Islamic scholars. This study aims to analyze the extent of Islamic perspectives on the imposition of fines, particularly in Indonesia. This study employs library research using a qualitative approach. The research findings indicate that the imposition of monetary fines (ta‘zīr bi al-māl) is not considered valid unless under circumstances of necessity (ḍarūrah), according to the consensus of the four major Islamic schools of thought (madzāhib). However, fines in the form of asset destruction directly related to the offense (ta‘zīr fī al-māl) are deemed permissible according to the Mālikī school of thought. The implications of this study suggest that the government must ensure the presence of an urgent necessity to justify the legislation of fines, apply proportionality in assessing the need, and guarantee that the allocation of collected fines is accurately directed toward the public interest.
The Existence of Gender Equality in Leadership: A Perspective of Sa‘id Ramdhan al-Buthi Ahmad, Ali; Ismail Birrur Rohman; Ahmad Fauzi
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Syariah : Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61570/syariah.v3i1.136

Abstract

Gender equality, especially concerning leadership, is a complex topic in Islam. Issues of feminism and women's emancipation are often considered taboo in Muslim communities in Pakistan. Traditional Muslim scholars, influenced by the cultural dimensions of Islam in their era, formulated laws regarding male supremacy over women in their writings. In contrast, in the modern era, contemporary Muslim scholars, such as Dr. Said Ramdhan al-Buthi, engaging with Western knowledge, have attempted to establish new paradigms regarding feminism, particularly concerning women's leadership, while remaining grounded in scriptural analysis. This study aims to describe al-Buthi's views on gender equality in women's leadership. Al-Buthi's perspective holds particular value in legitimizing feminism within Islam, as his arguments are strongly rooted in the Qur'an and Hadith. This study was qualitative and adopted a library-based research design. Data were collected from al-Buthi's writings and other relevant literature and analyzed using narrative synthesis and content analysis. The findings indicate that, in al-Buthi's view, women are granted access to leadership, albeit with certain limitations, which differs from the general prohibitions of traditional scholars. This finding suggests that socio-cultural aspects can influence scholars' decisions and simultaneously promote inclusivity in leadership.
Konsep Qarīnah sebagai Alat Bukti Pembunuhan dalam Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia: Studi atas Kasus Jessica-Mirna Chodir, Fatkul; Ahwadzy, Muhammad Arfan
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Syariah : Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61570/syariah.v3i1.138

Abstract

The Jessica-Mirna case shocked Indonesia due to the presence of cyanide poison in the coffee served, which became the central piece of evidence in the murder trial. Throughout the judicial process, this case sparked public debate regarding whether Jessica was justifiably convicted as the perpetrator of the crime. This study aims to examine the concept of qarīnah as indirect evidence in Islamic criminal law and Indonesian positive law through the lens of the Jessica Mirna case. Using a comparative conceptual case study approach, this research analyzes how each legal system understands, accepts, and applies qarīnah to establish the perpetrator’s intent in a premeditated murder. The findings reveal that Islamic criminal law regards qarīnah as an important indication that considers the moral aspects and intent of the accused, whereas positive law regulates qarīnah formally through stringent evidentiary procedures stipulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. The Jessica-Mirna case demonstrates the practical application of qarīnah in the judicial process, reinforcing the role of indirect evidence in determining truth and justice. This study contributes to expanding the comparative understanding of evidentiary roles in both legal systems while strengthening the relevance of qarīnah in the modern context.
Legal Analysis of Receiving Funds from Money Politics in Indonesian Elections and Measures to Overcome It from the Perspective of Imam al-Ghazālī Chammadullah, Sa'id; Hikam, Sohibul; Muhammade Nahidl, Izdihar
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Syariah : Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61570/syariah.v3i1.154

Abstract

The practice of money politics has consistently been a prominent and highly debated topic in Indonesia's political landscape. The rampant occurrence of vote buying during every election cycle makes this issue crucial to examine, particularly from a legal perspective and with a focus on potential solutions. This study investigates Imam al-Ghazali's views on the legal permissibility of accepting funds derived from money politics and explores his proposed solutions to this issue. This research aims to delve into the legal framework surrounding money politics in general elections, identify effective strategies to combat it, and instill a comprehensive understanding of the ruling on accepting funds from such practices. This library research employs a qualitative descriptive approach. The primary reference for this study is Imam al-Ghazali's seminal work, Ihya’ Ulum ad-Din, supplemented by various other relevant texts by other prominent Islamic scholars. The findings indicate that the practice of money politics carries severe negative consequences and is categorized as bribery (risywah), which is expressly prohibited by the Islamic law. Consequently, according to Imam al-Ghazali, accepting funds from vote-buying is haram (forbidden), and recipients are obligated to return these assets to their rightful owners or the state treasury. The enforcement of a strict prohibition on accepting such funds is imperative, alongside concerted efforts to improve the economic conditions of society as preventive measures against this widespread issue. This study offers an in-depth understanding of the legal implications of accepting money politics funds from al-Ghazali's perspective. It also opens avenues for further discussion on money politics and its potential solutions through the lens of other Islamic scholars.
Fikih Manhajī dan Qaulī; Analisis Metodologi terhadap Mekanisme Ijtihād dalam Penetapan Hukum Ahmad Royhan; Cucu Surahman
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Studi ini didorong oleh kebutuhan untuk memperkuat metodologi istinbāṭ hukum di tengah keterbatasan teks-teks fikih klasik dan kompleksitas isu-isu kontemporer yang semakin berkembang. Perbedaan konteks sosial antara ulama terdahulu dengan Indonesia modern menyoroti urgensi kerangka istinbāṭ yang mengintegrasikan teks-teks naskah, maqāṣid, dan analisis sosial secara operasional. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan konstruksi metodologis fikih qaulī dan manhajī sebagai dua model ijtihad yang menghubungkan wahyu dengan realitas kekinian. Dengan menggunakan penelitian pustaka kualitatif, studi ini menerapkan metode deskriptif–analitis dan komparatif untuk mengkaji literatur ushul fikih klasik dan kontemporer yang terintegrasi dengan maqāṣid asy-syarī‘ah. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa ijtihad qaulī beroperasi dengan memilih dan menguatkan pendapat hukum untuk kasus-kasus baru, sedangkan ijtihad manhajī merumuskan ketetapan hukum melalui penalaran analogis, keumuman teks setingkat mujtahid, dan mafhūm al-kalām ketika teks tidak eksplisit. Keduanya menunjukkan fleksibilitas hukum Islam sekaligus menjaga komitmen pada konsistensi naskah, maṣlaḥah, dan stabilitas sosial. Integrasi fikih manhajī–qaulī pada akhirnya menawarkan model operasional dan adaptif yang berakar pada maqāṣid, memberikan kerangka kerja yang relevan untuk menjawab berbagai masalah keagamaan dan sosial modern sekaligus memungkinkan evaluasi berkelanjutan demi memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat yang terus berkembang.
Studi Komparasi antara Legalitas Talfīq dalam Qaḍiyyah Tunggal Perspektif Ibnu al-Himām al-Hanafi dan Mazhab Hanafiyah Faazal Ulaa; Ubaidillah
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Talfīq berarti melaksanakan ibadah atau muamalah menggunakan dua konsepsi mazhab yang berbeda dalam satu tindakan, Talfīq merupakan isu hangat para pemikir muslim sejak era kuno, sejarah kodifikasi mazhab menjadi tragedi paling berpengaruh dalam terbentuknya wacana talfīq. Pada kurun sembilan hijriyah muncul statemen kontroversial yang dituduhkan pada Ibnu al-Himam mengekor wacana legalitas talfīq secara mutlak. penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengungkap secara fakta bagaimana epistemologi Ibnu al-Himam al-Hanafi dalam merumuskan talfīq. dan bagaimana pandangan para ulama dalam internal mazhabnya. Dengan melalui pendekatan kualitatif serta analisis komparatif dapat diketahui bahwa legitimasi talfīq bersandarkan pandangan Ibnu al-Himam tidak benar karena Ibnu al-Himam justru menolak praktik talfīq, begitupula suara mayoritas dalam mazhab Hanafi. Mengapa diskursus ini penting, sebab banyak pemikir muslim kontemporer yang menyuarakan legalitas talfīq dengan mengutip pokok pemikiran Ibnu al-Himam padahal faktanya tidak demikian.
Kontekstualisasi Pembagian Warisan 2:1 Perspektif Mubadalah : Efforts to Find the Meaning of Equality in Islamic Family Law in Indonesia Asyrofudin, Muhammad; Setyawan, Rahmad; Khairuddin; Muhammad Adib Samsudin; Ulum Ahmad Adnani
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article revisits the 2:1 inheritance distribution between men and women through the perspective of mubadalah to find the meaning of equality in Islamic Family Law in Indonesia. This study uses library research methods, with data sources from the Qur'an, hadith, classical fiqh books, tafsir works, contemporary literature, journal articles, and the thoughts of modern scholars on inheritance and gender issues. The analysis was conducted in three steps: 1) examining classical fiqh concepts and the theological basis for the 2:1 inheritance distribution rule; 2) contextualizing the social conditions of early Islamic Arab society with the socio-economic realities of modern Indonesian society; and 3) applying the mubadalah interpretation method as an analytical framework to understand the inheritance verses more substantively. The results of this study show that the 2:1 provision is not an absolute rule, but rather a formulation that arose from the social and cultural structure of early Islamic society. Through the principles of reciprocity, justice, and gender equality, the mubadalah interpretation opens up space for reinterpreting inheritance law to be more adaptive to social and economic dynamics and gender roles in Indonesia. This reinterpretation is a practical necessity for realizing substantive justice in Islamic Family Law, especially when women contribute significantly to family and community life. Thus, reinterpreting the 2:1 inheritance rule is not merely a normative academic discourse but a practical necessity to uphold the values of equality and benefit in Islamic family law in Indonesia, and is in line with the main objectives of Sharia (maqāṣid asy-syarī‘ah) in realizing justice and humanity.
Epistemologi Tahqīq al-Manāṭ sebagai Wacana Integrasi Keilmuan Lain dalam Fiqh Sosial; Studi Batasan Integrasi Keilmuan Lain dalam Fikih Sosial Ahmad Faizul Albab
Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies
Publisher : Bidang Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (bp2ki) Ma'had Aly Lirboyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Fiqh sosial (yurisprudensi Islam) memposisikan fikih dalam konteks untuk menjawab isu-isu kontemporer sesuai dengan kemaslahatan umum (maslahah). Proses kontekstualisasi ini menuntut keterbukaan terhadap perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, teknologi, dan ilmu sosial. Berdasarkan premis ini, studi ini bertujuan merumuskan batas-batas konseptual untuk integrasi keilmuan lain ke dalam fikih sosial. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif dengan analisis konten. Dengan memanfaatkan teori tahqīq al-manāṭ, penelitian ini mengkaji batas nyata dalam mengintegrasikan ilmu lain ke dalam kerangka Fikih Sosial, sebuah aspek yang belum banyak dieksplorasi. Tahqīq al-manāṭ adalah alat metodologis yang digunakan untuk menentukan realitas konkret dan faktual dari isu yang sedang dibahas. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa salah satu pertimbangan utama dalam menangani permasalahan melalui perspektif fikih sosial adalah dengan memasukkan wawasan dari disiplin ilmu lain. Melalui tahqīq al-manāṭ, tampak bahwa batas pengintegrasian ilmu eksternal terletak pada fungsinya sebagai alat untuk memahami kenyataan kontekstual dari masalah yang dihadapi. Batas ini harus dijaga agar ketetapan hukum yang dihasilkan melalui fikih Sosial tetap berpijak dan tidak terlepas dari sumber-sumber tekstual transendental. Hubungan antara fikih Sosial dan temuan ilmiah berjalan secara sirkular dan timbal balik, sehingga tercipta dialog konstruktif antara logika uṣūl al-fiqh (prinsip-prinsip yurisprudensi), pengetahuan ilmiah, dan ketetapan fikih yang dihasilkan. Studi ini berkontribusi pada reinterpretasi dan penjelasan batas-batas interdisipliner dalam fiqh sosial.

Page 3 of 4 | Total Record : 32

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Syariah : Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies