cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dedi Junaedi
Contact Email
dedijunaedi@gmail.com
Phone
+628118114379
Journal Mail Official
dedijunaedi@journal-laaroiba.com
Editorial Address
Lembaga Publikasi Ilmiah (LPI)  Institut Agama Islam Nasional (IAI-N) Laa Roiba Jl Raya Pemda Pajeleran Sukahati No 41 Cibinong, Bogor 16913 Telp 021-8757150 HP 08118114379 asyari@jurnal-laaroiba.com  
Location
Kab. bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Published by Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor
ISSN : 26568152     EISSN : 26564807     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47467/as
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga pertama kali terbit April 2019 untuk mendukung pengembangan riset dan kajian manajemen, hukum, bimbingan, dan konseling keluarga Islam dalam arti luas ditinjau dari berbagai sudut pandang. Oleh karena itu. jurnal ini akan menampilkan artikel-artikel hasil riset dan kajian teoritis, empiris maupun praktis yang berkaitan dengan hukum, bimbingan dan konseling keluarga Islam. Publikasi jurnal ini bagian dari kerjasama dengan Masyarakat Ekonomi Syariah dan  Intelectual Association for Islamic Studies (IAFORIS).  E-ISSN 2656-8152 P-ISSN 2656-4807  DOI: 10.47476/as. Terbit tiga kai setahun setiap April, Agustus dan Desember. Volume 1 Nomor 1 2019 sampai Volume 6 Nomor 1 2024 terbit di url https://journal.laaroiba.ac.id/index.php/as. Mulai edisi Volume 6 Nomor 2 2024 sampai selanjutnya terbit di url https://journal-laaroiba.com/ojs/index.php/as
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 464 Documents
 37   38   39   40   41 
Perlindungan Hukum Masyarakat Adat terhadap Hak Ulayat dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam: Studi tentang Perlindungan Hukum Masyarakat Adat terhadap Hak Ulayat dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Kabupaten Luwu Timur Hamra Hamra; Abdul Rahman Nur; Salmi Salmi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11268

Abstract

This research is motivated by the gap between the constitutional recognition of indigenous peoples and the reality of customary rights protection, which are often neglected by investment interests and the state's right to control. Although Article 18B Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution guarantees the existence of indigenous peoples, this recognition is conditional and weak in technical implementation. The main problem in this study is the ineffectiveness of East Luwu Regency Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2022 in protecting the customary rights of the Padoe Indigenous Peoples from mining company expansion. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results show that the recognition of customary rights in the Basic Agrarian Law is still sectoral and has not been followed by comprehensive special legislation. In East Luwu Regency, the role of the local government is still very limited due to the lack of an inventory of customary territories and the existence of sectoral egos in natural resource management. In conclusion, de jure recognition does not automatically provide de facto protection for indigenous peoples without the government's political will to implement the regulation effectively. Researchers recommend accelerating the formation of the Customary Law Communities Law and establishing specific customary land boundaries through a Regent's Decree to ensure legal certainty and justice for indigenous communities.
Analisis Komprehensif Isu Hak Asasi Manusia Kontemporer Tantangan, Implikasi, dan Prospek Solusi Dwi Wahyu Endarto; Achmad Nasyruddin; Bayu Adhy Nugraha; Jueni Jueni; Ikbal Ikbal; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11303

Abstract

This article comprehensively analyzes contemporary human rights (HR) issues, highlighting the challenges in HR enforcement, their implications for human dignity, and prospects for innovative solutions. Drawing upon international legal frameworks and philosophical perspectives, this research examines how armed conflicts, humanitarian crises, modern discrimination (including in the digital sphere), and the roles of various actors impact HR protection. A qualitative research method using a literature review and document analysis approach is employed to synthesize findings. The study reveals that the politicization of HR issues, erosion of civil liberties, and new technological challenges present unprecedented complexities. The article concludes with strategic recommendations for strengthening legal frameworks, education, and international cooperation to ensure respect for HR in the future.
Eksplorasi Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Kontemporer: Inovasi dan Relevansi dalam Lanskap Hukum Modern Dwi Wahyu Endarto; Achmad Nasyruddin; Bayu Adhy Nugraha; Jueni Jueni; Ikbal Ikbal; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11304

Abstract

This research explores contemporary legal research methods, focusing on their innovations and relevance within the dynamic modern legal landscape. Technological advancements, globalization, and the increasing complexity of legal issues necessitate adaptations in traditional legal research methodologies. This article identifies and analyzes the shift from conventional normative and empirical methods towards more interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and technology-driven approaches, such as LegalTech and Artificial Intelligence (AI). The discussion encompasses the role of AI in predictive analytics, natural language processing, and the automation of legal data retrieval, as well as the application of advanced statistics and big data analysis in enhanced quantitative research. Furthermore, in-depth qualitative methods like legal ethnography and complex case studies are also highlighted. This study also examines the implications, ethical challenges, advantages, and limitations of adopting these new methods in legal research practice and education. Thus, this article provides a comprehensive guide for legal researchers to produce relevant, valid, and comprehensive research in the contemporary era.
Tantangan Pengujian Hukum Pidana Mati dan Pemidanaan Alternatif di KUHP Baru Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Integrasi Pengujian Desi Puspita Anggerina; Rifqy Afrizal Siddik; Toto Hartono; Luthfy Abbad Dudikoff; Ida Muidah; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11305

Abstract

This article analyzes the challenges of judicial review of capital punishment and the integration of alternative sentencing in Indonesia's New Criminal Code (KUHP Baru), Law No. 1 of 2023, from a human rights perspective. The New KUHP reconfigures capital punishment from a primary penalty to an alternative and conditional one, allowing for probationary periods and offering various alternative sanctions such as social work and supervision. While this marks a significant reform aimed at balancing legal certainty and human rights protection, it also introduces complexities in judicial interpretation and implementation. The research questions focus on the challenges in reviewing capital punishment's constitutionality and legality, and the potential along with obstacles in integrating alternative sentencing. Utilizing a normative-juridical approach, this study evaluates the compatibility of the New KUHP's provisions with international human rights standards and explores the prospects for effective integration of alternative penalties. The findings indicate that while the alternative and conditional nature of capital punishment is a step towards humanization, its judicial review remains complex due to inherent human rights implications, particularly the right to life. Furthermore, integrating alternative sentencing requires clear guidelines and adequate infrastructure to ensure justice and rehabilitation. Recommendations include developing clear implementing regulations and enhancing judicial capacity to ensure the effective and humane application of the New KUHP.
Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap KUHP Baru Tantangan Harmonisasi Norma Pidana Nasional Sulistiawati Sulistiawati; Muh. Arbai Santoso; Adrian Bimantara; Chandra Evita; Agus Riyadi; Adhe Permana; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11306

Abstract

The New Criminal Code (KUHP Baru), enacted on December 6, 2022, and effective as of January 2, 2026, represents a significant transformation in Indonesia's criminal justice system. Its implementation not only shifts the approach to criminal law from retributive to restorative, but also opens avenues for the integration of legal review by the Constitutional Court (MK) to ensure the harmonization of national criminal norms. This research aims to analyze the mechanisms of MK's integration of reviewing laws and Regional Regulations (Perda) against the New Criminal Code, and its implications for Article 2 of the New Criminal Code regarding living law and formal legality. Furthermore, this study aims to identify and evaluate the challenges of harmonizing national criminal norms in MK's decisions concerning specific cases such as demonstrations, embezzlement, and insult to state institutions after the implementation of the New Criminal Code since 2026. The research method employed is a normative legal approach with secondary data types, including laws and regulations, MK decisions, and related legal literature. The findings indicate that MK plays a crucial role in maintaining the consistency of national criminal law through the constitutional review of the New Criminal Code and its derivatives. However, challenges in harmonizing national criminal norms persist, particularly in the context of Article 2 of the New Criminal Code which recognizes living law and formal legality, as well as in the regulation of specific cases such as demonstrations, embezzlement, and insult to state institutions. This study recommends better coordination among MK, legislative, and executive bodies to avoid normative conflicts and ensure the fair and effective application of criminal law.
Pasal 240-241 KUHP Baru Ancaman "KUHP Karet" bagi Kebebasan Berpendapat di Indonesia 2026 Robert Sangkala; ⁠Ida Komala; Satria Ari Wibowo; Roif Roif; ⁠Ali Asari; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11307

Abstract

This article analyzes Articles 240-241 of the new Criminal Code (KUHP) proposed in the 2023 KUHP, effective as of January 2, 2026, which impose penalties of up to 4 years imprisonment for insults against the government or state institutions. Using a normative-legal research approach, the article explores the potential for these provisions to be interpreted as a "rubber KUHP" that restricts freedom of expression, as reported to the UN. The analysis compares these articles with Article 19 of the 1945 Constitution, the ICCPR Convention, and UN recommendations, alongside potential case studies such as the criminalization of activists. The findings indicate that these provisions risk undermining civil democracy, despite their intent to protect national dignity. This research emphasizes the urgency of revision to maintain balance between state protection and human rights.
Analisis Komprehensif Pasal 2 KUHP Nasional: Konsep Hukum yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat, Tantangan Implementasi, dan Implikasi terhadap Asas Legalitas Pidana Indonesia Robert Sangkala; Ida Komala; Satria Ari Wibowo; Roif Roif; Ali Asari; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11308

Abstract

The enactment of the National Criminal Code (KUHP Nasional) through Law No. 1 of 2023, effective from January 2, 2026, marks a paradigm shift in Indonesian criminal law by introducing Article 2, which recognizes "living law" (hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat) as a supplementary source of criminal liability. This study employs a normative legal research approach to analyze the philosophical foundations, juridical construction, and practical challenges of Article 2 in balancing material legality with formal legality principles. Two key research problems are addressed: (1) the alignment of living law with the legality principle (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali), and (2) implementation challenges in diverse Indonesian contexts. Findings reveal that while Article 2 promotes restorative justice and cultural pluralism aligned with Pancasila, it risks interpretive ambiguity and potential violations of human rights standards. Recommendations include regulatory harmonization and judicial training. This research contributes to the discourse on modernizing Indonesia's pluralistic criminal justice system.
KUHP dan KUHAP Perdebatan Hukum, Kebebasan Sipil, dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Peninjauan Judicial Review Siti Nur Ambarini; Masharin Masharin; Iyus YL Tobing; Arif Hardiyanto; Adzan Dylan Caesarrio; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11309

Abstract

This article examines the ongoing legal debates surrounding Indonesia's Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), focusing on their implications for civil liberties and the pivotal role of the Constitutional Court in judicial review processes. The recent revisions to the KUHP have sparked significant public discourse, raising concerns about potential infringements on fundamental rights, particularly freedom of expression and assembly. Simultaneously, the KUHAP, as the procedural framework, governs the implementation of criminal law and its impact on the rights of the accused. This research aims to analyze the contested provisions within both codes, explore the arguments put forth by various stakeholders, and critically assess the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence in adjudicating challenges to these laws. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study will delve into statutory interpretations, legal theories, and comparative legal perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal complexities. The findings will highlight the delicate balance between maintaining public order, upholding human rights, and ensuring the rule of law in a democratic society. Ultimately, this article seeks to contribute to the ongoing scholarly discourse on legal reform in Indonesia and offer insights into the future direction of its criminal justice system.
Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia dari KUHP Kolonial ke KUHP Modern, Tantangan dan Prospeknya Nita Yunita; Herawati Herawati; Maman Dana Darmana; Endah Ratnawati; Witandri Witandri; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11310

Abstract

This article analyzes the transition from the colonial-era Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) inherited from Dutch rule to the modern KUHP enacted in 2023 and effective from 2026, focusing on the shift from retributive justice to restorative principles. The colonial KUHP, based on the 1918 Wetboek van Strafrecht, emphasized imprisonment and state control, often clashing with Indonesian values and social realities. In contrast, the new KUHP incorporates human rights, alternative sanctions like community service, and recognition of customary laws, marking a historic break from colonial legacy. Key challenges include potential curbs on civil liberties through provisions on insults to state officials (e.g., Pasal 240-241), implementation gaps in harmonizing subordinate regulations, and balancing cultural norms with global standards. Prospects lie in enhanced victim protection, corporate accountability, and alignment with international trends, though success depends on judicial review by the Constitutional Court and public education. This reform represents a progressive step toward a more inclusive and equitable criminal justice system in Indonesia.
Analisis Politik Hukum dalam Perancangan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Guna Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Progresif Nurlindawati Nurlindawati; Eko Purwanto; Ahmad Zaki Rayhan; Rendhi Renaldhi; Sena Neranda; Firman Adi Candra; Mochammad Ridzky Salatun
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11311

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the configuration of legal politics in the process of drafting regulations in Indonesia, particularly in the effort to synthesize the poles often considered conflicting: legal certainty and progressive justice. Using an analytical-critical approach, it is found that the legislative process is frequently trapped in political pragmatism that prioritizes legal certainty for economic interests, while neglecting responsive substantive justice. This paper proposes a synthesis where ideal legal politics must place humans as the primary subject of law, where formal certainty must not undermine substantive justice.

Page 39 of 47 | Total Record : 464

 37   38   39   40   41 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga More Issue