cover
Contact Name
Ardan Moris
Contact Email
ardan@iblam.ac.id
Phone
+6285215345871
Journal Mail Official
ardan@iblam.ac.id
Editorial Address
Raya Jl. Poltangan Raya No.6, RT.3/RW.5, Tj. Bar., Kec. Jagakarsa, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12530
Location
Kab. bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law
Published by Neolectura
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29866693     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37010
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Postulat adalah jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Neolectura, Divisi Publikasi Buku dan Jurnal Ilmiah PT Naraya Elaborium Optima yang bekerja sama dengan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM, diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun. Postulat adalah media publikasi ilmiah dalam bentuk makalah konseptual dan penelitian lapangan yang terkait dengan bidang kajian ilmu hukum dan relevansinya. Diharapkan Postulat dapat menjadi media bagi akademisi dan peneliti untuk menerbitkan karya ilmiah mereka dan menjadi sumber referensi untuk pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Postulat merupakan jurnal yang berada dibawah naungan PT Naraya Elaborium Optima
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 91 Documents
Peran Kepolisian Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 217/Pid.Sus/2025/PN.JKT.SEL) Elthaufani, Lucky; Cumbrandika, Chitto
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2113

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital technology has intensified online gambling in Indonesia, posing complex challenges for law enforcement. This study analyzes the role of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) in handling online gambling crimes, focusing on the Komdigi employees case. Using a descriptive qualitative approach through literature review and policy analysis, the research examines the legal framework, enforcement practices, and obstacles faced by Polri. The findings show that Polri, through the Cyber Crime Directorate (Dittipidsiber) of Bareskrim, has carried out preventive measures such as public education and digital literacy campaigns, alongside repressive actions including digital forensic investigations, website blocking, and prosecution of offenders. The main challenges include ambiguous regulations in the ITE Law, cross-border jurisdictional issues, and limited inter-agency coordination. The study recommends more adaptive regulatory reforms, the use of artificial intelligence and big data for early detection, and stronger international cooperation to effectively combat transnational online gambling networks
Pendirian Danantara dalam Revisi Undang-Undang Bumn: Implikasi terhadap Struktur Pengelolaan BUMN di Indonesia Racmawati Eka , Amanda; Nachrawi, Gunawan
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2123

Abstract

The establishment of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) is a strategic effort to enhance national economic growth. To maximize their contribution, SOEs require governance that is independent, professional, and based on Good Corporate Governance principles. The government’s creation of Danantara aims to centralize SOE operations and separate them from regulatory functions. This study analyzes the impact of Danantara’s formation on SOE governance, focusing on the separation of regulatory and operational roles and its implications for investment and efficiency. Using a normative juridical approach, the research examines legal norms and frameworks related to SOE management. Findings show that the inclusion of Danantara in the revision of SOE Law No. 1 of 2025 significantly changes governance structures. Previously, the Ministry of SOEs and the Ministry of Finance handled both regulatory and operational duties; now, the Ministry acts solely as a regulator, while Danantara manages operational functions. This reform improves efficiency and investment coordination but poses challenges in redefining SOEs, excluding them from state finance status, and recognizing losses as corporate rather than state losses. These changes are crucial for future SOE governance and their strategic role in national economic development
Analisis Yuridis dan Etis Kasus Suap Penyidik KPK: Studi Kasus AKP Stepanus Robin Pattuju Nikita Putri, Dhea; Purba, Lilis
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2124

Abstract

A significant new standard has been established in the battle against corruption in Indonesia as a result of the corruption case that involves AKP Stepanus Robin Pattuju, an investigator for the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Based on the ruling of the Central Jakarta Corruption Court Number 66/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst, the purpose of this publication is to conduct an analysis of the legal, ethical, and institutional elements of the case. The research employs a case-based methodology in conjunction with a normative legal strategy. Using Article 12 letter a and Article 11 of the Corruption Eradication Law in combination with Article 65 of the Criminal Code, the findings of the research demonstrate that the crime of bribery was demonstrated lawfully and persuasively. This was done in line with the law intended to eradicate corruption. From an ethical perspective, Robin's actions undermine the integrity of the KPK as an independent institution. From an institutional perspective, this case reveals the weakness of the internal oversight system and the KPK's dependence on investigators from the National Police. The main recommendations are strengthening the integrity of investigators, reforming the KPK's institutional structure, and improving the internal oversight system to prevent similar cases.
Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi dalam Sistem Small Claim Court di Indonesia dan Malaysia Rachmatullah, Denny; Setiawan, Ichwan
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2131

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Small Claim Court mechanisms under Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 4 of 2019 in Indonesia and Order 93 Rules of Court 2012 in Malaysia in resolving default disputes. Using a normative and comparative juridical approach, the research evaluates procedural speed, simplicity, cost efficiency, and substantive justice. The findings show that Indonesia applies a higher claim limit of IDR 500 million and utilizes electronic court systems that accelerate case resolution, but faces challenges related to digital infrastructure and uncertainty over judgment finality. Malaysia, by contrast, implements highly simplified procedures without mandatory legal representation and ensures strong enforcement mechanisms, yet is limited by a low claim ceiling of RM 5,000 and low public awareness. Overall, Indonesia excels in material scope and digitalization, while Malaysia demonstrates greater procedural efficiency and enforcement effectiveness. However, neither system fully achieves the principle of swift, simple, and low-cost justice. The study recommends strengthening digital infrastructure and legal certainty in Indonesia, and increasing claim limits and public outreach in Malaysia.
Kekosongan Hukum terhadap Pemain Judi Online dalam Sistem Hukum Positif Indonesia: Kajian atas KUHP dan Undang-Undang ITE Hilmy, Ahmad Syaikhan; Jadidah, Fikrotul
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2137

Abstract

Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia recognizes human rights in the form of the right to communicate and obtain information. Nowadays, this right is often exercised through social media. However, the intended positive and healthy environment of social media is increasingly being tainted by the rise of online gambling. Existing regulations have proven insufficient in providing legal justice, certainty, and utility. In addition, the legal and social impacts within society tend to be harmful and misaligned with the spirit of eradicating online gambling crimes. This research employs a normative legal method with a statutory approach. The findings indicate a legal vacuum in regulating online gambling for personal use by individual players. Therefore, this study encourages the strengthening of the task force for combating online gambling and advocates for the establishment of more specific, comprehensive, and implementable regulations addressing individual online gambling practices.
Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Ketentuan Pasal 13 Ayat (4) P3b terhadap Transaksi Pengalihan Saham dalam Rangka Reorganisasi oleh Wajib Pajak Singapura di Indonesia Syafari, Herdin; Ardiansyah, Ardiansyah
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2154

Abstract

The increase in foreign investment from Singapore to Indonesia often involves corporate restructuring such as mergers, acquisitions, or spin-offs that have implications for cross-border tax obligations. Based on domestic law, every transfer of shares is basically an object of income tax. However, Article 13 paragraph (4) of the Indonesia-Singapore P3B provides an exception for transactions carried out in the context of reorganization, so that the profits from the transfer of shares are not taxed in the source country. The main problem in this study is about the regulation and legal certainty regarding the transfer of shares in the context of reorganization as stipulated in Article 13 paragraph (4) of the Indonesia-Singapore P3B. This study uses a normative legal method with two approaches, namely a legislative approach and a conceptual approach to examine the doctrine of international tax law and the principle of substance over form. Data sources were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through literature studies which were then analyzed descriptively analytically. The results of the study show that Article 13 paragraph (4) of the Indonesia-Singapore P3B normatively provides legal protection for taxpayers who reorganize without the purpose of tax avoidance. However, in implemention, this provision still faces obstacles in proving the economic substance of transactions due to the absence of an explicit definition of "reorganization" in P3B. Therefore, the application of the substance over form principle is essential to ensure that the reorganization is carried out with legitimate business objectives. Scientifically, this research contributes to strengthening the understanding of the relationship between international tax law and legal certainty in the context of P3B, as well as providing normative recommendations for the establishment of technical guidelines that can clarify the criteria for cross-border reorganization so as not to cause tax disputes and uncertainty for foreign investors.
Analisis Yuridis Implementasi Penanganan Pasal 114 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 35 Tentang Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 7494/K/Pid.Sus/2024) Setiawan, Anggie Bagus; Sari, Nia Ayu Mayang
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2155

Abstract

Dalam penelitian ini, pendekatan penelitian hukum normatif digunakan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis penggunaan Pasal 114 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 dalam menangani tindak pidana narkotika. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 7494/K/Pid.Sus/2024 adalah subjek studi kasus yang bertujuan untuk menemukan hambatan dalam praktik peradilan. Bahan hukum primer, seperti undang-undang dan putusan, dan bahan hukum sekunder, seperti jurnal dan doktrin hukum yang relevan, dibahas dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelemahan pembuktian, terutama dalam hal unsur “menjadi perantara dalam jual beli,” menunjukkan bahwa kegagalan implementasi penanganan kasus. Jaksa Penuntut Umum (JPU) tidak dapat membuat hakim percaya, terutama tentang niat jahat terdakwa (mens rea). Mereka juga tidak membawa terdakwa dan orang lain yang pernah bertemu dengan terdakwa. Ada perbedaan antara standar pembuktian yang ketat di tingkat pengadilan dan metode penyidikan yang bergantung pada bukti fisik, seperti yang ditunjukkan oleh putusan Mahkamah Agung yang mengurangi hukuman terdakwa. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kegagalan yang sistematis dalam menerapkan undang-undang dapat melemahkan upaya pemberantasan narkotika. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan peningkatan strategis dalam prosedur penyidikan dan penuntutan. Ini termasuk meningkatkan kolaborasi antar lembaga penegak hukum dan meningkatkan kemampuan forensik digital.
Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Standard Essential Patent (SEP) di Indonesia Terkait Pertanggungjawaban Pelanggaran Paten Oleh Importir Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 132K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023 dalam Kasus Nokia v. PT Bright Mobile Telecommunications. Putri, Sarah Ayu Ramadhani Sukmana; Isradjuningtias, Agri Chairunisa
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2193

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis pergeseran penting dalam yurisprudensi penegakan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) di Indonesia, khususnya terkait pertanggungjawaban hukum importir atas pelanggaran Standard Essential Patent (SEP) di tengah kompleksitas rantai pasok global. Permasalahan berangkat dari ambiguitas yuridis yang sebelumnya dimanfaatkan untuk membebaskan importir dari tanggung jawab hukum, sebagaimana tercermin dalam sengketa antara Nokia Technologies Oy dan PT Bright Mobile Telecommunication. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus untuk menelaah Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 132 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023, guna menjawab apakah importir dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban sebagai pelaku pelanggaran langsung serta menilai implikasi yuridis dan bisnisnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Agung melalui penafsiran literal dan substantif terhadap Pasal 19 Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten menegaskan bahwa tindakan mengimpor merupakan bentuk pelanggaran paten yang berdiri sendiri dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara langsung. Putusan ini membongkar pembelaan prosedural plurium litis consortium dan menegaskan prinsip teritorialitas. Secara yuridis, putusan ini memperkuat kepastian hukum dan efektivitas penegakan HKI, sementara secara bisnis mendorong penerapan uji tuntas HKI dan penyesuaian kontrak serta strategi lisensi teknologi global.
Analisis Kriminologi tentang Maraknya Judi Online dan Upaya Pemberantasannya melalui Pemblokiran Rekening Bank Pawoko, Akbar Maulana; Kemala, Anyelir Puspa
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2194

Abstract

This research analyzes the rise of online gambling practices in Indonesia from legal and criminological perspectives. The study aims to identify the underlying factors driving online gambling and to assess the effectiveness of bank account blocking as a law enforcement measure under Article 27 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law. Using a normative legal method combined with a criminological approach, the research examines statutory regulations and behavioral factors influencing perpetrators. The findings show that online gambling is driven by economic pressures, weak digital supervision, and easy access to gambling platforms. Although blocking bank accounts helps disrupt illegal financial flows, its effectiveness is limited by technical loopholes, rapid account switching, and weak coordination among law enforcement agencies, the Ministry of Communication and Information, and the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Therefore, a more integrated strategy is required, including stronger legal enforcement, improved technological supervision, enhanced inter-agency coordination, and public digital literacy programs to prevent online gambling
Analisis Sengketa Tanah Akibat Sertifikat Ganda Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Nurhayati, Siti; Suardi, Suardi
Postulat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i1.2211

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out what are the main factors that cause double certificates in land dispute cases and to find out the legal consequences of double certificates and know the settlement mechanism in the perspective of civil law. This research uses a normative juridical approach method, which is a legal research method that relies on the study of applicable legal norms supported by a case approach to see how the court applies legal norms in practice. From this research the author draws the following conclusions: First, that broadly speaking the factors causing the existence of multiple certificates can be categorized into 3 aspects, namely the first technical aspect, which relates to the mapping system and land documentation. Second, administrative aspects such as errors in collecting and processing physical and juridical data by the BPN. Third, social factors/aspects, which are related to low public understanding of land rights and land registration procedures. Second, disputes due to multiple certificates can be resolved through litigation and non-litigation channels. Litigation is conducted through a lawsuit in court, while non-litigation can be in the form of mediation, arbitration, or settlement through the Land Office.

Page 9 of 10 | Total Record : 91