cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljouridisch@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jj/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal Juridisch
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29876559     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26623/
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including: Criminal Law, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Business Law, Medical Law, Environmental Law, Legal Philosophy
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 87 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
Batas Kewenangan Pengadilan dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase: Studi Kasus Akuisisi TPI: Limits of Court Authority in the Annulment of Arbitral Awards: A Case Study of the TPI Acquisition Vikri Pramana Putra; Muhammad Junaidi; Oktarini Kusniawati; Cita Tsaabiethah Agustria Sasti
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i1.13332

Abstract

This research is motivated by the controversy surrounding the annulment of the arbitral award in the TPI acquisition case, which reveals a serious conflict between the principle of final and binding arbitration and judicial intervention that exceeds the limits of authority under Law No. 30 of 1999. The urgency of this study lies in the need to critically assess the fractured relationship between courts and arbitration, particularly when courts expand the interpretation of public order and disregard the kompetensi-kompetensi principle, thereby creating legal uncertainty for business actors. Using a normative juridical research method with qualitative analytical techniques based on case study and doctrinal interpretation, this study aims to identify the limits of judicial authority, map the forms of judicial overreach, and explain their implications for arbitral finality. The novelty of this research lies in its structural analysis of judicial practices in the TPI case, which have not been thoroughly examined in previous studies, as well as in its conceptual synthesis of authority theory, finality principles, and arbitral institutional design. The findings provide theoretical contributions by refining the understanding of the limits of judicial authority and offer practical benefits in the form of judicial and regulatory reform recommendations to strengthen the integrity of Indonesia’s arbitration system.   Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kontroversi pembatalan putusan arbitrase dalam kasus akuisisi TPI, yang memperlihatkan benturan serius antara asas final and binding arbitrase dengan praktik intervensi pengadilan yang melampaui batas kewenangan menurut UU 30/1999. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kebutuhan untuk menilai secara kritis keretakan hubungan antara pengadilan dan arbitrase, terutama ketika pengadilan memperluas tafsir ketertiban umum dan mengabaikan prinsip-prinsip kompetensi hingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha. Menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan teknik analisis kualitatif berbasis studi kasus dan penafsiran doktrinal, penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi batas kewenangan pengadilan, memetakan bentuk judicial overreach, serta menjelaskan implikasinya terhadap finalitas arbitrase. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis struktural terhadap praktik yudisial dalam perkara TPI yang selama ini belum diurai secara mendalam dalam penelitian terdahulu, serta sintesis konseptual antara teori kewenangan, asas finalitas, dan desain kelembagaan arbitrase. Hasil penelitian memberikan kontribusi teoretis berupa pemurnian pemahaman batas kewenangan pengadilan dan manfaat praktis berupa rekomendasi reformasi yudisial dan regulatif untuk memperkuat integritas sistem arbitrase Indonesia.
Implementasi Hukum Maritim Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Pengusaha Kapal dan Anak Buah Kapal: Implementation of International Maritime Law in Resolving Business Disputes Between Shipowners and Seafarers Aulia Uyun Asalina; Zaenal Arifin; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Endah Pujiastuti
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i1.13384

Abstract

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of international maritime law instruments in resolving business disputes between shipowners and seafarers (crew), while formulating a juridical solution model oriented toward legal protection and access to justice. The core problem lies in the ineffective implementation of the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC 2006) and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982) in cross-jurisdictional practice, which often results in the protection of seafarers’ rights remaining largely normative rather than operational. This research employs normative legal methodology using statutory and case approaches to examine the relationship between substantive maritime labour protection standards and the jurisdictional framework of flag states and port states. The findings reveal a structural gap between international legal norms and enforcement capacity, driven by weak flag state supervision, the prevalence of flags of convenience, disparities in national regulations, and limited access of seafarers to dispute resolution mechanisms. The study proposes an integrative model based on systemic integration between MLC 2006 and UNCLOS 1982 as a framework to strengthen multilayer enforcement and national regulatory harmonization. The novelty of this research lies in its analytical construction linking international legal instruments with the operational design of maritime business dispute resolution mechanisms.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai efektivitas implementasi instrumen hukum maritim internasional dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis antara pengusaha kapal dan Anak Buah Kapal (ABK), sekaligus merumuskan model solusi yuridis yang berorientasi pada perlindungan hukum dan access to justice. Permasalahan utama terletak pada ketidakefektifan penerapan Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC 2006) dan United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982) dalam praktik lintas yurisdiksi, yang menyebabkan perlindungan hak ABK sering berhenti pada tataran normatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus untuk menganalisis relasi antara standar perlindungan ketenagakerjaan maritim dan struktur yurisdiksi negara bendera serta negara pelabuhan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara norma internasional dan kapasitas penegakan hukum, yang dipengaruhi oleh lemahnya pengawasan negara bendera, praktik flags of convenience, disparitas regulasi nasional, serta keterbatasan akses ABK terhadap mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa. Temuan ini menghasilkan model integratif berbasis systemic integration antara MLC 2006 dan UNCLOS 1982 sebagai kerangka penguatan multilayer enforcement dan harmonisasi kebijakan nasional. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada konstruksi analitis yang menghubungkan instrumen hukum internasional dengan desain mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa bisnis maritim secara operasional.
Adaptabilitas Arbitrase Internasional dalam Sengketa Investasi: Studi Indonesia dan Singapura: The Adaptability of International Arbitration in Investment Disputes: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore Mariani Agnestasia Soeitoe; Zaenal Arifin; Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno; Putri Haliza Yuniar; Ni Nyoman Tri Partini
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i1.13406

Abstract

This study examines the adaptability of international arbitration in resolving cross-border investment disputes between Indonesia and Singapore, focusing on Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) and investment agreement design. Using a qualitative normative juridical approach with comparative analysis of treaties, arbitral awards, regulations, and academic literature, the study identifies contrasting policy orientations. Indonesia demonstrates institutional adaptability through BIT termination and renegotiation, selective application of Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET), and gradual integration of investor due diligence obligations to safeguard regulatory sovereignty. In contrast, Singapore reflects normative adaptability by consistently applying FET, recognizing implied consent, and aligning remedial practices—such as interest awards—with international standards. The findings reveal two distinct yet complementary models of legal adaptability in international investment arbitration. This study contributes by offering a comparative and integrative framework linking normative, institutional, and remedial dimensions, providing insights for balancing investor protection, legal certainty, and state regulatory space in ASEAN investment governance.     Penelitian ini mengkaji adaptabilitas arbitrase internasional dalam penyelesaian sengketa investasi lintas batas antara Indonesia dan Singapura dengan fokus pada Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) dan desain perjanjian investasi. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan studi komparatif terhadap perjanjian investasi, putusan arbitrase, regulasi, dan literatur akademik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menampilkan adaptabilitas institusional melalui pembatalan dan renegosiasi BIT, penerapan selektif prinsip Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET), serta integrasi bertahap kewajiban uji tuntas investor guna menjaga kedaulatan regulasi. Sebaliknya, Singapura menunjukkan adaptabilitas normatif melalui konsistensi penerapan FET, pengakuan implied consent, serta harmonisasi praktik remedial dengan standar internasional. Penelitian ini menegaskan adanya dua model adaptabilitas hukum yang berbeda namun saling melengkapi, serta menawarkan kerangka komparatif integratif yang menghubungkan dimensi normatif, institusional, dan remedial untuk menyeimbangkan perlindungan investor, kepastian hukum, dan ruang kebijakan negara.
Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Kecelakaan Kerja di Indonesia: Legal Protection for Workers against Termination of Employment Due to Work Accidents in Indonesia Septa Juwita; Endah Pujiastuti; Agung Aristyawan Adhi; Willar Haruman
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i1.13414

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal provisions governing termination of employment due to workplace accidents and the effectiveness of industrial relations dispute resolution mechanisms in Indonesia. The background to this study is based on the fact that workers who are victims of workplace accidents are still being terminated from their jobs despite the existence of normative protections in various laws and regulations. The urgency of this research lies in the need to assess whether the applicable regulations actually provide effective protection, identify potential normative disharmony after the enactment of the Job Creation Law, and examine the position of workers in industrial power relations. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach as well as descriptive-analytical specifications. The results of the study show that normative regulations on the protection of workers who are victims of work accidents are available, but their effectiveness is not yet optimal because regulatory changes after the Job Creation Law tend to expand employer flexibility, create potential for normative disharmony, and reinforce the imbalance in the bargaining position of workers in dispute resolution practices. The conclusion of the study confirms that legal protection has not been fully realized in substantive terms. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of the analysis of layoff regulations due to work accidents with the effectiveness of industrial relations dispute resolution mechanisms as a unified legal protection system.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan hukum pemutusan hubungan kerja akibat kecelakaan kerja serta efektivitas mekanisme penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial di Indonesia. Latar belakang penelitian didasarkan pada masih terjadinya pemutusan hubungan kerja terhadap pekerja korban kecelakaan kerja meskipun perlindungan normatif telah diatur dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kebutuhan untuk menilai apakah regulasi yang berlaku benar-benar memberikan perlindungan efektif, mengidentifikasi potensi disharmoni norma pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, serta menelaah posisi pekerja dalam relasi kuasa industrial. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual serta spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan perlindungan pekerja korban kecelakaan kerja telah tersedia secara normatif, namun efektivitasnya belum optimal karena perubahan regulasi pasca Cipta Kerja cenderung memperluas fleksibilitas pengusaha, memunculkan potensi disharmoni norma, serta memperkuat ketimpangan posisi tawar pekerja dalam praktik penyelesaian sengketa. Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa perlindungan hukum belum sepenuhnya terwujud secara substantif. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi analisis pengaturan PHK akibat kecelakaan kerja dengan efektivitas mekanisme penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial sebagai satu kesatuan sistem perlindungan hukum.
Konflik Kepentingan Partai Politik dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah: Political Party Conflict of Interest in Government Procurement Moehamad Nindyarto Laksmana Praja; Muhammad Junaidi; Zaenal Arifin
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i1.13465

Abstract

This study examines the mechanisms of political party conflicts of interest in village procurement in Central Java, identifies regulatory gaps that enable such practices, and assesses their implications for good governance. The research employs normative legal methods using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, complemented by interviews as supporting data. The findings indicate that village procurement is highly vulnerable to political intervention and patronage due to regulatory fragmentation among village procurement rules, administrative law, and political party regulations. A case study of village operational vehicle procurement reveals decision centralization, indications of collusion, and the instrumental use of procurement for political benefit distribution. These patterns demonstrate that party-related conflicts of interest are not incidental but operate systemically through power networks that undermine transparency, accountability, and administrative neutrality. The novelty of this study lies in its theoretical construction, positioning political party conflicts of interest in village procurement as a form of institutionalized structural corruption embedded in regulatory gaps. The study recommends clearer separation between political party functions and village governance, explicit conflict-of-interest regulation, strengthened oversight mechanisms, and integrity education for village officials.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis mekanisme benturan kepentingan partai politik dalam pengadaan barang/jasa desa di Jawa Tengah, mengidentifikasi celah regulasi yang memfasilitasinya, serta menilai implikasinya terhadap prinsip good governance. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual, yang diperkaya dengan wawancara sebagai data pendukung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengadaan desa memiliki kerentanan tinggi terhadap intervensi politik dan patronase akibat ketidaksinkronan regulasi antara hukum pengadaan desa, administrasi pemerintahan, dan pengaturan partai politik. Studi kasus pengadaan kendaraan operasional kepala desa menunjukkan indikasi sentralisasi keputusan, kolusi, dan penggunaan pengadaan sebagai instrumen distribusi manfaat politik. Fenomena tersebut menunjukkan bahwa benturan kepentingan partai tidak bersifat insidental, melainkan beroperasi secara sistemik melalui jaringan kekuasaan yang melemahkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan netralitas pemerintahan desa. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada konstruksi teoretis yang menempatkan benturan kepentingan partai politik dalam pengadaan desa sebagai bentuk korupsi struktural yang terinstitusionalisasi melalui celah regulasi. Penelitian merekomendasikan penegasan pemisahan fungsi partai dan pemerintahan desa, pengaturan konflik kepentingan secara eksplisit, penguatan pengawasan, serta pendidikan integritas aparatur desa.
Tindak Pidana Pemilu Sebagai Kejahatan Demokrasi Konstitusional: Electoral Crimes as Constitutional Democracy Crimes Junius Akbar; Muhammad Junaidi; Arief Rizal
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i1.13515

Abstract

This study aims to analyze electoral crimes as crimes against constitutional democracy from the perspectives of criminal law and constitutional law. The study is grounded in the persistence of a normative approach that treats electoral crimes merely as special offenses without a theoretical framework explaining their impact on the legitimacy of state power. In practice, money politics, vote manipulation, and abuse of authority not only violate criminal law but also distort the constitutional mechanism of government formation. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, using systematic and teleological interpretation of electoral law norms. The findings demonstrate that electoral crimes should be understood as crimes against democracy that violate fundamental legal interests, namely, popular sovereignty and the legitimacy of political authority. Their classification as extraordinary crimes is constructed through the integration of constitutional crime theory, democratic legitimacy theory, and the theory of democratic system protection, which collectively explain their systemic and constitutional impact. The novelty of this study lies in its conceptual reconstruction that repositions electoral crimes as violations of democratic power reproduction mechanisms, as well as its reinterpretation of their place within criminal law as offenses protecting collective constitutional interests. These findings support the need to reformulate electoral criminal law policy based on the protection of democratic legitimacy.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tindak pidana Pemilu sebagai kejahatan terhadap demokrasi konstitusional dalam perspektif hukum pidana dan hukum ketatanegaraan. Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari masih dominannya pendekatan normatif yang menempatkan tindak pidana Pemilu sebatas delik khusus tanpa konstruksi teoritik mengenai dampaknya terhadap legitimasi kekuasaan negara. Padahal, praktik politik uang, manipulasi suara, dan penyalahgunaan kewenangan tidak hanya melanggar norma pidana, tetapi berpotensi merusak mekanisme konstitusional pembentukan pemerintahan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus melalui interpretasi sistematis dan teleologis terhadap norma hukum Pemilu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindak pidana Pemilu harus dipahami sebagai crime against democracy yang menyerang kepentingan hukum fundamental berupa kedaulatan rakyat dan legitimasi kekuasaan. Kualifikasi sebagai extraordinary crime dibangun melalui integrasi teori constitutional crime, teori legitimasi demokratis, dan teori perlindungan sistem demokrasi, yang menegaskan bahwa dampak pelanggaran Pemilu bersifat sistemik dan konstitusional. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada rekonstruksi konseptual yang mereposisi tindak pidana Pemilu sebagai pelanggaran terhadap mekanisme reproduksi kekuasaan demokratis, sekaligus menawarkan reinterpretasi kedudukannya dalam sistem hukum pidana sebagai delik yang melindungi kepentingan konstitusional kolektif. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya reformulasi kebijakan hukum pidana Pemilu berbasis perlindungan legitimasi demokrasi.
Efektivitas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 dalam Pencegahan Korupsi Pengadaan Pemerintah: Effectiveness of Presidential Regulation Number 46 of 2025 in Preventing Government Procurement Corruption Miko Jaya Nanda Pratama; Zaenal Arifin; Ni Nyoman Tri Partini
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i1.13521

Abstract

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Presidential Regulation No. 46 of 2025 in preventing corruption in government procurement of goods and services. This study answers the question of whether Presidential Regulation No. 46 of 2025 is effective in reducing corruption in procurement or whether it opens up new risks in the modern procurement system. The research problem is based on the high vulnerability of the procurement sector to conflicts of interest and abuse of authority despite regulatory reforms and system digitization. Effectiveness in this study is measured operationally through four indicators, namely normative compliance, prevention of conflicts of interest, integrity of the electronic procurement system, and effectiveness of risk-based supervision. The research uses a normative legal method with a regulatory, conceptual, and case approach, analyzed qualitatively. The results show that Presidential Regulation No. 46 of 2025 normatively strengthens transparency and efficiency through digitization and simplification of procedures, but still leaves vulnerabilities in the procurement planning stage, expansion of administrative discretion, and limitations in preventive oversight. It is concluded that the effectiveness of regulations is conditional and depends on the integrity of the apparatus and institutional oversight capacity. The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of the duality of regulations as an instrumen for preventing corruption and as a source of new systemic risks due to the modernization of procurement.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menilai efektivitas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 dalam pencegahan korupsi pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah. Penelitian ini menjawab pertanyaan apakah Perpres Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 efektif menekan korupsi pengadaan atau justru membuka ruang risiko baru dalam sistem pengadaan modern. Permasalahan penelitian didasarkan pada tingginya kerentanan sektor pengadaan terhadap konflik kepentingan dan penyalahgunaan wewenang meskipun telah dilakukan reformasi regulasi dan digitalisasi sistem. Efektivitas dalam penelitian ini diukur secara operasional melalui empat indikator, yaitu kepatuhan normatif, pencegahan konflik kepentingan, integritas sistem elektronik pengadaan, dan efektivitas pengawasan berbasis risiko. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Perpres Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 secara normatif memperkuat transparansi dan efisiensi melalui digitalisasi dan penyederhanaan prosedur, namun masih menyisakan kerentanan pada tahap perencanaan pengadaan, perluasan diskresi administratif, dan keterbatasan pengawasan preventif. Disimpulkan bahwa efektivitas regulasi bersifat kondisional dan bergantung pada integritas aparatur serta kapasitas pengawasan kelembagaan. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada analisis dualitas regulasi sebagai instrumen pencegahan korupsi sekaligus sumber risiko sistemik baru akibat modernisasi pengadaan.

Page 9 of 9 | Total Record : 87

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): MARCH Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): NOVEMBER Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): MARCH Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): NOVEMBER Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): JULY Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): MARCH Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): NOVEMBER Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): JULY Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): MARCH More Issue