Journal of International Relations Studies
Journal of International Relations seeks original manuscripts that provide theoretically informed empirical analyses of issues in international relations, as well as original theoretical or conceptual analyses. The journal represents no particular school or approach, nor is it restricted to any particular methodology. Instead, it seeks to foster an awareness of methodological and epistemological questions in the study of International Relations, and to reflect research and developments of a conceptual, normative and empirical nature in all the major sub-areas of the field.
Articles
609 Documents
<![CDATA[2. KEPENTINGAN PEMERINTAH NORWEGIA DALAM KERJASAMA PENANGANAN DEFORESTASI DAN DEGRADASI HUTAN DI INDONESIA MELALUI MEKANISME REDD+ ]]>
<![CDATA[Berutu, Mesi Fransiska]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahyudi, Fendy Eko]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 3, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (270.765 KB)
<![CDATA[The deforestations and forest degradations in Indonesia have a global impact as they havebeen held responsible in increasing the amount of world carbon emissions. Thegovernment of Indonesia actively participates in many efforts combating the problem, oneof which materialiazed throughthe initiation of bilateral cooperation between Norway andIndonesia under the scheme of REDD+ (Reducing from Deforestations and ForestDegradations), where Norway plays role as donor and Indonesia becomes the recipientcountry.This particular cooperation could be well explained by utilizing the approach ofConstrutivism. Following the constructivists’ stand point, the Norwegian action in givingdonor to Indonesia isseen inseparable from Norway’s identity as a ‘green actor’ whoincludes environment as one of the primacies among her foreign policy priorities.]]>
<![CDATA[Efektivitas Peran Search for Common Ground dalam Menangani Kejahatan Kemanusiaan terhadap Perempuan dan Anak-Anak Korban Konflik Poso 2009-2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Purnasanti, Linda Uji]]>;
<![CDATA[Windiani, Reni]]>;
<![CDATA[Pattipelohy, Shary Charlotte]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (357.078 KB)
<![CDATA[The high number of casualties among women and children encouraged SFCG (Search For Common Ground) to participate in dealing with the crimes against humanity upon them due to Poso conflict 2009-2016. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of SFCG's role in handling the issue by using qualitative research methods. The role of SFCG as an INGOs (International Non-Government Organizations) could be explained by using Nelson's indicator to determine the role of International Organization in conflict and peace which is also supported by Galtung's conflict resolution theory of peacebuilding. The results of this study found that SFCG's role in dealing with the crimes of humanity on women and children victims of Poso conflict during 2009-2016 was considered effective and should be an alternative againts similar social issues to involving internal and external organizations from various institutions.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PERBEDAAN KEBIJAKAN KONTRATERORISME AMERIKA SERIKAT TERHADAP KELOMPOK TERORIS ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Levant) DAN BOKO HARAM TAHUN 2014 – 2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Sekarini Santoso, Nabilla Ayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Rosyidin, Mohamad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (700.347 KB)
<![CDATA[After 9/11, the U.S. have been so adamant on eradicating terrorism all over the world, and adopted a foreign policy that focuses on counterterrorism named „war on terror‟. The war on terror have been targeting terrorist groups like al-Qaeda, and most recently, its foremost focus is on ISIL. While the U.S. promised to erase all terrorism in the world, the policy still has some imbalance towards whom it applies to. Towards ISIL, the U.S. and its coalition have made subsequent progress on their counterterrorism efforts while towards other groups, such as Boko Haram, the policy application has been stagnant with not much progress. This thesis is a qualitative research using Mill‟s Method of comparative study to see the differences of each policy and will explore and analyze the reasons why the counterterrorism effort of the U.S. is unequal, focusing on its differences of counterterrorism policy towards ISIL and Boko Haram using Analytical Eclecticism as a tool. Furthermore, this thesis will also incorporate defensive realism and liberal internationalism to analyze the possible reasons on why U.S.‟s counterterrorism policy has a difference between whom it applies to. The result of this study shows that U.S. have a political interest in Syria including its rivalry with Russia and its needs to contain Russia‟s power in the Middle East and its interest to topple Assad from the Syrian government.]]>
<![CDATA[7. PERGESERAN ORIENTASI GERAKAN TERORISME ISLAM DI INDONESIA (STUDI TERORISME TAHUN 2000-2015) ]]>
<![CDATA[Subhan, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahyudi, Fendy Eko]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 4, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (265.347 KB)
<![CDATA[Aksi terorisme pada 11 September 2001 yang menelan 3000 korban jiwa di AmerikaSerikat dan bom Bali di Indonesia pada 12 Oktober 2002 telah mengubah pandanganmasyarakat terhadap terorisme. Terorisme identik dengan agama khususnya Islam. Tidaklain karena teror-teror tersebut diklaim dilakukan oleh kelompok Islam Al Qaeda danJamaah Islamiyah. Selain bom Bali, pada periode tahun 2000 hingga 2009 juga terjadirangkaian aksi terorisme di Indonesia yang dilakukan oleh kelompok Islam. Namun,memasuki tahun 2010 hingga 2015, terjadi aksi-aksi teror yang berbeda dari periodesebelumnya, baik dari segi sasaran maupun pelaku-pelaku yang terlibat. Oleh sebab itu,rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah telah terjadipergeseran orientasi gerakan terorisme di Indonesia dan apakah orientasi saat ini tetappada orientasi agama atau telah berubah menjadi berorientasi lain. Teori yang digunakandalam penelitian ini, yaitu The Four Wave of Modern Terrorism, Teori PemberontakanManusia, Teori Kemunduran Terorisme dan The Lone Wolf Terrorism. Penelitian inibersifat eksplanatif dengan metode observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi di lapanganterhadap mantan teroris sebagai data primer, dan didukung sumber data sekunder berupastudi literatur sebagai bahan pendukung. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian inimenunjukkan bahwa telah terjadi pergeseran orientasi gerakan terorisme di Indonesiaberupa munculnya lone wolf terrorism dan merebaknya paham takfiri yang memecah belahkelompok teror di Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Kebijakan Penanganan Penyelundupan Pakaian Bekas di Provinsi Riau, Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Yaneski, Arifa Filza]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Basith Dir, Andi Akhmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (286.377 KB)
<![CDATA[This research aims to describe about secondhand clothes smuggling and implementation ofLegislation Number 7 of 2014 as Indonesia’s government effort to overcome thesecondhand clothes smuggling in Indonesia, specifically in Riau. This research is adescriptive research guided by transnational crime concept by United Nation Conventionagainst Transnational Organized Crime and a public policy theory by Van Meter and VanHorn called a Model of Policy Implementation Process. This theory describe that a policyimplementation is affected by five factors; policy’s standardization, resource, agent’scharacteristic, and society conditions (social, economy, and politics). This research is aqualitative research by using interview and literature studies as the data source. The resultof this research are some factor explications about standardization of Legislation Number7 of 2014 affecting the policy implementation and also there are some influences fromeconomic condition in Riau that cause any resistance about the policy.]]>
<![CDATA[KERJASAMA INDONESIA – MALAYSIA DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN LINGKUNGAN: STUDI KASUS KABUT ASAP RIAU PERIODE 2008-2013 ]]>
<![CDATA[Fiani, Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Pattipeilohy, Shary Charlotte]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 1, Nomor 2, Tahun 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Haze pollution in Riau, Indonesia is an annual problem that should be dealtby Indonesia and Malaysia Governments. Haze pollution is a form oftransnational crime because it has been polluting the environment ofMalaysia. Riau haze pollution coming from forest fires and land adverselyaffecting the entire important aspects. The seriousness of the problem of hazepollution in Riau, need some immediate prevention attempts taken byIndonesia and Malaysia. Indonesia established bilateral cooperation withMalaysia to address this issue because Malaysia is the one that received themost severe negative impact of the haze. The results of the bilateralcooperation is an agreement in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding(MoU) between Indonesia and Malaysia for the prevention of forest fire andhaze in Riau. MoU between the two countries was signed in 2008 andlegitimate until 2013. However, the conditions in Riau due to haze pollution,is getting worse in 2013 which led to the smog disaster. Question problemthat arises is how the implementation of the cooperation between Indonesiaand Malaysia in response to the case of haze in Riau during 2008-2013. Thepurpose of research to describe and analyze the situation in Riau due to haze,haze reduction, and the implementation of cooperation between Indonesiaand Malaysia during the period 2008-2013. In answer to the problems andobjectives of the research carried out by using the theory of internationalcooperation, transnational crime theory, and the theory of environmentalcrimes in the paradigm of liberalism. This research is using a qualitativemethod with the type of descriptive-analytical by using literature reviews andinterviews research technique. The finding of this research is theimplementation of the cooperation between Indonesia and Malaysia has notgiven an effective and optimal results due to it’s lack of time, location, andlaw enforcement as well as human resources problems in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Hambatan Aksesi Turki ke Uni Eropa ]]>
<![CDATA[Ikhsan, Yozar Qohari Bil]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (827.451 KB)
<![CDATA[Based on political term in the Copenhagen Criteria, European Commission decide the requirements for Accession to European Union which to guarantee and protect Democracy, Human Rights and Minority Rights. Those are supported by the Liberalism perspective on international relation study which explains that regional cooperation and international cooperation can be done if the state can guarantee the enforcement of Democracy and protect the Human Rights included Minority Rights. This research purpose is to find the obstacles of the Turkey accession to European Union using Descriptive-Qualitative analysis method and Liberalism approach. This research result argues that Turkey has done many efforts for qualifying up the requirements to get the Accession to European Union immediately. But in 2010-2016 the European Union appraised Turkey hasn’t done the enforcement of Democracy, Human Rights, and Minority Rights fully yet. Then Turkey accession efforts to the European Union got an obstacle.]]>
<![CDATA[5. Combating Cyber Racism: Analisis Komparatif terhadap Implementasi Protokol Tambahan Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime tentang Cyber Racism (CETS 189) di Amerika Serikat dan Australia Tahun 2012-2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Charlina, Riani]]>;
<![CDATA[Utama, Tri Cahya]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 1, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (275.073 KB)
<![CDATA[In this globalization era, technological advances undeniably encouraged the developmentof the scope of crime along with the development of science. The phenomenon of crimecommitted in cyberspace, known as cybercrime, is one of the most dangerous crimes thatare currently faced by most people in the world. One of those crimes is racism incyberspace or what so-called cyber racism. The United States and Australia are the twolargest countries out of the Council of Europe member countries which committed toovercome cyber racism by ratifying the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime andadditional protocol concerning cyber racism (CETS 189). Nonetheless, there are somedifferences in the implementation of this convention between the United States andAustralia in overcoming cyber racism. This study aims to determine factor that influencesthe differences in the implementation of CETS 189 in the United States and Australia.Using culturalist approach as an analytical lens, this study argues that national law is thecause of the differences in the implementation of CETS 189 in the United States andAustralia. It is affected by cultural factor in which the United States has liberal perceptionregarding freedom of speech, while Australia tends to provide some limits on freedom ofspeech.]]>
<![CDATA[CENTRE FOR MARINELIFE CONSERVATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT’S STRATEGY AS AN NGO IN STRENGTHENING THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM’S COASTAL COMMUNITY RESILIENCE ]]>
<![CDATA[Pertiwi, Diyah Ayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 3, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (278.807 KB)
<![CDATA[Climate change is the biggest challenge for humanity in this century as it causesproblematic environmental changes and destructive weather conditions. Vietnamesecoastal community were considered as the most vulnerable people suffering from theimpacts of climate change as their livelihoods are depending on the marine-basedresources. However, this research found that the coastal people today are more able toadapt, adjust and overcome the negative impacts of climate change after receivingintervention from Centre for Marinelife Conservation and Community Development(MCD). This research aims to describe the coastal community condition and explain thestrategies used by MCD to strengthen the coastal community resilience in Vietnam. Thisqualitative research is developed using literary technique. In which, author collected datafrom secondary sources, comprise of publications from of MCD, other related ministriesand institutions. Using the conceptual frameworks of NGO Concept and TransnationalAdvocacy Network, this research answers the question that MCD uses its strategies bymaintaining cooperative manner to deliver its influence within the socialist governmentutilizing the Transnational Advocacy Network and conducting small-scale change andlarge-scale change. These strategies allow MCD to strengthen Vietnamese coastalcommunes’ resilience and to sustain under the socialist regime.]]>
<![CDATA[RASIONAL-KONSTRUKTIVIS: INDONESIA DI PERSIMPANGAN JALAN MERESPON KEBIJAKAN ‘TURN BACK THE BOATS’ AUSTRALIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Maajid, Ahmad Luthfi]]>;
<![CDATA[Susitianingsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Rosyidin, Mohammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (312.785 KB)
<![CDATA[The flow of asylum seekers caused by the many conflicts that arose in theMiddle East and around Asia since about 2001 led Australia to start behavingantipathy to them. Those asylum seekers usually called boat people. Then, itbecomes a reason for Australia to apply restrictive asylum policies. One of thepolicy is called 'turn back the boats' namely by bringing back the boat peoplewho indicated from Indonesia back to Indonesia. This causes asylum seekersexploded in Indonesia region and impacted negative causes. Indonesia wasforced to accept these asylum seekers even though it is detrimental and was notan obligation for Indonesia. This paper intends to analyze the dilemma ofIndonesia to address the Australian policy and asylum-seekers issue usingrationalist and constructivist theory. On the one hand, Indonesia in accordancewith the rationalist view, refuse the asylums and Australia’s policy because ofthe cost-benefit considerations and it is not the obligation for Indonesia.However, on the other hand, Indonesia recessive condition forced to accept theboat people and it is consistent with the constructivist view. But apparently,constructivist still has not succeeded explaining this somehow-unique caseconsidering that Indonesia has no commitment in conducting the reception ofthe asylum seekers.]]>
