Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Dinamika Komunikasi Politik dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Salatiga Tahun 2024 Tunjung Wijanarka; Rizki Amalia Yanuartha; Dewi Kartika Sari; Benedict Alvianto Nazara
Jurnal Neo Societal Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): Edisi Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Halu Oleo (UHO)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52423/jns.v10i4.123

This study seeks to explore the dynamics of political communication in the Salatiga City election. The author will use Bourdieu's ideas as a foundation to understand social reality and social media analysis as a campaign medium for mayoral and deputy mayor candidates of Salatiga City. Thus, the analysis can further describe how political communication of candidate pairs takes place. Also, how the understanding of the candidate pair in bringing plurality values in the campaign can be seen. Through a qualitative research method with an exploratory type, the results of the study show that there are candidate pairs who have advantages in different social capital and capital capital, which ultimately has implications for the political communication style of each candidate pair that is different from each other. In addition, to support the arguments and data presented, the author uses the Hybrid Media System (HMS) as one of the approaches to understand how different types of media – both old and new media – interact with each other and compete in the process of production, distribution, and consumption of information. This study concludes that the media plays an important role in the political communication process of each candidate which also utilizes the social capital and political capital owned by each candidate.

Illiberal Governmentality Dan Resistensi Akademi: Epistemic Accountability Dalam Demokrasi Indonesia Pasca Pemilu 2024 Rizki Yanuartha
Jurnal Neo Societal Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): Edisi Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Halu Oleo (UHO)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52423/jns.v10i4.126

This article analyzes the configuration of Indonesia's democracy after the 2024 election through the framework of illiberal governmentality to understand how government rationality limits the democratic space. The goal is to identify governance mechanisms that normalize illiberal practices while exploring forms of academic resistance as a critical response to them. The approach used is qualitative with Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough), including text analysis, discourse practice, and social practice. Data were obtained from institutional statements, policy documents, democracy index reports, national and international media coverage, and NGO reports. Thematic analysis was carried out by tracing the main frame, the relationship between discourses, and the dominant narrative regarding state relations and academic resistance, with validity strengthened through source triangulation and documentation trail audits. The results of the study show that the state maintains electoral legitimacy through electoral success, but at the same time narrows the substance of democracy through three mechanisms: (1) security channels based on legal regulations, apparatus, and digital surveillance; (2) normalization pathways through campus bureaucratization and research regulations; and (3) biopolitical pathways in the management of social assistance and digital surveillance. Academic resistance emerged as a practice of counter governmentality based on epistemic accountability. In conclusion, the quality of Indonesia's democracy lies in the dialectic between the rationality of government and the resistance of civil society as the guardian of substantive democracy

Illiberal Governmentality Dan Resistensi Akademi: Epistemic Accountability Dalam Demokrasi Indonesia Pasca Pemilu 2024 Rizki Yanuartha
Jurnal Neo Societal Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): Edisi Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Halu Oleo (UHO)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52423/jns.v10i4.126

This article analyzes the configuration of Indonesia's democracy after the 2024 election through the framework of illiberal governmentality to understand how government rationality limits the democratic space. The goal is to identify governance mechanisms that normalize illiberal practices while exploring forms of academic resistance as a critical response to them. The approach used is qualitative with Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough), including text analysis, discourse practice, and social practice. Data were obtained from institutional statements, policy documents, democracy index reports, national and international media coverage, and NGO reports. Thematic analysis was carried out by tracing the main frame, the relationship between discourses, and the dominant narrative regarding state relations and academic resistance, with validity strengthened through source triangulation and documentation trail audits. The results of the study show that the state maintains electoral legitimacy through electoral success, but at the same time narrows the substance of democracy through three mechanisms: (1) security channels based on legal regulations, apparatus, and digital surveillance; (2) normalization pathways through campus bureaucratization and research regulations; and (3) biopolitical pathways in the management of social assistance and digital surveillance. Academic resistance emerged as a practice of counter governmentality based on epistemic accountability. In conclusion, the quality of Indonesia's democracy lies in the dialectic between the rationality of government and the resistance of civil society as the guardian of substantive democracy

MODEL PENGUATAN SOLIDARITAS JEMAAT MELALUI AKSI SOSIAL PEMBAGIAN SAYUR: KOLABORASI MAHASISWA KPK FISKOM UKSW DENGAN GBI OLA ET LABORA BUKSULING SALATIGA Rizki Amalia Yanuartha; Syaloomita Asrilla Sagala; Angelica Margaret Sitorus; Astrid Meicadila; Shella Angelia
ADIMAS Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/adimas.v10i1.11629

Di era modern dengan masyarakatnya yang individualis, solidaritas sosial menjadi aspek utama dalam memperkuat hubungan antarindividu. Pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan membangun solidaritas jemaat melalui aksi sosial pembagian sayur, oleh mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana (UKSW) bersama Gereja Bethel Indonesia (GBI) Ola et Labora Buksuling, Salatiga. Kegiatan berfungsi sebagai bentuk pemenuhan kebutuhan pangan dan memperkuat kebersamaan serta kepedulian dalam komunitas gereja. Analisis menggunakan pendekatan interdisipliner, mengacu pada teori solidaritas sosial Ã‰mile Durkheim, teori religiusitas Glock & Stark, serta teori hierarki kebutuhan Maslow. Solidaritas sosial tercermin dalam aksi kolektif yang mempererat hubungan antarjemaat melalui pembagian sayur, sementara religiusitas menjadi faktor pendorong keterlibatan individu dalam tindakan prososial. Selain itu, teori Maslow menunjukkan pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar seperti pangan dapat meningkatkan kesejahteraan psikologis dan sosial jemaat. Pelaksanaan program melalui metode Participatory Action Research (PAR) mencakup tahapan: planning, action, dan member checking. Planning melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD) dan observasi lapangan untuk menentukan sasaran penerima manfaat. Implementasi pembagian sayuran dilakukan secara berkala, disertai edukasi tentang pola makan sehat. Evaluasi melalui wawancara dan diskusi reflektif bersama jemaat untuk mengukur efektivitas program. Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan kegiatan berhasil menunjukkan solidaritas sosial dalam komunitas gereja, mempererat hubungan antarjemaat, serta menumbuhkan kesadaran pola makan sehat. Program ini juga memberikan manfaat psikososial rasa memiliki dan keterlibatan jemaat dalam komunitas. Kegiatan ini berpotensi direplikasi sebagai model pembangunan sosial berbasis komunitas yang berkelanjutan.Â

Praktik Adaptasi Nelayan Dalam Kesenjangan Digital Di Desa Tetehosi I, Nias Erika Enjellina Hia; Rizki Amalia Yanuartha; Antik Tri Susanti
Jurnal Sosiologi Kontemporer Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sosiologi Kontemporer, Juni 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Universitas Bosowa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56326/jsk.v6i1.9257

Penelitian ini mengkaji praktik adaptasi nelayan dalam menghadapi kesenjangan digital di Desa Tetehosi I, Kecamatan Idanogawo, Kabupaten Nias. Fokus penelitian diarahkan pada bentuk kesenjangan digital yang dialami nelayan serta strategi yang mereka lakukan dalam memasarkan hasil tangkapan ikan di tengah keterbatasan akses teknologi. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi lapangan, dan dokumentasi terhadap 12 informan yang terdiri dari nelayan, pedagang ikan, pengepul, konsumen, dan aparat desa. Analisis menggunakan perspektif digital divide Van Dijk serta konsep modal, habitus, dan arena Pierre Bourdieu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nelayan di Desa Tetehosi I menghadapi kesenjangan digital terutama pada aspek akses infrastruktur dan pemanfaatan teknologi secara produktif. Keterbatasan jaringan internet menyebabkan penggunaan media digital belum berkembang secara optimal. Akan tetapi, sebagian besar nelayan telah memiliki telepon pintar dan mampu menggunakan aplikasi seperti WhatsApp dan Facebook. Teknologi tersebut lebih banyak digunakan untuk komunikasi sehari-hari daripada pemasaran ikan karena hasil tangkapan umumnya telah terserap melalui jaringan pembeli dan pengepul yang telah terbentuk. Dalam kondisi tersebut, nelayan mengembangkan strategi adaptasi melalui penjualan langsung di pantai, pemanfaatan media digital secara terbatas melalui status WhatsApp dan komunikasi telepon, serta penggunaan cool box untuk menjaga kualitas hasil tangkapan. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kuatnya modal sosial dan habitus pemasaran tradisional menjadi faktor penting yang membuat praktik pemasaran lokal tetap dipertahankan meskipun peluang digitalisasi tersedia. Oleh karena itu, kesenjangan digital pada masyarakat nelayan tidak hanya berkaitan dengan keterbatasan teknologi, tetapi juga dipengaruhi oleh struktur sosial dan praktik ekonomi yang telah mengakar dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. This study examines how fishers adapt to the challenges of the digital divide in Tetehosi I Village, Idanogawo District, Nias Regency. It focuses on the forms of digital inequality experienced by local fishers and the strategies they employ to market their catch despite limited access to digital technology. A descriptive qualitative approach was adopted, with data collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation involving twelve informants, including fishers, fish traders, middlemen, consumers, and village officials. The analysis draws on Van Dijk’s digital divide framework and Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of capital, habitus, and field. The findings reveal that the digital divide among fishers is primarily reflected in limited digital infrastructure and the underutilization of technology for productive economic activities. Poor internet connectivity remains a major obstacle to the broader use of digital media. Nevertheless, most fishers already own smartphones and are familiar with applications such as WhatsApp and Facebook. These platforms are used mainly for everyday communication rather than fish marketing, as the majority of catches are already distributed through long-established networks of buyers and middlemen. In response to these conditions, fishers have developed various adaptive strategies, including direct sales at the beach, limited use of digital media through WhatsApp status updates and phone communication, and the use of cool boxes to preserve the quality of their catch. The study further demonstrates that strong social capital and a deeply embedded traditional marketing habitus continue to shape local marketing practices, even as opportunities for digitalization become increasingly available. These findings suggest that the digital divide within fishing communities cannot be understood solely as a matter of technological access, but must also be viewed in relation to the social structures and economic practices that have long been embedded in everyday life.

PERAN NORMA DAN SOLIDARITAS DALAM KOLABORASI POLSEK DAN MASYARAKAT STRATEGI ADVOKASI, MEDIASI, NEGOSIASI UNTUK MENEKAN KRIMINALITAS DI UNGARAN BARAT Callista Aurora Suarez; Alvianto Wahyudi Utomo; Rizky Amalia Yanuartha
Jurnal Interaksi Sosiologi Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Interaksi Volume 5 Nomor 2 2026
Publisher : Laborataorium Jurusan Sosiologi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/jis.v5i2.19691

This study addresses the persistent problem of crime in communities, which necessitates a comprehensive approach that is not only legal and repressive but also social and participatory. The main objective of this research is to detail the forms of collaboration between the police (Polsek) and the community, explain the factors that contribute to its success, and identify the obstacles encountered during its implementation. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, this research delves into the collaborative efforts between the police and the community to reduce crime in West Ungaran District. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation in Sendangputri and Nyatnyono villages. The key findings show that the collaboration between the Polsek and the community, particularly in these two villages, has been effective through participatory and community-based approaches. Strategies such as advocacy, mediation, and negotiation have not only contributed to a significant reduction in crime rates but have also strengthened local social structures by increasing trust, citizen solidarity, and informal social control. The research concludes that this collaboration effectively reduces crime and enhances local social structures by using advocacy, mediation, and negotiation strategies.

Equipping Youth: Membangun Kesuksesan Remaja JKI Keluarga Kerajaan Salatiga melalui Manajemen Diri dan Peningkatan Kepercayaan Diri Hizkia Bryan Hulu; Clarischa Geovani Raharja; Sabrina Dwi Cahya; Aloysius G. Tamaka; Rizki Amalia Yanuartha Yanuartha
Magistrorum et Scholarium: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jms.v5i32025p274-284

Self-management and increasing self-confidence are crucial elements in shaping teenagers' success, enabling them to manage stress, develop leadership skills, and build a solid foundation for achieving life goals. Increasing self-confidence is the main key to achieving goals, increasing intrinsic motivation, and overcoming obstacles with belief in one's potential. This research explores the central role of self-management and increasing self-confidence in shaping adolescent success, especially in the JKI Keluarga Kerajaan. In addressing the unique challenges of adolescents in this environment, researchers implemented a specially designed Equipping program. The impact of equipping is reflected in the youth's ability to appear in the 7-minute sermon at every Kingdom Generation service on Sunday. This research is expected to provide in-depth insight into the important role of self-management and self-confidence in shaping adolescent success, especially in the context of spiritual life and ecclesial service.

Normalisasi Money Politic dan Habitus Digital Generasi Z di Akun TikTok Andik Nur Prabowo dalam Pemilu Indonesia 2024 Oschar Ebenheazer Laumalay; Rizki Amalia Yanuartha; Royke Roberth Siahainenia
Jurnal Sosiologi Kontemporer Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Sosiologi Kontemporer, Desember 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Universitas Bosowa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56326/jsk.v5i2.7828

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana wacana politik uang (money politic) direpresentasikan dan dinormalisasi dalam konten media sosial, khususnya melalui akun TikTok Andik Nur Prab menjelang Pemilu Indonesia 2024. Menggunakan pendekatan Analisis Wacana Kritis (AWK) model Teun A. van Dijk dan teori habitus Pierre Bourdieu, penelitian ini menelusuri struktur teks, kognisi sosial, serta konteks sosial dari interaksi pengguna terhadap konten parodi bertema “serangan fajar”. Data diperoleh melalui observasi daring terhadap unggahan video dan komentar publik pada akun TikTok tersebut selama periode Desember 2023-Februari 2024, dengan total interaksi mencapai jutaan penayangan dan ribuan tanggapan pengguna. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa praktik politik uang tidak hanya direpresentasikan secara humoris dan simbolik, tetapi juga dipahami oleh generasi Z sebagai hal yang lumrah dan tidak bermasalah secara etika. Struktur wacana yang ringan dan menghibur justru memperkuat legitimasi sosial terhadap praktik politik transaksional. Melalui teori habitus Bourdieu, ditemukan bahwa modal ekonomi, sosial, budaya, dan simbolik berperan dalam membentuk habitus digital yang permisif terhadap praktik politik uang. Media sosial, khususnya TikTok, berfungsi bukan hanya sebagai ruang ekspresi, tetapi juga sebagai arena produksi dan reproduksi ideologi yang menguatkan normalisasi money politic dalam budaya politik generasi muda. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis interaksi pengguna TikTok sebagai bentuk produksi habitus politik digital, yang menjelaskan bagaimana wacana viral di media sosial berkontribusi pada pembentukan opini publik dan pelemahan etika demokrasi di kalangan generasi muda Indonesia. This study aims to analyze how the discourse of money politics is represented and normalized in social media content, particularly through the TikTok account of Andik Nur Prabowo in the context of Indonesia’s 2024 general election. Using Teun A. van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of habitus, this research examines the textual structure, social cognition, and social context of user interactions with parody content themed around the so-called “dawn attack” (vote-buying practice). Data were collected through online observation of videos and public comments posted on the account between December 2023 and February 2024, which generated millions of views and thousands of user engagements. The findings reveal that money politics is not only presented humorously and symbolically but also perceived by Generation Z as normal and ethically acceptable. The humorous and relatable narrative structure reinforces the social legitimacy of transactional politics. Through Bourdieu’s framework, the study identifies that economic, social, cultural, and symbolic capitals shape a permissive digital habitus toward money politics. Social media, especially TikTok functions not merely as a space of entertainment but as an arena for the production and reproduction of political ideology, strengthening the normalization of money politics in youth political culture. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of TikTok user interactions as a form of digital political habitus production, explaining how viral discourses on social media contribute to shaping public opinion and weakening democratic ethics among Indonesia’s younger generation.

Praktik Upcycling Sisa Tenun Sumba Timur menjadi Eco-fashion 4-in-1: Studi Praksis Sosial di Parahita Craft, Salatiga Putri Rimba Widyawati; Arianti Ina Restiani Hunga; Rizki Amalia Yanuartha
PERSEPTIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): PERSEPTIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Kalibra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70716/perseptif.v4i3.779

The fashion industry generates textile waste, creating an urgent need for more sustainable production and consumption practices. This study aims to examine the upcycling of East Sumba woven textile (Tenun Sumba Timur) remnants through the development of a 4-in-1 eco-fashion product at Parahita Craft and to analyze how habitus, capital, and the social field shape this practice. A qualitative case study approach was employed. Data were collected through participant observation during an internship, semi-structured interviews with eight informants, documentation, and document analysis. The data were analyzed using an interactive process of coding, theme development, data display, and conclusion drawing, and were interpreted through Pierre Bourdieu's theory of social practice. The findings show that upcycling is shaped by a culture of experimentation, knowledge of textile materials and sewing skills as forms of cultural capital, and institutional networks as social capital. The 4-in-1 product was developed through fabric classification, material combination, design discussions, and production testing. Among the three consumers interviewed, aesthetic appeal initially attracted interest, while cultural and sustainability narratives strengthened product recognition. However, this recognition did not automatically translate into market legitimacy or organizational economic independence. The study concludes that upcycling is a social practice shaped by the interaction of habitus, capital, and the social field.

Negosiasi Relasi Gender dalam Keluarga Bapak Rumah Tangga dan Buruh Perempuan PT. Taekwang Kabupaten Subang Cindy Veronika Sihombing; Arianti Ina Restiani Hunga; Rizki Amalia Yanuartha
PERSEPTIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): PERSEPTIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Kalibra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70716/perseptif.v4i3.816

This study analyzes the negotiation of gender relations in stay-at-home father families among female workers employed at PT. Taekwang in Subang. The study aims to examine the conditions that drive changes in gender roles, the negotiation process surrounding the division of domestic work and childcare, and the ways in which stay-at-home fathers interpret their roles within a patriarchal culture. This study employs a qualitative approach with a case study design. The primary informants consisted of eight individuals, representing four married couples selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, and were subsequently analyzed thematically using Marxist-Socialist Feminist Theory and the concept of hegemonic masculinity. The findings indicate that gender-role transformation is influenced by husband employment instability, wives employment opportunities in the industrial sector, work flexibility, and childcare needs. Husbands assume greater responsibility for domestic work and childcare, while wives play a more dominant role in providing for the household economy. However, the negotiation process results in only a partial redistribution of reproductive labor, as wives continue to perform some domestic tasks, while the male-breadwinner norm and social stigma toward stay-at-home fathers persist. These findings demonstrate that the transformation of gender relations occurs through a dynamic negotiation involving economic conditions, social reproductive labor, power relations, and the construction of masculinity.

Title

Found 30 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 30 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 30 Documents
Search