Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Persaingan Usaha Antara Ojek Pangkalan (Konvensional) Dan Ojek Online Maya Aprillya Putri; Teddy Prima Anggriawan; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.536

The development of communication media has led to the presence of applications to order online motorcycle taxi transportation services. The application can be easily downloaded via PlayStore or similar applications. Therefore, the purpose of this discussion is to find out how business competition is between conventional ojek and online ojek business actors. In Indonesia there are several online motorcycle taxi service providers such as Grab, Gojek, and Maxim. The services provided are not only in the form of online motorcycle taxi services, but also in the form of food delivery services (grabfood), online shopping services (grabmart), package delivery (grabexpress) and other services. It is known that there are problems between online motorcycle taxis and conventional motorcycle taxis that have occurred, such as the beating by a conventional motorcycle taxi driver against a Gojek driver in Bojongsoang, Bandung. In this study, the authors used a qualitative type of research because it discussed business competition between business actors. Meanwhile, the nature of the research used is descriptive research. The research approach used by the author in this journal is included in the type of statutory approach and the Case Approach.

Persaingan Usaha Jasa Transportasi Online Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tiara Rizky Aprillia; Teddy Prima Anggriawan; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.558

In the current era of globalization, the progress of technology and information development occurs very quickly. Developments in the transportation sector have experienced significant changes with the presence of online transportation services in the form of an application. Online transportation service applications are very easy to use which has an impact on other transportation services. Therefore, the purpose of this discussion is carried out in order to find out how business competition lies therein, including between online transportation service business actors and ordinary (conventional) transportation businesses. Some online transportation service providers in Indonesia include Uber, Grab, Go-jek, In-driver, and others. The services provided by online transportation services are not only in the form of transportation services, but offer food delivery services, online shopping services, and services to deliver packages. Business competition between online transportation services and (conventional) transportation services causes unfair business competition. In this research, the author uses a qualitative research type because the author discusses the business competition between the two by conducting an analysis. The research approach used by the author in this journal is to use a statutory approach.

Keterkaitan Pemberian Discount Pada Produk Kosmetik Dengan Konsep Predatory Pricing Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha Firsty Sasi Suci Ramadhani; R. Teddy Prima Anggriawan; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.562

Giving discounts on each product is also the main target to increase the number of buyers. Discount is a price discount given by the seller to the buyer as a reward for certain activities from the buyer that are pleasant for the seller. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Usaha Tidak Sehat has regulated how a business actor may not practice business competition by setting prices below other business competitors. One of them is known as Predatory Pricing, which is an act of a business actor providing a very low price for his product so that his competitors are unable to compete with him and are then forced to leave the market. One example of predatory pricing is the case of giving a large discount to a cosmetic brand which indicates a lower price than other competing brands.

PERJANJIAN KARTEL SEBAGAI BENTUK PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT DALAM KASUS PT. YAMAHA DAN PT. ASTRA HONDA Bagus Alief Massayyid; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto; Teddy Prima Anggriawan
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.574

Trade is a very promising livelihood. Where in addition to the community, there are also relatively many supporters of the trade process, trade itself is a livelihood that can promise high levels of prosperity by business actors. It's just that the problem in a competition is what is called fair competition or unhealthy competition. Here it is clear that the problem is unhealthy competition where there is a lot of competition. deviation where the deviation causes one of the parties to be harmed. One example of a case of unfair business competition is the Cartel Agreement as a Form of Unfair Business Competition in the Case of PT. Yamaha Indonesia Motor Manufacturing and PT. Astra Honda Motor. Unfair business competition can result in a party losing money and can damage the smooth progress of the local and world economy. Therefore, before it's too late to overcome unfair business competition, we must prevent that from happening. If it is proven that the business actor committed fraud in business competition, namely carrying out prohibited activities which resulted in monopolistic practices and or unfair business competition, then the sanction that will be obtained can be in the form of administrative action.

PERAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU) DALAM PRAKTIK KARTEL MINYAK GORENG Nabilla Rahmadina Hariyanti; R. Teddy Prima Anggriawan; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.575

Business is a works that generates certain profits that are run with the capital used to make the business. In a business there are several important factors, one of which is the potential and business opportunities. In starting or running a business, it is not far from the thing called competition. What is meant by competition, in this topic is business competition, is the efforts of two parties/more companies, each of which is active in obtaining orders by offering the most favorable prices/conditions. One form of business competition is cartel practice. Based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, it is stated that the Business Competition Supervisory Commission is a commission established to supervise business actors in carrying out their business activities so that they do not engage in monopolies and or unfair business competition. In this study, the authors analyze the workings and roles of the KPPU in dealing with cartel practices.

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Saham Yang Kehilangan Kepemilikan Saham Moh. Rizal Muhaimin; Andika Hasta Pramayudha; Sumriyah Sumriyah
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): September : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i1.634

This legal research is Legal Protection for shareholders who experience loss of share ownership. The problem in this study is how the form of legal protection for shareholders in terms of related laws. This legal research is taken from a normative juridical approach which is a research by examining all laws and regulations related to the problem. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The end of this legal research is to answer the form of legal protection for shareholders who lose their share ownership. Keywords: Shares, Legal Protection, Loss of Share Certificate Ownership.

Penyuluhan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Kenakalan Remaja, Khususnya Bullying Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Teddy Prima Anggriawan; Nauval Bahij; Aulia Rahmah; Salzabilla Cinta Aurellya; Akbar Firman Syah
Jurnal Pengabdian West Science Vol 3 No 07 (2024): Jurnal Pengabdian West Science
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jpws.v3i07.1435

Bullying merupakan bentuk kekerasan yang dilakukan oleh individu atau kelompok untuk menyakiti atau mengintimidasi orang lain. Perilaku ini dapat berupa kekerasan fisik, verbal, atau psikologis, dan sering terjadi berulang kali. Bullying dapat terjadi di berbagai lingkungan, termasuk sekolah, tempat kerja, dan/atau lingkungan tempat tinggal. Dampak dari bullying sangat serius, termasuk menurunkan rasa percaya diri, menyebabkan depresi, kecemasan, bahkan tidak jarang korban bullying melakukan percobaan bunuh diri. Upaya untuk mengatasi bullying melibatkan pendekatan multidisiplin yang mencakup pendidikan, penegakan hukum, dan dukungan psikologis. Sekolah dan tempat kerja perlu mengembangkan kebijakan anti bullying yang tegas dan menegakkan peraturan yang mengatur tentang konsekuensi bagi pelaku bullying. Selain itu, program pendidikan yang menanamkan nilai-nilai empati dan saling menghormati sangat penting dalam pencegahan bullying. Masyarakat juga harus dilibatkan untuk menciptakan lingkungan yang aman dan mendukung bagi semua individu. Dengan demikian, penanganan bullying memerlukan kerja sama dari berbagai pihak untuk menciptakan perubahan yang signifikan.

Persaingan Usaha Antara Ojek Pangkalan (Konvensional) Dan Ojek Online Maya Aprillya Putri; Teddy Prima Anggriawan; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.536

The development of communication media has led to the presence of applications to order online motorcycle taxi transportation services. The application can be easily downloaded via PlayStore or similar applications. Therefore, the purpose of this discussion is to find out how business competition is between conventional ojek and online ojek business actors. In Indonesia there are several online motorcycle taxi service providers such as Grab, Gojek, and Maxim. The services provided are not only in the form of online motorcycle taxi services, but also in the form of food delivery services (grabfood), online shopping services (grabmart), package delivery (grabexpress) and other services. It is known that there are problems between online motorcycle taxis and conventional motorcycle taxis that have occurred, such as the beating by a conventional motorcycle taxi driver against a Gojek driver in Bojongsoang, Bandung. In this study, the authors used a qualitative type of research because it discussed business competition between business actors. Meanwhile, the nature of the research used is descriptive research. The research approach used by the author in this journal is included in the type of statutory approach and the Case Approach.

Persaingan Usaha Jasa Transportasi Online Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tiara Rizky Aprillia; Teddy Prima Anggriawan; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.558

In the current era of globalization, the progress of technology and information development occurs very quickly. Developments in the transportation sector have experienced significant changes with the presence of online transportation services in the form of an application. Online transportation service applications are very easy to use which has an impact on other transportation services. Therefore, the purpose of this discussion is carried out in order to find out how business competition lies therein, including between online transportation service business actors and ordinary (conventional) transportation businesses. Some online transportation service providers in Indonesia include Uber, Grab, Go-jek, In-driver, and others. The services provided by online transportation services are not only in the form of transportation services, but offer food delivery services, online shopping services, and services to deliver packages. Business competition between online transportation services and (conventional) transportation services causes unfair business competition. In this research, the author uses a qualitative research type because the author discusses the business competition between the two by conducting an analysis. The research approach used by the author in this journal is to use a statutory approach.

PERJANJIAN KARTEL SEBAGAI BENTUK PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT DALAM KASUS PT. YAMAHA DAN PT. ASTRA HONDA Bagus Alief Massayyid; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto; Teddy Prima Anggriawan
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.574

Trade is a very promising livelihood. Where in addition to the community, there are also relatively many supporters of the trade process, trade itself is a livelihood that can promise high levels of prosperity by business actors. It's just that the problem in a competition is what is called fair competition or unhealthy competition. Here it is clear that the problem is unhealthy competition where there is a lot of competition. deviation where the deviation causes one of the parties to be harmed. One example of a case of unfair business competition is the Cartel Agreement as a Form of Unfair Business Competition in the Case of PT. Yamaha Indonesia Motor Manufacturing and PT. Astra Honda Motor. Unfair business competition can result in a party losing money and can damage the smooth progress of the local and world economy. Therefore, before it's too late to overcome unfair business competition, we must prevent that from happening. If it is proven that the business actor committed fraud in business competition, namely carrying out prohibited activities which resulted in monopolistic practices and or unfair business competition, then the sanction that will be obtained can be in the form of administrative action.

Title

Found 56 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 56 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 56 Documents
Search