Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Memahami Perbedaan antara Apheresis, Plasmapharesis, dan Pertukaran Plasma: Urgensi Memahami Terminologi dalam Praktek Klinis Sehari-hari Mashabi, Yasmine; Rorong, Agnes Tineke Waney; Abdillah, Fauzan; Widowati, Henie
Jurnal Biomedika dan Kesehatan Vol 8 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Apheresis is a modern technique that is relatively safe and more efficient compared to conventional methods in blood component collection. In this procedure, only specific components of the blood such as platelets, plasma, or red blood cells are collected, while the other blood components are returned to the donor's body. This approach allows for more focused donations and minimizes overall blood volume loss. Transfusions from apheresis results from a single donor have also been shown to reduce the risk of immunological reactions as well as decrease the likelihood of bacterial contamination. Now, in addition to being used as a blood collection method for donation purposes, apheresis is also increasingly widely applied as therapy for various medical conditions. The accuracy in medical terminology is a crucial element for clinical practice, directly contributes to the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions, patient safety, and the efficiency of communication among health professionals. Three terms that are often misinterpreted as synonyms but have substantial clinical differences are apheresis, plasmapheresis, and plasma exchange. Although all three are based on the principle of extracorporeal separation of blood components, each procedure has different indications, methods of execution, and therapeutic goals. This article aims to elaborate on the fundamental differences among these three terms while emphasizing the urgency of education and standardization of terminology in everyday health service practice.
Melindungi Kulit: Tinjauan Komprehensif tentang Tabir Surya Anorganik dan Perannya dalam Fotoproteksi Al-Sayed, Raghda; Ahmed, Dena; Zainulabdeen, Khalid; Waleed, Reem; Bufaroosha, Muna; Hairunisa, Nany; Lestari, Ade Dwi; Widowati, Henie; Ridwan, Alvin Mohamad; Anestessia, Ira Juliet; Yousif, Emad; Panduwati, Lira; Mayasari, Atut Cicih
Jurnal Biomedika dan Kesehatan Vol 8 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18051/JBiomedKes.2025.v8.359-373

Abstract

Sunscreens are topical agents that protect the skin from the damaging effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, a major contributor to premature aging and skin cancer. These products are typically categorized into two main types: physical (inorganic or mineral) and chemical (organic) sunscreens. Physical sunscreens primarily consist of zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO₂), which reflect and scatter UV rays, thereby providing broad-spectrum protection. Compared with chemical sunscreens, which absorb UV radiation and convert it into heat, inorganic agents are associated with a lower risk of systemic absorption and skin irritation, making them particularly suitable for sensitive skin and pediatric use. This review explores the fundamental mechanisms of action, formulation challenges, and comparative effectiveness of inorganic sunscreens. Special attention is given to their photostability, which contributes to longer-lasting protection, and to their safety profiles in both acute and chronic use. Additionally, recent innovations in nanoparticle technology have enhanced the aesthetic appeal of these agents by reducing visible residue. However, this has also raised new concerns about nanoparticle penetration and environmental impact. Finally, the review addresses public health considerations, including regulatory updates, consumer preferences, and the role of education in promoting informed use of sunscreen.
Autonomic Response to Face-Mask-Wearing in Individuals with Anxiety Disorders Kosasih, Adrianus; Istriana, Erita; Khaerani, Rita; Widowati, Henie; Samara, Tjam Diana; Wartono, Magdalena; Hidayat, Adi
Jurnal Biomedika dan Kesehatan Vol 9 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background. This study aims to see the relationship between the use of N95 masks and the autonomic responses of individuals with anxiety disorders. Methods. This study is an analytic experimental study on 140 respondents. Assessment of anxiety disorders was carried out by completing the DASS 42 questionnaire and psychiatric interviews by a psychiatristt. Autonomic responses are measured by measuring heart rate variability (HRV). Short-term root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) HRV parameters were measured using the Polar H10. HRV was measured when the respondent was not wearing a mask, when wearing an N95 mask and when wearing an N95 mask with a valve that had been opened (sham). Results. HRV in respondents with anxiety disorders had a significantly lower value than respondents without anxiety disorders. Both at baseline (median: 16.33 vs 23.35, p=0.004), when using an N95 (median: 16.47 vs 22.01, p=0.008) and when using a sham N95 (median: 16.94 vs 22.24, p=0.005). However, there was no relationship between the use of N95 masks and HRV in respondents with anxiety disorders (RMSSD baseline vs N95: median 16.33 vs 16.47, p=0.979). Conclusion. There is no relationship between the use of N95 masks and HRV in individuals with anxiety disorders. Keywords: anxiety disorders; heart rate variability; N95 mask.