Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Re-Examining The Construction Of Unnamed Hire Purchase Contracts For Motor Vehicles And Their Relationship With Leasing Edison Donauli Simbolon; Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Markus Suryoutomo; Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan; Kholilur Rahman
Socio Legal and Islamic Law Vol 1 No 2 (2022): The Journal of Socio-Legal and Islamic law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/jssl.v1i2.20808

Abstract

The agreement is the right of every person to enter into an agreement, but entering into an agreement must see the rules or provisions governing the agreement so that the agreement is valid. The lease-purchase agreement is a creation of practice based on the principle of freedom of contract. Freedom of contract is not purely as free as possible, there are limitations in carrying out or making contracts. One of the limitations of the principle of freedom of contract is Article 18 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, which lists several things that cannot be done in a contract. As a result, if this is done, the contract is null and void by law. Many lease agreements nowadays are agreements made unilaterally by the seller, which should have been made by both parties, what determines everything is that the seller and the consumer just have to agree and comply. This weak consumer position and cause many losses. It is this weak position that is exploited by the seller by imposing several things in the articles of the agreement such as taking back the unit if it does not pay without taking into account the payment made by the consumer beforehand. This research is a normative legal research that uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and case approach that aims to find out the re-examination of motor vehicle lease-purchase agreement construction  
Privacy Protection Against Forced Wirebreaking Attempt by Law Enforcement Officials Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Dharma Setiawan Negara; Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Vivi Ayudya Permatasari
Realism: Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v3i3.99

Abstract

The law permits coercive measures in law enforcement, one of which is telephone tapping. Initially, telephone tapping was closely linked to the protection of privacy as a human right; however, such protection can be limited when necessary and is regulated by law. In Indonesia, regulations governing telephone tapping remain fragmented, as several law enforcement agencies authorized to conduct telephone tapping regulate the mechanism independently through different legal frameworks. This situation has the potential to create legal uncertainty and raise concerns about the protection of citizens' privacy rights. This study uses normative legal research with a legal and conceptual approach. This study aims to analyze the authority of several state institutions to conduct telephone tapping and to examine the mechanisms governing telephone tapping to ensure the protection of the right to privacy as a human right in the law enforcement process
KEDUDUKAN AKTA YANG DIKELUARKAN OLEH NOTARIS YANG SEDANG DALAM MASA TAHANAN Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Kholilur Rahman; Abraham Sridjaja; Jamalum Sinambela
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v12i1.2573

Abstract

The notary in carrying out his position must remember that the deed made by or before him is an authentic deed that becomes a document/state archive, and the agreement stated therein becomes a law for those who make it. The important role of a Notary in making a deed is inseparable from the possibility of actions that are contrary to the propriety prevailing in the society in carrying out the duties and functions of a Notary. A notary who is currently in detention as long as he has not been dismissed as a notary is still capable of making an authentic deed, but in terms of propriety, this is not justified. UUJN contains sanctions against Notaries who are proven to have committed violations, during this period the Deeds made downgraded from Authentic Deeds to Underhanded Deeds. This legal research uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. In this context, it is concluded that the Notary is temporarily dismissed from his position because he is currently undergoing a detention period. After the temporary dismissal period ends due to the detention period, the Notary will be rehabilitated after the temporary dismissal period ends. The rehabilitation in question implies that the notary concerned is activated and returned to his original position. Therefore, if the notary is returned to his original position, the deed made by the notary is authentic. In this case, if the detention period is more than 6 months, while the temporary dismissal period has ended, the notary has authority according to his functions and duties.
Pendekatan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kartel Dalam Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Kholilur Rahman; Pratiwi Ayu Sri D; Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Jamalum Sinambela
Notary Law Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Desember: Notary Law Research
Publisher : Program Studi Kenotariatan Program Magister Fakultas Hukum UNTAG Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/nlr.v5i1.1085

Abstract

Para pelaku usaha berlomba-lomba dalam hal mengejar keuntungan sehingga terciptalah suatu iklim persaingan usaha antara perlaku usaha yang satu dengan pelaku usaha yang lain. Hal seperti ini menjadi positif apabila dalam suatu persaingan tersebut menggunakan cara-cara yang adil dan fair. Hal yang terjadi adalah tidak jarang pelaku usaha didasari oleh keinginan untuk menambah keuntungannya menggunakan cara-cara yang melanggar hukum dengan membuat suatu kesepakatan dengan pelaku usaha lain yang bertujuan untuk merusak iklim persaingan usaha yang telah berjalan baik yang salah satunya dikenal dengan istilah kartel. Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, iklim persaingan usaha dijaga oleh Negara. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha sebagai garda terdepan dalam hal pengawasan persaingan usaha. Namun terjadi beberapa permasalahan mengenai kewenangannya yang menyebabkan tetap terjadinya kartel dalam suatu persaingan usaha. Penelitian ini berusaha menjawab itu semua melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual maupun pendekatan kasus agar menghasilkan pemahaman atas permasalahan kartel dan penegakan hukum pidananya di Indonesia.